Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

I have to disagree with you.....sm

Posted By: Cindi on 2007-01-23
In Reply to: Keystrokes, if you can't make it there, I would not apply to any other national - Starshine

on that explanation.  I do NOT work for Keystrokes, but I did try them out very briefly awhile back and they put me on an account that had horrid ESL dictators that I could not even begin to understand.  I tried telling them in a round about way, but they never would give me anything different and there was NO WAY I could have stayed there with that mess.  If they had anything better than that, I wouldn't know, but I have heard that most of the accounts or horrible.  Besides that, they weren't too bad, but nothing out of the norm. Not every company is good for every person. 


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

I disagree with you......sm
I've been working with them since July and have not had any problems with communication or having work available, and I'm an employee. 
Have to disagree

I am a hospital employee.  I like the platform, it is basically word.  I am making more lines here than I ever have anywhere else.  I only work on one account.  The equipment is fine, brand new Dell with flat screen.  No problems in particular with supervisors or QA.  Hospital can be picky about things, but it is the hospital, not DK.  Benefits are great through the hospital, very affordable.  


DK is no worse than anywhere else, you just have to find what is best for you.  They are working fine for me  


I disagree with you. sm

I have to say that the reason companies are offshoring is not completely their fault.  US MTs, over the  years, have gotten to where they want to make more and more money so that they have to produce less and less work every day. 


Any talented MT should be able to produce 1500 lines (accurately) in an 8-hour period.  At a rate of 0.075 cpl, this would total $112.50, which works out to 14.00 per hour.  If you want to earn more than that, you work extra to do so.  There are people coming out of college with degrees that do not start out at a wage like that and don't make that until they have many, many years experience in their field.  This would be though in an average area.


By asking for exorbitant wages, which you could also earn by increasing your line count and working just a bit harder, we are forcing companies to have to look at offshoring more and more work.  Yes they work cheaper over there.  However, they also don't mind working harder and doing everything possible to increase their line count.


Another issue bringing our wages down is the fact that now an Editor is used.  This has come about simply because the MTs that are coming into this business are not adequately trained.  Therefore, an extra cost associated with the higher wages.  The same editor can be used but editing India work and the company will make a better profit and turnaround times are much better.


I do feel that MTSOs should look at the cost of living of different areas and also pay MTs accordingly as any other job would.  For instance, an secretary in some parts of Texas start out at 6.50 per hour; however, a secretary in New York may start at 17 or more per hour.  This is an issue that has never been addressed by an MTSO and I am sure never will be.


Over the last several years, many schools have developed that teach MT.  However, they are not producing quality MTs.  To make it in this business and earn the big bucks, you have to have speed and accuracy.  You have to be able to remember medical terms.  Most of all, however, if you cannot produce 200-250 lines per hour minimum, you might should consider a new job.  This is a production job and if you can't produce, it is not the job for you. 


For those of you experiencing out of work problems, easy solution... find another company to work for/with.  There are too many out there, so don't waste precious time.  Find one.


 


 


Well, I disagree with YOU !
Here is your statement -Over the last several years, many schools have developed that teach MT. However, they are not producing quality MTs. To make it in this business and earn the big bucks, you have to have speed and accuracy. You have to be able to remember medical terms. Most of all, however, if you cannot produce 200-250 lines per hour minimum, you might should consider a new job. This is a production job and if you can't produce, it is not the job for you.
___________________

Now, I am taking issue with this type of noncaring type attitude to those of us who are 50 and older, have a lot of physical problems, but you know what, I might not produce 220 lines/hour, but I do type 70-90 wpm, but I find I can only type for four hours, then have to stop, and then restart later on to finish up. Up to now, I have found employers out there who do understand this, and as long as I get my quota in for the day, they and I do not see anything wrong with doing the work this way. Well, you had your say, now, I had mine. Why don't YOU get to work, and stop chewing-out us other hard-working MTs, and there are quite a few of us left! I stack my medical terminology memory next to a doctor's, so there you have it, and I just could not sit by and read your comments without having some of my own to stick up for those us in my situation.
I disagree with you.

I disagree with you on a number of points.


