All depends on what news you watch, polls
Posted By: TTer2 on 2008-10-23
In Reply to: Surge, Obama style - Success? Yes, indeed....sm
are all over the place
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
- Surge, Obama style - Success? Yes, indeed....sm
- All depends on what news you watch, polls - TTer2
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
It all depends on what news station you listen to
I talked to my best friend the other day (whom I met when I was in the Army). Her husband is in Iraq. Her son is in Afghanastan, and her daughter is in Iraq. None of them like war (who does) but the consensus among them and their fellow soldiers is that it is worth it. Do they want the war to end, heck yeah. Do they want to come home, heck yeah. Do they want to give up everything they've been fighting for. NO WAY! They say if they leave now everything they have done to help the people of Iraq will all have been for nothing. They want to stay until the job is finished and not any sooner. They say if we don't do this it will be left up to our children, our nieces and nephews to take care of when they get older.
It all depends on who you listen to for news. Of course MSNBC, CNN and other liberal news agencies say its a mistake we should not be there, need to come home now. But my freinds said her husband and two kids and all their fellow soldiers say stay until the job is done. For every soldier on video saying we shouldn't be here, etc, etc., there is another soldier like the one in the OPs link that say, don't tell us its not worth it.
This predictable when News is doing polls
They can manipulate the demographic as they want. It was stated today that most of this week's polls were made up of more democrats than
Republicans. Well, of course that will bode against the president.
Look at what the polls were saying on election night in 2004. According to the news polls Kerry was winning. However, when the results were in that wasn't happening, but I'm sure you will come back with the argument that the election was fixed....and if you do then there's no debating, because that has never been proven to be true. In fact, investigations completed recently showed that Democrats were registering dead and mentally/medically incompetent people in Michigan.
Believe in polls all you want, but personally they are very easily manipulated to show what a particular organization wants them to show.
I don't watch TV. Especially the TV news. Never have. nm
x
You obviously don't watch much Fox news, do you....sm
In their efforts to be fair and balanced, they'll have two libs on to one conservative, and almost always end up leaning leftwards of center.....
Makes me sick, actually. Especially seeing Fox is trashed all the time for being ALL conservative and therefore shouldn't be watched, when that is far from the case....
Fox gives equal and more often than not, more time to the lib point of view.
That's hardly fair and balanced, the way they claim.
And still they're bashed for being right wing.....go figure.....
Tsk!Tsk. I watch Fox News. I really
find them to be pretty accurate in their reporting. They interview others on the good and bad from the news of the day and get both sides of the picture. I don't know what is so bad about that. They are not as biased as the other news programs....believe me, I've watched quite a few mostly one-sided news.
FYI, I'm not talking about O'Reilly, Hannity and Colmes, Greta VanSustern, etc. I'm talking about the regular news.
I guess you don't like it because its more fair in its reporting and not one-sided.
Anybody watch ABC News tonight?
Charlies Gibson had a personal interview with JM about Sarah. Very interesting. He has the utmost confidence in her as VP.
Most of the news tonight was on the convention.
watch Faux news they are all
about flags, lipstick, crosses in the sand -- all the symbolic distraction you could ever, ever hope for.
You must watch MSLSD and get your news from those
credible sources Keith (I'm jealous of Bill O'Reilly's fame, fortune and ratings) Olbermann and Chris (I get a tingle down my legs when Obama speaks) Matthews.
Maybe it's because I watch a lot of news on different stations
besides reading political news in the WSJ, hometown paper, and others.
Seems like I can't have a down-to-earth discussion with you so from now on, I will ignore your sarcasm.
