Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

I personally think it helps to an extent...

Posted By: sam on 2008-08-27
In Reply to: Have you been watching the convention and does this help you in your voting decision - What do you think

I listened to Michelle Obama's speech and I thought she was very articulate...and they are a beautiful family. I did listen to Hillary, and in my opinion, she made it all about her. She said the right things, but I don't think her heart was in it. I think there is a LOT of bitterness there still. Bill already put his foot in his mouth, no telling what he will say during his speech. What I found very strange was the camera focused on him while Hillary was speaking, and he had tears in his eyes, and he mouthed "I love you I love you I love you." It was easy to see what he was saying. Have no idea if that was for the cameras or was a really unguarded moment. Who knows? It just seemed really out of character for him. I did notice that she said she came before the crowd a proud mother, a proud Democrat and a proud United States Senator from New York...but nuttin' about being a proud wife...lol. Who can blame her??

As to Barack and Michelle being down to earth, I know that is the message she wanted to send. But when speaking to a group of middle class-type women, she kinda messed up when she told a story about Barack getting on to her for a $10,000 bill for the kids(yes, ten thousand) and she said to him, "Do you know how much camp costs?" That demonstrates that she was out of touch with the people she was talking to. $10,000 is probably a third of what they make a YEAR if they were lucky. She lives a very different life than the middle class. She may remember it from childhood, but she has left that behind her. Not that that is a bad thing...it just demonstrates that they are rich folks just like McCain. Most politicians are. It goes with the territory. All that being said, having money does not make any of them bad people.

I missed the speech of the man from Virginia, so can't comment on that one. Bill's will be interesting. You never know what is going to come out of his mouth.

I think we will find out more about the candidates after the convention, when we have official nominees, get to the debates, and if we can sort through the mud being slung from both sides, that is where most of our information will come from.



Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

She took it personally because she was attacked personally. Plain and simple.

Where did you get your debating skills?  On the south side of Chicago in some street gang?  Because if you did, it shows.


In a REAL debate, there is no room or tolerance for personal attacks.  Yet, that's all you people know how to do.  You can't stay on the issue.  You MUST attack the poster personally, claiming to know not only what they think and feel but also claiming to know what every liberal ever thought or did, what they're thinking and doing right now and what they will be thinking and doing for the next 1,000 years.  In fact, you seem to know everything about anything that ever existed on the planet, exists now or will exist into infinity. 


As I (and others) have said repeatedly and you just can't seem to grasp, if you constantly treat people badly, they're not going to want to associate with you.  Lurker was very gracious in her posts to all of you on your board, but even she, in the end, couldn't tolerate your continued, nonstop, personal attacks any more (as she indicated in her responses to the attackers).  If you ever stop knowing it all and become interested in the proper way of debating someone, you could learn a lot from Lurker.  You see, having *thick skin* is only important if you're a thug in a gang somewhere.  It's irrelevant when it comes to treating humans like humans, and in that area, you have a lot to learn. 


As for me, I like to learn from intelligent, friendly people with different political views, so I visit boards where those kinds of people are found.  Not all conservatives are angry, rude, come out swinging and need to personally attack 1,000% of the time.  Some of them are actually quite nice and informative, and they can be found on other forums.  Too bad they can't be found on MTStars.


Have a pleasant evening.


God helps those who help themselves...
nm
Yep, it helps...off to Google...
however, I know I can find as many or more for the other side. Have you read them as well? I will if you will....
I hope this helps
Each election seems to get worse and worse. This is by far the worst election I've seen in my life. I think in the era of computers people are more quick to say hateful and hurtful things because you can't see who you are saying it to. Stuff you would never ever say to someone's face.

I served my country in the US Army under Ronald Reagan and was proud of my country. I learned that there are many people of different nationalities/ backgrounds and that everyone should be respected. I was proud of my country back then but like you I am ashamed of the way people act today.

