Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

That's funny - on Dr. Phil?

Posted By: Zville MT on 2009-01-22
In Reply to: Anybody up for a good laugh? s/m - penny

You would think he would be able to help her!!! LOL!!!


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Thank you, Dr. Phil. :-) nm
nm
Who said anything about Dr. Phil?
For starters, I did not author the original "classical psychopath" post, which Backwards Typist (BT) automatically assumed applied to her instead of the governor (who, by the way, IS a classic psychopath). But I did find the knee-jerk paranoid reaction rather intriguing, so I decided to respond, as is customary on this forum, while exercising 1st amendment rights.

Now here you come along to defend BT and, as is your usual style, you have conflated the situation way beyond the original context, to now include "whatever opinions expressed on this board that don't agree with" mine. Since I was not the original poster and my reply was a response to BT's own paranoid conclusion (and not an original premise of mine), the connections you are trying to make here are, shall we say, rather void of logic.

It does not take a Dr. Phil to look up a simple definition and apply it to a given context. There is nothing particularly judgmental in doing so, especially in light of the fact that I never claimed to be any sort of expert. It is merely an exercise in intellect and logic, concepts which, on more than one occasion, have seemed to cause you to go ballistic, as you are now demonstrating.

If you are so tired of my alleged "holier-than-thou" attitude (your perception, yet not my intent) and condescension, you could always opt to skip my posts and save yourself some aggravation, since you seem to think they are identifiable by my yellow-bellied choice to use sentence form in the name and subject box instead of the more "regular" habit of employing a consistent moniker. You seem to be pretty good at identifying your least favorite poster on this forum, despite the fact that I am not the only one who fails to meet your strict standards of always using a "regular name." I have my reasons for posting in this fashion, but do not necessarily feel compelled to defend or explain myself to you, other than to say that I've BTDT and did not enjoy being stalked by sam night and day for weeks on end when I did use a nick-name. I certainly do not think the tired, worn-out right-wing fringe mantra of "do you have something to hide?" merits further comment.

By the way, as long as we are nitpicking over apostrophe placement, you might want to run spell check on your posts next time, unless you think "been" is spelled "bene". Having a built-in editing tool comes in handy and only takes a few seconds. Wish we had that back in the dark ages in 1974 when I first started transcribing.

Things tend to get a bit murky at this point. When trying to admonish me for having a "lot of nerve speaking for anyone but" myself, you probably should eliminate the part where you are "so sure there are others" who think I am heavy-handed and rude, MS sm......m, or whatever your regular name is. I have no difficulty "owning" my opinions, but am not really interested in engaging with posters who use raw emotions and juvenile catch phrases as a substitute for thoughtful, well researched political debate. If you are ever in the mood to actually confront a real political issue head-on, back up claims with fact and express intelligent conclusions in place of whining, blowing things out of proportion and taking things WAY too personally, I would be more than happy to accommodate.

Well, thank you, Dr. Phil.........sm
Whatever opinions expressed on this board that don't agree with yours are now considered psychopathic and have markers of antisocial behavior and lack of conscience. What gives you the right to pass such judgment on anyone?

Personally, I am a little tired of your holier-than-thou attitude and condescending mannerisms that you have displayed consistently since you have bene posting here without having the intestinal fortitude to sign your posts with a consistent moniker. I'm sure there are others who think your brand of criticism is rather heavy-handed and rude. Now, let's (and it is spelled with an apostrophe, which you would know if you were an MT) think about what that says about your personality type.

Most regular posters on this board use a regular name in posting so we can tell who we are conversing with. You, on the other hand, choose not to. Do you have something to hide? Are you afraid to "own" your own opinions because subconsciously you know you are somehow deficient or inconsistent in your opinions and afraid that you will be called on it? You seem to gain a great deal of satisfaction in elevating yourself to a position of false piety and have no conscience in doing so. And don't bother saying that no sarcasm is intended because each and every one of your posts literally drip with sarcasm. You have a lot of nerve speaking for anyone but yourself.


Hey, Dr. Phil......(sm)

Not even close....LOL. 


Like Dr. Phil Says...and it's true:

"Those who have nothing to hide, hide nothing."  It matters not what y'all think of Dr. Phil. 


