History significant for "IPP" at age 6?
Posted By: Sheryl on 2005-11-30
In Reply to:
Subject: History significant for "IPP" at age 6?
I don't see anything in my Abbr. book that might fit this. s/l IPP or IPT. Any ideas anyone? THanks!
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Family history significant for s/l share-covery II. thank you
Subject: Family history significant for s/l share-covery II. thank you
Past medical history: Significant for s/l uterine CA.
Subject: Past medical history: Significant for s/l uterine CA.
patient is a 15-year-old girl with history of significant
Subject: patient is a 15-year-old girl with history of significant
s/l Norwood degenerative type disorder. ???
Past medical history significant for s/l wrekal sinus excision
Subject: Past medical history significant for s/l wrekal sinus excision
Under past medical history - history of abnormal s/l petatrie functioning. I really cannot make *sm
Subject: Under past medical history - history of abnormal s/l petatrie functioning. I really cannot make *sm
it out. It is a foreigner. He is saying it very fast. History of abnormal petatrie functioning is what is sounds like to me. I have no clue.
history of colorectal history with metastasis to the liver and lymph nodes
Subject: history of colorectal history with metastasis to the liver and lymph nodes
is it possible that he says "a significant portion"?
Subject: is it possible that he says "a significant portion"?
significant? stigmata of? nm
Subject: significant? stigmata of? nm
s
No Significant Enlargement?
Subject: No Significant Enlargement?
hemodynamically significant stenosis?
Subject: hemodynamically significant stenosis?
A significant relative weakness?
Subject: A significant relative weakness?
He has a significant relative weakness with executive functioning...
Is 'significant relative' correct?
No evidence for hemodynamically significant stenosis.
Subject: No evidence for hemodynamically significant stenosis.
nm
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
NSA = no significant abnormality or no sign. anomaly. nm
Subject: NSA = no significant abnormality or no sign. anomaly. nm
PMH: Significant for s/l valve plus atrial fibrillation. Thank you Debbie
Subject: PMH: Significant for s/l valve plus atrial fibrillation. Thank you Debbie
Does this make sense? No significant pain inversion
Subject: Does this make sense? No significant pain inversion
Skip my pitiful answer. Maybe NSD for no significant disease? nm
Subject: Skip my pitiful answer. Maybe NSD for no significant disease? nm
Sorry, meant inconsistent *bash-A pers*, not significant
Subject: Sorry, meant inconsistent *bash-A pers*, not significant
he had significant disease of an ostial diagonal as well as an AV s/l gurve circumflex. thank you
Subject: he had significant disease of an ostial diagonal as well as an AV s/l gurve circumflex. thank you
during cystoscope says bladder was smooth w/o significant s/l cellulosaculos??? or diverticula
Subject: during cystoscope says bladder was smooth w/o significant s/l cellulosaculos??? or diverticula
no significant protuberance with current *s/l* NT tube at intermediate suction
Subject: no significant protuberance with current *s/l* NT tube at intermediate suction
I think he is saying NT or angi or something. I cannot tell. This is in the area of her abdomen and she is being seen for not having bowel movements for two days.
Pt had a cardiac cath which showed no significant *coronary obstucting to his knees*.
Subject: Pt had a cardiac cath which showed no significant *coronary obstucting to his knees*.
The patient has had an abdominal CT scan in January 2006 which showed significant intra- and extra b
Subject: The patient has had an abdominal CT scan in January 2006 which showed significant intra- and extra b
The patient has had an abdominal CT scan in January 2006 which showed significant intra- and extra biliary tree dilatation, but this was unchanged from a previous scan of 2003.
I am specifically wondering about the hypen after intra. Thanks.
pleural effusion is smaller but has significant amount of free flowing fluid on the s/l *cubulous*
Subject: pleural effusion is smaller but has significant amount of free flowing fluid on the s/l *cubulous*
osteonecrosis- pt had "a bone scan significant for area of intense focal [s/l bony labeling]"?
Subject: osteonecrosis- pt had "a bone scan significant for area of intense focal [s/l bony labeling]"?
The whole sentence reads thusly:
The patient also underwent bone scan, this being significant for an area of intense [s/l focal bony labeling] involving the lateral epicondyle of the right femur in an individual without history of trauma, and given his history of aseptic necrosis of the femoral head, it was felt that this might be reflective of osteonecrosis including "osteochondritis desiccans."
Thanks in advance for any help.
The knee is pain significant because she had a total knee replacement. Make sense? nm
Subject: The knee is pain significant because she had a total knee replacement. Make sense? nm
,,
There is significant medial and medial *peripatellar* pain with hyperflexion.
Subject: There is significant medial and medial *peripatellar* pain with hyperflexion.
There is significant medial and medial *peripatellar* pain with hyperflexion.
Subject: There is significant medial and medial *peripatellar* pain with hyperflexion.
There is significant medial and medial s/l peripatellar pain with hyperflexion.
Subject: There is significant medial and medial s/l peripatellar pain with hyperflexion.
He does have a mild s/l pivot lie, but no significant pivot shift
Subject: He does have a mild s/l pivot lie, but no significant pivot shift
Thanks :-)
history
Subject: history
s/ true, screw, tew.
A 20 gauge____ guide monoptic coaxial system was employed to obtain 2 core biopsies of the lesion
OB history
Subject: OB history
CAMT- In my BOS second edition- page 290: Separate GPS sections by commas:
G4, P3, A1 
History of?
Subject: History of?
Could the dictator be saying "history of" cholecystectomy," instead of "her 'seri' cholecystectomy?
history of **leg TB**? sm
Subject: history of **leg TB**? sm
it's on a numbered list so i really dont have anything else to work on. THANKS!
not sure but her history is.....
Subject: not sure but her history is.....
pt had a surgery recently from a MVA and had several broken bones, also history of hypertension, diabetes and peripheral vascular disease. thanks
|