I feel that in today's world people have just gotten worse and worse. I think a lot of frustrations arise from what is happening in the country right now (a lot of uncertainty). Even though there are people who will only blame one side or the other and never take responsibility, if you read history you will see both sides are at fault. But more people are angrier and have no fear of standing up and saying whatever they want to without doing research. It's seems a lot easier to blame the other side than try to find a solution.

My g-pappy told me two things you never talk about with people. Politics and religion. He said those two are the hottest of subjects, not everyone is going to agree with you, and you will most likely either hurt someone's feelings or have yours hurt. And as my mama said to me.... "if I ever hear you talking like that to someone I'll slap the snot out of you" HA HA

For me....I just want a qualified President and I'll leave it at that.
This quiz was fun. Helps to lighten up a bit.
x
Having a goal helps! My neighbor used to
he got the idea that he wanted to run in a marathon someday, and I don't know how he's managed to stick with it for so long but in just a year, but he's gone from a slug, to a fit, good-looking athlete! Every day after work, he runs the hills around our town. Then, when he's done with that, he gets on his bike and rides about 20-30 miles. He also cut out the junk food. He's gone from about 300 pounds to a lean 150 or so. Truly amazing!
I think to a certain extent you are right, but...(sm)

one of the main problems we have in the region is reputation.  As far as most Arabs are concerned the west is the west, with little differentiation between the US and Europe.  If you look at it from their point of view, the west (Britian) took their land to give it to the Jews, and the US (also west) has been backing this decision ever since.  As we all know, this has been the main contention since WWI that they have had with us.  So, in that respect I believe it is very important to look at the history of the situation. 


There are also problems with recent history.  Bush said he wanted a 2-state solution.  Publicly he denounced the advancement of Israeli settlements into Gaza; however, the settlements not only did not slow down, but actually increased the whole time he was saying this.  What was done about it?  Nothing -- that is unless you count Bush raising the amount of money we give Irael each year.  Israel has been using this support we provide to strong arm the rest of the region for years, and reallly needs to be reigned in if we are to have any credibility in the region whatsoever.


well put. Marijuana is passive, helps pain. Alcohol kills.
nm
I agree to an extent. I think she would
make a much better president than Obama or McCain. I don't think Obama can win (he's inexperienced & the media will destroy him if he gets the nomination), and our economy can't withstand McCain, who is 100% pro-free-trade & wants to expand it, more tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations while screwing over working people, etc. They're already predicting $7/gal gas if McCain gets it. I originally was hoping for Edwards, then hoping for Clinton because I think that's our only chance to beat McCain.
This is true to a certain extent (sm)
There are a lot of great companies out there that do put money back into their company and its employees. Unfortunately, there are too many that the CEOs and their boards pocket the money and couldn't give a rat's patootie about their employees and they're the ones ruining it for everyone else. Also unfortunately, they're the ones we just bailed out with our tax dollars. Sad commentary on the way our country is moving. I like the map of the liberal brain at the end, though - that's funny!
I agree to a certain extent
I do agree that not everyone should be lumped into one group. It's being done on both sides (including myself sometimes). Especially when you are called names (pubs) when your neither a republican or democrat (I'm what I call mutt because I like a little of what every party has for ideas), but when your called a "pub" it's easy to shoot back with a reply and say (dems). Not everyone is in the same group. I do believe that there are people who voted for Obama based on what they believe he can do to help the country. But at the same time there are people who have absolutely no idea who he is, what his past record is, who is friends are, who elevated him to where he is, how he was able to beat out all the candidates that have experience and knowledge about the issues, but he was pushed ahead by the big money people (Wall Street, Bredzinski, etc) and the other candidates were squashed and had no chance without the funds that these "big money" people poured into Obama to ensure he would become president. Anyway...those people who jumped on the band wagon and would not listen to anything except he'll be the first black president, or Bon Jovi or Brad Pitt or other stars are supporting him. Those are what I refer to as the Kool-Aid drinkers. The one's who come on this site and don't talk about issues, about what's happening in the economy, what Obama's plan is. No they come on and say "he's my hero, he's the Messiah, he's makes my heart happy and makes me want to dance, he's just like us because he eats chili dogs and cheese fries just like we do". I've heard every crack-pot "reasoning" for why they "love" Obama, but never for any substance like "I like his health care policy, or he has this idea or that idea of how he is going to create more jobs, he's in the process of drawing up papers to tax companies that take jobs overseas, etc, etc. Nothing like that, just he makes me so happy in my heart I'm dancing around in joy and ecstasy". Those are the Kool-Aid drinkers I refer to. The Obots, Obamaniacs, etc.

