|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Yes, but even when the overseas business build plants [2006-04-04]
breaks and incentives that it is the exact same thing, just on our home soil. One state gave Mercedes the land to build 2 plants for free plus no taxes to the state for 10 years, plus other perks picked up by the state residents.
I think I'm going to get religion so I can legally stop paying taxes and ask for my SS account to be refunded (like that would ever happen!)
I'll quit paying taxes if they use it to train overseas MTs [2006-03-21]
G et AL can take a bite out of that one if they think that is the direction they will take this program! After all, the approved programs are online and AAMT provides certification overseas, so what is to stop the big MT corporations who are devoloping facilities to house 5000 MTs in India and other locations from using MY tax money to train overseas MTs???
PracticeXpert, Inc. announced the sale of its transcription business unit [2006-01-04]
CALABASAS, Calif., Jan. 3, 2006 (PRIMEZONE) -- PracticeXpert, Inc. (OTCBB:PXPT) today announced the sale of its transcription business unit to Transcend Services, Inc. (Nasdaq:TRCR).
Commenting on the sale, Jonathan Doctor, president and CEO of PracticeXpert, stated, Transcend is very much like PracticeXpert. They utilize leading-edge software applications to deliver transcription services, just as PracticeXpert utilizes leading-edge software applications to deliver our physician revenue management services. Allowing Transcend to focus on providing our customers with transcription services will allow us to focus on what we do best -- outsourced billing and collections for medical practitioners.
We consider this transaction much more than a sale of our transcription business unit. We see it as the beginning of a long-term partnership with Transcend. We intend to formalize a strategic marketing arrangement with Transcend under which they will be the transcription provider of choice to PracticeXpert customers, and Transcend will be able to offer our revenue management service, practice management systems, and electronic medical record systems to the thousands of physicians who currently use their services.
Under the terms of the agreement with Transcend, PracticeXpert will receive up to $500,000, over three years, on an earn-out basis, with an initial payment on closing in the amount of $40,000.
About PracticeXpert, Inc.
PracticeXpert provides turn-key practice management services and technology solutions to medical practitioners that improve operational efficiencies and enhance cash flow. PracticeXpert offerings include medical billing, accounts receivable management, practice management, consulting, seminars, practice management software, electronic medical records software and related services. PracticeXpert bundles its technology applications with its billing and other practice management services to provide a complete and integrated solution to its physician customers. To find out more about PracticeXpert, Inc. (OTCBB:PXPT), visit our website at www.practicexpert.com.
PracticeXpert Completes Reorganization into Business Units [2005-08-02]
LOS ANGELES, July 28, 2005-- PracticeXpert, Inc.announced today that it has completed a company-wide reorganization into business units focused around delivery of its various product lines, allowing the rapidly-growing physician practice management solutions provider to reduce administrative costs and improve operational efficiency.
The reorganization, begun in February 2005, has resulted in the creation of five business units, each with a newly appointed vice president. The five business units and their respective VPs are: Revenue Management Services Group, Tony Biele, VP; Health Information Systems Group, David Pack, VP; Transcription Services Group, Michael Gale, VP; Consulting and Education Group, Scott Phillips, VP; and Managed Operations Group, Kim Ransier, VP. Each of the VPs previously held management positions in the company.
Business unit vice presidents' report to Senior Vice President of Operations Don Calabrese, who managed the implementation of the reorganization plan. The new organizational strategy, which is aligned with the delivery of PracticeXpert's various product lines, enables increased management accountability, improved communication, and delivery of a consistent quality of service to customers.
The reorganization is a direct result of PracticeXpert's impressive growth over the past two years driven by several acquisitions of physician services companies providing a variety of services and products, including outsourced medical billing services, medical transcription, software systems, and consulting. Five of the acquired companies alone provided outsourced medical billing services, with much of the business focused in the oncology specialty, but with operations spread amongst five facilities with dissimilar management structures and financial reporting systems.
With so much growth we had achieved critical mass, and it was time to integrate our operations and consolidate management, said Jonathan Doctor, PracticeXpert CEO. Now with our operations streamlined we've got an organization that can easily assimilate future acquisitions and track performance, Doctor added.
Commenting on the organizational strategy, PracticeXpert CFO Mike Manahan said: From the beginning, one of the goals of our acquisition strategy was to reduce operating overhead in the acquired companies by centralizing and aggregating core administrative functions that have no impact on the services and products we provide to our customers, ultimately increasing profitability. This restructuring allows us to maximize these savings and realize these savings sooner for future acquisitions.
In parallel with the reorganization into business units, corporate accounting, finance and human resources departments have been centralized and consolidated for all business units at the company's Oklahoma City facility. Heading these departments are Lisa Dobbs, Director, Accounting and Finance, and Masumi Ward, Director, Human Resources.
About PracticeXpert, Inc.
PracticeXpert provides turn-key practice management services and technology solutions to medical practitioners that improve operational efficiencies and enhance cash flow. PracticeXpert offerings include medical billing, accounts receivable management, practice management, transcription, consulting, seminars, practice management software, electronic medical records software and related services. PracticeXpert bundles its technology applications with its billing and other practice management services to provide a complete and integrated solution to its physician customers. To find out more about PracticeXpert, Inc. (OTCBB:PXPT), visit our website at www.practicexpert.com
Note: Any statements released by PracticeXpert, Inc. that are forward- looking, are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Editors and investors are cautioned that forward-looking statements invoke risk and uncertainties that may affect the Company's business prospects and performances. These include economic, competitive, governmental, technological and other factors discussed in the statements and in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. CONTACT: PracticeXpert, Inc.
Investor Relations Contact
Michael Manahan, CFO
(800) 661-9984
mike@pxpert.com
Product and Trade Relations Contact
MPH PR
Louis Landon
(310) 234-3200
llandon@mphpr.com
You're great at giving advice. [2008-11-02]
Didn't you say you got out of the business? Why didn't YOU start a union instead of quitting?
technology moves on... [2008-08-03]
Anyone entering this field now needs to learn to be tech savvy or they are going to starve. I learned the theory part, but my school did not require us to use word expanders, so I am already behind right out of the gate. I also would be a better Editor if I learned the shortcuts instead of relying on the mouse. I am working on it, but it does not come naturally to me. These tools are the only way to survive in this business and VR is one of the biggest tools to the MTSOs and it is here to stay!