 


First of all, as was pointed out by another poster, 1500 lines in 8 hours depends totally on the accounts and dictators you transcribe.  I have an (occasional) account where I can transcribe 400-500 lines an hour, and that, obviously, is due to the template.  I have another account on another job where I can only transcribe 120-140 lines an hour.  That isn’t due to my failings but due to the slowness of the company-provided computer and their platform.  When transcribing another dictator, I can usually transcribe 250-275 LPH.  The main reason I can do this is because I get this dictator all the time, have had the opportunity to become accustomed to his style of dictation and can make shortcuts based on his particular consistent phrasing of sentences.  If a person transcribes for more than 100 different dictators, the Transcriptionist never has the opportunity to become familiar with the dictator.  There are many variables in how many lines someone can transcribe per hour, and they don’t always involve the skill level or competency of the transcriptionist.


 


I also take issue with the fact that people coming out of college with degrees earning less.  Who cares?  Why should MTs who have been in this business for 20-30 years suffer just because kids who graduate from college make less money?  I’m sure most of these seasoned MTs would tell you that they made much more money 10 or even 15 years ago than they do today.  They are hanging in there with a deteriorating industry, just trying to make a living wage.


 


I especially disagree with paying transcriptionists different rates based on where they live.  Often that is the only recourse for those of us who have the ability to relocate to economically impoverished areas, just to keep up with steadily declining wages in the MT industry because we love this kind of work.


 


Although I agree that speed used to be a very important of a transcriptionist’s job, I also believe that with the evolution of VR, the need for typing speed in a transcriptionist is obviously going to diminish since it is no longer required.  Combine that lack of skill with the new graduates you mention who are basically clueless, and a whole new generation of incompetence is being created, leaving the more experienced, seasoned MTs out in the cold.


 


I personally am going to remain with the smaller companies, as I believe when it is all said and done, they are the ones that truly care about quality, and they may be the only ones left after all the big nationals outsource themselves into extinction through their new quantity versus quality standards.  They are also the ones who are less likely to cut the throats of their loyal, highly-skilled employees.


 


Disagree

Just because an MT is a production worker doesn't mean we never deserve a raise.  Basically, you expect the MT to do more, more, more, and never make anything more per hour, which isn't right or fair in general, and especially with the way the cost of living constantly goes up, health insurance, etc...


As far as editors go, editors have always been a part of the MT world as long as I can remember.  They aren't anything new.  I'm sure it's much easier for an Editor to edit jobs done by U.S. MTs than people in India who can't even speak English...That's just common sense.  Alot of their reports need to be totally redone because the quality is so bad, yet you'll send work to them??? LOL!!!


Amazing how you only harp on quality, speed and accuracy when it comes to U.S MTs; none of which you're getting from any MT in India, but you're okay with that because it's filling up your pockets. 


Soon, U.S. medical records will have to remain in the U.S., which is the way it should be.  You'll see.


I have to disagree (sm)

I used to be an MTSO.  There is a very fine line to walk between overstaffing and adequate staffing.  With the TATs being what they are today, it is even worse.  You have to keep the clients happy or they will go elsewhere.  I don't believe that is a problem at TT like it is at many other companies.  I also never ran out of work during slow times, just adjusted my schedule.


disagree

SirPercy - please don't denigrate yourself with such names.  No one is garbage, maybe a little trashy, but certainly not garbage.  I just left D and L typing a few weeks back.  They were fab-u-lous. Challenging (in a good way -- not too hard to comprehend) work, wonderful software, very nice staff. Always was paid as promised, on time. I didn't want to leave, but had other committments. I give them 5 stars.


 


I disagree.
Great company small company to work with. Plenty of work and payroll is DD and always on time. There are a lot of ESLs, but if you're an MLS that's great. Let's face it their here and they're not going anywhere. Their only downfall is that are no benefits so if you need paid vacations and insurance don't go there. They do not treat you like you don't exist. You are in constant communication through IM which stays up all day and there's always phone or email if needed. As for previous post you do look up a lot of addresses, however those are provided for you for each account. If you do not have it you don't search you leave a blank. No guessing. No internet searching. Can't find a word - they don't dock you for blanks. They would rather you leave a blank than guess. Daily feedback. You can have DSL to work with them, you dowload several voice files at a time and then can up load at same time or individually so second line would probably help but not necessary. They do not have much in the way of flexible hours, pretty much wanting you to work 8 hours straight but what job doesn't. They are not strict though, very easy to work with. As I said though if you are needing insurance coverage and vacation/sick time they currently do not offer, although have been working changing this.
I disagree
We work long hours (often longer than reported) on a job that is physically demanding (people don't realize how much so until they do it a few years and people who have never done it have absolutely no clue). You cannot socialize at all when you work, your right foot, both hands, ears and eyes are 100% on task for many hours. Because we work from home I think most people don't realize how hard we do work. In fact, most of us work harder from home. Yet, we get vacation time that is like a carrot dangling in front of a horse to get and you'd better be careful how you use it, unrealistic demands that we would have told any hospital to shove it (well, most hospitals don't treat their employees like that to begin with). We work holidays, weekends, nights, days, you name it. Our work is changed and thus our incomes, we're asked to be on call without pay. I could go on but I won't.