Yes, let's give the man a chance. Let's avoid name calling and that is on both sides. When someone posts "he's just like us cos he eats chile dog and cheese fries just like we do", yes they are going to get called a Kool-Aid drinker cos that's what they are. Bringing an opinion like that to this board deserves a response like that. I remember when people who supported McCain were explaining why they supported him, they were met with such hate-filled messages it was awful and I had to take this site out of my favorites.

I say lets give the guy a chance. To tell the truth I don't think he's off to a very good start with already adding to our deficit with the huge cost of the inaugeration (and no, all that money is not being donated by rich people - some maybe, but the rest will just be added and the citizens of America will end up paying for it). Also the people he has picked for his cabinet members. Not good at all.

Yes, he is a smart man. Nobody makes it through law school if they are not smart, but you have to remember, he is a lawyer. He knows how to bend the rules, changes the laws, and maneuver out of things.

I'm not calling Obama any names, but it would be nice if people on the board started bringing real issues to the board instead of lately posted "I love you Obama, you make my heart soar, the mere mention of your name brings me joy, blah, blah, blah". Can we just stick to issues.

How about what is happening inside. People should read what's been going on with Pelosi. DH was telling me that Pelosi is upset because Obama had promised through his campaign that the wealthier people are going to pay more in taxes and now he's changed that and said he's not going to make them pay any more. So guess there's trouble brewing in the democrat party alone. Truthfully I have not read the article, but DH was telling me this yesterday, so I'll have to try and find the article (good luck to me, cos he reads about 80 or so news sites a day - everything from Drudge, MSNBC, Fox, CNN, local and national newspapers, etc) - can you tell he doesn't work :-o.

But these are the issues I want to hear.

Truthfully I am very happy for the people who voted for him. I'm glad you are all happy and giddy. I'm glad you are about to start a week-long celebration. That's all and good and I'm happy for you. But for the people who are following what is happening, who have concerns about the direction our country is taking, about the issues that Obama does not believe in the constitution and is going to try to change it while he is in office (what's next, is he going to try and change the Bible too?). For the people who are worried because there is someone who is trying to change the constitution so that there is no term limits and is fighting for Obama to be the President until his death. These are very worrisome and I am very worried for our country.

So, while I wish Mr. Obama the best, hope he will do good for the country, I am also worried. I won't (and have never called) Mr. Obama any names, but if people continue with the sillyness I will most likely be tempted to call them Kool-Aid drinkers. - Just the "cat" in me.
To a certain extent I agree....however..(sm)

LGBT issues is only a part of the whole course.  It starts in K with why you shouldn't tease and then continues and doesn't hit LGBT issues until the 5th grade.  This is obviously a problem in this state or they wouldn't be addressing it. 


I agree that kids tease, but given today's lack of guidance in the home for kids, the schools are having to take on this responsibility just to keep the kids safe while in their custody.


In a post below you said that we didn't have to have that kind of teaching in school.  You're absolutely right.  We knew what not to do because our parents taught us that.  My grandmother raised me for the most part.  She could "out christian" the best of you.  She didn't agree with homosexuality, interracial marriage, etc, etc, etc....She did teach us that it was wrong as she saw fit.  She also taught us not to make fun of others no matter what.  But by the same token she didn't sit there in front of us and call Rock Hudson a fag.  That's the difference.


