Nominations

Medware has won for two years.  Most of the management personnel, transcription supervisor, QA supervisor, etc., are members of AAMT, and currently one is President of AAMT.  Doesn't it stand to reason that they could all write nominations for their company?  Does AAMT check to see whether the nominations come from the transcription team or the management?  Of course, it is possible that Wilma just wrote numerous nominations for Medware.

• AAMT 2006 Employer of the Year - MT
  • I worked for mag until this year...SM - Gatrans
    • When Mag won the award, they were not a good company to work for. nm - me
    • What's the problem with Mag Mutual?? Are we missing something? - anon
      • Pretty low line rate, mediocre benefits. I had to turn - them down, too. nm
        • That's strange. When I received an offer, I thought it was competitive and the benefits were good - anon
    • Could you email me about Mag Mutual. - Need more on Mag
  • Great post! - Thanks!
    • But it also does not mean that it is a BAD thing either. sm - Lassie
      • Not according to the AAMT when I inquired. So in reality a recruiter - MT
      • Nominations - Just curious
        • When I checked before, it absolutely didn't matter. Yes, a QA person or other - MT
  • This year they chose one that really is a good company to work for. nm - Well,
    • So who is their 2006 Employer of the Year? - Can't find it on their site.nm
      • AAMT Company of the Year - nn
      • WebMedX. nm - sx
  • Actually, it's a good sign that a company SM - what I've seen
    • Either that, or some bigwig within the company is in knee-deep with AAMT. - Not impressed with AAMT Company of the Year.

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu