Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

I did read the whole link and

Posted By: me on 2009-03-30
In Reply to: You give a link that supposedly exposes snopes.com yet SM - Can you not read???

Every nutcase leftwing comment about it trying to defend them.

The reason I posted is because it's a fact that snopes is not a credible source to get your information from. Snopes is run by a couple of leftwingers. They interject their opinion and try to debunk things that are most definitely true. One being that they would say certain things were hoaxes when in fact they were true and we know this because we'd pull up Youtube and there it was right on camera. Example: Snopes said that the email going around that the O is going to cut back veterans benefits is a hoax. The fact is it was not a hoax. I was watching a talk show and a lady in the Obama administration said it's true and that she was not happy about it, but "blah, blah, blah" (give some lame excuse as to why they were doing it). Hence...snopes outright lied about information that is true. The couple that runs snopes are not credible sources for any truth. They are a couple with an agenda and I'm sure get paid plenty for it.

That was the reason for my post - because anyone who tries to back up what they want uses the excuse "check it out on snopes first". Well snopes has been debunked on many issues. They put out false things that benefit the left wingers and demonize anyone who has a conservative or moderate point of view.

It's just very simple. Snopes is not a credible source for truth or fiction. If you want to find out the truth check multiple sources (and don't even try to pull a "Fox news thing" because I'm not suggesting anything about Fox news. I'm saying check out multiple sources. Do not just stick with one source. And certainly not snopes!!!

Good lord!!!!!


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Here's a link that should help those that can read

The Election Choice: McCain and Obama on the issues


http://online.wsj.com/public/page/election-choice.html


 


I posted the link to everyone could read it...
I also saw the part where she was fired for using the credit cards for her own personal use. I thought others might like to see the article and read it for themselves since it is a topic for discussion today. I would say with her being fired, that demeans her credibility. I in no way intended to spread gossip, just posting the link since the story is out there.
Did you even read the link you provided?
Obama is requiring community service not military service. Community service is a constructive way to spend time and energy. War is a destructive way to spend time and energy.

Obama also said that he would provide a college education to anyone who volunteers to do community service. This can only help make the United States a stronger and better nation. It sounds like a wonderful plan to me!

The following is from the link you provided:

The Obama Administration will call on Americans to serve in order to meet the nation’s challenges. President-Elect Obama will expand national service programs like AmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a new Classroom Corps to help teachers in underserved schools, as well as a new Health Corps, Clean Energy Corps, and Veterans Corps. Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by developing a plan to require 50 hours of community service in middle school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college every year. Obama will encourage retiring Americans to serve by improving programs available for individuals over age 55, while at the same time promoting youth programs such as Youth Build and Head Start.
You obviously failed to read the entire link.
to back up her claims. I don't need to research this further. I was a 40+ grown-up when the confirmation hearings were held and I remember them vividly, since it was one of the most blatent miscarriages of justice I have witnessed first-hand in my entire life. I was a bit more naive back then but now, of course, I understand completely how the Bushes operate and how this could have happened under their watch.
See link inside for his website - read for yourself sm
http://www.davidicke.com/index.php/

You believe there is a hidden "reptilian invasion / agenda"?? Really? and those of us who don't see it are the deluded ones?
I read on the link I posted that he lived in the building -
it said he lived there and had every right to be there. I am not sure where it is.
Don't think you read the same article, THAT IS THE TITLE...see the link I posted...

 xx


I hope you can find that link. I'd love to read about that study.
Wouldn't poetic justice be served if it was discovered that the conservative brains lit up on the left side?
post the link only, not the whole article and the link. See rules for posting.
x
This looks interesting. A long read, so will read it when I get home from work. nm
nm
Obviously u didnt read, I said NONE of them are moral. Read the post before spouting off.

I read on CNN (yes, I do read liberal stuff too..hehe)...sm
...that Karl Rove was actually very disappointed in the McCain campaign for airing negative type ads against Obama.

So I would say that Rove is definitely not in the hip pocket of the McCain campaign.
Good research sam - but a lot to read right now so gotta read it later
I've been goofing off too much from work. I appreciate what you wrote and will read when I'm done with work here.
sorry, should read I did not read post that way.
,
All you have to do is read up on Marxism, read up on...
black liberation theology, and look at what Obama is proposing. All of it a matter of public record, most of it from his own mouth. Your denial of it does not change the facts. If you support socialism, vote for him. Certainly your right. You are already wanting to squelch any kind of dissent...what's up with that? If you seriously consider calling someone a socialist a smear, you really need to read up on your candidate. I did not post a smear, I posted a fact. Redistribution of wealth is socialist and he already said he was going to do it...I heard him say it and it is now a campaign commercial. Sigh.
Some on this board can only read what they want to read (nm)
x
READ THE ARTICLE-READ OTHER
READERS COMMENTS!!!
Okay, thanks, that's not what my link said. SM

Mine also said he failed to mention this case when being questioned.  Well, there's a thousand stories out there.  It really doesn't matter to me. It doesn't affect how I think of him one way or the other.