Everyday I watch the news or
look at the news on the internet, etc. and there is always a murder mentioned in the news. I'm sure that there are people who are targeted merely because of their sexual orientation. However, people are murdered everyday. I personally hear about murders more than I've heard about murders based on sexual orientation in the news. How many little kids went missing one right after another one and they found their bodies later? We have gang related killings. We have race related killings. We have religious related killings. I don't see the schools teaching about acceptance of religions because there are people who are targetted merely for their religious beliefs as well. It truly is sad when you think about all the murders that occur day in and day out. It makes you wonder what is wrong with our world that a man can shoot his wife and children and then himself or that someone can take a child, molest them, and then kill them. It is very sad indeed.
I watch Fox News also. I have watched all networks.
nm
I disagree. I watch all the cable news networks
his observations about their evolution of identity to be quite astute and entertaining.
Translation: I watch a lot of Fox News and stick strictly to party rhetoric.nm
z
If you believe in polls good for you - The King of Polls said
So the polls only poll a few small areas with certain demographics. You trust that. Sure maybe they only poll Hollyweird and the other liberal cities. They also reflect all the phone voter registrations, so maybe to your cat and cartoon characters it matters that Obama is ahead. Me - I'll wait for election day to find out the truth about who is ahead in the race. I've said it before and I'll say it again (and glad to know Mr. Rassmusin backs me up on this one) - polls do not matter and do not reflect a real vision of who is ahead in the race.
The polls that supply that electoral map are just that....polls...sm
Polls mean less than nothing to me. Polls intimidate and mislead the voters, in my opinion. Thanks for asking.
Isn't it time to watch Hannity or bowl or some other watch Nascar?
UR W T
It all depends on how you look at it....
Obama actually has 166,186 vote lead over Clinton in the popular vote -- 17,267,658 to 17,101,472. If Michigan's primary is included, where Clinton received 328,307 votes and Obama none due to the fact he removed his name from the ballot, Clinton takes a 162,123 vote lead.
It depends on who you believe.
nm
Depends on who you ask. It is okay according
nm
All depends on what you think a nut is, eh.
He is a well-respected researcher and author, who has gained a lot of confidence and respect of some of the finest minds on this planet. Sure he may have some books you don't agree with, but there are a lot of authors like that. Some books you enjoy others you don't. And if you don't do the research yourself how can you discount anything anyone who has spent 20 years researching has to say. Probably the same crowd that discounts scientists and climatologists who have been at their jobs for 40 and 50 years as kooks because they come out and tell you Algore doesn't know what the he!! he's talking about. I guess people would consider them "nuts" too. David Icke has a website where you can learn a lot of useful information.
I guess before JFK was assassinated if people were told there would be an assassination and it would come from within, people would have called them nuts too.
Actually, the people I consider nuts are the ones who will only listen to what is fed to them through the boob tube (Olberman, Matthews, Maddow, Limbaugh, Hannity, Colmes, etc) and the ones who will not listen to issues of importance but just follows the leader with their eyes closed, and anything they don't agree with or like they call nuts. I guess in their own minds by making fun and ridiculing others who don't agree with them they must feel elevated above all others - just another elite nut to me.
Sometimes you have to look with both eyes open to get to the truth.
Depends
what the definition of 'lobbyist' is. Same as it depended what the definition of 'is' is.
depends on what poll you are looking at
I've seen recent polls that put both Clinton and Obama about even with McCain when matched up together and others that show both of them come out ahead of McCain 5-10 points. Others then show McCain ahead. Polls are so subjective that you have to take them with a grain of salt. The most telling thing to me is that Democratic vote turnout has been twice that of Republican turnout in some areas, so no matter what people are saying in the polls, getting them to the voting booths in November is a different matter. The Democrats are energized and enthusiastic, flocking to the polls. The Republicans overall are leukwarm on McCain (and the party in general) and it's showing in unenthusiastic turnouts. This will play very well for whomever the Democratic candidate is in November.
