This bird is not protecting the
Posted By: gourdpainter on 2008-10-27
In Reply to: I'm thanking God for Mr. Berg - Kaydie
constitution. But then maybe he'll succeed and Hillary will be the candidate to replace Obama..........could that have anything to do with the case doyathink? Come to think of it, might not be such a bad idea, I doubt McCain would have a snowball's chance againt her.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
And don't forget the bird flu.
Almost a year ago Bush reserved the right to declare martial law if/when the bird flu comes to the USA.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/october2005/041005militarytakeover.htm
As for your other points, I'm sure there are home-grown terrorists in the USA. Will Bush limit his target to those people? That's the problem. Nobody knows for sure. All people can be certain of is how he feels about swiftboating and getting revenge on anyone who disagrees with him. And that's why this man should be forced to follow the law and use warrants when spying on Americans. He simply can't be trusted.
I do question which troops he will be using, though. They're too busy fighting Bush's war in Iraq (not to mention likely war in Iran) to be able to fight Bush's war against Americans who don't agree with him.
Hey - did you know that old bird is still alive?
seriously, she's like 96. I bet she gets really offended when she hears people saying that her son is too old to be president or that he'll croak while he's in office. I just assumed she was dead. Learn something new everyday!
Okay if you weren't shooting me the bird
then what were you trying to tell me oh and high and mighty one?
Bush's bird flu **plan**
Oh no!! Bush has a **plan** for the bird flu..YIPES!! Run for the hills.
An alleged pandemic of the bird flu would do that. (NT)
:-(
Chertoff says bird flu = police state.
It may not be foreign terrorists you have to fear at your door! - This week Chertoff announced that in the event of a widespread bird flu epidemic here it would not be the medical authorities or health departments who will be running the show - the Department of Homeland Security intends to take over and make our medical and quarantine decisions for us.
Apparently with the migrations of the world's birds about to begin, all the experts are saying that this bird flu could rapidly spread across the world and become a really serious threat.
What has the Bush Admin. done to prepare? They bought themselves 100,000 doses of Tamiflu. You, on the other hand, can wing it. There's no more left. Let's see, 100,000 doses ought to just about make sure his haves and have-more base will have plenty to go around.
Bush supporters in la la land will have no trouble believing those doses are meant for babies and the elderly, and of course somehow for themselves. For the rest of us, the word is: Garlic, goldenseal and echinacea, and stop filling the bird baths.
Protecting borders?
We went to Iraq to protect our borders? That is a new one! Why did we go to Iraq? WMD? There werent any. Getting Saddam (heaven knows why..there are terrible leaders in other countries that are much more threatening..i.e., N. Korea, Iran). Well, we got him. So, why are we still there? We are there because our goal has always been to control the Middle East and it's oil. Of course, the American people would not have sacrificed their children in war for those reasons, so Bush had to scare the American people into war. We walked right into the terrorists web by invading Iraq. Gave them a reason to fight us. We are in a country where we dont belong. We need to leave. Set a time table, train the Iraqis to take care of their own country and leave. Protect our borders? How about protecting the border from USA to Mexico. Or USA to Canada. Those are borders that will affect us right here on our soil. The Iraq invasion was a major mistake. This murderous administration knows it but, of course, Bush never backs down on anything, even when he is dead wrong and forget about ever admitting he made a mistake about anything or apologize for something. This war is wrong and history will show this and Bushs legacy will not be kind.
Protecting America?
Invading Iraq was not protecting America. Invading Iraq has caused America to be less safe and has started a world wide terrorist movement against America.
At that time there was no law protecting them...
or why would hospitals be allowing them to die? Nice dodge, but not true, and he knew it.
Yes, and protecting American should be O's first
nm
Man being sued for protecting
his private proverty from illegal immigrants. Why is our country allowing this? Illegal aliens do nothing but cost us money that we don't have. Arizona now has the highest rate of kidnapping because of Mexico. We need to protect our border!!! Bring our troops home and put them on the border.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/09/16-illegals-sue-arizona-rancher/
I'm all for protecting people but here
is my issue. When someone murders someone, it isn't because they love them. Aren't most crimes like assault and murder basically out of hate? I guess I don't mind protecting certain groups but to me if you kill a homosexual you shouldn't get more time in the slammer than if you killed a heterosexual. You killed a person and to me that is that regardless of their sexual orientation....but whatever.
Some of those things listed on there is just downright wrong. Personally, I feel that we should have the right to beat the crap out of people who get their jollies off of exposing themselves to others. Strangers, especially children, shouldn't have to put up with that. Ya know. Sick sick people.
I heard that someone suggested pedophiles be added to the list. I'm sorry but anyone who wants pedophiles to be protected ought to be smacked around themself. JMO though. We need to protect our children from them....not protect pedophiles from us.
The DNC has been protecting Obama for 18 months....
they have not let him do an interview with anyone who didn't either get a thrill up their leg talking to him or were so enraptured with him they softballed every question. When he went on O'Reilly was the first time he went into an interview with someone who was not going to softball him, and he did not do much better than she did...and that is with 18 months surrounded by hundreds of advisors.
I have no doubt she will be fine talking to world leaders. We will never see the side of the person that talks to world leaders behind closed doors. I have as much faith in her as #2 talking to world leaders than I have with the #1 on the other ticket who wants to pander to them and frankly sell us down the river. He shows weakness...and her words were prophetic. When you face those guys, you don't blink. She made that case to Charlie Gibson, and she didn't blink. She kept eye contact way more than he did. And he had notes...she didn't. lol.
Laws protecting from murder
Yes, this country does have laws that protect citizens from being murdered.
A "citizen" is defined someone who "is born or naturalized in the United States."
Fetuses, embryos, etc. aren't born or naturalized. The issue of when life begins is akin to the "chicken/egg" question and will never be answered to the satisfaction of everyone. It relies mostly on religious views, and one's religious views shouldn't be forced on someone else who may not believe the same.
Again, I believe in minding my own business and NOT judging someone who may have or has had an abortion because it's none of my business.
If you don't believe in abortion, then I guess the simplest answer is: Don't have one.
Thank you President Bush for protecting and
nm
Santa protecting children from a terrorist
what's wrong with that?
and just where is the terrorist going to put that TNT--in the manager?
I guess if you were Santa you'd just try to give the terrorist a big ole hug...
You know it's pretty darn sad that Christmas is so darn political this year. This is a neutral statement because it's happening on both sides, liberal and conservative
Darn right - we must ALWAYS err on the side of protecting the INNOCENT.
xx
Nope. -was protecting the country instead of talking
nm
Bush is a president who cares about protecting America
not building a legacy, like Clinton. It is a crying shame that those in the left circle of the Democratic party have become so embittered they actually put us all at risk.
|