IC Taxes [2008-07-28]
Make sure you either get with a good accountant or get a really good tax program (we use TurboTax every year) because as an IC, taxes don't get taken out of your check, but you get to take deductions for everything that you use for your business. If you own your house, you can deduct the square footage of your office space from your mortgage, you can deduct part of your electricity bill, cell phone, internet, any equipment you have to buy, milage if you have to travel for work - the list can go on and on. Just make sure to keep receipts and good records - I got audited my first year as an IC. I passed with flying colors because everything was legit and I had a receipt to back it up. Hope this helps you and good luck!!! =)
Time to introduce a bill [2008-06-27]
This is great news but from my experience, the bottom line is all most companies care about. The company I worked for never paid for enough quality control hours-usually only one hour per day and outsourced it's MT work. Records came back with incorrect names, gender, diagnoses, procedures and labs because the outsourced Transcriptionist could not flag the work for the dictating doctor (boss said doctors were too busy to deal with it) and/or entered anything just to get the chart to clear medical records. They only dealt with issues when lawsuits arose and my guess would be that since most cases are arbitrated, the doctors were the winners yet again. All this is to say, even if the suits know they will get better quality, they do not care because they are only concerned with lining their pockets.
It is not just MT jobs that suffer because of outsourcing. Will you (or anyone else for that matter)be denied work or insurance in the U.S. because an overseas transcriptionist entered erroneous information in your medical record? U.S. citizens would probably be outraged to discover this is happening to their private information despite HIPPA. I believe it is time to get tough and form a coalition to introduce a bill to end outsourcing of medical transcription. Time to take a stand and fight back.
AMEN [2008-04-22]
Amen but where did you hear of this study?? Sometimes these are just rumors and everyone gets a jazzed up. I get a minimum of three phone calls a day on my business phone from either India or philippines. Maybe there are just too many companies there doing this work, or they are losing the work? I don't kn ow, but the guy from India is always called Joseph. Even in some of the emails.
I agree with your comments about the work.
A two strike [2007-11-20]
would knock them back! Anything that hurts their business would work.
Loved it! [2007-06-10]
I loved Medware for the short-time I worked for them. I was working a full-time in-house position,which I was trying to get out of. I worked for Medware part-time trying to transition out of the in-house position. They were absolutely wonderful people to work for!!!!! I was working 4 hours a day part-time for Medware plus my 40-hr a week job (supervisor/transcriptionist). My plan was to work for Medwarefor 3 months to become eligible for their insurance and leave my in-house position and work for Medware. It became too much, as my husband and I also have our own business and I do the office work. I left Medware. However, I would work for them again in a second. It appeared to be a very competent, helpful company. I highly recommend them!!!!
I came across a website that [2007-06-02]
has information for workers whose jobs were replaced by overseas competition. There are all sorts of rules. A petition must be made by 3 workers who have lost their jobs, all from the same location. Would they mean the company location, or would the fact most MTs work at different locations mean we couldn't file a petition I wonder. I'm not in that situation, but I think it's a good idea to know what's available.
http://www.doleta.gov/tradeact/petitions.cfm
VBC- just another way to rip us off. Dowetypereportslikethisnottomentionalltheworkwedonotgetpaidfor! [2007-05-26]
Do we get paid when the doctor changes his mind and redictates? No. Do we get paid extra when the doctor does not dictate the date of exam or the correct one, and we have to dig through 100 patient sheets? No. Do we get paid for looking up the spellings of doctors' names and addresses? No. Does the amount we are now getting paid cover software expenses, AAMT dues, business license, tax accountant, reference books, computers, car expenses for those accounts that insist on tapes that only put 1-2 reports on the tape that do not even cover gas or time spent driving/getting dressed, IT techs, phone lines, template setups, training other MTs, call-in systems, transcribers, foot pedals, office rent, medical expenses related to work injuries, paid time of when seeing a doctor for these injuries, surgeries, etc.? Not hardly. I have 7 years of experience working over 120 hours a week, 7 days a week and make less per line than the first 2 weeks I was interning in college. Jeesh, we have to hit the space bar to separate words. If you have radiculopathies as bad as I do, each keystroke hurts like heck, and I should get paid for it. Unfortunately, I cannot say space to my computer, and it magically puts it in. Just for once, instead of the doctors cutting our paycheck, why not going after the overpaid HIM department who came up with this hairbrain idea!!! They are on salary. It does not cost them money to go to the bathroom, yet everytime we take our hands off the keyboard, we pay! How would the HIM department like to read their reports like this? Laboratorydata:Completebloodcountstodayevealawhitebloodcellcountof,000/mm3,hemoglobin of2.3gm/dL,andaplateletcountof93,000/mm3.
I say they can pick up my medical bills, which in the last 2 years were over $3 million with us paying over $90,000. Did I remember to include all the money it costs in lost work to apply for a job only to get ripped off on your paychecks or have them pay so late that after late fees, there is nothing left. Oh yeah, advertising, websites, e-mail accounts, FTP, cell phone, fax lines, equipment, equipment, equipment.
VBC stands for visible black character. They are trying to drive our salary down even further! [2007-05-26]
VBC means no payment for spaces, formating, paragraphs, nothing. These HIM department people just sit at the desks all day coming up with more ways tocut our pay even more the whole while theycollectingsalaries increases yearly, and AHID (formally AAMT) will probably endorse this as a way to brown nose other healthcare-related industries to get them to become members, thereby increasing AHID (AAMT memberships with dues/revenue pretty much the same way they did with overseas transcription companies, which as everybody knows has resulted in lower pay for US transcription.
Supply and demand [2006-07-31]
That is only going to supply the industry with cheaper labor! If the demand is that high for MTs then it would seem we would be paid more since there do not seem to be enough of us, right? Then here comes AAMT to the rescue with the latest of their nutty ideas - training people to do our jobs for even less! Seems to me that would flood the labor pool with new MTs (I use the term loosely here) and drive down our wages.
I am so glad I gave up my membership and CMT years ago when I saw the direction they were going. I still have friends who are AAMT members who, IMHO, appear to be brainwashed. One person told me recently that the USA does not have enough people interested in becoming an MT and that is why AAMT is recruiting overseas and it will not impact our jobs at all. Argh!