If you had the truth on your side, wouldn't you produce it?


Enough said.


Thanks for posting about Phil Donahue. I have not followed him, except sm
way back when when he had his talk show I loved to watch.

I agree with you, the site posted does not prove he is an atheist. I would have to hear it from his mouth to believe it.
Phil Berg for Hillary?
Philip Berg is/was an avid Hillary Clinton supporter and filed his motions before the Democratic Convention, didn't he? Besides, the court has not made any demands on Obama to produce anything. He released his birth certificate and the Hawaiian birth announcement, nothing more is required.

Also if you check Obama's official website, you'll see that Michelle Obama has a busy campaigning schedule while her husband is in Hawaii. I don't know, but I don't think it's too strange to think that she may have felt it was important to continue campaigning during his absence at such a crucial time.
I think Dr. Phil is kind of a bully.

Oprah and Ellen, and Dr. Phil

are not in a position to force the rest of us to share our wealth, punish us if we do not, while keeping their wealth for themselves.  Not a good comparison at all. 


Oprah is on record saying that (even with her multi-millions) she does not just hand money to individuals who tell her they need it.  Why should she think that would help someone who obviously failed to take care of their own money?  They want money?  They can go make it the hard way, as she has.  (Then she supports Obama.  Go figure!)


Obama is more like the minister who preaches fidelity, while having affairs with his parishioners.  He's someone who says that to help public schools, all children should have to attend them (except his own.)  Lectures on the evils of tobacco, raises taxes on it, while sneaking cigarettes.  Gets his own sweet deal on a mortgage, supports the bailout of deadbeats, yet penalizes those who have been responsible with their money.  Criticizes company executives for use of corporate jets, then flies on his own jet to Arizona just to sign a bill. 


Get the picture?  ''Do as I say, not as I do.''


This proves that Phil Berg is a hardhead who
twice failed legal action. So you still have presented nothing that back up your claim that this is still on the docket. By the way, ever heard of frivolous lawsuits. They are not confined to medical malpractice, dontcha know?
Did you ever wonder why most Democrats in politics don't embrace people like Phil.
or should I cally him Phillie.  There are some far leftist Democrats that no Democrat worth their salt wants to be hooked up with.  Phil is one of them. He has a long list of hates, some of which include cops.  He hates them.  If you remember his shows from eons ago, he had several shows about them.  No politician worth his salt has someone like that on his ticket.  Think about it.  When was the last time you saw Phil with a politician? 
Phil Donahue is the man. Had Bill O'Reilly shaking in his boots.nm
He makes good points and the only thing you get from his stance is that he doesn't want to fight the taliban, which is unfortunate for you NOT true.

Give a quote where he says the US should not fight the taliban.
already heard this - wasn't funny then, not funny now!
x
This is funny.nm
x
So are so funny
LOL, your posts get funnier and funnier..with more hate shining through, LOL. 
This is so funny! Thank you.
I copied it and sent it to everyone I know, and they love it, too. 
OMG! Too funny!!

Especially the guy who said he was in favor of national healthcare because he works 40 hours a week and his benefits are terrible.  Yet he didn't know that Bush doesn't WANT him to have good medical benefits.


The last guy was right on the money (even if he didn't know Bush's name):  Bush SHOULD be over there with a gun in his hand since he started this mess.


Someone should point out to these people who can't remember that his name IS what he is: BU_ _ SH _ _!


Vanna... I wanna buy a vowel.


That's funny. No, I am most

Too funny - here's 1 more
Donald Rumsfeld was meeting with George W for their daily brief regarding the war in Iraq.  Rumsfeld said to George, And yesterday, 3 Brazilian soldiers were killed in Iraq.  Bush is visibly distraught; hanging his head, wringing his hands.  He finally looks up at Rumsfeld and says, My God, that's terrible.  How many are in a Brazilian?
This is what is funny about this?

They have made up their minds they have got this thing won just like they did in 2004.  They don't even entertain the possibility that they will lose.  They are so egotistical to think they might even throw the elections to make the Republicans look like fools.  This is along the same thought process that they think they won by losing California primaries and losing on Prop. 50.


