No one uses "peahen", so I insist on the "Mr." for sake of clarity.

Posted By: Mr. Peacock - NM on 2009-05-02
In Reply to: Gender is implied in the name - aviculture

X

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

rubber and - glue
- Not really a loss, IMHO. - Zville MT
- Apparently you've been sniffing the glue - Old part-timer
- See my post regarding Specter, please. - TechSupport
  - yeah, but - glue
    - So you do anything to get reelected? You don't get it, do you? - TechSupport
      - I don't know where you get the cheap motel reference from - glue
        As do you, my dear. As do you. - TechSupport
        Tech Support: 'Peacock' would be a better username for you! - ?
        Or "Sam", as he used to be called. - *
        I remember 'Sam', I always thought she was a woman. - ?
        He said he was, but his posts were definitely - masculine, & identical to T.S's.
        My gosh--stop the personal bashing... - Kendra
        It is another one of those - Ashamed of some fellow libs.
        And we should care because.....? - ctmt
        It's kinda fun to watch you playing mental bumper cars - with yourself.
        Beautiful birds...thank you very much. But, make it Mr. Peacock, will you? - TechSupport
        Gender is implied in the name - aviculture
        No one uses "peahen", so I insist on the "Mr." for sake of clarity. - Mr. Peacock - NM
        maybe common for your age group (my dear) - glue
        Oh, you're quite wrong. - TechSupport
        lets describe you - glue
        There are plenty of us who get - Trigger Happy
        He called you a 'crone', why do you keep defending him?...nm - oho
        I am with 'glue'. ,,,,,,,,,,,,sm - ?
        So you have a problem with big words? - ctmt
        If you do not like what I write, MOVE ON. - ?
        Yep, remember him calling us a bunch of old cronies? - No TS fan here.
        I'd like you to find that post for me, please. - TechSupport
        Find it For Yourself - I'm not your maid...
        Yup, he's a know-it-all JERK. - !
        TS himself admitted being of advanced age. - ?
        Yeah, it's what I call... - Male MT Syndrome
        That would probably make him a codger - A.Nonymous
        As a kid, we called them "old BUZZARDS". - The shoe seems to fit, huh!
        crone : codger - oho
        Was that cronies... - or actually 'crones'?
        Whatever you want to call it TS... - You were insulting us...no matter what you want to
        'Whatever' is a word used by teenagers - who can't be bothered to think before they spea
        Whatever... - LOL!!
        Yes, exactly......whatever, whatever....! nm - ?
        Well....the solution to your problem is - Trigger Happy
        Mr. Peacock's or whatever's posts are no 'problem' to me. - ?
        I think Trigger Happy is Either Tech Support's Wife - Or just another moniker...
        I just get tired of people - Trigger Happy
        You must confuse me with somebody else because I never - ?
        Projecting your personal insecurities much? - ctmt
        Once again...if you don't like his posts - Trigger Happy
        Ah, but you see, you're wrong again. (Are you masochistic or something?) - TechSupport
        An inappropriately personal question - A.Nonymous
        OMG!! Is T.S. one o' them FUZZIES? - (Check that scene out on YouTube - hysterical!)
        where is the link?...nm - ?
        Again, what are you talking about in your so - ?
        name calling - wrong
        Touche' :) :) :) - bee
        Same thing could be said about you - Trigger Happy

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

Addendum for sake of clarity.
For the sake of clarity, the hearings on the The Imperial Presidency of GW Bush and Possible Legal Response are being conducted in the House Judiciary Committee, not the House of Representatives since, like the energy bill, Pelosi's position is one of "impeachment is off the table." Just how long she can keep it off the table is anybody's guess. John Conyers is skeptical by nature and, in the past, has been lukewarm and uncommitted one way or the other on impeachment. Evidently he has changed his mind when confronted with evidence he could no longer ignore. This was discussed by him during his interview on Democracy Now! in one of those programs back in June. Though he was not willing to comment on "an ongoing investigation," he did make it quite clear that he will exhaust all avenues in "getting to the bottom" of the issues that are being raised in this HDC process and take appropriate action.

http://thebivouac.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/rep-kucinich-takes-phone-caller-questions-on-impeachment-video/
Kucinich talking about HJC impeachment process, C-Span, Washington Journal. There is about 30 minutes of video here.