It depends on the situation
I voted for Bush the first term. He was running against Gore. The country could not afford another 4 years of Clintons. I voted for Bush and I'm proud I did because it helped keep a known bafoon who didn't know squat diddly out of the white house. After Bush was elected a lot changed. I didn't want to vote for him again, yet the best the dems could do was give us Kerry???????? There were so many qualified people running. How that ninny got in there (must have been all those purple hearts). So I voted for Bush again. However I wasn't voting for Bush, I was voting against Kerry. That doesn't make me and others morons, it makes us well-informed voters. If it meant four more years with Bush in there then so be it, but I'll tell you something. With everything that has happened in the world these past eight years the US is lucky that Gore and Lerch were not in office. That's the way a lot of people feel.
Now we're in a totally different election. Both McCain/Palin and Obama/Biden are very different from their usual party people. This year is an unusually difficult election. Times are quite different than they were 4 and 8 years ago.
To tell someone they are a moron because they didn't vote for democrats? The other choice would have been even more moronic to vote for.
With everything that has happened I'll take Bush over Gore or Kerry anyday. And before anyone goes blaming him for everything that's happened - He's just a talking head being told what to do. If you want to blame anyone, blame the bafoons in his party (Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc to include the people who tell Bush what he's going to do).
I suppose it depends on who says it...sm
If she said it referring to herself....who cares.
If someone says it about Sarah Palin.....who cares, it will bounce off, as she is neither of those words.
What about when Obama talked about all the small town bitter people holding on to their guns and religion, in his San Francisco speech?
Was that bad? I think it was, and he disenfranchised a whole group of voters, to this day, who would not consider voting for him....
That is perhaps, the phrase that deRothchild was comparing to...not sure, but perhaps...
Sooooo.....to answer your question? which word is worse? Well, both of them are, and there's been plenty of name calling lately. It's getting tiresome, really.
Petty, spiteful, little name calling, which has run entirely too rampant lately in the media, not to mention on this board from time to time.
depends in which poll you look at....
and all within the margin of error.
I think that depends on your definitition (sm)
of a *nice neighborhood.* I don't judge neighborhoods by the cost of the houses, I judge them by the people who live there. At present I live in an average-to-small house on a double lot. Plenty of room for the backyard garden, cookouts, etc. I have neighbors who I would not trade for the world. So, if I had that kind of money I would probably stay right where I am. I may, however, change that tile in the bathroom to marble and put that koi pond out back that I've been wanting for years....LOL.
I guess it depends on how you look
at it. There are so many things that I don't agree with Obama on that I want him to fail. If he is succeeds, I feel that our country will fail because we will go down a path that I don't agree with. I want America to succeed but if Obama does everything he wants.....I don't see how America can succeed. I mean no ill will to him and do not wish him any harm. I just do not like the way he is handling things, spending money, etc. The ideas that he has and the government assisted programs he wants to institute will not only bankrupt us even more but I feel are bad ideas because people shouldn't rely on government to live. They need to rely on themselves. I feel that these programs will not encourage personal responsibility or hard work. It will reward irresponsible and lazy people. It will crush the American dream. So yes....in that sense....I want him to fail. I don't want Americans to have to rely on government for everything. I don't like the idea of our government getting bigger and controlling more and more things.
I look at Obama and I see a typical politician. He did nothing but try and make everyone feel all warm and tingly about change and hope and all he has done since he has been in office is lie one right after another.
I feel that if Obama succeeds in his personal agenda....America will fail.
Depends on location.
If it is Podunk, Nowheresville--probably. If it is NYC or Boston or even someplace like Wichita--not so much.
It all depends upon the culture.
The hand-holding custom among Arab men as they walk does not signify that they are on a 'date' but is a symbol of mutual respect and/or friendship.
As far as greetings go, a handshake with direct eye contact is becoming more acceptable, but some ethnic customs do persist. The European double-air-kiss is a greeting between equals (and pretentious New Yorkers). Among Japanese the relative depth of bows acknowledges who has the superior rank, but both bow. Bowing of one Arab to another or one European to another (not to be confused with a smart click of the heels and bob of the head, a sort of antiquated European salute) is a sign of subjugation. I am acknowledging you as my superior in rank. I am your humble subject.
