So she teaches ethics in writing. SM
Posted By: MT on 2007-02-21
In Reply to: Now you know I am not - Lurker
And lots of my family lives on the West Coast. I didn't realize your friend, who exaggerates, is the spokesperson for the price of gasoline. Know what, Lurker, I think this is the first time I ever felt the need to post something proving your wrong. I think you are the one with the problem. Get over it.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Ethics and Legal Ethics
You obviously understand nothing about "legal ethics", confusing it with "ethics". Obviously, arguing something to be true that you know to be false is extremely dishonest and unethical. But legal ethics demands it. Similarly, legal ethics demands that you do everything in your power if it will help your client -- or at least this holds for legal ethics in some cultures, and the whole point of legal ethics is that no one should be criticized for doing something in its name. He was representing his clients which does not prove his *gasp* moral compass.
Hope someone teaches O that there are 50 states,
not the 57 he mentioned on the campaign trail (oh yeah, there ARE 57 Islamic states)
That is contradictory to what our faith teaches
You are asking us to only follow part of our faith by keeping our "religion personal". That is contradictory of what our Lord told us to do, so now you are treading on my right to follow my Lord.
Christianity is not a "blind faith". That just goes to show your lack of understanding. But since no matter what I say you will not concede to any points, this conversation has ceased to productive.
And the radical religious right in America teaches...sm
that no one gets to heaven unless they believe in the "Lord Jesus Christ". I do not agree with either, but they both have the same belief that there is no way but their way. There is no difference.
Is also shows how much you know about ethics and morality....
You appear to be a fool. An unethical fool.
Common sense and ethics
seems to become less and less around these days. I agree with your post. The b/c issue is so the least of my worries and I simply don't understand exactly what it is the supporters of same want to accomplish.
I fear we haven't seen anything yet. Heard on CNN (which of course some will say is not credible) that the unemployment rate could reach 20% within the next few months. I should think with MTs not having enough work now, that would keep them sufficiently busy worrying. I don't know what Obama will do. All I know to do is pray. I think it is entirely possible that Bush AND the congress have put us so far in the tank there may not be any way out economically. My guess is that we will be taken over by one of our creditor nations and there goes what's left of our freedom, certainly the freedom to get on the internet and state our thoughts. But then Bush has bought himself a ranch in Argentina isn't it? So if his residence in Big D doesn't suit him along with the condition he has left this country in, he has an escape. Unfortunately most of us can't afford that luxury so we'll be left to deal with the mess he and the idiot congress have left us along with a massive debt in proportions I cannot begin to comprehend.
Yes, there are many more things at this point that are far more important than the b/c issue. Wouldn't surprise me if these lawsuits are being filed to dupe people who believe everything they hear. As I've said before, I do not believe that those who are keeping this b/c thing rolling posting the same thing over and over and over are actually MTs. I think they are promoting a political agenda. I have said this before and I notice no one has posted challenging my thoughts.
I had a great holiday. Thanks for asking. I hope you had a great time too.
Wonder how that SP ethics part 2 deposition is going?
Wonder if she can manage to stay out of the court system until after November 4th.
All that ethics housecleaning comes back to haunt SP.
The moment McCain made his announcement of the Palin pick, I googled her name and the troopergate investigation was the first thing that came up. I remember this well because I posted a lengthy piece on this forum after I found out who she was. It's still there in the archives. She was already in deep poop over this before anybody ever knew she would be the VP pick….something that McCain in his infinite wisdom decided to overlook in his haste to pull a maverick political stunt and try to reign in all those disaffected Hillary voters, for all the good it did him.
At that point, there had been no democratic team of attorneys (independent investigators, not sent by the Obama campaign) or media scrutiny. You can hardly lay the blame for this fiasco on Obama, though I am sure you would like to try. Furthermore, the investigation at that point was being conducted by the Alaska State Legislature. I will not take a great deal of time trying to argue with you over the bias or democrat witch hunts you are trying to insinuate. Facts are facts, dear, and I have no sympathy for poor little Palin who made an entire political career based on ethics housecleaning only to end up on the short end of that stick by her own hand. This is your candidates' and campaign's problem, not mine. Palin is obviously not ready for prime time and can't hold her own with the big boys. No surprise there.
I'm Writing In Tina Fey (nm)
.
Your writing style gives you away....(sm)
You are holier than thou in your attitude. You can't get away by claiming you're not the same "sm" poster, when you use the same phrasology over and over in your posts.