DocQment(TM) Ovation - MedQuist Launches Next-Generation [2006-07-07]
MOUNT LAUREL, N.J., June 29 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Today's healthcare providers face what appear to be several conflicting challenges in the area of dictation. Pressures to decrease costs and improve productivity must be weighed against the need to demonstrate compliance and increase physician choice and satisfaction. To help its customers meet these challenges, Medquist Inc. (Pink Sheets: MEDQ) has introduced DocQment(TM) Ovation, a Web-based, enterprise digital voice capture and transport solution.
Studies by the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (http://www.himss.org/) have shown that when considering the purchase of a new dictation system, providers value HIPAA compliance most highly, followed by Web-based, centralized administration and automatic document routing. Because Ovation is Web-based, it offers easy-to-use tools to manage documents, users and workflow from any computer with Internet access, creating numerous opportunities for productivity improvement. Physicians can select from a variety of options for capturing their dictation, including telephones, PDAs, and desktop computer-based dictation devices.
DocQment Ovation is our newest technology innovation developed in direct response to industry feedback and providers' interest in replacing previous- generation dictation systems, says Scott Bennett, MedQuist senior vice president of Sales and Marketing. An integral component of our growing technology portfolio, Ovation helps to provide an end-to-end solution from dictation to billing, including front-end and back-end speech recognition.
Document Ovation was specifically engineered to be compatible with MedQuist's previous-generation dictation stations, thus facilitating the retention and recruitment of transcriptionists, and making it easy for providers to upgrade with little or no physician retraining required. Deployed at the customer's location, Ovation provides an enterprise view that allows transcription supervisors to easily manage users, documents and voice files from a single dashboard instead of using multiple systems. Ovation's sophisticated configuration options enable administrators to easily track work and share resources in order to get the right document to the right Transcriptionist at the right time.
According to Emmy Weber, MedQuist vice president of Product Management, Breakthrough capabilities engineered into DocQment Ovation, like the ability to define the date that begins the aging process for documents (including admit date and date of discharge), give users better information at the point of dictation to improve workflow, accuracy and report routing.
With MedQuist's help, we configured DocQment Ovation around the way we do business, says Wanda Newton, HIM director at Maury Regional Healthcare System, a three-hospital system located in Tennessee. With Ovation, we are now managing our hospitals and departments more efficiently. We saw a 34 percent increase in productivity in the first two months of use of Ovation, a positive trend that we expect will continue.
Ovation is available for immediate installation. For more information, contact a local MedQuist representative or dial 1-877-489-1500 for sales assistance.
MedQuist, a member of the Philips Group of Companies, is a leading provider of clinical documentation workflow solutions in support of the electronic health record. MedQuist provides electronic medical transcription, health information and document management products and services, including digital dictation, speech recognition, Web-based transcription, electronic signature, medical coding, mobile dictation devices, and outsourcing services.
CBaySystems Introduces CBayFlo VoiceDirect [2006-07-07]
ANNAPOLIS, Md., July 6 /PRNewswire/ -- CBaySystems Services, Inc., one of the industry's fastest-growing providers of medical transcription solutions, today announced the general availability of CBayFlo VoiceDirect -- its own automated digital dictation and voice capture system.
Using CBayFlo VoiceDirect, everyone involved in the medical transcription process -- physicians, HIMs, and transcriptionists -- is able to take advantage of greater speed, quality and security, from capture, to review, to transcription, to approval, to records management and archiving.
At its core, CBayFlo VoiceDirect enables physicians to dictate into any digital recording device -- a PDA, tablet PC, desktop or phone -- and have it securely captured for transcription. Highly accurate, and featuring natural language processing, it eliminates the time and cost of manually transcribing recorded dictation.
With the introduction of CBayFlo VoiceDirect, hospitals who are dependent on expensive, proprietary dictation systems from Dictaphone, DVI, and Lanier can enjoy new freedom and flexibility. CBayFlo VoiceDirect incorporates the same features and quality at a significantly lower price. At the same time, it is built on an open technology platform that allows it to interface with legacy Dictaphone, DVI, Lanier and home-grown systems. This allows a smooth migration path (with zero training) as well as easy integration with other HIM systems.
By developing our own technology, we're able to seamlessly integrate the power of voice into every component of our CBayFlo platform, said Christopher Foley, President of CBaySystems Services. Our commitment to RD means we're no longer reliant on a third party system, and can deliver more of the benefits from this powerful technology -- and significant savings -- directly to our customers.
Some of the specific benefits of CBayFlo VoiceDirect include:
* High security and voice quality -- resulting in better quality records,
and easier workflow
* Compliance with the latest HIPAA regulations and technologies
* Customized/advanced reporting capabilities, through a secure web portal:
making it easy for HIMs to review and manage the entire workflow process
Part of a Comprehensive CBayFlo Technology Suite
CBayFlo VoiceDirect is just one of the components of the CBayFlo System -- a fully-integrated technology platform that manages medical transcription records at every stage of their lifecycle, from dictation and scheduling, through transcription, editing, web-based management, and long-term archiving.
Unlike other systems that force hospitals into a fixed process, CBayFlo is flexible and customizable to work the way you want to work. All processes and workflows can be configured to your exact business and information/reporting requirements.
Specific components of this powerful technology platform include:
* CBayFlo DocView: advanced document viewing/editing/reporting
* CBayFlo VoiceRecord: software for PDAs and digital recorders that allows voice to be uploaded to the web, and offloaded to a dictation server for transcription
* CBayFlo eDemographics: an HL7 interface engine to exchange data with other HIM and patient records
* CBayFlo Enterprise Document Manager: hospitals can manage and track the transcription process through a web-based portal
-- CBayFlo DocuTrack: real-time updates of the status of each record and file
-- CBayFlo DocView: document view/edit
-- CBayFlo E-signature: document e-sign
-- CBayFlo DocXchange: an HL7 compatible interface engine
As an ASP application (no additional hardware or software is required for the hospital to purchase), CBayFlo is extremely secure and reliable, with multiple levels of redundancy incorporated into its standard architecture.