There was only one guy bowing. It was our president, and his upper body was nearly horizontal to the ground, far lower than shaking hands with a shorter man would seem to require. I don't mind if Obama thinks he needs to appear friendly, I just don't want him acknowledging subservience.
It depends on the legs! Why should and would
a woman with ugly legs expose them? Then it gets indecent and fugly. If the legs are nice it's acceptable.
Regarding what you state that the IQ depends
solely on the DNA, similar to the color of the eyes, height, etc.... ..I disagree. disagree. Therr is this theory that the realtive IQ score is already set at the age of 7 and cannot be improved. In my opinion it can be improved by ongoing education.
You should definitely try it.
When life begins depends on
someone's religious beliefs. Not all people believe that life begins at conception.
I don't think the beliefs of any religious group over another religious group should be shown preference when it involves the law.
I guess it depends on your perspective...
if you are as far left as Obama, I guess CNN WOULD look conservative...lol. I guess it is in perspective. The point I was trying to make but obviously failed is that no one is going to learn anything if they only listen to one side...and people who automatically yell yeah you got that from Fox or Rush Limbaugh are exactly the kind of people I am talking about. You give an opinion, and if it differs from theirs it automatically came from Fox or Rush Limbaugh and that makes it wrong. I just wish people would not listen to the party line on either side and would use due diligence and research for themselves. The Obama website is not where to go to learn about Obama. The McCain website is not where to go to learn about McCain. Voting the party line is just too Pied Piperish for me. Although I am not and never was a Democrat, I have to applaud that PUMA bunch for having the gall to buck the system and fight for what they think is right. I am not crazy about their candidate either, but I admire their guts, and that is what America is about, by golly. Hil has every right to put her name in nomination at the convention and people who support her have their say. That being said, I noticed Obama caved on that and came out with that placating and to MY thinking condescending thing of "letting women and Clinton supporters feel vindicated." Yeah right...lol. He wants their votes. Period. Go PUMA!
guess it depends where you live because...
where we live, the entire region, all I see are small businesses starting up, then they are gone within a year, one after another, ghost towns in all the cities of empty businesses being literally destroyed by Wal-Mart et al.
There has to be a middle ground, and there has to be more tolerance or there will always be division more and more, rich or poor, and there will always be revolution and unrest.
and what are you talking about 'sharing' with people. you think paying taxes and contributing to road work, infrastructure, everything paid by taxes should be on the backs of poor people and middle class, which excuse me if I am wrong, but does middle class even exist anymore in reality or just in people's own truths of what they want to see.
we see every day more and more people down scaling their lifestyles, sacrificing whether to buy groceries or gas, more and more people cannot even get jobs because of credit checks and background checks (guess working now is also only for the elite, well-off people, and no one should ever be forigven for their past or allowed to progress). who then is promoting social programs - seems to me right now people are being pushed into eventually making all the same pay, fixed income.
...and excuse me forefathers but do did they think they could enslave people, force them to leave their own countries and families, tie them up and bring them to America, abuse them, torture them, treat them less than animals, and then have no responsibility for them.
this what people are calling 'sharing' with people less fortunate than ourselves was created here and we are left to resolve it.
I would rather have a leader in this country who would at least recognize it, try to fix it, then to just have the same old rhetoric and division, pushing people farther and farther apart so only a few people can make profits..
gotta run -
I am not sure what your family above would have to 'share' but I do respect your point of view...
Depends on what part of California - sm
it's like 2 states sometimes. The central portion of the state: Central Valley in the north, Orange County in the south, chock full of narrow-minded midwest transplants, many of whom are evangelical christians. The coast and mountains have more progressive and free-thinking people. (Also the more highly-educated, as a rule). You couldnt pay me to live anywhere but on the Calif. coast.
