Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

The man who wants to make a Hotel out of Souter's property was on Fox News.

Posted By: Democrat on 2005-07-01
In Reply to: I sure don't agree with - MTME

I disagree with partial birth abortions as well.  That's one thing that has bothered me that Bill Clinton signed into law.  It should be outlawed. 




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

    The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
    To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


    Other related messages found in our database

    And even though my property value went down in a blue state...
    my taxes still went up. That's what goes on in a Democratic-controlled state. They sent my assessment that valued my home at $40,000--yes $40K less than last year and my taxes STILL went up. And you can bet property taxes in Washington are higher than those in Tennessee. I can't rent my home out for what my payment is, so each month, we lose money because we can't sell it with the housing market the way it is and did the right thing when we financed, by NOT financing a home we could not afford with an ARM. Luckily, we got a really good deal, so the house is still worth more than we paid for it, but not much and it doesn't really matter anyway because, like I said, we can't sell it. I think that I would be happy if your property values stayed the same, rather than falling.
    Rahm Emanuel Evading Property Tax
    On Home By Declaring Himself A Charity?

    Wow. When I’m wrong I’m the first eventual one to admit it, so I’ll go ahead and say it, “I was wrong.” Yes, I doubted that Obama could bring about the “change” I needed to not have to worry about paying bills anymore.

    Well Barack Obama has put my money where his Cabinet is with the news that his newly minted Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, has possibly been evading taxes on his home for years. How could he do it? Easy! He created a fraudulent charity in 2002, named it after him and his wife, set its address as his personal residence, and voila, taxes are gone:

    According to the Cook County Assessor’s website, the Chicago home of four-term Democrat Congressman and likely new White House Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, doesn’t exist. While the address of 4228 North Hermitage is listed as Emanuel’s residence on the Illinois State Board of Elections’ website, there seems to be no public record of Emanuel ever paying property taxes on this home…

    Why would 4228 North Hermitage property owners Rahm Emanuel and wife Amy Rule not pay property taxes?

    One reason could be because Emanuel and Rule declared their 4228 North Hermitage home as the office location for their non-profit foundation appropriately called the “Rahm Emanuel and Amy Rule Charitable Foundation”. As a non-profit headquarters, they may consider their home as exempt from paying taxes.

    Skeptical? You shouldn’t be! After six years, the “Rahm Emanuel and Amy Rule Charitable Foundation” has had only two donors. Can you guess who?

    The Rahm Emanuel and Amy Rule Charitable Trust was formed in 2002, when the Chicago lawmaker was first elected. The former Clinton White House aide and his wife, Amy Rule, are its only donors.

    USA Today has a great article about Rahm and other Dems, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who are illegally operating charities under their own names while failing to report that information.

    Congratulations, America, you’ve just elected another corrupt politician who surrounds himself with corrupt supporters. “Yes we can” steal from the government and those we represent!
    Source: Illinois Review and USA Today

    Rahm Emanuel Evading Property Tax
    On Home By Declaring Himself A Charity?

    Wow. When I’m wrong I’m the first eventual one to admit it, so I’ll go ahead and say it, “I was wrong.” Yes, I doubted that Obama could bring about the “change” I needed to not have to worry about paying bills anymore.

    Well Barack Obama has put my money where his Cabinet is with the news that his newly minted Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, has possibly been evading taxes on his home for years. How could he do it? Easy! He created a fraudulent charity in 2002, named it after him and his wife, set its address as his personal residence, and voila, taxes are gone:

    According to the Cook County Assessor’s website, the Chicago home of four-term Democrat Congressman and likely new White House Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, doesn’t exist. While the address of 4228 North Hermitage is listed as Emanuel’s residence on the Illinois State Board of Elections’ website, there seems to be no public record of Emanuel ever paying property taxes on this home…

    Why would 4228 North Hermitage property owners Rahm Emanuel and wife Amy Rule not pay property taxes?

    One reason could be because Emanuel and Rule declared their 4228 North Hermitage home as the office location for their non-profit foundation appropriately called the “Rahm Emanuel and Amy Rule Charitable Foundation”. As a non-profit headquarters, they may consider their home as exempt from paying taxes.

    Skeptical? You shouldn’t be! After six years, the “Rahm Emanuel and Amy Rule Charitable Foundation” has had only two donors. Can you guess who?

    The Rahm Emanuel and Amy Rule Charitable Trust was formed in 2002, when the Chicago lawmaker was first elected. The former Clinton White House aide and his wife, Amy Rule, are its only donors.