I think they know they're in trouble, but have chosen to lay their strategy out like they've got things under control.  The Democrat blogs are all up in arms about what is happening with the party.  Let's just say the extreme left is very unhappy with them right now, and they think the extreme left is their bread and butter.  They thought that in 2004 and look where it got them.


Wow, this really shows how screwed up they are, not you dem, but your party.


LOL - too funny.

Too funny. One of the best
http://seattle.nwsource.com/horsey/viewbydate.asp?id=1400 David Horsey from the Seattle Post-Intelligencer and Mike Keefe from The Denver Post consistenly nail it....too good.
It's almost funny to me
How heated this debate has gotten. When I looked at that site I posted, where it compares the current legislation and the proposed legislation, it doesn't look all that different, just more funding so that more children qualify.


Funny that. sm
Yours and one other are the only bad comments about her I have seen. it doesnt' appear to be working.
Too funny
Unfortunately too true.
I don't think it was funny....like I said, if he DID say it...
she should have slapped him silly right there in front of the cameras and everybody. But it IS rumor. It was told, supposedly, by 3 reporters from Arizona to this guy writing a book who has a bone to pick with McCain. As to not coming forward because of fear of retaliation...I don't buy them for a nanosecond. I am sure when this guy went looking for dirt some money crossed hands and a lot of embellishing went on...like any political smear book on any political candidate. When you can't deal with real issues that can be proven or disproven (Read "The Case Against Barack Obama" and you will know what I mean). There is none of the personal smear tactic where innuendo and "anonymous" quotes are used. Just plain simple historical fact that can be proven. THAT is the kind of information I pay attention to. Not the "anonymous" rumor stuff.

Obviously if it DID happen they wish it never happened. Obama wishes someone had not been taping when Wright went off on his rants. Obama wishes no one had checked on his fib about voting against saving babies who survive abortion. McCain wishes he hadn't done the things he did to cause his first marriage to fail. Everyone has regrets.

What about all the rumors and innuendo about Hillary Clinton bathmouthing the secret service people and calling them names every bit as hateful as what the rumor says JOhn McCain called his wife? I just chalked that up to rumor and innuendo because it could not be proven...just like I am doing about the McCain thing.

As to them denying it...why bring more attention to it...ever heard of "I think he doth protest too much?" I don't blame them. I would not dignify the accusation with a denial either.
DO YOU THINK THAT'S FUNNY?????
x
Funny...no.
Sad and pathetic......yes.  How can they ban one speaker because of his affair and lies and yet let another man speak who did the exact same thing.  The only difference is that Hilliary was not dying when Bill shoved a cigar up Monica's.....well....you get the idea.
Something funny about
the sandbox. Your subject line is a phrase I used a while back when I was on the run from the Bible thumpers. Their fearless leader will be hopelessly confused now that the libs are coming out in droves sporting all kinds of intimidating intelligence. Their heads snap around like Linda Blair in the Exorcist as they spin themselves into the ground and especially when the same phrases and concepts start showing up from all different directions. They really do not know what to do when they can't dominate the board and woop up on one lib at a time...seems to be their limit.
too funny

Yeah and McCain has a biracial love child..........just ask GW, his campaign told everybody the REAL truth. O is a closet muslim (just ask the mental giants on this board!). He eats baby brains for breakfast. He wants to teach kinder-kids the proper way to put on a condom. He's hiding, he's hiding, he's hiding..........but, he hasn't been able to drop a decent deuce since the onset of his campaign because the media is so far up his bum. Bad Obama. Bad, bad, bad. Spank him, spank him hard. Yeah, just like that. And the truth shall set you free.


