There is no arguing with that kind of logic.

Alex Jones is not a physicist or a structuralist, I presume.  The people who built the WTC explained how the extreme heat from the jet fuel caused the buildings to topple.  There is no use arguing this with you. You have chosen to believe it and there you have it. 

• Former Head of Star Wars: Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect - PK
  • I visited this site. My brother, who is schizophrenic, goes to sites like this. sm - passing thru
    • 911 Video Loose Change - GBA
      • And..... - Yowsa
        • More to it than just the jet fuel. sm - GBA
          • BTW, Popular Mechanics pretty much debunked all the myths you speak of. - Yowsa
          • There is no arguing with that kind of logic. - Yowsa
    • Why? Just curious. sm - GBA

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

nm

opinion and I have mine.  Sorry but I heard it directly from McCain's own mouth that he would stay in Iraq 100 years if that's what it took?  If that's what it took for what?   The region has never been "stable" and it isn't going to be stable now.  The people don't want us there.  If they want freedom let them fight for it themselves.  Read much about the American Revolution lately?  This war was and is about oil.  Wasn't Bush cronies with Sadam?  As well as Cheney?  Maybe even McCain?

...am I to assume that if you personally were imprisoned on faulty and/or trumped up charges that later proved false that you should therefore remain in prison?....simply because at one point the charges against you were believed to be true by the court? 

You are saying that our government can never admit to a mistake or to being misled and then CHANGE the course of action? 

As Ted Koppel said, our reason for Iraq went from being for our own national security and then as the facts were revealed about the reasoning for this, it changed to being for the good of the Iraqi people.  It has now proven to be neither for the good of the Iraqi people or for the lives of the Americans.

I suppose your comments will not bother me if I do not try to argue/respond, so I no longer will.  Easy solution.  It's not that I don't think you have some relatively reasonable views on providing health care to kids, you just aren't willing to have your taxes raised to provide that care, and that is your personal feeling.  I could come up with some great solutions too, but the fact is that you and I are not a part of Congress, and any hypothetical solutions we come up with are going to do nothing to cover the families that could benefit from the S-SCHIP right now, which is when these families need help - right now.  I will gladly support any bill that is designed to ease medical costs for any family.  I will gladly have my taxes raised if it means children and families making middle-income wages suffer less.

So you can respond to this if you want, but I will no longer respond to any of your posts.

Obama would let it alone Unfortunately, he is not going to do that.  He has already said that his first order of business will be to sign into law the FOCA.  He will be allowing many ill-aborted babies to die without treatment after having been mutilated, burned, etc.  This isn't an issue of whether or not you are pro-life or pro-choice.  This is about whether or not a born child should be left to suffer and die.  The key word here is born.  That child was born. 

I work on a peds hospital account.  I type reports everyday about babies born at 25 weeks and everything being done to save them.  I don't see how someone can say "that baby gets to live today and I'm going to help it because the mother wants it to live, and that baby will die today because the mother does not want it." 

This FOCA directly undoes the Safe Haven act.  It makes no sense.  How is the FOCA any different than a mother leaving their unwanted infant to die in a trash can?

I would assume the only thing Obama might not have paid for would have been travel to NY.  So, you tell me, exactly how else was he supposed to get there when the Secret Service is in charge of how he gets from point A to point B. 

You need to pay attention to what has actually been going on in this country instead of getting wrapped up in the pettiness that is now the republican party.  Where was your outrage when Bush spent billions on a war over BS?  Amazingly, you guys have been on a spending spree for the last 8 years (most of which wasn't even on the books, BTW), and now all the sudden you want to worry about the cost of a date. 

Poor little you, you can't afford a date.  Well, next time think ahead and try not to vote in a president like Bush, and maybe, just maybe, the whole economy won't be in the shi++er and you can have your date, along with a job!

simply stating my opinion. It seems like many here on this board have some bug up their behinds, are bitter and angry (most tend to be O supporters, go figure) and can't have adult conversation without resorting to name calling.

Everything below is from their official, sanitized website, but for the real view of this group read their forum which includes lots of photos of firearms, many with children alongside them.

________________

"War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself."

-- John Stuart Mill

(From the Mission portion of the website):

War IS an ugly thing, but as long as nations and leaders exist that detest freedom, sometimes it is the only way to secure a lasting peace. Most leftist anti-war protesters and pundits don't understand this. They state that this use of force is always unnecessary -- that war, ANY war, is never good. Some of them, born into the luxury of American freedom, believe that liberty can exist passively, that somehow the world's natural state will always settle into utopian harmony. Others, in an attempt to absolve themselves from the unearned guilt they harbor living in a nation of prosperity and wealth, try to buy morality on the cheap by pronouncing themselves for the 'good'. To them, the derivation of the 'good' is based on a simple, yet peculiar standard: the powerful and competent are wicked, while the feeble and impotent are innocent - regardless of the context. That is why they defend Iraq instead of America, and the Palestinian "resistance" instead of Israel.

"

Do any of you watch Survivor?  I love that show.  I think Im in pretty good shape but there is no way I could survive for a month on an island like they do but I like to watch and make believe that I could (smile).  Snakes and alligators and bugs..YIPES. 

Don't know who you are referring to but I suppose all countries have residents who don't wish it well but I assume that statistically they would be a very tiny minority as really, why would they live in a place they wish to see destroyed?  Seems silly.

This country seems to be unable to educate itself about the nature of our foe.  We rely on leaders who seem to flaunt their ignorance about the middle eastern culture.  So perhaps you are right, there are those who wish us harm.....by utilizing repeatedly the same failed techniques/agendas that as you stated, continue to stoke the fires of hate that have been burning for a very very long time -- the agendas of ignorance and unwillingness to learn from history.  As long as this runaway ignorance prevails our soldiers will continue to die along with the Iraqi civilians and our world will become less safe.

There is a world of heartache ahead in the very near future.  In case you haven't been following the trend, there is one church that has been advising its members for over 100 years to stock pile food and supplies, be self-sufficient, and otherwise make nice with the world.  The holocaust is coming, but there isn't going to be some saving-grace rapture first.  The righteous people will collect into specific locations to survive while the unrighteous have a slug fest and kill each other off.  Its very real and it is likely going to be within this lifetime.

creepy thought for you to be fixated on.  EEEWWW.