    USA Today has a great article about Rahm and other Dems, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who are illegally operating charities under their own names while failing to report that information.

    Congratulations, America, you’ve just elected another corrupt politician who surrounds himself with corrupt supporters. “Yes we can” steal from the government and those we represent!
    Source: Illinois Review and USA Today

    P.S. Our property is shale and this is a true story

    One year we had such heavy rains for days on end. I was out in the side yard and saw pools of oil. It was coming from the shale. Told hubby we should start an oil well.


    Sure wish they would come knocking on my door (Marcellus Shale people), but they aren't considering our county.


    I wold rather go to the Penisula Hotel and have High Tea!
    May I offer you some scones, crumpets, or finger sandwiches?
    Socialism....taking all the goods, money, property, etc....
    and putting it in control of the community...socialism. That is how Chavez got into power. Most do refer to Venezuela as a "socialist state." Reuters called it the "socialist government of Chavez." Trouble is, "the community" is not controlling anything. It never seems to reach that point, because the nut at the top gets the power and wants to keep the power, so control says with the government and the "community" is just stuck...dictatorship. It would appear that a good many Venezuelans recognized what was happening (although trying to make himself President for life is a huge clue) and are trying to get the country to vote down the referendum. Cuba is another example. I cannot think of a single instance where socialism did not evolve into a dictatorship. They already have a dictatorship in Venezuela; the referendum would just be a rubber stamp. He has already shut down media that did not agree with him. Still, if the referendum fails it could erupt into a civil war. I hope not, for the peoples' sake.
    Ahmadinejad Feted at Obama Fundraiser’s Hotel

    From www.Newsmax.com: 


    1. Ahmadinejad Feted at Obama Fundraiser’s Hotel
    2. Ambassador Holbrooke: Don’t Let Ahmadinejad Speak
    3. Biden Has Given Little to Charity
    4. Palin’s Newsmax Interview Gains Wide Play
    5. Hillary Campaign Still Deep in Debt
    6. Washington Times Quotes Newsmax Report
    7. We Heard: Bill O’Reilly, Sarah Palin, National Anthem


    These stories and more on Newsmax.com.  Also, Jodie Evans of Code Pink was at the dinner noted above.


    Not to mention her ritzy hotel bills she stuck the state with.nm

    x


    hotel room, like the guy said, the Alaska plane is not a famil station wagon. Sounds like fat cat to
    no message
    good grief, forget the clothes, the woman charges everthing to Alaska, plane tickets, hotel rooms, l
    x
    NOBODY can make Saddam look good. But Bush seems to be the ONLY one who can make him look less

    If you can't make abortion illegal, just make it impossible (sm)

    That's right, Bush is still alive and well.  Check this out.


    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#28024676


    Yeah, I know it's MSNBC, but how many other people are doing a lame duck watch?


    Just because you make a statement does not make it true...
    .
    FOX news IS the news. The only 1 that tells BOTH
    nm
    It's all over the news - and I mean ALL news stations.
    not just the ones you don't like.

    Those who make you believe absurdities can make

    Do you get any news except at the DU? ????? NM

    Believe it or not, I do keep up with the news.
    I realize this is an old story, but it has a new twist to it because now Gary Bernsten is now giving the specifics surrounding it.
    When the news first came out that he was..sm
    hosting a fundraiser for her I thought it was weird, but now that you bring it up (and it's a good question) I did some research and it appears that old Ruppert has a history of switching his backing between parties. Some believe his main objective is monopoly in broadcasting, not party loyalty or belief in party ideals (aka Big Business 102).

    Excerpt from wsws.org: 'When it comes to politics, Murdoch, known in media circles as the “dirty digger,” is equally adaptable in pursuing his personal gain. The most loyal right-wing Tory and friend of Margaret Thatcher during the 1980s, as he built up his media holdings in Britain, he switched his loyalties to “New Labour” when he saw that Tony Blair could provide a fresh face for even more reactionary politics and was more than willing to further Murdoch’s interests in return for editorial backing. He made similar swings in his native Australia between the Labor and Liberal parties to further his efforts at monopolizing the print and broadcast media.'
    Actually, I saw it on ABC News....
    the footage of Obama not putting hand over heart for pledge. In all fairness, that is the only footage I have seen of him not doing so....never was a recipient of whatever chain email you are speaking of. Believe it...yes, saw it with my own eyes. Why he did it, have no idea. There could be a multitude of reasons why he didn't do it. Here is the big BUT...it does make one a but curious when coupled with the fact that he dispensed with wearing of the flag pin on his lapel. I heard his explanation; I am just not sure I buy it. Each thing alone not such a big deal...together, it does make one wonder, so I can see why nanna might have reservations. It is good to question things and not take everything at face value...be the candidate Dem, Repub, Inde...whatever.
    Fox news