No, it's not that attitude that is harming the MT field. It's the attitude toward the MT field that is harming the MT field. It's become a nuthouse.

I disagree

I'm sorry, but I think we most certainly are different from assembly line workers or a pharmacy tech, etc.  Our job involves a whole lot more than those professions and I feel proud that it does.  I would say an experienced multi-specialty MT might be on the level of having a bachelor's, and what would be wrong with that?  How many of you with years of experience can diagnose a patient after hearing the H&P and know not only what meds to prescribe but their proper dosage along with a treatment plan?    


We still do patient care but in a different way.  We work with the written record as opposed to hands-on patient care.  Why should this mean we don't need as much knowledge?   We're the patient's safety net, as I recently heard a medical professional say.  Especially with the EMR and electronic signatures, we've got to be darn sure all the bases are covered and covered correctly.  The next time that patient is treated, what we have transcribed will be what the treating physician refers to.  How else can we know what the mumblers, speed demons, ESLs are saying if we don't know what they are supposed to be saying!  This is where the years of experience really pay off.


I think you're selling yourself and this profession short to compare it to those others.   To do our job well and make the most money, we can't spend time looking things up.  We have to KNOW it.  We have to know anatomy and physiology, disease pathology, pharmacology, procedures, maneuvers, signs, surgical equipment, the world of nuclear medicine, etc.  not to mention knowing how to make the best use of our computer's software, and the Internet, and tricks of the trade with our platforms, and skills with the English language such that we can edit where necessary all the while following account specifics which change depending on which account you are on.   Yee gads, it's amazing what we do!   If this weren't the case, why would the companies be so insistent on wanting people with years and years of experience?  They don't want errors and they want high production from us.  That's why newbies have such a hard time finding employment -- they don't know enough yet.  It takes years, as you all know, to incorporate the booklearning with excellence in the job performance.   It all has to come together and this takes time and effort on our part and the end result (our pay) should be worth the effort just like with any other job. 


 


I, too, disagree.
I feel obligated to use my expert grammatical and punctuation skills to make my work look professional. Typing verbatim makes the following look bad: the dictator, my company, and me! Of course, we would never change the meaning of the sentence - goes without saying. I have a problem with making everyone look dumb, though.
I disagree, as well..sm
medical transcription is SO different from anything you described, such as court reporter or closed captioning writer. When I was in MT school, we were TAUGHT to make the doctors dictations more correct with respect to grammer, punctuation, spelling, etc. This verbatim junk just came out recently as a way of cutting lines for the Transcriptionist and is sooo wrong. but as the other poster stated, we can all disagree and each to their own opinions.
some will disagree...but SM
many companies will offer their top quality MTs an abundance of work on a continual basis, but often offer less work for the less talented MT. I'm not saying one is harder working than the other, but as a previous MTSO, it does not take long to figure out which MTs will produce the quality work that requires little to no editing, making the service operate overall more efficiently. I will be the first to admit when I operated a small service of 5-10 MTs over ten years ago, the top quality producers (not quantity) received more work than the less skilled. Both had the proper education and training, some are just naturally better MTs than others. I would imagine this is how many large companies operate (not saying all). So when you don't have adequate work and you feel you are a top-notch MT, either move on. On the other hand, consider your work and don't always be quick to blame the company you work for.
I disagree with you
I have a great background with ESLs but seems like I got a good bit of them. I couldn't make a decent line count with short reports and these dictators. Sadly this happens everywhere especially where work is farmed out from the hospital. Do you think they are gonna assign you the butter reports. Heck no, they assign out the ones they cannot do or don't want to do. Its no different anywhere else. If you wanna survive in this business these days you have to learn to do these and then find a place that pays you what you want and has the right balance of reports to add up to the check you want.
Disagree. sm
Well, I just don't know about you guys.  The level-1 acute care center I work for is up and running 24/7.  Hope no one I care about is at your facility on the weekends, waiting for discharge , consult ,  transfer, surgery, whatever.   P.S.  Been chugging along here 20 years, not a prima donna.
Disagree
I disagree. RC starts at 5 cents a line. MedEDocs starts at 7.5. BIG difference.
I disagree
The company should mail the paperwork to the employee and provide an overnight or 2 day prepaid means for the employee to return the paperwork. Some people cannot afford to pay $25 for a fax machine. BTW, the cheapest I've seen is $50.