The CBayFlo platform represents an important component of the WorldClass Advantage we deliver to our customers every day, noted Foley. By providing advanced technology, hospitals and physician practices can significantly reduce costs and save time -- allowing them to devote more resources to improving patient care.
employment [2006-05-31]
From my experience, there are a wealth of jobs out there. Try MTjobs on the internet. There are tons of jobs. I was able to go directly into transcription after retiring as an RN. I thought transcription would be a piece of cake but I have come to the conclusion that MT work is more challenging than nursing! I
enjoy the challenge--
Also, build your private library of Stedman references.
MedQuist Announces Unaudited Financial Results, 6 Million in Operating Loss [2006-05-11]
MT. LAUREL, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 11, 2006--MedQuist Inc. (Pink Sheets: MEDQ.PK) announced today certain preliminary, partial and unaudited financial results, and provided updated information regarding previously-announced litigation and governmental investigations and proceedings. Once the Company completes the financial assessment and review of its billing practices disclosed in the Company's previous filings with the SEC, KPMG LLP, the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, will complete the audit the Company's financial statements. The Company is continuing the process of working toward becoming current in its periodic reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company's review of its current and prior period unaudited financial statements, as well as KPMG LLP's audits for those periods, may identify adjustments or reclassifications which may be reflected in the periods to which they relate. At this time, the Company cannot estimate the total costs of (i) the billing review, (ii) defense of the class action matters, (iii) the SEC investigation, and (iv) compliance with the Department of Justice investigation, all of which have been previously disclosed in either the Company's filings with the SEC or the Company's press releases. Accordingly, the only costs related to the defense of these matters that have been included in the results below are actual costs incurred through March 31, 2006 by the Company. Because the completion of the billing review and resolution of the litigation and governmental investigatory matters are pending, the Company is not certain whether any changes to the accounting treatment of any component of its consolidated financial statements will be required and, if any changes are necessary, whether any such changes would have a material impact on its current or prior period consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the financial information set forth below is preliminary, unaudited, and subject to change based on the completion of the financial assessment and review of the Company's billing practices, resolution of the class action matters and governmental investigations and proceedings, and the completion of the review and/or audit of its financial statements, as appropriate.
The financial information and related narrative discussion set forth below is derived from the Company's internal books and records. The Company cautions investors not to place undue reliance on the financial information presented below. As a result of the developments described above and in the Company's previous SEC filings, the Company's financial statements have not been audited or reviewed by KPMG LLP, its independent registered public accounting firm. The financial information contained in this press release also has not been audited or reviewed by an independent registered public accounting firm. Such information is not a substitute for the information required to be reported in the Company's Forms 10-K and Forms 10-Q that have not yet been filed. There can be no assurance that the results of the billing review, and resolution of the litigation and governmental investigatory matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's revenue, results of operations and financial condition.
Legal Proceedings
Investigations and Proceedings Commenced by the SEC and the Department of Justice
As previously announced, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) is currently conducting a formal investigation of the Company. The Company will continue to fully cooperate with the SEC.
As previously announced, the Company received an administrative HIPAA subpoena for documents from the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts on December 17, 2004. The subpoena sought information primarily about the Company's provision of medical transcription services to governmental and non-governmental customers. The information was requested in connection with a government investigation into whether Medquist and others violated federal laws in connection with the provision of medical transcription services. MedQuist continues to cooperate fully with the Department of Justice.
Shareholder Securities Litigation
As previously announced, a shareholder putative class action lawsuit was filed against the Company in the United States District Court District of New Jersey on November 8, 2004. The action, entitled William Steiner v. MedQuist, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:04-cv-05487-FLW (the Shareholder Putative Action), was filed against the Company and certain former Company officials, purportedly on behalf of an alleged class of all persons who purchased MedQuist common stock during the period from April 23, 2002 through November 2, 2004, inclusive (the Class Period). The complaint specifically alleged that defendants violated federal securities laws by purportedly issuing a series of false and misleading statements to the market throughout the Class Period, which statements allegedly had the effect of artificially inflating the market price of the Company's securities. The complaint asserts claims under Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, thereunder. Named as defendants, in addition to the Company, were its former president and chief executive officer and its former executive vice president and chief financial officer.
On August 16, 2005, a First Amended Complaint in the Shareholder Putative Class Action was filed against the Company in the United States District Court District of New Jersey. The First Amended Complaint named additional defendants, including certain current and former directors, certain former Company officers, the Company's former and current external auditors and Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (Philips). Like the original complaint, the First Amended Complaint asserted claims under Sections 10b and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act) and Rule 10b5 of the Act. The Class Period of the original complaint was expanded 20 months and now includes the period from March 29, 2000 through June 14, 2004. Pursuant to an October 17, 2005 consent order approved by the Court, Lead Plaintiff Greater Pennsylvania Pension Fund filed a Second Amended Complaint on November 15, 2005. The Second Amended Complaint dropped Philips as a defendant, but alleges the same claims and the same purported class period as the First Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages. Pursuant to the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, discovery in the action is stayed pending the filing and resolution of the defendants' motions to dismiss, which were filed on January 17, 2006, and will be fully briefed by May 26, 2006. The Court has not set a hearing date on the motions. The Company believes that the claims asserted in the Second Amended Complaint are without merit, and is vigorously defending the action.
Customer Litigation
As previously announced, a putative class action was filed in the United States District Court Central District of California. The action, entitled South Broward Hospital District, dba Memorial Regional Hospital, et al. v. MedQuist, Inc. et al., Case No. CV-04-7520-TJH-VBKx, was filed on September 9, 2004 against the Company and certain present and former Company officials, purportedly on behalf of an alleged class of non-Federal governmental hospitals and medical centers that the complaint claims were wrongfully and fraudulently overcharged for transcription services by defendants based primarily on the Company's use of the AAMT line billing unit of measure discussed below. The complaint charges fraud, violation of the California Business and Professions Code, unjust enrichment, conversion, negligent supervision and violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. Plaintiffs seek damages in an unspecified amount, plus costs and interest, an injunction against alleged continuing illegal activities, an accounting, punitive damages and attorneys' fees. Named as defendants, in addition to the Company, were a senior vice president, its former executive vice president of marketing and new business development, its former executive vice president and chief legal officer, and its former executive vice president and chief financial officer.
On December 20, 2004, the Company and individual defendants filed motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue, or in the alternative, to transfer the putative action to the United States District Court District of New Jersey. On February 2, 2005, plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint both adding and deleting named plaintiffs in an attempt to keep the putative action in the United States District Court Central District of California. On March 30, 2005, the United States District Court Central District of California issued an order transferring the putative action to the United States District Court District of New Jersey.