    A propanganda machine for repubs.  No one is obligated to appear on that network.  There are plenty of other media outlets. Fox's ratings are dropping and MSNC's are climbing.  Fox disguises these facts by including their entertainment ratings in with their "news" ratings.  As far as ALL OTHER MEDIA being liberal, that is a transparent technique to keep viewers from getting opinions from ANY OTHER source than Fox.  I certainly wouldn't fall for that bunko.  I also notice that they concentrate on certain sites such as Media Matters and NY Times specifically because those sites are excellent at presenting the truth about distorted information disseminated by the propaganda machine. To each his own.


     


     


    Where do you get your news?

    Sorry, I'm conservative, but have to ask why you would go down that road when you can find those answers yourself.


    Might I suggest worldnetdaily.com, townhall.com, drudgereport.com, breitbart.com, talk radio (and the hosts' web sites, including Laura Ingraham, Glenn Beck, Savage, Levin, Michelle Malkin, Rush, etc.).  There are countless news stories that never make the mainstream media.


    Another thing to consider is who a person keeps for company.  When questionable names keep coming up (Pflager, Rezko, Wright, Ayers, Dohrn, etc.), that would concern me if I were considering any kind of relationship with someone, but that's just me.


    Those who support Obama get their news from MSNBC, CBS, NBC, and so on.  Those networks alone have been proven repeatedly to be biased.  All the times that McCain went abroad, where were Couric, Gibson, and Williams?  Why would any American think that the Democrats, who are determined to reinstate Fairness Doctrine, think that it won't come back and bite them?  Why should any American be silenced just because one group disagrees with another?


    Do you know what is posted on blogs like the DailyKos and HuffingtonPost? 


    Lastly, a couple more stats.  The #1 most liberal Senator is Obama.  Kennedy is #2, Biden is #3.  Even the moderate Democrats are distancing themselves from him.  This info is documented and not fiction.


    That's rather left of left, I would say.


    I'm already looking for my fire extinguisher, but the truth hurts sometimes.


    Trust your own gut.


    She knows it because it was all over the news
    nm
    news

    You have more options now than anytime in history to gather information.  You can gather information from both sides of the issue and verify the facts and then make your own decision based on your personal values.


     


    Old news....nm
    xx
    Fox News is the only one I DO believe.
    nm
    SP on ABC News
    Just saw first installment of interview with SP with Charlie Gibson.  In my opinion, she really messed that up!  Experienced and ready to lead?  No way.  Danced around every question and flat out lied when asked what she said about Iraq War being a mission from God.  What's the worst thing about listening to her for the first time in her own words, she says NUCULAR!!!  Just like George Bush.  Oh no...not again. 
    SP on ABC News
    She was so nervous, she had big red blotches on the side of her neck. He pressed on dancing around and not answering the questions he asked. She looked like a deer in the headlights to me.
    old news....ho hum.. nm
    xx
    NBC news...
    http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/09/17/1413605.aspx
    old news
    This happened years ago, not yesterday. How come you are just hearing about it? Did you check your dates in snopes?
    Maybe old news, but why does no one get it? sm
    do you just want to ignore all the blatant truths about Obama being linked to terrorists and cling to hope that he is not REALLY a terrorist and hope that he really will do what he says? So just blindly accept him at his word and ignore all the indications that tell us otherwise. Do you not see any huge red flags waving in front of your eyes??
    Fox NEWS is not the news
    Joe the plumber is a plant! All your info is wrong.
    Fox News
    Plenty has been said about Sarah Palin's appearance, from her designer glasses to her striking similarity to actress Tina Fey.

    But lately her stylish look has come at a price -- more than $150,000 of which was paid for by the Republican National Committee -- according to a report Tuesday by Politico.

    The Web site cited financial disclosure records that suggest the wardrobe makeover began in September and included bills from Sak's Fifth Avenue in St. Louis and New York totaling nearly $50,000.

    The documents also show a $75,000 shopping trip at Neiman Marcus in Minneapolis in September, as well as about $4,700 spent on hair and makeup, Politico reported. Documents don't show similar costs in August.

    http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/21/report-rnc-spent-g-spruce-palin/
    fox news
    Good Evening,

     

    1.  On Sunday night at 9 on Fox News, Hannity's America will run "The Ten Reasons Why Barack Obama Should Not Be President."  Please spread the word.

