I have nothing against Sam.

Posted By: Proof is in the archives on 2008-09-21
In Reply to: Well, see, that person that posted obviously has it in...sm - ms

Sam has always asked us to provide reference for the claims we make on this forum. She made a claim and would not back it up with a reference. I did the research and found her claim to be false. She could at least be big enough to admit that she was wrong. She was not the first person to bring up Saul Alinsky on this board.

I am merely setting the record straight and not allowing someone to take credit for something they did not do. It doesn't matter to who it is. We should all be held accountable for claims we make and be able to back them up with fact!

Sam was mistaken...end of story!

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

Saul Alinksy - The proof is in the archives
- I said "I believe.." and I did believe, and I was wrong.... - sam
- I can witness to the truthfulness - et Jim
- You silly woman - call me Jules
- Mere words cannot describe my feelings to your post....so I won't even try.... - ms
  - That tends to happen when there's... sm - No Chance
    - Well, see, that person that posted obviously has it in...sm - ms
      - I have nothing against Sam. - Proof is in the archives
        Really? In the big scheme of thing, this seems awfully - petty..nm
        So the post really is about Sam and nothing about politics? - mt
        No, it was about not believing everything that is said without check the facts! (nm) - Bait Shot
        Certainly. Check the validity of the posts... - sam
        The lesson here is...not everything people "believe" is correct! (nm) - Ta Da
        The lesson I learned is that Sam has class...you are - petty
        Oops...should be "checking" the facts (nm) - Bait Shot

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database