Depends on who he campaigned or voted for
If he wanted O in, it will probably be one-sided like all the rest. If he wanted McC in, it will be one-sided, too. If he remained neutral, like newspeople SHOULD be, then it should be interesting. I do like him, though.
I guess it depends on what affiliation you have.
It seems to me that there is just as much, if not more, bashing by Republicans/conservatives as I see directed towards them. In actuality it is probably fairly evenly split.
I don't watch Fox, I watch CNN and feel the
exact same was .... just sayin
I don't watch Fox, I watch CNN and feel the
exact same way .... just sayin
depends on how you measure success I guess....
He only got a 4-5 point bounce in the polls and lost that the next week. Not all Americans were impressed with his "citizen of the world" speech. There are those of us who wonder where his real allegiance lies. No wonder.
By the way, when I say "hoohah" I don't mean the word you refer to. Apparently it does not mean the same thing in my neck of the woods. If I want to intimate the 4-letter word I would certainly do it more directly...not my style.
There is no way that little speech in Germany was "diplomacy." And gee, call me old-fashioned, but I think if you are running for Pres of the US, you should give your political speeches HERE.
I did not demand, nor have I heard anyone else demand that Obama admit the surge is working. It is obvious that it is. The fact that he chooses to ignore it does not give me any more faith in his ability to run the country or take care of national security issues, and makes me doubt his honesty. As to being true to his beliefs...didn't take him long to throw his lifelong friend and mentor the Reverend Wright under the bus for political expediency. There's that trust thing again.
How anyone can say, faced with all the info out there about him and how he handled the Wright thing (which was in name only, you don't stay in a church for 20 years that is built on black liberation theology if you don't believe it)...and say with a straight face he is being true to his beliefs.
Well, I take that back...he IS being true to his hard left socialist/Marxist beliefs. Already wants to redistribute wealth aka economic parity, a big element of the black liberatin theology...by taxing oil companies and redistributing their profits to people who did nothing to earn it. How much more socialist approaching Marxist could you possibly be? In that, yes, I would agree...he is being true to his socialist/Marxist beliefs. You got me there.
I guess it depends on your view of the beginning of
is life. I'm not advocating third or even second trimester abortions but believe me it's far better for a woman to abort a child than have one that won't care for it. Take Casey Anthony, for example...
We need to vote as if our entire future depends on it,
x
Depends on what you call racist I suppose
@
I didn't say that depends on what the definition of "IF"
There is a big difference between IF and WHEN. IF I said "...If I go to the store" or "...when I go to the store" IF means I may go to the store, WHEN means I WILL go to the store.
The other poster said that Mccain was saying he was going to be president and I pointed out that so did Obama and I gave PROOF from his OWN site.
Depends on the mistake. Making the case for war in Iraq on a stack of
lies from Curveball, not your everyday ooops.
As if.
Diaper Dave in airport rage "Do You Know Who I Am?" umm...depends
Report Of Vitter In Airport Rage: Do You Know Who I Am?!!
Roll Call reports that Sen. David Vitter (R-LA), the staunch social conservative whose career became bogged down in the 2007 D.C. Madam prostitution scandal, was sighted this past Thursday night having an incident of airport rage at Dulles Airport.
Vitter arrived 20 minutes before the plane was scheduled to depart, and found the gate locked. He then opened the door, setting off the alarm and inviting the attention of an airline worker:
Vitter, our spy said, gave the airline worker an earful, employing the timeworn "do-you-know-who-I-am" tirade that apparently grew quite heated.
That led to some back and forth, and the worker announced to the irritable Vitter that he was going to summon security.
Vitter, according to the witness, remained defiant, yelling that the employee could call the police if he wanted to and their supervisors, who, presumably, might be more impressed with his Senator's pin.
But after talking a huffy big game, Vitter apparently thought better of pushing the confrontation any further. When the gate attendant left to find a security guard, Vitter turned tail and simply fled the scene.
