How predictable that I read an entire thread and am capable of forming an independent conclusion?

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

it would save a lot of that foot taste in your mouth and egg on your face.

I never said that the transcript was not Rush's words.  What I said was a bunch of bunk and lies was the columnist's comments about Rush and I stand by that.   and for your information just because something is posted on the internet does not make it factual or true.  Do I really have to point that out to you?

Oh, and BTW I don't agree with Pat Robertson's remarks.  I am Christian, but I think Pat R. needs to shut up and retire.  He definitely does not speak for all Christians, but again, Cindy Sheehan has said the equivalent about Bush except in much, much more vulgar and hateful language.

U.S. military was protecting the Hezbollah supporters. Am I really missing it?

Simply stating Christian beliefs.  This country, although based on religious freedoms, was founded by Christians.  In God We Trust ring a bell?

or associate Democrats with christianity.  It's actually down and has been consistently going down.  Of course, I know a lot of Christian Democrats.  None of them seem to post here, but I know many in my private life. They are far to the right, though, like Democrats use to be

that Palin is dumb because she had 3+ chances to describe the job she was trying for and never did get it right.  Maybe it was because she didn't know what the Bush doctrine was (much less what it meant), or that she couldn't name one magazine/paper that she read, or that she thought she had experience in foreign relations because she could see Russia (literally), or a whole host of other things along that line.

As for spending money in a recession, guess what?  That's what we are supposed to be doing.  The other option is to do what Herbert Hoover did -- a spending freeze....oh wait...that's right.  The pubs are actually proposing that idea.  It lead us into a depression last time, so it's bound to work this time.  Now that's dumb.

Also, when you say "raising taxes" you might want to be more specific instead of going with that broad stroke the pubs like to use.  Only 5% of people will actually see a tax increase.

Oh, btw, why are all you pubs up in arms about spending when 6 out of the top 10 earmark'ers in the Omnibus bill are pubs?

Yes, but just because Hitler made a case for exterminating the Jews by calling them socialists, and because Ford may have also hated them.....doesn't mean that in reality the Jews all really were socialists. 

As I said, they were propagandists, or at least Hitler was (and if Ford publicly wrote about or ridiculed the Jews then he would be included) and propagandists pass off LIES as the TRUTH.  So therefore we cannot draw a historically accurate conclusion that Jews are basically socialists.

and the stories of a half a century ago keep coming..sigh..shall I post ALL THE CRAP that Bush and his family have been involved in?  Like the stripper who had an abortion and later was murdered in Texas..she was involved with GW..do we need to post the sins and horrors of our politicians..it would fill this board big time..Now, get along little fool, get along and run on back to the conservative board so you all can rip liberals apart and pat each other on the back about what good xtians you are..NOT..

Typical Publican.

On June 15th, you accused me of being *Teddy* (which I wasn't), just like I'm not Stephen Crockett.  In fact, before reading your post on the Conservative Board, I never knew he existed, and I even told him that when I emailed him regarding your misleading use of his post on another topic because I felt he had a right to defend himself, as it's cruel and unusual punishment for anyone to be compared to Ann Coulter. 

It seems he feels that manipulating people's votes to favor one party or another should be a very serious crime, punishable with the death penalty.  (I thought you guys were all about the death penalty; I'm shocked.)  I can't say I disagree with him.  In other words, there was a context to his quotes; he had a reason for saying what he said, as opposed to Coulter who wants to have Supreme Justices killed, John Murtha killed and thinks the Oklahoma City bombing should have occurred in the New York Times Building -- all to assassinate people who merely dared to DISAGREE the almighty Coultergeist -- not because they had committed a crime that stripped Americans of their rights.

As far as accusing me of impersonating him or *Teddy,* I'm sure the administrator can verify that I wasn't posting as either poster, if the administrator chooses to do so.  Also, you probably should realize that when you make whacko accusations like this, it diminishes the credibility you have when you post other things. 

In any event, I'd like to personally thank you for posting his post.  He now has a new fan, thanks to you. 

Have a nice day.