To a certain extent I agree....however..(sm)

LGBT issues is only a part of the whole course.  It starts in K with why you shouldn't tease and then continues and doesn't hit LGBT issues until the 5th grade.  This is obviously a problem in this state or they wouldn't be addressing it. 


I agree that kids tease, but given today's lack of guidance in the home for kids, the schools are having to take on this responsibility just to keep the kids safe while in their custody.


In a post below you said that we didn't have to have that kind of teaching in school.  You're absolutely right.  We knew what not to do because our parents taught us that.  My grandmother raised me for the most part.  She could "out christian" the best of you.  She didn't agree with homosexuality, interracial marriage, etc, etc, etc....She did teach us that it was wrong as she saw fit.  She also taught us not to make fun of others no matter what.  But by the same token she didn't sit there in front of us and call Rock Hudson a fag.  That's the difference.


I can understand and empathize to an extent,
while I was able to have one child, I was not able have anymore than that due to a multitude of problems leading to miscarrying, hysterectomy and a diagnosis of SLE and a stroke at the age of 45. As for unwanted cats and dogs, I agree with you there too, but I have taken action in this situation, for over 20 years on my own with no funding at great expense to myself, I have taken in hundreds of cats and found homes, with the exception of handicapped ones, nobody wanted them so I just kept them and dealth with their handicap. The reward in this is that I have managed to save some lives, albeit it is only a cup of water out of the ocean. And I would not agree with creating embryos for the purpose of research, but I am not against using ones that will be otherwise thrown away. If it should turn out that they can save lives, I think that is a good thing. I think a line would have to be drawn, and could be drawn, but then again, somebody mentioned in a post (forget who) that God gave us domain over the animals and the human race in general has not done a very good job there though, so you could be right.
It proves the extent of the torture that was used...(sm)
as well as shows the public exactly what the last admin did.  It puts in front of the public (in particular republicans who would be against prosecuting the Bush admin) the facts.  I honestly think the main point of showing pics is to gain public support for the prosecution of the last admin.  I think dems are kind of fighting the battle before it gets there to make prosecution easier......but that's just my opinion.
I agree to a certain extent - see message
I too could care less who has affairs nowadays. Doesn't make me think any less or more of them. However - my little however :-) - He was not the President of the US - Clinton was. Clinton should have been removed from office (although then Gore would have been in charge, so I take that back now) :-) Anyway...it was the fact that Clinton had an affair that got him in trouble, it was the lies, manipulation, lies, and all the other illegal stuff he did that went along with it.

I don't particularly think they are being any less or more hard/lenient on this guy than they had with others who did the same thing. Remember John Edwards? The democrat who WAS running for VP? My point is more that you can't say "this guy was a republican that might have possibly run for VP the next election, and that's why its so bad", when you don't bring up Edwards who DID run for VP.

I feel this way...if it's a republican who is caught having an affair the liberals are sure dragging them through the mud, and if it's a democrat who is caught having an affair the conservatives drag him through the mud. I don't feel either side gets a free pass when it comes to being raked through the coals. I'm sick to death of hearing about this republican who had an affair about as sick as I was hearing about that NY guy, and Edwards, and that guy who got caught in the bathroom at some airport, etc, etc., but your making it sound like only the democrats getting picked on and that's just not true.

P.S. - We really don't need Biden to have an affair to have a field day with him, every time he opens his mouth and speaks he does a doozy on himself. HA HA HA
To a great extent, it is Frank's fault, previous poster correct.
Barney Frank and the rest of the democrats in charge of Congress now, will be laughing at you, too....at all of us.
This what I'm personally going to do

In every place I go where the pledge is recited ballgames mostly when we got to the words under God it's amplified UNDER GOD!!!  That's what I intend on doing even if it becomes illegal.  I don't care if they outlaw the word God period I'll shout it from the mountaintops.  First of all to glorify my God, and second of all to irritate those who think it's a curse word.


Go ahead sue me...hang me...chop my head off.  The best is yet to come for me anyway. 