I feel that an employee should NEVER have to spend a dime in order to obtain a job.

If you interviewed at a local hospital for an inhouse job and they asked you to do something that required you to spend $50 before you could take the job, what would your response be???? This situation is no different.

It is not a matter of complaining, it is a matter of not being able to afford to purchase a fax or pay $25 to have papers faxed back to an employer. There are plenty of companies who overnight the paperwork and provide a means for the employee to overnight it back. I have worked for 3 such companies.

To the person who stated that if you work from home, you should have a fax machine: These people are MTs. It should not be assumed by an employer that all MTs have fax machines at home as a fax is not pertinent to their jobs.
Sorry would disagree there - sm
I'd always choose working for a smaller company over a larger one. But it's harder to find them these days.

I think with offshoring being as prevalent as it is even with the McTranscription companies, it's getting increasingly difficult for small companies to compete at all for anything but clinic work, and even that's getting harder because small companies might not be able to handle the McDoctors megagroups that are everywhere these days.

And as far as smaller ones becoming larger ones, I don't believe it happens; the playing field simply changes beyond a certain growth level with the technology and staffing requirements of larger groups. I've seen that happen several times. And then the successful smaller company is often approached by another one, maybe a little larger, and a purchase comes about, and, well, the smaller company is no more, really.
I disagree . . .
with all due respect. I know for a fact that many, many doctors outsource willing to India. In fact, many here in Ventura County, California, encourage it and recommend it to their peers. We are way past the period of getting attention from the doctors. They don't care. If it means cheaper labor, so be it, for them. Where the power lies is within the people. If the public were to strongly voice their objection, write their congressmen, the AMA,consumer rights,legislation, then perhaps there would be some attention paid. Unfortunately, inertia has a hold of the public now. People do not speak up loud and clear and voice their opinions and objects to the powers that be. America has fallen into complacency. People are too busy and stressed out to find the time to protest and spend on advocacy.
Not really...have to disagree with you
It is an odd spelling, easily made a typo,or maybe just so excited to say what she thought was the best co. to work for accidentally misspelled.  There are many possibilities here.  Don't know why you made a big deal over it though.  Have to agree with the other posters, basically someone touched a nerve with you.  You are the only complainer.  Now that is very odd.  My hand is down, sorry annabanana, don't agree with you.  She's happy.  Obviously your not!!!
I disagree
I just tested in the past couple of weeks. My experience was different. I was given 48 hours to test. All testing materials were accessed via a website. No tests were emailed to me. The grammar and medical portions are timed and taken via the website. You only get one shot at these tests. The transcription portion of the test is also accessed via the website. You are emailed a password to access the site. It is stressed in that email that you must complete testing in 48 hours. You do not have to do it all at once, as long as you complete within 48 hours. Good luck!
I disagree.
I have only been working in this field for just under 1 year (graduated last January and started working FT in April). I easily make $15-18 an hour. I have even made over $20 an hour on a few good days. I am not glued to my chair for a straight 8-10 hours. I do take bathroom breaks and eat lunch, but when I am working, I am only working. I treat this as I would a brick & mortar job. When I am working I do not surf the net, answer the phone, or chat with the family. I also look for ways to increase my productivity every day. I have taken the time to create templates for each of my docs for each type of report they dictate. I have spent a lot of time adding to my expander. My Expander has increased my productivity by at least 50%. This has been time-consuming, but these things have helped tremendously. I am still consistently seeing my line counts go up each month. There is money to be made as an MT. I am sorry that for whatever reason it is not working out for you.
I disagree. sm
very flexible, great pay, user friendly platform, plenty of work, acct specs are a bit much but that is being addressed, no slow issues any longer, wonderful benefits, best boss (mine anyway). Perhaps the other poster was not happy at Webmedx but I am. I have been here since 2003 and am not going anywhere. They really value their people. No off shoring either.
Disagree
If the industry stepped up and brought some professionalism, mature management, ethical pay structure might be nice, etc etc etc, the offshore thing would be appealing, but IMO the industry has a very low self esteem and has a hx of being a doormat rather than a leader.
Disagree.. What he needs to know is only..sm

IF she can accept to job under his terms (salary, schedule, etc.) and she can start work.  It's not his business if she has given a 2-week, a 1-week, or 1-day notice or given any notice at all.  Employers in ANY field do not routinely ask such a question (unless they want to make sure they'll be the only game in town.)  They'll almost always ask you when you can start, and the decision to give the old company 2-weeks' notice is up to you; if you've been treated right, 2-week notice is fair, if treated badly, no notice would not both my conscience. The other poster is right, given the horrible way MTSOs exploit MTs, keep you old job until you know the new one works out.  They have left us in such a financial bind, for the most part, that most of us cannot affort the luxury of quitting, job-hunt, and then wait weeks to get paid.  