Late Update: Vitter is now responding to the story, after a spokesman declined to comment in the initial reports:
"After being delayed on the Senate floor ensuring a vote on my anti-pay-raise amendment and in a rush to make my flight home for town hall meetings the next day, I accidentally went through a wrong door at the gate," Vitter said in a statement. "I did have a conversation with an airline employee, but it was certainly not like this silly gossip column made it out to be."
Take a look at these polls.sm
Just to give you an idea, take Denver's Rocky Mountain News poll (the state is very conservative) below, and look at the results. Almost every poll I have seen shows large percentages of Americans think the same way as the theorists.
http://blogs.rockymountainnews.com/denver/rockytalklive/archives/2006/08/the_government_and_911_2.html#more
Here is another one from Ed Schultz at Air America with a 50/50 split.
http://www.wegoted.com/index.asp
Polls
Make that alter-ego. Changing names according to post content = literary license. I'm sure you've heard of it before, being so intimately acquainted with the literary world and all. Makes things a bit more intriguing. Enables one to dial back rabid mad-dog rhetoric.
Case in point. You don't launch into your "5-paragraph volleys" unless you think you are talking to GT. As BW, I enjoy the luxury of not having to drag out an entire arsenal of put-downs just to make myself understood, since you can’t quite figure out who you are talking to. Usually I am pretty good about revealing the aliases eventually, but not always. That is another prerogative of free speech.
BTW, when you lift content and ideas from somebody else's post, it's customary to use quotes. Disciple? Shades of the gospel according to Saint Hannity. Another suggestion would be that when you plagiarize thought or content, at least be careful not to put it into responses addressed to the original author.
Yes, Congress has a lower rating than Bush. He wields a powerful weapon that empowers him to obstruct, stall and reverse any sort of viable legislative initiatives. It's called the veto pen. In this last session, he has used it 8 times but Congress has managed to override him on 4 of those vetoes. They at have at least shown more ability than Bush to cross the aisle and engage themselves in effective bipartisan initiatives and convince them to vote against their fearless leader.
You and the pubs make no excuses for being too inept at reaching consensus (a decidedly American concept). Obstruction, stalling and reversals are akin to dodges, deceive and deflections. They are the strategies used by petty dictators and their parties in a setting of “might makes right,” that divide and conquer approach, rather than taking the high road and exerting the effort or harboring the desire to create a representative government body. Bipartisanship has never been his forte anyway. No surprise there.
Polls are interesting, but not terribly reliable, given the problems that arise when you start to consider the source, sift through bias, skewing and the like. More than likely, the polls offer the most reliable reflection of public opinion would be the approval ratings of the candidates, not that status quo that is destined to be decimated come November. Most dems are just about as frustrated with the whole mess as you are. On that we can agree. But my take on approval ratings, at least in terms the current state of affairs in Congress and the executive branch, is that the low numbers reflect a much more deep-seated frustration and anger toward being lied to about the war and the incalculable costs in terms of human life as well as tax dollars, the state of the economy and the perception that nobody anywhere is doing anything, typical of a lame duck in a campaign year. The nation as a whole is in a really bad mood, to be sure. They simply don't approve of anything, at the moment.
More than likely, this will play itself with a major overhaul on both sides of the aisle. Who comes out on top in Congress in terms of numbers is anybody’s guess.
Polls are even at 42%
per a CBS poll taken on Wednesday, so this does not include Palin's speech or McCain's acceptance speech.
Polls & More
Remember, this is the party that prides itself on being "tolerant." Yeah, sure. How tolerant have they been of anything a conservative has to say? This why they lie in wait here, so the few times I even bother to take the time (more like waste it) to post something, I try to make the subject line not stand out as a "right-winger" view.
This board is no better than DailyKos, HuffingtonPost, etc. Go to those sites and see how well the libs behave. I look at this forum very seldom now after seeing what the bulk of my industry thinks and how totally nasty they behave. They make having a cat fight look like a tea party.