I personally think that

the McCain campaing has set Palin up to be the attacker of Obama's character and let McCain talk about what they will do if they are elected. 


As for Palin lying, I do believe that Obama has not been 100% truthful with things brought out about him.  He has changed his story several times on different associations and issues and that makes me not trust him. 


I do find it interesting that a lot of times what an Obama supporter can say about Palin....a McCain supporter can say about Obama.  LOL!  Kind of makes you wonder what the heck all of us are thinking really. 


One thing that holds true for me in the case of Sarah Palin is that she cut spending in her state.  I truly do believe that for the sake our country....we need to cut back on the government pending and this just reinforces my trust in McCain and Palin to do just that.  Obama...on the other hand....I believe will not cut back on spending as he has endorsed more pork in his short term in senate than McCain has his entire career.....and that to me says a lot.  And that has nothing to do with him being a POW and having the scars to prove it.  LOL!


Personally, you hit on one of her best...
attributes. I like the idea of a VP who could lock and load with the Secret Service if need be. Shove those guys out of the way and take care of herself. Hooah! lol.
Well, I personally am a
right-leaning Libertarian who registered Republican last time McCain made an attempt, just so that I could vote for him in that primary.

This time around he has morphed into something so frightening that I'm voting for Obama, & I haven't voted for a Democrat in 30 years.


Well, personally s/m

I could  not care less so long as they don't mess around with the constitution.  I do think, however, that there is much ado about nothing.  As for the alleged tax breaks...when my husband and I married we asked my CPA about tax ramifications.  He said we would be better off to marry.  When we filed our first joint return, the same CPA said he didn't realize how much our income was and that in fact, marrying was the worst thing we could do tax-wise.  So if gays/lesbians want to marry for tax purposes, they had better take a good hard look at where the marriage will put them.


I don't know that there's anything legal/illegal about it but I expect that in the case of serious illness or injury a significant other would not be kept from the bedside. 


My husband and I used an attorney to draw up papers (forget what they are called) that directs everything that could possibly be foreseen and the cost was something like $350.  That would work just as well for gays/lesbians I would think.


We  have a gay couple in our community, also biracial.  They moved here from another state.  Both wear wedding rings, I have no idea what it symbolizes, haven't asked.  One is rather elderly and has relatives here but they accept the significant other and everyone just goes about their business.


Gay/lesbian relations are not new, it goes all the way back to biblical times.  I don't lean in that direction myself so I do not know anything about it, whether it is a choice or people are born with that bend.  I just have a hard time with God saying that it is an abomination for a man to lie with a man as with a woman and then that He would turn around and cause people to be born with this kind of sexual orientation.  That being said, let them do what they will, it is between them and God.  Like religion and politics, they don't need to try to shove it down the throats of the majority who are heterosexual.


I personally don't know anyone......... sm
with voter's remorse right now, but I can guarandangtee you there will be a whole bunch of folks in about 6 months to a year or so who will rue the day they cast their ballot for the O.
perhaps you just don't personally know anyone
rrrrrrr
Personally
I think it's all of the above and then some.
I have never personally used that phrase myself. sm
But then, I am sure someone will expend a huge amount of energy to prove me wrong.  
I personally feel

that Jesse Jackson is a detriment to the black community.  Surely there has to be someone better to represent and stand up for the black community.  If a white person made the general comments that Jesse Jackson does......the black community would scream racism.  His own son spoke negatively about his father and his comment. 


I personally don't feel that there will ever be equality between the races because people are constantly wanting to point the finger at the other race.  Do I want equality....yes...of course I do.  I have many black friends who are great people that I care about.  But until we stop pointing the finger at the other race, it won't stop.  Prejudice and racism is on both sides.  It isn't just the white folks or the black people.....it is on both sides and until people stop and realize that and learn to forgive and forget and be accepting.......it won't change.


As for Bill Cosby, I loved watching the Bill Cosby Show when I was younger, but the more I learn about Bill......the more I think he is a huge bigot.