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/35061
At this link, you will find these links:
Hearing on Impeachment Videos
Submitted by davidswanson on Sat, 2008-07-26 18:06.

Kucinich enters hearing to cheers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2MWTh0QF40
Rep. Robert Wexler:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_T1ojrKhp6E
Rep. Steve King:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eZxCloEbQk
Rep. Jerrold Nadler:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hL7259BAP9s
Rep. Dennis Kucinich:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRAcenaTVkQ
Bruce Fein:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80IphtHrFzg
Vincent Bugliosi:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDAFozFn4kU
Bruce Fein:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXyDK2-p4fU
Vincent Bugliosi:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q53p34yzZac
Vincent Bugliosi:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7abu9a0xtNI
Lamar Smith:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epf0QpeFcag
Rep. Baldwin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFNmanXtZ9o
Maurice Hinchey:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CHKV-7vvYk
Rep. Dan Lungren:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKc5e0oAvYM
Protesters ejected:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uosDxv1bjCc
Rep. Walter Jones:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU5HKfes0cE
Congressman Steve Cohen:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZezNyKmKF1M

What are they calling him "Mr." Obama...
Not all the time, but a lot of thetime they say "Mr" Obama. I just read a newspaper article with that reference and I hear it off and on the t.v. and radio news.

Thanks for the clarity..nm
x

Teabagging clarity (or not)...(sm)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#30160248

ROFL....

Why is it you insist
on saying she is stupid? She has successfully run her state with high approval ratings. Do you have a problem with people who say doggoneit? That is stereotypical of you.

What I wonder is how people look like who insist that
Michelle ist gorgeous, beautiful, wow, lovely, fantastic.c....?

If you insist, we could always bring Bristol
unlike McC's supporters, I actually listen to my candidate when he says off limits. You are too covered with mud to realize he was defending your idiotic VP candidate and trying to shield her and her family from the glare of some VERY unfavorable media. The only chickens around this roost coming back are the ones that W set loose in the coop. I'll pass on following up the skeletons in McC's closet out of respect for my candidate's feelings. REAL American family values tell us not to go there.

We insist bc issue has NOT been debunked because
Still waiting for the courts to decide.

why do you insist on changing the subject
when Bush was in and we mentioned Clinton we'd be hemmed and hawed at that Clinton and Gore were gone and to get over it. Now that we say something about Mr. Messiah and we get Bush/Cheney comments.

Give it a rest. They are gone.

Why do you insist on ignoring the facts?..(sm)

They are not trying to "teach our children that homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle." They are trying to teach our children how not to beat the crap out of someone who is different, including homosexuals. How hard is that to understand? If people were teaching this at home, they wouldn't have to teach it at school.

Its called TOLERANCE, not acceptance.

oh for pete's sake
The far right is reading something sinister into this. Even your link acknowledges that Obama voted against this bill with an intentionally inflammatory name because of technical wording that would infringe upon Roe v. Wade but wasn't opposed to the federal version with different wording. He's not in favor of leaving babies to die. For pete's sake, no one is. These kinds of bills are thrown around all the time by both sides just so they can use it as ammo against the other side later, things like Women's Human Rights bill and Anti-baby Mutilation Act, so when the other sides votes for or against their opponent can say, "you voted against women's human rights," or "you voted in favor of baby mutilation."

I hope for your sake

your brother or son are never on the wrong side of a divorce case that involves a politician. To reach down from the Governor's office into a matter belonging to the trooper's direct superiors is nothing but abuse of power and vindictiveness. That should scare the blue right off your hair.

Oh for heaven's SAKE
Hitler? Marx? You don't know what you are talking about, & bringing your religion into it gives your religion less credibility, doesn't give you more.

http://atheism.about.com/od/adolfhitlernazigermany/a/ChristFascism.htm

Get a life, for God's sake!
.