Disagree 100%.
No one makes you work under these conditions. No one makes you work in this industry.

It is 100% voluntary. It is 100% based on your direct choice.

Who gives a rip how men see female MTs? What in the world does that have to do with anything?

There is no exploitation of women at all because women are not a helpless group. They make their own choices.

CHILDREN -- Now CHILDREN can be exploited because they cannot make choices for themselves and cannot have control of their own little lives. The ELDERLY, the DISABLED - these groups can be exploited.


I have to DISAGREE
I am a QA and work for a small company of about 75 MTs.  The MTs that I work with are wonderful.  They are very kind and receptive to any QA feedback.  They are also very appreciative.  I personally enjoy my job and have great satisfaction in knowing I am able to help someone.  I am blessed to work at such a great company.  Yes, I do work on production but the focus is on quality, so I just commit to doing my job to the best of my ability.  So...there are good QA jobs out there, just keep looking. HAPPY NEW YEAR!
Just disagree with you
There are unions here, does everyone have to belong? Nope. If I work as independent, 9-5 and make 5 cents a line- does that play into your job? If I work restricted hours and have so much line count a day- does this mean all people are going to have to become employees. I don’t think your reasoning above means much of anything. Just tells me what the employers are NOT supposed to do, speaks nothing of my job as compared to yours. So surprising how others worry so much about how a person does their job.
I disagree with you.
Most of the companies who pay QA by the line also expect you to provide feedback to their MTs. Providing feedback can be very time consuming. While you spend time typing up emails with feedback, you are not being paid for that time.

I would take an hourly job any day before I will accept a by the line QA position..especially at the 3.5 to 4 cpl rate that most companies pay. If a company wants to pay me .05 cents per line, then I would consider it. Otherwise, no way.

Also, if a company who pays by the line does not require feedback be sent to the MTs, then I would also consider it.
I disagree
I think the MTSO should tell the MT if the account is no longer with the company. They don't have to tell any gory details, but she does deserve to be informed.

I think the MTSOs often like that MTs are isolated from each other and from management. It's easier to get people to put up with baloney that way, because no one knows for sure what is going on.

I think a good company should want to keep everyone informed, and I think things would ultimately run better that way (even when giving out negative news).
I disagree...sm
A nasty QA person can certainly drive away even a good MT by just being inconsequent and irritating.
It is known that QAs deem themselves as 'know it alls', even when they are wrong and whould never admit to make a mistake.
I disagree.

but carry the same terminology.  Even a neurologist will comment on an orthopedic issue or a hematology issue in a consult (clinic), so I don't think you're accurate there.


Acute care should pay more based solely on the fact that you can get numerous dictators, but the specialty terminology is the same from a medical perspective. 


With 20 years in this field, it can be done.  I had radiology experience (6 years), jumped right in to doing card caths, pacer inserts, and cholecystectomies.  So, don't go there, okay?  Don't want to be unkind, but the terminology is all the same.


Disagree
Having radiology experience will prepare you for clinic work, but acute care, trauma, of course depends on the facility. I do acute care and it's a LOT more difficult than clinic notes and more difficult terminology. Have 37 years experience backing me up. Get paid more for doing ESLs & acute care, OPs, etc.
I disagree.
I've been doing this 28 years and I find the ESL has been less over the years. The second or third generations are becoming doctors. I have the foreign-sounding names but they are American accents. I think things have gotten easier.

Again, the doctors are bringing in the money. No one is going to tell them to clean up their act.