Once again, did he personally call you
to say he would quit HIS job and be at home with the kids? Oh wait, I KNOW! The oldest pregnant one can watch ALL of them! Now, There is an idea! Furthermore, yes, you ARE bashing US, by saying we have a 1950's mentality, just because we want to ACTUALLY RAISE our OWN kids, instead of a DAY orphanage! What a concept? Raise your own kids! Dr. Laura people, you all should listen to her...
I personally feel that
neither McCain nor Obama will be able to really pull us out of this horrible economic situation.  They will be able to help or make it worse, but no one president is totally going to pull us out of this horrible situation that we find ourselves in today.  I personally put the blame on everyone....dems and repubs alike.  Our president is currently republican but the congress is controlled by the dems and quite frankly I haven't seen a whole he11 of a lot out of either group to start pulling us out.  We are too busy flinging mud between parties to really focus on what our country needs and that is a shame as well as scary. I hope and pray that people in Washington will get their heads out of their butts and consider the future of our country instead of how much money they can line their pockets with and that goes for both dems and repubs.
I personally feel that this

failure in our government is a failure on both sides.  This isn't strictly dems, although dems control the congress, and this isn't strictly reps even though the pres is a rep.  I think they should all stop pointing fingers as what is done is done and find a solution that will benefit the tax payers and not line the crooks' pockets with money anymore than they already are.


As for McCain....no matter what....at least he had the balls to say....HEY...we have a problem here.  That is more than other politicians have done who benefited from FMFM money.


Of course, I personally don't have a problem with
any of it. I don't look to the debates to help make up my mind, they are for entertainment value to me. I simply was putting out there what I had read. I too agree, the VP debate is going to be the one everyone wants to see.
I personally believe that they are both good men...sm
We are lucky to have two such good men to vote for. That being said, you need to do your own research at reliable places, keep an open mind, and take nothing at face value. In the end, we all vote with, hopefully, our brains/hearts/instincts. The issues are what really matter. Who honestly represents your values and who is going to help the ordinary person, the middle class, the poor, the rich, whatever is your agenda.
What makes you think that I personally don't?

pub or dem, who benefited from this should be the ones financially responsible to repair it.  But that isn't going to happen and I'm sick of hearing about who's responsible for it.  What about the homeowners who applied for these mortgages that they knew they couldn't afford?  I hold them responsible.  What about the banks who gave them the loan, knowing they could never repay it, but didn't care because they were just going to sell it?  I hold them responsible.  What about the CEOs who made millions on their severenace packages when they walked away from these failing companies?  I hold them responsible.  I don't care what party they are affiliated with.  But the fact is, no one person is going to be held accountable.  As a whole, the taxpayers will be made to be responsible.


You talk a good game and some of what you say makes sense.  Unfortunately, you have to read through all the pub/dem cr@p to really get to what you're saying.  Are you going to try to tell me that not 1 single pub had anything to do with any of this?  That it all rests on the individual dems?  Come on -- that's a load of bull and you know it.


And I respect yours. Personally,
if I had to be in a foxhole with someone, it would be McCain no question.  I have a feeling that Obama would look out for himself. 
Personally, I think she meant (Lou
.
i personally don't care much for either of them

Madeline Halfbright was Clinton's Sec. of State.  Don't even get me started on her.


No matter what, I give nobody a free pass just by the R behind his/her name.  Look at Olympia Snow & Susan Collins!  Talk about embarrassments!


I personally think that we should drop

everything except for American.  We need to unite and come together and we need to drop the extra titles.  That doesn't mean we should forget where we come from or our heritage.  It just means that when we lose focus on us all being Americans and just Americans....we start to categorize and stereotype and segregate ourselves.


Besides, I really don't want to be call an Indian-German-Scottish-Hungarian-American.  I'm an American and I'm proud of that.