Go stalk someone else, because you tend to only bother the conservative posters. We do try to skip over you as much as possible, but you tend to post all over the board these days, don't you.
Where would I find this in writing? sm
Would you tell me where I would find this info, please?
***Under Obama's plan, every one making under $200,000 will get a tax refund (and yes that includes those who don't even pay taxes) of at least $500.***
The writing is on the wall!!!
xx
I assume you are writing all this from Iraq?
Otherwise don't call anyone a coward but yourself. If you support this war, get off your flabby butt and get over there.
When Hitler sent the German army into an unpopular war, were the Germans who wanted the war stopped and the troops brought home cowards? Did they not show support for the troops by questioning Hitler's war? They were admirable and good people to stand up in the face of the German political administrations' choices!. They LOVED their troops but did not LOVE Hitler. Some of the German troops who died in Hitler's misguided war were my husband's relatives. And no, Bush is not Hitler so don't try misquoting me on that. The point is, not all wars are noble and good, despite what your proteswarrior group might say. And just because a PERSON or administration got us into a deadly MESS doesn't mean we should remain in that quagmire and continue letting our troops be killed, whether it is the Civil War, Vietnam or Iraq. Gee, at one time even the Civil War seemed like a good idea. 650,000 lost? Was it worth it? Maybe other alternatives could have been explored?
You hawks are not going to get it. Us libs can love our troops and support them but we cannot love and support this war. We can't pretend this is a good and noble cause.
Writing mine in because I don't care
Many say that's a "wasted vote," but I think not. It shows both candidates that there are people that don't agree with either one of them! Besides, if I don't like either one, I'm not voting for the "lesser of two evils" because either way, it's still evil in the end, right? I'd rather "waste" a vote on a write-in candidate than have any remorse later for placing a vote I can't stand behind.
Yeah I wasn't really writing that
like as maybe it's a fact. Like I said conspiracy theorist idea. Like how there are aliens and the government is hiding them from us, or how we bailed out companies so they could go on very expensive retreats and bird hunts (OOPS wait that one IS true! LOL)
Sorry I wasn't trying to say anything bad, promise!
Amen for writing this. Do not forget
I heard and read that if a president was not doing well in the current office, it was due to the president before him. It takes about 7-8 years for the mess to start showing.
While I don't think that writing a check cures al ills
I certainly hope that what they can buy is regulated like WIC and food stamps in my state. While you believe that everyone there are innocent victims I'm not so naive to believe that everyone would use this money the right way. There should be a block on tobacco and alcohol, and they shouldn't be allowed to pull cash back on these cards. Otherwise, I don't have a problem with them buying other home, clothing or food related items.
Oh, by the way did you hear that people are showing up at the relief centers that are NOT from the hurricane devasted area trying to get$2,000 debit cards? If you believe that people won't try to can the system then you don't live in the real world.
You should be writing to your democratically controlled congress...
about those issues as well. They are the ones we actually vote for personally and put there. They are the ones who should be taking care of us. Their approval rating is way lower than Bush's. And yes, I am pointing fingers at BOTH sides of the aisle.
My candidate is only Mccain because I don't see the point in writing in someone else
I'm sorry you all are too DENSE to see what will happen when Obama is president. I'm so over this. We will meet back here in a couple of years and see what all you Obama lovers are saying when half your paycheck goes to a bunch of lazy bums who won't get off their butts and get a job. You are all obviously to enthralled with his nice speeches and pretty features to look any deeper.
It doesn't matter what we say or how we say it or what evidence we bring up, you will blindly follow that man off a cliff, and sadly, you will be dragging the rest of us with you.
I don't care if he is black mexican european greek or chinese. he is not what we need for our country. Let him take his socialist view points elsewhere.
maybe they just stopped writing that calendar at that point
because it seemed like a good place to stop. I mean, they had to stop at some point, right?
it's more complicated than that...they didn't just stop writing. nm
x
Bush is busy writing his legacy.
x
If I understant your previous writing correctly,
apparently you have been missing in action over the last 8 years. There have been absolutely NO checks or balances, so how would that be any different than what we already have. Obama ushering in a New World Order? You have completely misunderstood this whole conversation. These things have started almost 20 years ago. It is not NEW, it is now being expounded upon, but NOT NEW!! Bush played into this all of his 8 years in office...maybe you should look again and read some more. I am just the messenger.
|