We go through this every other week on this board about the dictators. It's just the way it is. Need to get over it and go on to something else.
Ok, now I have to disagree with you
In times past we were able to leave notes on the dictations for the dictators (mostly the physicians then) if we needed to say something regarding their reports and that would include if they were unable to be heard because of garbling up their words. Thank goodness, the hospital that I transcribed for now told the dictators NO cell phones. We had dictators talking from their vehicles with the calls breaking up. It can be done, it has been done and I work out of Atlanta and lady, the dictators here are a 1000 fold worse than when I first started in the same location. If you think things are easier, why are you complaining? That seems clueless to me.
I have to disagree with the above
TTS is a dream for me to work with, no problems at all, never have been. I have no pages and pages to comply with, so don’t know where this other poster is coming from on that. I work independent and my pay is comparable with others doing the same for other companies. As far as cherry pickers, have no idea how that is picked up. I just do the work that comes to me and would not know how cherry pick if I could. Information on Transtech on here last week with employees very upset about bringing in VR.
I disagree
You said:

The trick is holding on by our fingernails until the worm turns and our jobs come back.

I say:

No, the trick is to find a new career that pays more and CANNOT be taken offshore. I'm working on it as we speak.
I disagree with those who say they sm
are treated like human beings.  They treat you just about the way any other company treats you, like a machine.  You will type and type some more while getting desperate emails asking for more typing.  On holidays there will be no work.  You will be asked to be flexible, which means logging in and out all day and night to catch dribs and drabs of work along with everyone else.  It is not the worst place I've ever worked.  On a scale of 1-10, it rates about a 5 for me.
I disagree (sm)
I'm a rehire with Axolotl now. I worked for them about 2 years ago and just came back a couple months ago. I really, really hate to say this, but after reading your post, I wanted to share a bit.

I considered myself great at this. Other than when working for Axolotl, I've been in QA for the last 5 years with extremely hard accounts, and I was damned good. I don't mean to brag, which will be evident in a bit, but I really was good and proved that with great QA skills.

I came back to Axolotl because the company I was working for was going downhill with outsourcing, more and more unfair treatment of employees, blah, blah, blah, same ol' story. I was excited about going back to Axolotl because they are hands' down the very best company I know of, and I've worked for quite a few companies. They truly care about their employees and the business. When I had been with them the first time, I had a surgery that went terribly wrong and ended up in a coma for about a month. Because I had not qualified yet for official leave of absence, I should have at least had benefits dropped and/or fired, but instead they let me continue my benefits and let my husband pay the balance while I was out of work.

They're more than fair with pay, and they do offer the best benefit package (IMO of course).

So when I came back, I was happy and anticipated no problems whatsoever--I'd made consistently passing scores w/ them before, and I'd been in QA for true nightmare accounts since then.

I have been fully knocked off my high horse.

The switch from total QA to MT is brutal. If you haven't had to make that switch, you may not understand but it is a totally different mode of work. I had been used to auditing/correcting reports, not typing them anymore. So even my Expanders were geared toward QA and not MT. Sometimes I feel like a real newbie.

To be blunt and honest, I'm failing in QA scores. And there is absolutely no reason whatsoever except my own faults. I go back and read reports that I thought I had done perfectly and they're terrible. Where I am able to glance through a report and immediately pick out errors by simple knowledge that it doesn't sound right, and fill in the blanks for the worst dictators, apparently my mind has not made the jump to proofreading my OWN work. It's so hard to explain, but that's the only way I can put it.

I have received feedback that I have disagreed with and was able to get all questions answered and explanations when necessary. That being said, when I started REALLY reviewing my reviews today, I still flat out disagree and believe that there are some errors docked that are correct, but there is still a simple truth--there are plenty of mistakes because of my sloppiness.

As a QA I also understand the mindset. If the MTs I used to review made extremely obvious glaring mistakes, I'd give them 100% listen and be pretty nit-picky. I don't care who you are or how good you are, it's almost like every report is a fingerprint and no two people will ever have 100% matching reports. Whether it's just punctuation choices or omission/difference in small words like articles, it's different. And as QA, if you're listening/editing 100%, you're going to see and maybe change every one of those. If it's an MT who makes the aforementioned critical errors, the QA is more likely to be a little tougher on what is acceptable.

I have to say that now that I know this side of the coin, I hope I do not do this again, but I do understand it after being on QA.

So my only complaint so far is the screw-up *I* have made myself, and now I'm on the 'radar' so to speak. By now, I may have messed up too badly to redeem myself because no matter what, I will not be able to escape the admittedly rare areas where the dictation is vague and open to different interpretation. Unfortunately a very small mistake counts off, such as when someone hears of and the other one hears for. Most cases are obvious when the error is pointed out, but these are not. After listening again and again at all speeds, I know that the doctor said of colon cancer and the Editor knows that they said for colon cancer. there's nothing to be done if the editor listens and still holds the same opinion. :(

Again, though, this is MY fault. It's not Axolotl. I still think and will always say they're the best company I know of, and if I do end up too far gone, I will truly grieve because this is honestly the first company I've truly felt so good about.