I personally think Palin has now
Joe Biden has been in politics for a very long time.  Palin and McCain in no way answer any question directly.  Palin took a shot at the media through an interview with Brian Williams.  When asked to state the examples of the bashing she feels are wrong, she only gave one, and then didn't want to talk about it anymore.  I have to say that even though you feel Joe or Obama faced with a real problem are under the gate and squealing, you'd better look at the examples of McCain and Palin interviews first.  Pretty much all I hear out of McCain's mouth is "I'm sorry."  JMO, of course.
To Gourdpainter: I want to personally s/m

thank you for your many insightful posts on this board during this whole election process.  Your posts along with sam's posts have very accurately paralleled the glaring differences between these two candidates, yours being ones of depth of knowledge, integrity, tolerance and a true desire for change for the better, whereas, the other one's posts have been largely based on garbage gleaned from questionable websites, blogs and other biased sources that have accomplished nothing other than to incite hatred and intolerance in support of a candidate who has based his whole campaign on filthy lies and evil smear tactics in pathetic attempts to discredit his opponent who has risen above this display of low-down politics.


So, my hat's off to you, Gourdpainter, for setting an exemplary example for all of us to aspire to!!  


Personally, I tried 6 times and still

can't get away from them. Even this tax probably won't help. You name it, I've tried it except Chantix (sp) but I need a doctor to prescribe it and I don't have a doctor yet.


My mom smoked until she was 79. Died 4 months later. DH doesn't care if I don't quit after that because his mother died 6 months after she quit. Doesn't make sense, but it did happen.


I personally feel that this is

the natural cycle of our planet.


It still amazes me how AL Gore can go from place to place on a his private jet telling others we should be concerned about global warming.


How does this affect me personally?

AIG is losing more and more money every day...  we all know that.  My story is that my BF is on Worker's Comp for an injury.  He will never be back to what he was, but is as good as he is going to get until he can have a knee replacement, which they will not because of his young age.  So we are thinking it is time to settle with the insurance company - who is backed by AIG...


They are already offering us a lot less than what we expected because they say they don't have money to give, but what happens if we hold out and then the company goes belly up?  Do we just lose out completely then?


Can WC go belly up?  I mean, is it backed by the government since it is mandated by the government and he will keep getting his benefits if he does not settle or are we looking at maybe losing even his weekly check and medical benefits and so we need to take what we can get while we can?


I personally don't find either
of them particularly attractive but I would say Michelle is more attractive.
I personally don't agree with this.

I think gay marriage is wrong.  I would not mind a civil union so much but to me....marriage is a sacred thing between a man and woman.  It is bad enough that marriage between some men and women isn't taken as seriously as it used to be and that alone saddens me. 


I truthfully am sick and tired of having homosexuality shoved down my throat everyday.  These protests that are more riot like than actual protests, gay people knocking a cross out of an older woman's hand while she was civilly showing her point of view and was attacked for it.  The public displays in church of kissing and dancing around.  The spray painting of buildings and churches.  It is just ridiculous.  Acting like immature and childish brats does not warrant you the right to get married.  I think I might have more compassion for them if they did not act like they have since voters voted against gay marriage in California. 


I have some gay friends who are even ashamed by the stupidity of other gay people who act in such a manner. 


This is just something that I will never condone nor be happy with.  I do not hate homosexuals nor am I a homophobe.......this is just a lifestyle that I cannot approve of.  We are all entitled to our opinions on this subject....so please no bashing of me just because I was honest about my view points.  Whether or not you agree with me....fine.  We will just have to agree to disagree.


Personally....I'm tried of hearing it from
both sides.  I'm tired of the name calling from both sides.  This debate is getting nowhere and yet some of you people just cannot let it go and just agree to disagree.  There will never be a middle ground found on this discussion.  So let's just drop it and stop all the vicious attacks.
I personally feel that

Specter has been there for too long anyway.  The man has been there since 1980.  Time for some new blood. 


I agree with you and what you said about the crats.  I personally feel that libs on here give the crats too much credit just like the pubs on here give them too much credit.  If either side really gave a rip about the American people, neither party would have voted for all this spending under Bush and Obama. 