     

    2.  The article that follows is about Sarah Palin and the elites (both Democrat and Republican).  It is well worth the read:

     


    And this is news how?????
    HA HA HA HA HA. I never trusted her. I just hope I see as less of Dillary than I do of Condi.
    It's news because...(sm)

    Israel is getting ready to invade Gaza and is already in the process of bombing raids.  Meanwhile the current US administration (aka Bush/Condi/Cheney/etc) is perpetuating the lies about Gaza, such as who is the real terrorist, ignoring a legitimate democratically elected council, etc.  The OP explains all this.  Bottom line is that the US is giving Israel a green light, which to some of us (as well as a large portion of the world) is condoning genocide. 


    And Americans wonder why the rest of the world has such a bad opinion of us. 


    Old news.......
    I posted the entire article on how Obama wants to pay for abortions in Ethiopia and abroad with MY money but instead of responses of "NOT MY MONEY", all I got was criticism for being AGAINST abortion......

    Go figure..... that's what I mean when I say this country has lost its loyalty to itself and we have a president who has absoluely no loyalty to this country; his loyalties lie elsewhere
    I saw it on the news. It is to try
    this stimulus. Also that is why Obama had townhall meetings to show congress "We the people" want this stimulus to pass.

    Boy, Obama sure loves campaigning and speeches.


    Old news - nm

    nm


    I would think Fox News would be enough
    Unless, of course, you have built up your tolerance for it by listening to Michael Savage.
    The ones that have been all over the news -
    x
    As far as what is said on the news....(sm)

    I'm not responsible for that.  Having said that though I do think that as a whole people are more tolerant (I wouldn't go so far as to say accepting).  However, that doesn't diminish the fact that violence against homosexuals is still a prevalent crime.


    I actually do wish more people would teach their children as you described above.  If that were happening, none of this would be an issue and there would be no need to take it to the schools. 


    Let's take Patty, for example.  She has already said that yes, she does call homosexuals names in front of her kids.  She does this at the same time that she's spouting out references to the Bible.  So what do you think her kids think?  Maybe that it's God's will that they call homosexuals names?  I don't know what they're supposed to think or how they are supposed to act given her example.  Do you think she's teaching tolerance?  If not, who will if not the schools?


    Anybody else see this on the news?
    The taxpayers just footed the bill for Pres and Michelle Obama's $20,000 date this weekend in New York. Yeah, won't we ALL be making sacrifices - all of us to pay for them? Boils my blood to see any one in politics spending public money on such foolishness and so excessively.
    Just saw that on the news also.
    nm
    You might want to re-evaluate where you get your news..

    wednesday, june 29, 2005


    Army Exceeds Recruitment Goals


    Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Richard Myers announced tonight that the Army has exceeded its recruitment goals for the month of June: Army reverses series of recruitment shortfalls. (Hat tip: Ethel.)



    PENTAGON—After months of declining enlistment, the Army has more than met its recruitment goals for the month of June.


    Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Richard Myers announced the turnaround during a “town hall” meeting this afternoon at the Pentagon.


    Myers did not provide numbers, nor did he indicate how far above the recruitment target the enlistment number is.


    Rover is old news?

    The investigation is still happening.  How can it be old news?


    the are a NEWS channel

    it's kinda to pre-record live news coverage.  Probably nothing major will happen today, but who knows?  Your scraping the bottom by criticizing a live news channel for having live coverage.


     


    You must get your news off a different satellite than me
    because all I hear from the major networks is criticism of Bush and his policies. Some are worse than others I'll admit.
    Maybe Fox News is #1 for a reason
    Could it be that Americans are more conservative than liberal?  I mean, I doubt liberal Americans are tuning in to Fox for shock value.  I personally believe Fox News is pretty balanced.  Yes, it may lean more conservative, but they always equal out their guests on many of the shows such as Neil Cavuto, Shepherd Smith, Hannity and Colmes.  There is balance there.  Maybe conservative guests come off as getting more air because they are better debators and not always spouting talking points like the liberals do.  If one liberal says some phrase at 8:00 in the morning on the Today Show in reply to a topic then you could almost bet that Democratic pundits will spout the same line the rest of the day.  I've even heard talk show hosts do montages of multiple Democratic pundits within a 24-hour period, and it's scary how they all say the exact same thing.  If you remember Pee-Wee's Playhouse where he had a word of the day.  Democrats seem to have a word of the day too.  I'm not saying that  Republicans don't do that too at times, but it seems much more prevalent with Democrats.
    I saw that being advertised on Fox News...nm