Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

No evidence for hemodynamically significant stenosis.

Posted By: Cardiology MT on 2007-04-03
In Reply to: cardiology..... he stumbles here I think he says.... - debbie

Subject: No evidence for hemodynamically significant stenosis.

nm


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

hemodynamically significant stenosis?
Subject: hemodynamically significant stenosis?


I would put MRA Abdominal Aorta: No evidence for renal artery stenosis. sm
Subject: I would put MRA Abdominal Aorta: No evidence for renal artery stenosis. sm

And it is definitely not part of the ECG report.
Could they be slurring cerebral artery stenosis or some other stenosis? nm
Subject: Could they be slurring cerebral artery stenosis or some other stenosis? nm

s
cervical stenosis is spinal stenosis in the neck...sm
Subject: cervical stenosis is spinal stenosis in the neck...sm

It should actually be called

cervical spinal stenosis.
Hemodynamically!
Subject: Hemodynamically!

That's it!!!  It's amazing how words sound so much different when you have an idea of what it might be - especially when the doc has a very heavy accent.  Thanks so much!!!


hemodynamically...NM
Subject: hemodynamically...NM


hemodynamically serious
Subject: hemodynamically serious






Noun 1. hemodynamics - the branch of physiology that studies the circulation of the blood and the forces involved
physiology - the branch of the biological sciences dealing with the functioning of organisms

Is there something in the blank? Hemodynamically? nm
Subject: Is there something in the blank? Hemodynamically? nm

x
Can you hear hemodynamically?
Subject: Can you hear hemodynamically?


mid stenosis, mid-stenosis, midstenosis?
Subject: mid stenosis, mid-stenosis, midstenosis?

Right coronary artery with 80% mid stenosis.

Is this transcribed correctly? Does mid mean middle?
95% LAD stenosis, 50% mid s/l circ stenosis. nm TIA
Subject: 95% LAD stenosis, 50% mid s/l circ stenosis. nm TIA

x
is is neuro foraminal stenosis or neural foraminal stenosis
Subject: is is neuro foraminal stenosis or neural foraminal stenosis

x
No evidence of a DVT?
Subject: No evidence of a DVT?


It's scintigraphic evidence of....
Subject: It's scintigraphic evidence of....


almost looks like evidence of ascites? WAG here.
Subject: almost looks like evidence of ascites? WAG here.


No evidence of HAVT?
Subject: No evidence of HAVT?

???
Where is the evidence linking him to culdoplasty?
Thanks, I know about the Mt. Sinai link and Alexis Moschcowitz. But his only publications were about femoral hernias, rectal prolapse, and thoracoplasty. Where is evidence firmly linking him, or anyone for that matter, to the culdoplasty?
no evidence of "tropication" disease??
Subject: no evidence of "tropication" disease??

The patient had reportedly had an abnormal noninvasive arterial study with evidence of lower extremity trophication disease.   Tropication?  Any clues?


Thanks!!


There is no evidence of fistula extravasation
Subject: There is no evidence of fistula extravasation

or do you think he means


 


fistula or extravasation?


fistulous extravasation?


Walks with evidence of intaliga????
Subject: Walks with evidence of intaliga????

anybody please?
s/l centralagraphic evidence of ischemia
Subject: s/l centralagraphic evidence of ischemia

I cannot find this anywhere!  Please help.


s/l sin-thee-o-graphic evidence.. thanks
Subject: s/l sin-thee-o-graphic evidence.. thanks


Could be "intrinsic" - but are you sure it is "new" evidence? sm
Subject: Could be "intrinsic" - but are you sure it is "new" evidence? sm

Or "no" evidence? Did they find new masses or lesions?


Just checking - that little word "no" can make a WORLD of difference.