On August 1, 2005, the Company and the individual defendants filed their respective Answers denying the material allegations contained in the Second Amended Complaint. On August 31, 2005, the Company and individual defendants filed motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim and a motion to dismiss in favor of arbitration, or in the alternative, to stay pending arbitration. On December 12, 2005, the plaintiffs filed an Amendment to the Second Amended Complaint. On December 13, 2005, the Court issued an order requiring plaintiffs to file a Third Amended Complaint.
Plaintiffs filed the Third Amended Complaint on January 4, 2006. The Third Amended Complaint expands the claims made beyond issues arising from contracts based on AAMT line billing and beyond customers billed based on an AAMT line, alleging that the Company engaged in a scheme to inflate customers' invoices without regard to the terms of individual contracts and even in the absence of any written contract. The Third Amended Complaint also limits plaintiffs' claim for fraud in the inducement of the agreement to arbitrate to the three named plaintiffs whose contracts contain an arbitration provision and a subclass of similarly situated customers. On January 20, 2006 the Company and individual defendants filed motions to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim and a motion to compel arbitration of all claims by the arbitration subclass and to stay the case in its entirety pending arbitration. On March 8, 2006 the Court held a hearing on these motions, and took the matter under submission. The Court has not yet ruled on the motions. The Company believes that the claims asserted have no merit and intends to vigorously defend the putative action.
Medical Transcriptionist Litigation
Hoffmann Putative Class Action
As previously announced, a putative class action lawsuit was filed against the Company in the United States District Court Northern District of Georgia. The action, entitled Brigitte Hoffmann, et al. v. MedQuist, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:04-CV-3452, was filed with the Court on November 29, 2004 against the Company and certain current and former Company officials, purportedly on behalf of an alleged class of current and former employees and statutory workers of MedQuist, who are or were compensated on a per line basis for medical transcription services (the Class Members) from January 1, 1998 to the time of the filing of the complaint (the Class Period). The complaint specifically alleged that defendants systematically and wrongfully underpaid the Class Members during the Class Period. The complaint asserted the following causes of action: fraud, breach of contract, demand for accounting, quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, conversion, negligence, negligent supervision, and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act violations. Plaintiffs sought unspecified compensatory damages, punitive damages, disgorgement and restitution. On December 1, 2005, the Hoffmann matter was transferred to the United States District Court District of New Jersey. As discussed immediately below under the heading Myers Putative Class Action, the Company believes that the claims presently asserted have no merit and intends to vigorously defend the putative action.
Myers Putative Class Action
As previously announced, a putative class action entitled, Myers, et al. v. MedQuist Inc. and MedQuist Transcriptions, Ltd., Case No. 05CV 4608 (JBS), was filed against the Company on September 22, 2005 in the United States District Court District of New Jersey. The action was brought on behalf of a putative class of MedQuist's employee and independent contractor transcriptionists who claim that they contracted with the Company to be paid per AAMT line, but were allegedly underpaid due to intentional miscounting of the number of characters and lines transcribed. The named plaintiffs asserted claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and request an accounting.
The allegations contained in the Myers case are substantially similar to those contained in the Hoffmann putative class action and the two actions have now been consolidated. A consolidated amended complaint was filed on January 31, 2006. The named plaintiffs assert claims for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment and demand an accounting. On March 7, 2006 the Company filed a motion to dismiss all claims in the consolidated amended complaint. The motion has now been fully briefed. The Court has not set a hearing date on the motion. The Company believes that the claims asserted in the consolidated actions have no merit and intends to vigorously defend the suit.
Derivative Litigation
On October 4, 2005, the Company announced the dismissal with prejudice of a shareholder derivative action filed in United States District Court District of New Jersey. The suit, Rhoda Kanter (Plaintiff) v. Hans M. Barella et al. (Defendants), was filed on November 12, 2004 against Philips and ten current and former members of MedQuist's Board of Directors. MedQuist was named as a nominal defendant.
In a ruling dated September 21, 2005, the Court found Plaintiff's allegations that MedQuist's Board members breached their fiduciary duties to the Company to be insufficient. The Plaintiff had alleged that for a period from 2001 through 2004, the Defendants violated their fiduciary duties by permitting artificial inflation of billing figures; failing to adequately ensure accurate and lawful billing practices; and failing to accurately report the Company's true financial condition in its published financial statements. To the contrary, the Court concluded: Far from alleging facts supporting a substantial likelihood of liability, Plaintiff here has painted a picture of a board of directors that acted responsively given the circumstances . . . . On October 3, 2005, plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's order dismissing the action with prejudice. On November 16, 2005, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration. On December 13, 2005, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
On March 21, 2006, Plaintiff filed her opening brief on appeal. On April 20, 2006, MedQuist and the other defendants filed their opposition briefs. The appeal will be fully briefed by May 4, 2006. The Court of Appeals has not set a hearing date for the appeal.
Customer Accommodations
As previously disclosed, the primary allegations in a number of the litigation matters relate to how the Company interpreted the AAMT line billing unit of measure. The AAMT line billing unit of measure was developed in 1993 through a collaboration among several industry organizations with the intent of providing standardization in industry billing practices. However, due to inherent ambiguities in the definition of this unit of measure not fully anticipated at the time of its introduction, AAMT line-based billing was applied inconsistently throughout the medical transcription industry and eventually renounced by the groups initially responsible for its development. Despite these issues, a number of companies in the industry have continued to use AAMT line-based billing, and some customers still request proposals and contracts based on the AAMT line.
Like many medical transcription service providers, MedQuist once used the AAMT line unit of measure to calculate invoices for many of its medical transcription clients. It has been widely recognized and well documented throughout the industry, however, that the AAMT definition of a line is inherently ambiguous and subject to a wide variety of interpretations. In fact, no single set of AAMT characters was ever defined for this unit of measure. Accordingly, MedQuist began the process in 2004 of transitioning its AAMT line-based customers off the AAMT line unit of measure and, in April 2005, the Company completely eliminated the use of the AAMT line for billing and called on other industry transcription providers to follow its lead.
