lol wouldn't everyone like to know

Wouldn't that only apply if it was still an [2008-12-01]
x

It would have to be obvious, wouldn't it? [2008-11-24]
I mean, if it is not going out/offshore, they would not use the term domestic. How many times have they told us they don't offshore? I have heard this before but never really believed it in the first place.

Can you get employment if they let you go for whatever reason? Wouldn't it [2008-11-20]
be easy for them to come up with ANYTHING as a good reason? They won't have to pay employment...it will be too difficult for most of us to *hang in there*....apparently they can just keep lowering our pay until we all make minimum wage and are forced to quit. I would just really like to know if you can get unemployment if you QUIT (as in because the lower your pay?)......anyone know?

I certainly wouldn't be whining if I made 10 cpl...nm [2008-11-19]
xx

I believe they said they wouldn't do anything [2008-11-12]
unless it didn't show up by Wed. afternoon. I know it can be like 3:30 p.m. or something like that when they do the last batch of transfers. I bet they will ignore you till then. I would stay on them though.

i wouldn't complain about it unless it's counted against you somehow -nm [2008-10-22]
x

I wouldn't think necessarily so because [2008-10-16]
the number of transcriptionists in each group is smaller. I would think it would depend on the work flow in what ever group you are in.

I wouldn't worry too much about it. [2008-10-16]
The PS may have it on file, but she may not have recorded it yet in your file or forwarded to your regional manager. I'd wait it out and see if anyone asks for it. No sense getting off on the wrong foot with your new PS if you don't have to.

Um, I'm pretty sure you wouldn't have to ask...you'd know.. [2008-09-30]
xx

I wouldn't. [2008-09-11]
x

i wouldn't want her to teach my kids math [2008-09-03]
x

Yep, I left, wouldn't go back unless they doubled my pay [2008-07-27]
And also got rid of the cesspool, strict schedule, impact room, cheating me out of my bonuses, and everything else that was making me depressed and hate my job.Making almost double a week what I was making at MQ with my new job, with higher pay, better incentive, better platform, and one account. MQ offered me more money to come back, still couldn't come close to competing with where I'm at.

I wouldn't bother sending it to QA - how about [2008-07-24]
saving a step, getting the report to the client faster, and just putting in a blank yourself. I don't send to QA (IF only 1 or 2 blanks) if I KNOW QA is just going to blank it. I don't mean just when I don't think they can hear it -- only in a case like this where it's muffled out.

A little over dramatic..wouldn't you say? NM [2008-07-11]
XX

If you learned it, you wouldn't need the spellcheck [2008-07-10]
You can make spellcheck more reliable for yourself. Clean out your user dictionary. Report the incorrect spellings to mtquestions. I've sent several in and they take them out of the main dictionary.

Guess it wouldn't have to do with having [2008-07-09]
would it? LOL You crack me up.

lol wouldn't everyone like to know [2008-07-04]
after that email! Happy 4th to everyone!

I wouldn't trust MQ to make sure we all got paid! [2008-07-02]
Hopefully, they have to turn the personnel records over to the court to be sure everyone gets their due! I worked MQ from 1998 to 2008 -- I'm sure they owe me a few bucks.

I wouldn't bother appealing...HOWEVER, [2008-07-01]
I do agree with you in that it's NOT critical. Yes, it's an error but in every sense of the word it's not critical. I wouldn't worry about it since, like you said, all your other jobs are great.

I wouldn't appeal it but that is just me. [2008-07-01]
You made a mistake. Granted the surgery was over and done with....but still. We all make mistakes. It happens. We can't be perfect 100% of the time, but it is our job to provide correct information on reports. I'd just say leave it be and just be more careful in the future.

Nothing has changed.. I actually wouldn't [2008-06-25]
have even realized CBay bought us unless I came to this board. Maybe things will change, but they haven't yet. If you want specifics on MQ's benefits/insurance you should contact their recruiters directly. I'm happy with my line rate. However, some are not. It's relative, I guess. If by minimum you mean production, of course they do. I'm FT and the minimum is 150 lines per hour. You get a (little) bonus on all lines over that per hour.

Wouldn't that be a tax write-off for MQ? [2008-06-17]

I wouldn't go with that one. Its either one MTSO [2008-05-29]
Its ridiculous and NOBODY else out there in our MT world does that. Who knows their coworkers, right? At MQ, we are all isolated. Even in the outside world, I have never had to give a coworker reference, always just supervisor. And that can even be a ridiculous question at MQ - supervisor referral. And what if you are leaving, but don't yet want MQ to know? That sort of burns that bridge for you. I've only run into 1 recruiter who insisted on this, and for different companies, so I think its just him. Of course, if you are leaving and don't care, then the supervisor request would be fine, but good luck for anyone reaching a supervisor, too! Win-win situation for us!

Agree 100%. I wouldn't have accepted a position [2008-05-28]
with MQ if I was required to work a schedule. THey changed the rules in the middle of the game, not me. I have every right to be bothered by it. For those of you who started AFTER the fact and were required to give a schedule, of course you don't feel the same way. You started under those circumstances so it was just thrust upon you one day.

Wouldn't disagree at all [2008-05-22]
because I madeeach andevery one of those pointsclear in all my previous posts today, which you apparently have not read and don't plan to. Good luck to you and have a nice weekend.

Abandoned Jobs, etc [2008-08-26]
Did everyone else get a generic-sounding msg about this? Sometimes it I certainly don I was told that the one and only way that can happen is if we actually use the abandon function. It would certainly be news to me if they had addressed it to just me. Just checking. Thanks.

This was a heated debate during my training [2005-11-09]
and the trainer was arguing with a trainee about red print. I had the feeling she knew and just wouldn' commit to an answer. This stinks to say the least.