While polls mean almost nothing to me, Rasmussen is a very reputable one. Below is from Media Resarch Center (excellent; Bret Bozell, Libertarian). Included in the article are links for a great deal of info for anyone interested. Nasty posts, etc. mean nothing to me, so do as you please. I've made my pitstop here for the day (or week), and see that each time I look here it's only gotten more nasty.
**********************************************************************************************
A new Rasmussen poll of 1,000 likely voters shows that by a
stunning five-to-one margin, Americans believe the media
are actively trying to help Barack Obama win the Presidential
Election.
The new poll comes on the heels of last week's survey that
discovered by a margin of 10 to 1, the public believes the
media are trying to hurt Republican Vice Presidential
nominee Sarah Palin.
Shockingly, Democrats and "unaffiliated" voters both believe
that journalists are attempting to help Obama.
For the complete CyberAlert report:
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10831&RID=16855646
Much has been made of Barack Obama's "lipstick on a pig" remark,
but few, if any worked harder to run cover for Democrat
Presidential hopeful more than MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, who
questioned if the comment "insults...everyone's intelligence?"
But did Matthews insult his viewers' intelligence on Monday,
when he accused Palin and Rudy Guiliani of using coded racist
language when they referred to Obama’s experience as a
"community organizer?"
For the full CyberAlert report:
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10832&RID=16855646
Is CNN the talking parrot on the shoulder of the Democrat Party?
A closer look reveals the "best political team on television"
parroting the Democrats dismal view of the economy by mimicking
the claim that the Republicans are shying away from the issue.
In fact, in true parrot form, CNN repeated the charge at least
12 times during its September 4 coverage.
For the complete Business & Media Institute report:
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10833&RID=16855646
Haven't yet signed up for The Business & Media Institute's Balance
Sheet? It’s a free, weekly e-mail newsletter auditing media coverage
of business and economic issues. Packed with analysis of the top
issues in the news from a free-market perspective, it is essential
reading for everyone who wants to know what the media aren't
telling you.
The Balance Sheet also delivers expert commentary and links to
valuable resources. Click here to sign up:
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10834&RID=16855646
P.S: MRC's exclusive, special report "Obama's Margin of Victory:
The Media" is shipping. If you haven't yet reserved your copy
of this 60 page booklet that shines the white-hot light on the
media's overt role in Obama's meteoric rise to prominence do so
now by clicking here:
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10835&CID=500&RID=16855646
********
MRC News Report
09/11/08
********
***Brent Bozell's Syndicated Columns
MSNBC's Doomed 'Experiment'
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10836&RID=16855646
Toxic Beverly Hills
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10837&RID=16855646
***CNSNews.com
Passage of Year Makes Petraeus Look Good, Congressional Critics Look Bad
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10838&RID=16855646
Moms Say Palin Is Role Model for All Women
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10839&RID=16855646
Chavez Hails End of ‘Yankee Hegemony’ As Russian Bombers Arrive
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10840&RID=16855646
Palin Stars at Virginia Rally, Then Heads Home
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10841&RID=16855646
Biden's Bishop Seeks Prayers to Help Biden Become Pro-Life
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10842&RID=16855646
Democrat Leader Raises Specter of Government Shutdown over Oil Drilling
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10843&RID=16855646
***MRC.org
By 5-to-1 Public Thinks Most Journalists Trying to Elect Obama
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10844&RID=16855646
Matthews: Obama's 'Pig' Not Sexist, 'Community Organizer' Racist
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10845&RID=16855646
CNN Labels Palin's Environmental Stances 'Outside the Mainstream'
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10846&RID=16855646
'Non-Partisan' Liberal Group's Critique of Palin Cited by CNN
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10847&RID=16855646
ABC's Brian Ross Highlights Angry Librarians Opposed to Palin
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10848&RID=16855646
MSNBC Hosts Mock and Distort Prayer Request by Sarah Palin
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10849&RID=16855646
CBS Highlights Dem's Anti-Palin Plea: 'We've Got to Go After Her'
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10850&RID=16855646
NYT's Herbert: "Arch-Conservative" Clarence Thomas' "Self-Hatred"
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10851&RID=16855646
Couric Uses sex Scandal to Show Bush Admin 'Close' to Big Oil
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10852&RID=16855646
***Culture and Media Institute
Newsweek's Female Columnists Pile on Palin
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10853&RID=16855646
The Cost of Killing Palinzilla
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10854&RID=16855646
Palin Heat Threatens Planet
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10855&RID=16855646
Crude MTV Award Host Mocks Palin, Purity
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10856&RID=16855646
Stop the Presses! Palin's Church Holds to Bible's Teaching on
Homosexuality!