Due to these AAMT line unit of measure ambiguities, and the disparity in its interpretation, health care providers have raised concerns regarding charges for transcription services by their respective transcription providers, including the Company. In response to those concerns, and to foster ongoing business relationships with its customers, the Company has approached certain customers and offered to resolve any issues related to their prior AAMT line and other billing related issues.
As previously disclosed, the Company's Board of Directors has authorized Company management to make accommodation offers, up to an aggregate amount of $65.0 million, to certain customers to resolve any concerns over AAMT and other billing related issues. As of March 31, 2006, (i) the Company has entered into agreements with certain customers who have accepted accommodation offers to resolve concerns over AAMT and other billing related issues, and paid or credited an aggregate amount of $31.3 million as an accommodation to those customers and (ii) additional accommodation offers have been made by the Company to certain other customers in the aggregate amount of $11.9 million. From April 1, 2006 through the date of this release, the Company has entered into agreements with additional customers and paid or credited an aggregate amount of $2.9 million and has extended accommodation offers to additional customers in the aggregate amount of $1.1 million. Company management currently intends to make additional accommodation offers in the future, consistent with the Board's authorization described above, although the timing and amount of such offers have not yet been determined and the Company's plans may change in the future. The accommodation offers do not represent an estimate of potential liability, if any, in any of the previously disclosed litigation or investigatory matters pending against the Company.
The Company is unable to predict how many customers, if any, will accept the outstanding accommodation offers on the terms proposed by the Company, nor is the Company able to predict the timing of the acceptance (or rejection) of any of these outstanding accommodation offers. Until such offers are accepted, the Company may withdraw or modify the terms of the accommodation offers at any time. In addition, the Company is unable to predict how many of the future offers, if made, will be accepted on the terms proposed by the Company. The Company believes that its existing cash resources and cash flows from operations are sufficient to fund all of the customer accommodation offers it may make.
By accepting the Company's accommodation offers, the customer must agree, among other things, to release the Company from any and all claims and liability regarding prior AAMT and other billing related issues. The accommodation offers made to date, and those offers which may be made in the future, are not an admission of liability by the Company of any wrongdoing or an admission or acknowledgement that its billing practices with respect to such customers were or are incorrect. MedQuist Inc. -- Preliminary and Unaudited Financial Information
(in millions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Three months ended
----------------------------------------
March 31, 2006 March 31, 2005
------------------ ------------------
Revenues $ 97 $ 108
Operating loss $ (8) $ (2)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As of As of
March 31, 2006 December 31, 2005
------------------ ------------------
Cash $ 164 $ 178
Debt $ - $ -
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
Revenues:
Preliminary, unaudited results indicate that the Company's revenues decreased $11 million to $97 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from approximately $108 million for the comparable 2005 period. This decline in revenues is largely due to decreases in transcription outsourcing services and product sales of $9 million or 10%, and $2 million or 27%, respectively. The decline in transcription outsourcing revenues is largely due to a decrease in the volume of lines transcribed primarily related to clients for whom we no longer provide transcription services. Additionally, pricing pressures continued on the base transcription business during the first quarter 2006, but revenues were impacted far less by pricing pressures than in the comparable 2005 period. Management expects that pricing pressures will continue for the foreseeable future but that the introduction of several new sales initiatives and improved customer service programs should cause transcription volume to stabilize or improve throughout the duration of 2006.
Operating Loss:
Preliminary, unaudited results indicate that our operating loss increased $6 million to a loss of approximately $8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from an operating loss of $2 million for the comparable 2005 period. The operating loss of $8 million was primarily attributable to $9 million of costs associated with the following: (1) costs related to the ongoing billing review including (i) legal fees incurred in connection with governmental investigations and proceedings and defense of the class action matters and (ii) non-legal professional fees; and (2) increased expenses related to prior years' accounting reviews and audit. Operating loss was also impacted by the $11 million decline in revenues over the same period.
Balance Sheet Highlights:
As of March 31, 2006, the Company had $164 million in cash and cash equivalents and no debt. The $14 million decrease in cash as of March 31, 2006 compared with December 31, 2005 was primarily attributable to accommodation payments ($10 million) and capital expenditures ($4 million). There were no issuances of capital stock or other securities for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
The Company expects to incur significant costs and expenses in the future relating to the ongoing billing review, defense of the class action matters and governmental investigations and proceedings, and accommodation agreements. These costs and expenses include (i) legal fees relating to the SEC and Department of Justice investigations and proceedings, (ii) legal fees relating to defense and resolution of the litigation matters described above, (iii) customer accommodation payments and credits, and (iv) non-legal professional fees. The timing and level of these costs and expenses is, in many cases, not within the Company's control. While the Company is unable to predict the timing and level of these costs and expenses, the Company currently believes that it has sufficient resources, including cash on hand and cash flow from operations to fund these costs and expenses. However, there cannot be any assurance that unanticipated changes in the level of these costs will not exceed the Company's available cash resources, nor can there be any assurance that sufficient financing from external sources will be available to the Company on acceptable terms, if at all. In the event that the Company's cash requirements exceed its available cash resources, or if the timing of such costs and expenses requires the Company to divert cash resources away from operations, the Company may not be able to execute its operating plan, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and results of operations.
Other Developments
Restructuring:
As previously disclosed, in conjunction with the Company's movement to a single national service and support organization, a restructuring plan was developed in 2005 to consolidate approximately forty-eight (48) operating facilities and centralize certain components of the business in order to improve operating efficiencies. The Company is expecting to incur total restructuring costs of up to $8.5 million associated with this plan through the end of the fourth quarter of 2006. The Company incurred $1 million of restructuring costs for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This restructuring is expected to generate annualized savings of approximately $18.5 million. The Company realized approximately $1.9 million in savings during the three months ended March 31, 2006. Specifically, the Company has shifted resources to a single national service delivery and support organization for all of the Company's services and products and is in the process of eliminating local service centers.
The plan does not contemplate reductions of, and the Company has no current intentions to reduce, its medical transcription workforce. Rather, the Company will continue in its efforts to hire additional qualified transcriptionists. Further, although the Company is consolidating its local service centers as described above, customer-facing teams, led by account managers, will continue to coordinate customer support on the local level. The customer-facing teams will continue to work with and be supported by the Company's centrally managed customer service organization.
Offshore Outsourcing to India by US and EU [2006-05-10]
Posted May 1, 2006, this article analyzes the legal and cross-cultural issues that affect data Privacy Regulation in business. It examines India's lack of law enforcement and scores it workforce regarding the potentiality of selling confidential information and India's lack of faith of its ability to enforce any laws it has declined to adopt to protect personal information.
A long but must read for those concerned about offshoring.
Scribe Healthcare Technologies Exceeds 6,000 Users [2006-04-20]
Scribe Healthcare Technologies, a leading healthcare technology company based in the Chicago area, today announced growth has exceeded 6,000 users. Scribe platform users include physicians, clinicians, administrative personnel, and transcriptionists.
Lake Forest, IL (PRWEB) April 20, 2006 -- Scribe Healthcare Technologies, a leading healthcare technology company based in the Chicago area, today announced growth has exceeded 6,000 users. Scribe platform users include physicians, clinicians, administrative personnel, and transcriptionists.
“Until recently our growth has been primarily organic, selling to hospitals and profit driven medical practices. In 2005 we started targeting Medical Transcription Service Organizations (MTSOs) using our technology to run their businesses. Now with the launch of a joint venture “in2scribe”, we hope to become the foremost industry resource for MTSOs.” says Vice President of Sales Marketing, John Weiss. “As a result our growth rate continues to ramp.”
Scribe technologies are modular and Web-based, leveraging the Internet and standard Microsoft applications. Scribe offers a variety of technologies that help MTSO manage their business, recruit and train transcriptionists.
About Scribe Healthcare Technologies, Inc.Scribe Healthcare Technologies is a privately-held healthcare technology company based in the Chicago area. The company has developed a proprietary web-based platform that complements and extends the value for patient registration, Practice/Hospital Management and EMR Solutions. Scribe’s platform includes complete solutions for dictation, transcription, document management, EMR-Lite, Web portal, online prescriptions and reporting with data analytics.
Scribe serves more than 6,000 users. Business partners and resellers include consulting firms, transcription companies, and business process outsourcers. Additional information is available at www.scribe.com.
About in2scribeIn April 2005, the owners of Scribe Healthcare Technologies, EFD Transcription Services, and PENATCLE Electronic Records and Systems fulfilled their dream to create a network that would pull together resources to help to improve the efficiency, productivity, and profitability of the highly fragmented, mid-sized medical transcription firms.
Utilizing the talents and experience of our members, a common technology infrastructure, and a central management point, in2scribe offers a menu of services to our members including new profit centers, benefit plans, level-loading of your work load, and more. More information is available at www.in2scribe.com.
Brown & Meyers, Inc Announces Acquistion of Typewrights, Inc [2006-04-20]
Brown & Meyers, Inc., a leading national provider of medical transcription and court reporting services since 1997, located at 536 Washington Avenue in Portland, is pleased to announce the acquisition of Typewrights, Inc. This transition will be effective April 17, 2006. Typewrights is a legend in the medical and legal transcription marketplace, having been in business for 26 years.
Kate Meyers-Coyne, President of Brown Typewrights has an excellent reputation and it is a great honor for us to acquire them. We are very pleased to have these loyal Maine and New Hampshire customers joining our family, and plan to make this transition as quick and easy as possible for everyone.
In an effort to make the transition as seamless as possible, Patricia Burrows, the owner of Typewrights, along with Mrs. Meyers-Coyne, are working closely with customers.
Yes, but even when the overseas business build plants [2006-04-04]
breaks and incentives that it is the exact same thing, just on our home soil. One state gave Mercedes the land to build 2 plants for free plus no taxes to the state for 10 years, plus other perks picked up by the state residents.
I think I'm going to get religion so I can legally stop paying taxes and ask for my SS account to be refunded (like that would ever happen!)
Another thought.... [2006-03-24]
I myself do NOT feel comfortable having my information sent overseas, including my name, DOB, and often SSN listed in the demographics screen of each note. I have heard stories of prosecution (or lack there of) by identity theft from people in other countries. Maybe Americans should start boycotting or protesting the healthcare industries that outsource overseas!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'll quit paying taxes if they use it to train overseas MTs [2006-03-21]
G et AL can take a bite out of that one if they think that is the direction they will take this program! After all, the approved programs are online and AAMT provides certification overseas, so what is to stop the big MT corporations who are devoloping facilities to house 5000 MTs in India and other locations from using MY tax money to train overseas MTs???
Medical Transcription Recognized as an Apprenticeable Occupation [2006-03-14]
CHICAGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 10, 2006--Graduates of selected medical transcription training programs will now have access to registered apprenticeship programs, as the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has now declared medical transcription to be an apprenticeable profession - the first step in establishing a national apprenticeship program. The Office of Apprenticeship Training, Employer and Labor Services approved the application for apprenticeability determination submitted by the Medical Transcription Industry Association (MTIA) along with the American Association for Medical Transcription (AAMT).
Having a recognized apprenticeable occupation will provide a pipeline of medical transcription professionals entering into a workforce facing a serious labor and skills shortage. stated Keith Flannery, Vice President, MTIA. Workforce development under the standards established by this apprenticeship program will aid in facilitating the transition between student and an employable, productive, and qualified medical transcriptionist.
Given the challenge the industry faces in recruiting qualified candidates to meet the ever-increasing demand for real-time, quality healthcare data, a registered apprenticeship program couldn't be developed and launched at a more critical time, stated Peter Preziosi, PhD, CAE, AAMT Executive Director. Workforce development is essential to ensuring that documentation experts are in place to assist the industry in transitioning to an electronic health record and to preserving the quality and integrity of the health record in that future.
The Registered Apprenticeship Program, sponsored by the Medical Transcription Industry Association (MTIA), will offer structured on-the-job learning and related technical instruction for qualified medical transcriptionists entering the profession. The two associations, along with the Office of Apprenticeship Training, Employer and Labor Services, are finalizing program details.
Medical Transcription is a crucial process in the provision of quality healthcare in our country. This is a hallmark program for the industry, said Sean Carroll, President, MTIA.
Experience & proficiency requirements [2006-03-01]
What are the experience and proficiency industry requirements for U.S. MTs?
