Relevancy................ sm

Posted By: m on 2009-05-06
In Reply to: Since neither have - pxmt

Apparently you missed my statement that it is possible for polygamists and bigamists to love their wives/husbands just as much as gay people love their partners. So that DOES make it relevant. Gay people don't have the corner on the market for loving their partners. Surely you can understand that. No one could be dim enough not to.

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

Gotta question for gay rights people. - Trigger Happy
- You already posted this question. Civil unions are - NOT equal. Marriage is. n/m
- I still haven't seen a concrete answer - sbMT
  - The polygamy and animal arguments are irrelevant - pxmt
    - Polygamy isn't just religious beliefs - sbMT
      - That is not polygamy - pxmt
        Bigamists, polygamists and marriage, oh my! sm - m
        Since neither have - pxmt
        Relevancy................ sm - m
        Sorry - pxmt
        I definitely cannot imagine - Mythbuster
        And I certainly can't imagine........... sm - m
  - I could use a couple more honey-do's....nm - Evelyn
  - I see no reason why - Seriously
    - To be quite honest - sbMT
  - As a supporter - AnudderMT
- Did you ever notice... - CrankyBeach
  - Oddly enough .. - Evelyn
  - How do you reach that conclusion? - Uhm'ng MT
    - Maybe I should have said 35 to 40 years ago... - CrankyBeach
      - Actually, I don't see it as hypocritical - Uhm'ng MT
- I just wanted to say thanks. - Trigger Happy
  - Thank you for your effort, TH! You made - MTfromLA
- No...(sm) - Just the big bad
  - The "validity" of "gay Christians' faith" is not a government issue. - TechSupport
  - Well....civil unions would have - Trigger Happy
    - I think you're right...(sm) - Just the big bad
    - I think that's where it gets confusing - AnudderMT
      - Wow...that is sort of confusing. - Trigger Happy
        I think it's more making a statement - AnudderMT
        That makes sense. - Trigger Happy
        I should correct what I said about - Trigger Happy
        I don't think its a matter of not "getting" it....(sm) - Just the big bad
- My personal opinion - AnudderMT
  - Hmmm...that is interesting. - Trigger Happy
- No, because it's still not equal. Human beings should - not be 2nd class because of gender preference.
  - I understand that this is a very - Trigger Happy
    - Same sex couples are tired of compromising. - They want an equal right to live their lives.
      - Will somebody please tell me...(sm) - ctmt
        marriage vs civil union - A.Nonymous
        Civil union rights. - ctmt
        My point, exactly! - A.Nonymous
        If we all we're being so stubborn about this - Trigger Happy
        Compromise: - Mythbuster
        All or nothing at all - A.Nonymous
        In my opinion.... - Trigger Happy
        Well put............ sm - m
        Please excuse the typo in my subject line. - Trigger Happy
        My take - AnudderMT
        Thanks for 1, but 2 wasn't really an answer. (sm) - ctmt
        I would rather condone polygamy than - ****
        I personally feel that polygamy is - Trigger Happy
        Polygamy is predominately - Mythbuster
        That's what I am saying. I am also against - ****
        Then perhaps abolishing marriage is the answer - AnudderMT
        "Uppity homos"??!! Are you SERIOUS??!!! - ctmt
        I agree. In simple words: - ****
        What is "normal" anyway? - Trigger Happy
        Apparently, 'normal' to some people - Mythbuster
        Yes, I agree. But still... - ****
    - my opinion - me
      - Okay...well...let's go this route. - Trigger Happy

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

You have no idea of historical relevancy. sm
I am furious at people such as you who would put us all at risk, in fact, put our military at risk daily. SHAME ON YOU!