The problem is (sm)

Posted By: MT on 2008-04-16
In Reply to: The other side of it . . . - IC

it is contrary to the IRS definition of an Independent Contractor. They MTSO has a right to control the final outcome, but they do not have a right to control the exact means of the outcome. There is a difference between advertising, Majority of physicians dictate between XX-XX, but you are able to work any hours during the week versus We are seeking an IC MT to work M-F 9-5. The latter suggests they are expecting the MT to transcribe during that exact time period. If that is the case, they should be offering employee status.

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

I have to vent for a minute sm - Me, myself & I
- These companies want the best of both worlds, and - mt2
- The other side of it . . . - IC
  - The problem is (sm) - MT
- I have been wondering that too - PMC
  - When hired as QA was asked when (schedule) I - would be able to work. So far not required SM
    - That's great, but I was talking about the job postings. sm - Me, myself & I
      - Just wanted to post although may ask for schedule, - may not require you to stick to that. nm
- Yes, I agree! - frustrated2
  - Exactly my point. sm - Me, myself & I
- Their MTs need to report them to the IRS - nm - MT

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database