Per this article (http://www.fortherecordmag.com/archives/ftr_071805p26.shtml), Competition from overseas sources is also emerging in large part due to the lack of minimum wage laws in those countries. Low entry-level wages and lack of adequate compensation for skilled, experienced MTs have discouraged many individuals from selecting medical transcription as a viable career option at a time when the MT workforce is aging. Compounding the problem is the fact that many new MT graduates are not able to find employment because they are unable to meet experience and productivity requirements for U.S. MTs as mandated by the industry.
A real eye-opener to say the least. Wholesale giveaway of good quality American workers.
Neurologist saves $12,000 per year on medical transcription [2006-02-22]
Recognition vs. Transcription
W. Palm Beach, FL neurologist saves $12,000 per year on medical transcription using state-of-the-art voice recognition software
[ClickPress, Tue Feb 21 2006] Dr. H. Steven Block, M.D. uses Dragon NaturallySpeaking Medical Edition, voice recognition software for medical professionals, to eliminate a very real business problem--medical transcription costs-- which six years ago, began topping the $1,000-a-month mark. Today, a doctor can easily spend three times that amount.
Very open about his high regard for the Dragon Medical VR product, Dr. Block had much to say about its place in his solo practice: “I purchased Dragon Medical from Eric Fishman’s company, Nuance, which is actually located in the same building as my practice, on the floor above me. Neurology is all about ‘nuance’, no pun intended. But ‘nuance’ is really the best word to describe the health effects of a neurological problem. It has been a major focus of my practice.”
“Very subtle neurological changes can have devastating health consequences. You have to be able to communicate those subtleties in order for a medical record to have any meaning.”
“I see some really sick patients. Using an on-the-spot note generation product like Dragon, instead of a transcription service, let’s me get back to the referring physician with a fast note, usually within 10 minutes of seeing the patient. That kind of speed in delivering a medical exam note with ‘nuance’ can mean a great deal to everyone involved. You see, I can’t type. I never learned how to type. My kids who grew up instant-messaging can type faster than I can speak. They don’t need Dragon. But for me, Dragon is a wonderful tool.”
Dr. Block, 49, is no stranger to high technology tools:
“There are only so many hours in the day,” he laughed, driving down the road, talking via wireless cell phone headset, “and I’m very detail-oriented. I couldn’t be without Dragon, quite frankly.” One word I did not hear from Dr. Block is the word “downtime”. It doesn’t seem to exist in his vocabulary.
Having traveled the long and winding upgrade path for both Dragon and laptop hardware, Dr. Block has watched and participated in the evolution of the product for six years. “Like a surfer looking for the perfect wave,” he joked. The improvement he’s seen in the most recent version of Dragon Medical—combined with a high-RAM laptop with at least 512MB—has boosted performance to an almost unbelievable 99.5% real time voice recognition accuracy level, according to his observations.
His advice to new users: “If you haven’t tried Dragon Medical in the last four years,” he said, “try it again, the way it is now, with the new speech engine. It uses mathematical models to analyze word groups. There is a learning curve, but the training is not that bad, consisting of you reading a 15 minute script into a microphone, then a little touch-up here and there.”
“Try a few charts each day, and sit down where it’s quiet, where you can relax and concentrate on your speaking habits. Tech support is great; they’ll help you, and be sure to read the help file “How to Speak to a Computer”—and the manual. Especially for often repeated phrases, the voice-actuated “macros” are great, a real time-saver. It’s well-worth the time you invest in learning how to use this tool.”
What are the pitfalls? “Mumbling,” says Dr. Block, “that’s the main problem. Doctors are used to dictating in a low, monotone mumble, as fast as they can. A person might be able to handle it by going back and listening to the recording again and again. But for voice recognition, doctors need to speak in a normal, conversational tone of voice, just like we are doing right now. Speak normally, and Dragon has no problem, it works very well. It’s really quite simple.”
He stated that using a handheld Sony digital voice recorder with removable memory stick allows him to dictate anywhere, anytime, then later, “feed” the sound file to Dragon, achieving about 98% voice recognition accuracy. (Please note: If you are considering making a recording for later voice recognition by Dragon, be sure and use 16-bit resolution .avi format, or Dragon won’t even try to “digest” it. It won’t bother with a recording of poor quality, because the end result would be useless.)
Although he is considering it, Dr. Block has not yet adopted a commercial EMR(Electronic Medical Records) software system for his medical records, mainly because of concerns about interoperability standards. (Coming soon to an EMR near you.)
However, by using Dragon Medical as his “front-end” for the creation of detailed paper medical records, email reports, and digital-FAX messages, Dr. Block not only uses computers, but has also created a highly personal and expressive way to “chart” a patient, unmatched in detail, depth, and the “human touch” by out-of-the-box EMR software.
Would EMR software developers do well to discuss with this doctor any design plans for a voice-controlled, voice-recognition-based EMR program? I think so. Will a “hands-free” EMR workstation which responds to voice commands--as does the entire Dragon program--ever be used to help maintain a “sterile field” in the medical environment of the future? It certainly worked well on the Starship Enterprise, didn’t it?
HERE's more of what he thought 10/05...sm [2006-02-21]
TAMT NEWS
Texas Association for Medical Transcription
____________________________________________________________________
A recognized component of AAMT October 2005
SPECIAL MESSAGE FROM PETER PREZIOSI, PhD, CAE
I would challenge this group to think of new and expanded roles for transcriptionists in the electronic health environment. Let’s not think of transcription as it is today but as a role that is at the nexus of health information and information technology.
Transcriptionists should be reattached from the physician dictator and deployed to the entire electronic health record, ensuring that data captured, documentation, and report generation is accurate, complete, and appropriately placed throughout the record. Emerging roles for the Transcriptionist include database administrator, data abstraction, data coding, etc. Once both the profession and the industry embrace this concept, we must quickly put together the educational infrastructure and partner with the technology vendor community to build the software to support this vision, creating an emerging role in the workplace. This new role in the EHR expands the value of transcription, gets transcription away from production and being considered a commodity, and makes us true team players in quality patient documentation. Think of the individuals we could attract to the profession if this were the scope of practice!
This is a long-term vision that requires us to begin now to reposition both the profession and the industry. Let’s not wait for the crisis to worsen.
Peter Preziosi, PhD, CAE
Executive Director
American Association for Medical Transcription
100 Sycamore Avenue
Modesto, CA 95354
(209) 341-2445
(209) 527-9632 fax
peter@aamt.org
www.aamt.org/ca/texas/newsletter.doc
|
|
|