Link

Here is one link to it:


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/05/02/eveningnews/main692497.shtml


But this is not where I originally saw it - I believe it was covered on PBS which is where I saw it.


here is the link

I didnt want to put the report here as there is some profanity that Bush has used to his staff but here is the link. 


http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7267.shtml


 


trying again with the link
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7267.shtml
link
http://www.filmstripinternational.com/index.php?asshole
Link
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/21/AR2006032100452.html?referrer=email&referrer=email&referrer=email
If you can't see it try this link.sm
http://www.justcomments.com/funnycomments-images/oh_no.gif
- see link
sign the petition
Link
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/
Better link...sm
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-op-pett18jun18,0,3422826.story

Its the first cartoon on the right.
Link please. Thanks. nm

Here's the link.

By the way, that wasn't a good quote.  That was a GREAT quote.  In fact, your entire post was great.  Thanks very much for posting it.  You are so right and I couldn't agree with you more. 


http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/red_alert_for_staged_terror_attack.htm


The link says
it is a 'malformed video.'  Let me guess.  Bush lied.
See link below.nm
12
Thanks for the link.
This whole thing is so ironic.  Maybe Iraqi troops will be the next to come and participate in Bush's martial law.
No link..nm

The Link
The link to Bush Body Count is in the original post. Again, I don't believe a word of it, because I believe in innocent until PROVEN guilty.

See link

What's the deal guys?


You said you cannot get the whole link...
to come up without it being cut off.  It's too long?  So, you go to tinyurl, cut and paste your long link, and they will make the link shorter for you. 
How odd--try link below
   www.americanIssuesProject.org  That will take you to the same thing, including an article about Obama.
Link...
http://www.johnmccain.com//Informing/Issues/17671aa4-2fe8-4008-859f-0ef1468e96f4.htm
Link
Click the link below:
see link
http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071220/BIZ/712200327
See link

Good article - really talks about how nasty the media has been in this, and also more.- good read


http://www.gazette.net/stories/09122008/polilee181803_32478.shtml


 


 


Thanks for the link....sm
So true about the media, isn't it?

Also saw this on CNN last night, and was surprised that they allowed this viewpoint on their website.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/11/beck.palin/index.html
Thanks for the link
I've read it and can't tell if it is a more favorable article towards the republicans or democrats, so don't have anything to argue about that. However, the study only worked on 45 people? They are basing a study on just 45 people when the US is made up of 301,139,947 people (as of Jul 07). Like I say, I can't tell by the article which political group this benefits but it just seems to be an unreasonable basis to base the way a whole country votes on just 45 people (and all from the same region of the US) - again not sure if Nebraska is more liberal or conservative. Just seems like an invalid study to me.
here is another link about the same
see if this one comes through...

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4476649n
I don't know if this will help at all, but try this link. sm
www.PatriotPost.US

It is a conservative newsletter that, IMO, tries to present an equally balanced view of what is going on. It is not always in easy to understand words, but you get an explanation that makes sense of what is going on.

Try it, you might just be surprised.
Link please sm

Ahmadinejad Feted at Obama Fundraiser’s Hotel


 


I went on the website you referenced and could not find this.  Please back it up with the actual link. 


see link
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/debate_fact_check
I would like the link too
so I can see for myself.  Thanks.
When you go to this link s/m
take the Match-O-Matic quiz at the right. It gives you quotes from each candidate and you have to choose which one you agree with the most and at the end, it matches you with the candidate you chose most often. Let's see how well we all know the candidates we are backing based only on what they have said.
link

I'm sorry that I didn't save the link to the video clip I mentioned.  I did a search for Obama messiah on Youtube just now and I didn't find the one I mentioned.  Much to my surprise there were tons of such videos with accusations.  What I did find was this:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FyEZdy-Rag&feature=related  (Again, I don't know how to make a link but copy and paste in your browser.  It appears to be the real deal.  I didn't watch it all the way through as I am really, really busy today, so you can watch it and draw your own conclusions. 


If you go to youtube and search for Obama messiah you'll probably find the original one I was talking about which I believe to be a fake.  The above link, appears to me to be Obama himself in his own voice with his recognizable body language.


Try this link instead