Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Foley Bruhaha

Posted By: Observer on 2006-10-03
In Reply to: This is despicable. - Lydia

Talk about hipocrisy: The case of Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., In 1989, male prostitute Stephen L. Gobie admitted that Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., knew that Gobie had operated a prostitution service out of Frank's Capitol Hill apartment. Frank, an openly gay member of Congress, confirmed that he had Gobie as a roommate in his apartment. Frank said he fired Gobie when he learned that clients were visiting his apartment.

Was Frank told by the Democratic leadership to resign his seat as Foley was forced to do?

Not at all. That was 17 years ago, and he is still a member of Congress, a respected member of the Democratic minority and is slated to assume the chairmanship of a key House committee should the Democrats recapture control of the House. Where was the outrage then? CURIOUSLY ABSENT.

When former Rep. Gerry Studds admitted having sex with a teenage page, nobody in the Democratic leadership demanded he resign, nor did he offer to resign. He had a joint press conference with the boy and bragged about their affair. He was renominated by the Democrats and re-elected six times before retiring. Where was the outrage then? CURIOUSLY ABSENT.

And let us NOT forget Mr. Clinton...had sex with an aide in the White House no less, committing adultery then lying about itunder oath (perjury, which is a felony). Where was the outrage then? Curiously ABSENT.

As Rush Limbaugh noted Monday, The truth is that the people on the left who are acting all outraged and stunned and angry, they don't see what Clinton or Barney Frank or Gerry Studds did as repugnant. In fact, they view those things as private matters that didn't affect anybody's work, and it's nobody's business what somebody does with their private life, particularly when it comes to sex.

Unless it involves a Republican. Then it's a matter of outrage and hypocrisy.

NONE OF THIS WAS RIGHT. ON EITHER SIDE. BUT SHEESH, PULL OFF THE BLINDERS. HISTORY OF TURNING BLIND EYE HERE.




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Foley...I can't say what I want to on here about him...sm
He is out his rabbit ... mind. Emailing those kids like that under the guise of protecting them. I think those two are just the two we know about. They should confiscate his home computers and check them out.

I agree to disagree about Chavez's speech to the UN. I think he went to far, and I actually thought more of him before then. I may be too optimistic, but I do not see America as doomed. The people still do have a say (I'm holding out hope). We've got the midterm elections coming up and two more years left with this president.

As far as Bush vs Chavez, to me it's like a person who has conflict with a family member all the time, but when someone else tries to disrespect that same family member they take his side just b/c they're are family. As far as his comments on the UN needing to be out of the US, and he suggested it moving to Venezuela, I don't agree with that.
So you take issue with Foley, the perp, or
Being a forum of MTs, the phoney outrage over describing physiologic functions of male anatomy is probably a bit overblown, don't you think. Besides, you seem to be missing the point...being that Mark Foley actually carried out the acts that the poster described. Care to comment about that?