No evidence of right leg (s/l textopathy) or radiculopathy
Subject: No evidence of right leg (s/l textopathy) or radiculopathy

x
Or "no evidence of JVD," perhaps, but we have no context to go on. nm
Subject: Or "no evidence of JVD," perhaps, but we have no context to go on. nm

nm
Knee exam: No evidence of s/l "aligamenesis" to
Subject: Knee exam: No evidence of s/l "aligamenesis" to

nm
no evidence of skin peeling/descomation?
Subject: no evidence of skin peeling/descomation?

s/l descomation. 
No evidence of any s/l propsapatella alta or tilt
Subject: No evidence of any s/l propsapatella alta or tilt


Doc says " No edema. No evidence of s/l cords. What is meant by that? TIA!!!
Subject: Doc says " No edema. No evidence of s/l cords. What is meant by that? TIA!!!


On neuro exam...there is no evidence of "wish nodules". sm
Subject: On neuro exam...there is no evidence of "wish nodules". sm

Funduscopic exam showed sharp disc margins bilaterally. There is no evidence of “wish” nodules.
physical exam: abdomen s/l no evidence of preorientation..
Subject: physical exam: abdomen s/l no evidence of preorientation..

I know that I have heard this term before but I am drawing a blank... 


Thanks for you assistance. 


Funduscopic exam: No evidence of s/l apple eema
Subject: Funduscopic exam: No evidence of s/l apple eema

s/l apple eema or apalima?
"There was no evidence of a deep vein thromposis"
How do these RN's get out of HIGH SCHOOL without being able to read?
is it possible that he says "a significant portion"?
Subject: is it possible that he says "a significant portion"?


significant? stigmata of? nm
Subject: significant? stigmata of? nm

s
No Significant Enlargement?
Subject: No Significant Enlargement?


wild guess..."no evidence of sequelae of hepatitis C" ?? nm
Subject: wild guess..."no evidence of sequelae of hepatitis C" ?? nm


There is no s/l streaming, no evidence of foreign body with eversion of the lids.
Subject: There is no s/l streaming, no evidence of foreign body with eversion of the lids.

Mind is blank today.
On fluoroscein staining there was no evidence of s/l streaming to suggest puncture.
Subject: On fluoroscein staining there was no evidence of s/l streaming to suggest puncture.

I know I should know this, but it has been a long day to say the least.  Thanks!!!!
He has a tracheostomy with no evidence of infection. He uses s/l *super reflux* for communication.
Subject: He has a tracheostomy with no evidence of infection. He uses s/l *super reflux* for communication.

Thanks. 
History significant for "IPP" at age 6?
Subject: History significant for "IPP" at age 6?

I don't see anything in my Abbr. book that might fit this.   s/l IPP or IPT.  Any ideas anyone?  THanks!
A significant relative weakness?
Subject: A significant relative weakness?

He has a significant relative weakness with executive functioning...


Is 'significant relative' correct?


patient with breast cancer. skin reveals no evidence of *poterauge*??? thanks. nm
Subject: patient with breast cancer. skin reveals no evidence of *poterauge*??? thanks. nm

nm
Pt with AIDS under HEENT: enlarged tonsils. No evidence of "coplic" spots. nm
Subject: Pt with AIDS under HEENT: enlarged tonsils. No evidence of "coplic" spots. nm


Abdomen exam: Spleen tip palbable. No evidence of "poop medusee" !!? TIA!! nm
Subject: Abdomen exam: Spleen tip palbable. No evidence of "poop medusee" !!? TIA!! nm

nm
EEG: There was evidence of mild disorganization and diffuse slowing of the posterior ___________-sm
Subject: EEG: There was evidence of mild disorganization and diffuse slowing of the posterior ___________-sm

ligament ______ diffusely with function.   Thanks. 
Ophthalmology consult, this elderly gentleman has evidence of previous s/l a. phaci...the only
Subject: Ophthalmology consult, this elderly gentleman has evidence of previous s/l a. phaci...the only

thing that comes to my mind is phacoemulsification. The doc dictating this is so old and slurs so much that he should probably be retired. Any ideas anyone?
No evidence of cramping abdominal pain that would suggest a s/l hydraged obstruction. Help??
Subject: No evidence of cramping abdominal pain that would suggest a s/l hydraged obstruction. Help??


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.