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10857&RID=16855646
***TimesWatch.org
Public Editor Says Palin Coverage Fair, Parenting Angle "Legitimate"
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10858&RID=16855646
Obama's Terrorist Colleague Bill Ayers Makes Cameo in Story on Education
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10859&RID=16855646
Rev. Jeremiah Wright Compares Obama to Virgin Mary -- Times Doesn't Blink
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10860&RID=16855646
Seelye Shrugs Off Dem. Ed Rendell's "Big Lie" Smear of McCain
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10861&RID=16855646
Bob Herbert Unleashed: "Arch-Conservative" Clarence Thomas's "Self-Hatred"
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10862&RID=16855646
***Business and Media Institute - businessandmedia.org
CNN Parrots Dems on Republicans and Economy
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10863&RID=16855646
Greenspan: Recession Still Percent or More' Likely
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10864&RID=16855646
Media Error Causes Steep Loss for United Airlines
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10865&RID=16855646
ABC: Manmade Global Warming Causing Worse Allergies
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10866&RID=16855646
CEO: Fannie/Freddie Bailout Makes America 'More Communist than China'
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10867&RID=16855646
***NewsBusters.org
Covering for Dems: NYT Reporter Certain Obama's 'Pig' Wasn't Palin
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10868&RID=16855646
WaPo Religion Blogger Attacks Sarah Palin's Religion
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10869&RID=16855646
MRC's Bozell Discusses 'Lipstick' Smear, MSNBC Meltdown on 'Fox & Friends'
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10870&RID=16855646
Mitchell: Obama 'Clearly' Wasn't Talking About Palin
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10871&RID=16855646
Joe Klein: 'Obama is the precise opposite of Mountain Man Todd Palin'
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10872&RID=16855646
Former Time Columnist Unveils New Obama Spokesman: Buckwheat
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10873&RID=16855646
***Worst of The Week
The Trashing of Sarah Palin
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10874&RID=16855646
*** NewsBusted
For a Lighter Look at the News: Watch the Latest Episode of NewsBusted!
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10875&RID=16855646
***Eyeblast.tv
For the best in video, check out Eyeblast.tv!
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10876&RID=16855646
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
(Note: Please do not reply directly to this e-mail message. This
e-mail address is not designed to receive your personal messages.
To contact the Media Research Center with comments, questions or
to change your status, see the link at the end of this e-mail.)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + Comments? Questions?
http://www.mrcaction.org/r.asp?U=10877&RID=16855646
+ + + + +
The Media Research Center is a research and education organization
operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Contributions are tax-deductible for income tax purposes.
How much do you believe polls?
Yahoo had some info on the Rasumussen Polls and I went to their website to check it out: www.rasmussenreports.com
They have an electoral college page that shows the current "vote" at 248-163 in favor of Obama. I'm going to have to do some research and see how accurate polls were in previous presidential elections. They have it broken down by state and it is pretty interesting, if numbers are your thing!
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/election_2008_electoral_college_update
|