This was hard for me to submit here--I went from crying to shame, and then to rock bottom in confidence. My stomach has been burning the last 2 days, especially when I realized today that I am probably on my way to termination, regardless of what happens. There's just no way I can argue against of versus the and there's no way that these could overcome the really stupid mistakes I truly do make.

IMO, it is the personal desire to continue working for such a great company that makes it worse--not only may I lose the job with the company I truly love, but I also have been so ashamed to screw up so badly with people I admire so much.

Please keep hanging in there. I know from experience now how hard and frustrating this is, and I've really had a few bouts of high frustration too, especially today. However, I truly do not blame Axolotl. Granted, I do not know your situation, but in general and in comparison to my own treatment here, I respectfully but fully disagree.

They say pride goeth before a fall, and I gotta say that my pride has left the building and I'm definitely falling. :(


I also disagree!!

I have been with Axolotl as an MT for 2+ years and what you are suggesting is just not true.


Axolotl QA does NOT ding for punctuation UNLESS it is the SAME issue, SAME word, etc. that you have been corrected on numerous times and you still refuse to correct it. 


Our QA is STRICT but they also will work with you to help you make it to the point where you are receiving a 98.5% QA score.  You are not DINGED for punctuation but you ARE dinged for typing incorrect words, leaving out words and not following the account specifics. 


There are some tough accounts with some really strange account specifics but these rules come from the FACILITY and NOT Axolotl personnel.


Axolotl is known for their quality reports and they are also known to transcribe the reports the way the CUSTOMER wants then transcribed.  This is why Axolotl is different than any other company.


There are MANY, MANY MTs that would LOVE to work for a company like Axolotl who actually pays the MT what they are worth and who also provides great and affordable benefits. 


So please before bashing this company get the facts straight because what you are stating just isn't true.  I will have to say that by looking at your posts, your grammar and sentence structure has a lot to be desired.  Maybe you should check into going back to school for some grammar education??


Disagree
Look at MDI's website. They still advertise that they pay 9-11 cpl. If they are hiring at a lower line rate, they do not indicate such on their site. To think that they are deliberately acting in such a way as to get MTs to leave is ludicrous. Good MTs are hard to come by these days, and MDI certainly would not be hoping that we all quit just to offer new MTs a lower rate. If new MTs read their cpl description of 9-11 cpl they are going to expect exactly that.
to disagree
I didn't say the ESLs have to be good dictators, I said if the MTs are good and train ES well on the ESLs (no matter what quality of dictator they are), then ES will do well with the dictation. Okay, if your account was trained by 100+ MTs and ES still does well then I'd say you are lucky and you must work with a great group of MTs because I haven't found that typically to be the case in VR programs, but then again, maybe it's also that ES is just a good program anyway. Yes, I agree that dictators are fast and slow and everywhere in between and it evens out. I just meant if you get one of those doctors that talks really slow or sits and sorts through papers while he is dictating then VR probably isn't going to help your productivity any. But I agree - it evens itself out between fast and slow talkers.
Uhm...I disagree.
I suppose it depends on who you work for and how good their contracts are. Yes, good jobs are hard to get, but I don't think that's because there's a paucity of jobs.

Rather, it seems like the companies are willing to keep MTs who are sub-par just because they're cheap, which doesn't allow room for those qualified MTs we know are out there looking for jobs. If the MTSOs would shake the chaff from the wheat, they could re-fill those positions with GREAT MTs. But they'd rather settle with what they have. The almighty buck, you know.

I don't think this is specific to radiology.

The supervisors where I work know I have a half a dozen names at any one time of really good MTs looking for work, and they try to give me a heads up. Openings don't last long, that's for sure. But dying a slow death?

The best thing to do is look for other radiology MTs in your area and network. That way, they can keep an ear to the ground for you, and put in a good word for you when a spot comes up. If there are no MT groups in your area, maybe you could find one on MySpace, or start one yourself.