Too funny!
I will throw softly here :-)  I guess my point is, and again, I may be showing my ignorance on the subject.  I am a Christian, coming from a very fundamental background, but have since strayed from so much of the legalism.  I am beginning to see a lot of things from a different light, if you know what I mean.  I was taught that same-sex relationships was a horrible, horrible sin.  I no longer feel that way about the issue.  I do have questions though.  We as a human race are here because of heterosexual relationships are we not?  Not from same-sex relationships.  Would we be extinct if that was all there was, and if it were the norm?  I have worked with gays and lesbians, I have been neighbors of gays and lesbians, as I mentioned two of my best friends are gays and lesbians.  I do not have an issue --- REALLY!  It is just some back of the mind questions that I have. I guess we all have questions and may never know the answers.  I am not voting against gay marriages.  Yes, your same-sex relationship is your business as my heterosexual relationship is mine - - but it seems as if no one is questioning mine - - Is this because it is right, and the norm???  What exactly are the issues here??. 
that's okay - it was funny the first

time.  I imagined myself as a human broach.


 


It is just too funny
to see it happen though. I know they are trying to distract with stupid things and it really shows this individuals ignorance. But, it is an amusing way to kill a few minutes while my new software downloads!
I think she is funny. . .
I get tired of the pompous know-it-all attitudes.
too funny
x
Too funny

That gave me my laugh for the night.  Thanks,



too funny - thanks

   


 


OMG - too funny
My friend emailed me a few weeks ago and said if he says "uh" one more time...
That was almost as funny as your

Funny -- that's what I see too -- Nothing!


Funny
Sorry, I thought it was funny when McCain slipped up and said "fellow prisoners."  He might have come closer to the truth than he realized.  I saw, and heard, Obama slip up on the number of states.  Big deal!!  Have you ever been so dog-tired you could barely speak your own name?  Obviously both Obama and McCain were in such a state but there's always those who try to make a mountain out of a mole hill!
A little funny...s/m
Here in the boondocks where I vote we don't even have voting MACHINES.  LOL  Not only that.......in spite of the fact that I KNOW all of the workers personally and they KNOW me, I have to show my driver's license!!!!  I never question it.  I do not know if this is a State requirement or if it's a requirement of this "backwoods,  hillbilly"  HONEST place in America.  Might not be such a bad idea if all elections went back to the backwoods way of doing business.
This is really funny to me. I did not need my...sm
12 grandchildren to come down to Florida to convince me to vote for Obama. Neither did my friends. Most of us would move back to Jersey before we would vote for McCain, especially the women, not likely. We have been Democrats all our lives and are not going to change now. Obama has the Jewish vote in Florida hands down.
Funny, you seem to know he will fix your little
11
You are funny and right!
McCain did himself in over and over... first picking Palin, then going to Washington with his superman cape on, then bashing Obama, being snotty on the View, being rude in the debates, making noises. What the heck? I think he would be worse than Bush. People think Bush is as bad as it gets but I think truly, McCain could be worse.
Too funny! Yes, I am an MT. nm
.
You know what's funny?
There is an Obama ad running here in Arkansas.  It cracks my husband and me up.  It is McCain advertising FOR Obama.  All showing McCain's angry expressions during the debate and at the end from McCain's own mouth saying he voted with Bush 90% of the time.  He also says that he has voted with Bush more than anyone else even from his own party.  That ought to cause most people's common sense (if they  have any) to kick in.
that is too funny
the bible contradicts itself all over the place
OH MY GOD. This was funny at first, but it's
gotten completely ridiculous & monotonous. Hillary and McCain threw everything at Obama including the kitchen sink. After their extensive teams of researchers and lawyers got through, they found the BC was a non-issue, otherwise they would've had a field day with it! Not to mention the DNC would've never let him run because they wouldn't have chanced losing on a technicality. The courthouse in Hawaii has his BC and has shown and certified it officially. Let me repeat, the birth certificate has been made available and certified. All the neighbors at the time remember his pregnant mother and when he was born. The newspapers have his birth announcement. WHAT is it going to take for you to get your head out of the sand and quit spamming the board with this nonsense?! Use some logic here.
Funny how
we give the government money to use in a way that is supposed to benefit us ... war, space exploration, etc. and all the bull$#it they choose to waste it on. Then as soon as they want to help regular hardworking people out who are caught in the rut of low pay for hard work (a big part due to big corps dumping us for cheap labor and ability to pollute other countries), we say it is socialism. Really? ... Really?
Funny, isn't it sam, ......sm
How Obama's background seems to be off limits but he can investigate everyone else. How does that promote equality in a nation that he says has become more divided than ever?