Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

No Significant Enlargement?

Posted By: jus guessin at this late hour. on 2007-12-20
In Reply to: physical exam: neck shows no s/l N-S-E? looking for a standard abbrev. used for neck. nm - minmin

Subject: No Significant Enlargement?




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

vacuole enlargement?
Subject: vacuole enlargement?


thyroid enlargement? nm
Subject: thyroid enlargement? nm


Vimax says it is for penis enlargement...
Subject: Vimax says it is for penis enlargement...

I found a reference to "bimix" regarding erectile dysfunction, but I have no clue if it's right or not.


http://mens-health.health-cares.net/erectile-dysfunction-injection.php


no 'river' or spleen enlargement?
Subject: no 'river' or spleen enlargement?


 


 It's..


ABDOMEN: No 'river' or spleen enlargement. There was definite fullness in the left lower quadrant with pain on firm palpation.


 


Thanks!


Avodart (dutasteride) for prostate enlargement? nm
Subject: Avodart (dutasteride) for prostate enlargement? nm


is it possible that he says "a significant portion"?
Subject: is it possible that he says "a significant portion"?


significant? stigmata of? nm
Subject: significant? stigmata of? nm

s
History significant for "IPP" at age 6?
Subject: History significant for "IPP" at age 6?

I don't see anything in my Abbr. book that might fit this.   s/l IPP or IPT.  Any ideas anyone?  THanks!
hemodynamically significant stenosis?
Subject: hemodynamically significant stenosis?


A significant relative weakness?
Subject: A significant relative weakness?

He has a significant relative weakness with executive functioning...


Is 'significant relative' correct?


No evidence for hemodynamically significant stenosis.
Subject: No evidence for hemodynamically significant stenosis.

nm
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


NSA = no significant abnormality or no sign. anomaly. nm
Subject: NSA = no significant abnormality or no sign. anomaly. nm


PMH: Significant for s/l valve plus atrial fibrillation. Thank you Debbie
Subject: PMH: Significant for s/l valve plus atrial fibrillation. Thank you Debbie


Family history significant for s/l share-covery II. thank you
Subject: Family history significant for s/l share-covery II. thank you


Does this make sense? No significant pain inversion
Subject: Does this make sense? No significant pain inversion

 


Skip my pitiful answer. Maybe NSD for no significant disease? nm
Subject: Skip my pitiful answer. Maybe NSD for no significant disease? nm


Past medical history: Significant for s/l uterine CA.
Subject: Past medical history: Significant for s/l uterine CA.


patient is a 15-year-old girl with history of significant
Subject: patient is a 15-year-old girl with history of significant

s/l Norwood degenerative type disorder. ???
Sorry, meant inconsistent *bash-A pers*, not significant
Subject: Sorry, meant inconsistent *bash-A pers*, not significant


he had significant disease of an ostial diagonal as well as an AV s/l gurve circumflex. thank you
Subject: he had significant disease of an ostial diagonal as well as an AV s/l gurve circumflex. thank you


during cystoscope says bladder was smooth w/o significant s/l cellulosaculos??? or diverticula
Subject: during cystoscope says bladder was smooth w/o significant s/l cellulosaculos??? or diverticula


no significant protuberance with current *s/l* NT tube at intermediate suction
Subject: no significant protuberance with current *s/l* NT tube at intermediate suction

I think he is saying NT or angi or something. I cannot tell. This is in the area of her abdomen and she is being seen for not having bowel movements for two days.
Pt had a cardiac cath which showed no significant *coronary obstucting to his knees*.
Subject: Pt had a cardiac cath which showed no significant *coronary obstucting to his knees*.


Past medical history significant for s/l wrekal sinus excision
Subject: Past medical history significant for s/l wrekal sinus excision


The patient has had an abdominal CT scan in January 2006 which showed significant intra- and extra b
Subject: The patient has had an abdominal CT scan in January 2006 which showed significant intra- and extra b

The patient has had an abdominal CT scan in January 2006 which showed significant intra- and extra biliary tree dilatation, but this was unchanged from a previous scan of 2003.


 


I am specifically wondering about the hypen after intra.  Thanks.


pleural effusion is smaller but has significant amount of free flowing fluid on the s/l *cubulous*
Subject: pleural effusion is smaller but has significant amount of free flowing fluid on the s/l *cubulous*


osteonecrosis- pt had "a bone scan significant for area of intense focal [s/l bony labeling]"?
Subject: osteonecrosis- pt had "a bone scan significant for area of intense focal [s/l bony labeling]"?

The whole sentence reads thusly:

The patient also underwent bone scan, this being significant for an area of intense [s/l focal bony labeling] involving the lateral epicondyle of the right femur in an individual without history of trauma, and given his history of aseptic necrosis of the femoral head, it was felt that this might be reflective of osteonecrosis including "osteochondritis desiccans."

Thanks in advance for any help.
The knee is pain significant because she had a total knee replacement. Make sense? nm
Subject: The knee is pain significant because she had a total knee replacement. Make sense? nm

,,
There is significant medial and medial *peripatellar* pain with hyperflexion.
Subject: There is significant medial and medial *peripatellar* pain with hyperflexion.


There is significant medial and medial *peripatellar* pain with hyperflexion.
Subject: There is significant medial and medial *peripatellar* pain with hyperflexion.


There is significant medial and medial s/l peripatellar pain with hyperflexion.
Subject: There is significant medial and medial s/l peripatellar pain with hyperflexion.


He does have a mild s/l pivot lie, but no significant pivot shift
Subject: He does have a mild s/l pivot lie, but no significant pivot shift

Thanks :-)
Significant for hypertension, coronary artery disease,?? coronary artery bypass grafting... s/l ....
Subject: Significant for hypertension, coronary artery disease,?? coronary artery bypass grafting... s/l ....

fastras.  Patient has had several femoral bypass grafting as well as aortobifemoral bypass grafting in the past.