But don't give up on radiology. I hope there's a happy emoticon in your future. :)
Disagree
The punitive payment system is the disaster, IMHO, not the MTs.  Although, you could say that the MTs are a disaster simply because they continue to work under such conditions and allow the facility to treat them with such disrespect.  It seems to me that a basic hourly pay, plus bonus for xyz lines produced would be more fair.  Docking pay for not reaching a quota is not acceptable.  Why are the MTs always the ones to be punished in an imperfect system?  I wonder if that same facility docks the pay of doctors who refuse to speak clearly, continuously provide/enter incorrect demographic information, dictate while eating, yawning, etc., etc.??
Disagree again

Of course not all of the doctors and other dictating clinicians are awful, but the awful ones could improve.  However, they are not required to do so, so they don't..  MTs who accept that this is the way it has always been and always will be are those who deserve what they get.  Yes, anyone who accepts this disrespect should be allowed to suffer through it, IMHO.  If someone really enjoys and flourishes under such abuse, do not deprive them of such.  It is a choice, and for those of us who don't want to be a member of that club of MTs who allow themselves to be disrespected and apparently feel more comfortable in such a situation....well, we can find another club, another gig.


Some claim that there is a shortage of good MTs in the USA.  Well, maybe there is just a growing shortage of individuals, mostly women, who will allow themselves to be abused.  Unfortunately, it seems that offshoring has been the solution to this, rather than clean up the industry and make it more tolerable for USA MTs.  Instead of instituting a more effective training program for the dictating clinicians and better pay and benefits for USA MTs, the companies are going offshore.  At all costs, some of the USA facility managers feel that they can NEVER confront and correct a doctor. 


My opinions are based on my personal experience and observations in the medical field for over 30 years, first as a healthcare professional and then as an MT.  I was duped into training and working as an MT, having heard tales of how I could make a good living at home doing it.  It has not been the worst decision of my life; it is actually okay for a part-time way to earn extra pocket money from home.  However, it has been very disappointing as a way to earn a decent living and could have ended in my complete destruction if I had not put an end to it before it was too late.


I disagree
You do need a good accountant and if you will require contracts, you need an attorney as well.


No you don't need a good accountant and or an attorney if you are targeting local docs. If you go for larger hospital accounts having an attorney would be helpful but again not necessarily needing to be on retainer.

YOU ALWAYS NEED A GOOD CONTRACT.

As to rates, see my comments above. You'd be better off getting your foot in the door for face time by offering to review their current service and see if you can offer a better price. If you find out someone is paying 10 cpl you'll know your request for anything higher than that is likely to fall on deaf ears.

Caveat: Not all accounts will make a decision based solely on price, so spend some time thinking of every positive you bring to the table that is an added service.
I disagree in a way...
first responders, teachers, nurses, etc. do not accept certain conditions and at least can stand together when it comes down to the bottom line. It has been way too easy to manipulate the majority of MTs because we are 'virtual' employees, with very little to no connection to one another. You can scare us quite easily. There is no way for MTs to organize or unionize, and there is absolutely NO advocacy when there are problems...

I have seen it on the board for years already. As soon as someone stands up for their pay or benefits, they pretty much get slammed by other MTs who feel it necessary to 'bully' them into keeping their mouths shut in one way or another and to just accept what is going on and just be 'lucky you have a job.' Whatever their motivation, it has squashed and inhibited a lot of good and necessary dialogue.

I saw this attitude years ago when I was the only single woman in a roomful of married MTs at the hospital who only worked 'to get out of the house' or because their benefits were paid by their spouses would openly admit they never even used their paychecks other than to stash in the bank for savings.

Corporations are greedy because they are able to get away with it by people who let them get away with it.

It is like unions - they are only as strong as the weakest link and if you cannot organize yourselves they will also walk all over you.

We should have all stood together a long time ago already and perhaps jobs could have been saved, perhaps not, but we would probably be treated like human beings rather than slaves. I feel more like a slave every day, stuck in a dead-end job just to have some lousy health insurance that barely covers anything. At my age it is not easy to start over and I don't think there is anything wrong with fighting for what I already have, although I think it is too late now.
No, I have to disagree here....
I've worked at facilities where certain dictators were not channeled through VR, as the clean-up was far too extensive.

If you peruse the MQ board, you'll see this is usually the case with some of their accounts, too. Only the dregs are left to straight transcription in these cases.

BTW, I love VR and my post was in no attempt a put down of it. I work on Escription and it's my favorite platform. I've noticed you tend to get a tad defensive whenever you perceive something as a negative post about VR, but that's not the case with me.

I'm speaking from experience and it is most assuredly possible to withhold certain dictators from VR.
here we disagree......i do okay on the DQS for Medquist.
I think if you type fast, fast is fast on any platform so long as it reasonable.
I totally disagree with you....sm
I've worked on other VR platforms and this one is far superior.