For heaven's sake
What's next, that pie he was eating looked exactly like Elvis? Good grief.

Oh for Pete's sake, it won't work.

It will go underground. Like it or not, it is tied now to big business. You quoted it. This will not induce responsibility. You stand by your beliefs because you feel it just and it makes you feel good without much thought about the ramifications, the immediate and the future.

It is this kind of behavior that drives me nuts. This is the same behavior of why we as the United States are looked upon with such scorn pretty much around the world because we keep pushing our beliefs on others because we feel it just and it makes us feel good without much thought or regard to the people and the possible outcome. Not to mention, it tends to prey on the weak.

I think the method of abortion is what gets you all riled up. Would it make you feel better if abortions were all done chemically? Probably wouldn't be near as adamant about it, the vividity of it is what gets your attention. Too bad the site of bloodied, mangled, bodies of men, women, and children of those who die during war doesn't ignite the same fire in your heart.

George Carlin said this back in the 70s and it always stuck in my head. "Religion is like a lift in your shoe, just don't nail lifts to the natives feet".

Oh for Pete's sake. Why should this be an issue? sm
The one that springs to mind is John Edwards $400 haircuts.

I mean, really. Of course they want her to look good while she's on the campaign trail.

Why don't you ask who pays for Obama's , or Michelle Obama's wives wardrobe? Oh wait, maybe those were paid for by the gazillions of dollars he gets donated by anonymous donors overseas....or wherever.

This is really a nonissue for most people. You all are just trying to rile things up.

For goodness' sake, where did critical thinking go?
It's an editorialized article that includes many statements and facts meant for the reader to consider. It's not something intended to be only true or not true. You're supposed to THINK about it and measure it against what you know and come to your own opinion about it, and if it jars you, check out the facts for accuracy yourself. What has happened to the right's ability to think soundly?

For heaven's sake, READ THE ARTICLE.
the part about charges dropped WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It means that the charges can be brought against him again AFTER the review has concluded and the new policies are in place. Also, pay especialy close attention to the part where it says that Abd Al-Rahim will REMAIN IN CUSTODY. Does that sound like a free pass?

Oh, for pete's sake, stop with the Palin bashing... sm
We know that you hate her. Big surprise.

The more you bash McCain/Palin, the better they look.

Makes Obama look bad, the way his supporters trash her continually.

Get the facts - not fear - and for pete's sake stop being so nauseating
you probably don't know who I'm addressing it to and I want to keep it that way.

It's good you support your candidate, but this rhetoric back and forth, mine is more experienced than your, you'll be crying all the way to the polls while I'm laughing, blah, blah, blah.

Truth is we don't know who will win. One thing I'm seeing is most don't like any choice, but you hate one so much that you belittle the other side to prop yours up.

Also I'm not seeing anyone do any research. It's just mine has more experience than yours but no facts to back it up. Again - yada yada yada.

To me none of them are overly qualified. Some I can't stand, but I don't have that "I love this candidate or that candidate".

I just say stop belittling others until you can come up with hard facts as to why one is more qualified than the other. (well even then don't belittle others - just state the facts).

For Pete's sake, I agree. Let me say, CARE PACKAGES ARE A GREAT THING TO DO!
Let's all send care packages. I will check out the web site you provided and if it's legit my heart and pocketbook will lead me. Trust me, to your surprise I'm not a stingy old witch sitting here not willing to give a dime to the troops but yet preach about how much I love them. Don't believe that, well then it only rains under your cloud.

Where the disconnect is, is that you think that people are not allowed to be against this war, against this administration, and still be for the troops. When you come here and tell us what the troops are asking for in the form of care packages, it ticks me off even more with this administration for putting them in this situation, but you have reminded me that they are with needs and wishes and for their sacrifice we all should give to them.

In discussing this, our conversation can not be limited to care packages. Let me applaud you in all sincerity for being proactive and on top of sending the packages you have put together. I know you will make someone in Iraq's day brighter, a big hats off to you! I just happen to think they shouldn't be in this predicament anyway and on that we may never see eye to eye and that's fine.