As for the pubs, yes they keep saying no but it is because their constituents are saying no or did you not pay attention to the tea parties and the fact that thousands of people showed up to tell government to stop spending our money.  The pubs are trying to rebound by doing what their constituents want even though they didn't mind spending under Bush.


Both parties are full of double standards, temper tantrums, and whining.  When the pubs are in control...the crats do nothing but whine and stomp their feet and vice versa.  You can always tell when people on here are for one particular party because the thing they complain about is something their own party does but they never admit it.  Wise up, people!!! 


How many politicians are out there that you truly believe care about you and me?  All I see is a bunch of people bickering over party lines and making promises to get elected and then spending their whole term trying to pay back the people who donated to their campaign to get them elected by being their puppet.  That is what Washington has become and for those of you who refuse to see that both parties are involved....well....that is just sad.


I personally feel that

neither those memos nor those pictures should be released.  Look at the turmoil it has caused since the memos alone were released.  You got half of the story without all the information being released.  You have Pelosi lying through her teeth trying to save her own skin while pointing the blame at the CIA and Bush's administration while claiming she knew nothing.  It is just unnecessary turmoil right now especially since we still have troops in Iraq, Afghan....and God only knows when we will have to go to Pakistan to get the nukes away from the terrorists.  This just isn't the time to be going after our own people.  Fighting amongst ourselves only makes the true enemy stronger. 


I personally feel that those pictures will put our troops in more danger than they already are.  It will give extremist groups more ammo to recruit more people to their cause. 


And no matter what you feel about waterboarding....be it torture or extreme interrogation......terrorists do much worse to the people they capture.


Our objective right now is to win the war and keep America safe. 


So JBB, you know these people personally?
--
I personally do not feel that

he got second place just because he is gay.  If the voters were so anti-gay....he wouldn't have made it that far in the first place.  I think it is unfair to suggest that he lost because he is gay....just like I think it is unfair for someone to not enjoy his music merely because of his sexual preference. 


I personally feel that you need to do

some more research on what government controlled healthcare would do to privately owned insurance companies.  You need to look at the whole picture and not just the BS the democratic party dishes out to you that you so willingly take and believe without batting an eyelash.  Insurance companies will go under, more people will lose jobs.  If everyone has healthcare, more people will go to the doctor for sniffles and colds.  It will make the healthcare costs go up and Obama wants healthcare costs to go down.  The only way to do that is to limit the care that people can have.  Government will also have to cap what doctors and nurses can make and therefore we will have fewer and fewer people entering the medical field.  If care is limited because of costs, we might as well forget about research for new treatments because even if they have a new treatment, government healthcare won't approve of you to have it.  More people will be given death sentences instead of treatment in the attempt to cut healthcare costs.  Waiting periods will be longer because there will be more people wanting healthcare and less doctors and nurses to provide said healthcare.  You need to stop and think about this.  You are so blind on this subject it really is baffling.  Someone who preaches about research and so far all you have given on this subject is the same rhetoric Obama spews out which is nothing but total BS!


Our country is broke.  China pretty much owns us.  More and more people are losing jobs.  In my state the unemployment went up into the double digits again.  We cannot afford this healthcare plan and even if we could....it is a horrible idea and definitely something that shouldn't be rushed to pass because once we do this....you can't take it back. 


And another thing....the only way to pay for this is to tax us more and yet Obama promised not to raise any kind of taxes of 95% of American people.  Why are you letting him get by with that.  If a pub had made that sort of promise and renigged on it....like Bush Senior did........you all would be on him like flies on stink.  Why the double standards here?


Personally, I am debating nicely
both boards have been slow and peaceful for the most part. Debate is not fighting. It's only when someone gets offended and starts preaching down to the other debaters does it get personal.

I just disagree with you on one point and that's abortion. I believe all children born and unborn are equal. I don't expect you to see it my way, but I will defend and state my position not to incite an insult fest but to foster debate :)