Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Typical conservative lying and twisting of facts...

Posted By: see inside on 2005-07-13
In Reply to: I love it when the libs are wrong! NM - GoBush

Note that the Army exceeded the June goal of 5,650 by 507 recruits……….but if it hadn’t have lowered the original goal which was 6,700, it would have missed its goal again by 545. Are these guys smart or what?


 


You guys just never get real or get honest...do you?  ANd the pathetic part is that there so many folks who just follow along with the obvious deceptions and lies......




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

    The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
    To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


    Other related messages found in our database

    Typical conservative response......sm
    I'm sure there are liberal groups that back him. The same way Ann Coulter is embraced for her hate speech. I mean she won the Conservative Journalist of the Year Award if I'm not mistaken. Quite a prestigious award for a job well done, stirring up liberals. If that's what it's all about then I need to bow out and suceed this debate now. You don't think any has the stage to do any harm, well I respectfully ask you to think again, because her face was plastered all over the news spewing her hate for all to see and react, which is what she thrives on. She is hardly the noble person the cons (who support her) think she is.

    Certainly I can only speak for myself, but since I have actually *read* what Lurker was trying to relay. Neither she, nor I, support Churchill's statements about the 9-11 victims and have said he was wrong. He was dead wrong, and any liberal group that he is apart of should not condone his comments. Now where his blood line, his plagarism, and anything else you can dig up fits into the equation of hate speech doesn't matter to me.

    I too think teachers should teach an objective lesson, and if he was not doing so he should have been reprimanded up to losing his job if he continued to do so. *BUT* an objective lesson does not mean a lesson approved by conservative critics.




    typical O supporter, can't take the facts, so switch
    to something else...your kool aid should wear off in about 6 to 8 months.
    And yet you just keep lying and lying and lying. Not too bright.

    I did not mean typical of either party, just what I see as typical on
    .
    really? I think it is what was said - I'm not twisting anything

    The following exchange between Fox News host Brian Kilmeade and Fox News business contributor and substitute host Stuart Varney occurred during breaking news coverage of the attacks on London subways and buses on the July 7 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:



    KILMEADE: And he [British Prime Minister Tony Blair] made the statement, clearly shaken, but clearly determined. This is his second address in the last hour. First to the people of London, and now at the G8 summit, where their topic Number 1 --believe it or not-- was global warming, the second was African aid. And that was the first time since 9-11 when they should know, and they do know now, that terrorism should be Number 1. But it's important for them all to be together. I think that works to our advantage, in the Western world's advantage, for people to experience something like this together, just 500 miles from where the attacks have happened.


    VARNEY: It puts the Number 1 issue right back on the front burner right at the point where all these world leaders are meeting. It takes global warming off the front burner. It takes African aid off the front burner. It sticks terrorism and the fight on the war on terror, right up front all over again.


    KILMEADE: Yeah.


    So, who is twisting your arm? No one
    certainly no one is begging you to stay! Is it time to bring gourdpainter back?
    Not what they said at all! Just your twisting it to your liking!
    nm
    You are totally twisting what the OP said.
    They said, and I agree, that there is a difference between the people looting for food, water and bare necessities than those who are looting for guns, purses, and accessories. No one is promoting people who are stealing guns and harming people.

    Take it at face value, and leave the spin for the conservative board.
    Twisting and turning

    Wouldn't you say the mindset of the young depends on the conditions and need for the war?  That is what I was alluding to.  In condemning this generation with their lack of morals you are also condemning soldiers in Iraq, I assume?  My belief is that if this country ever found itself in a dire situation that our young people would respond as needed.  Call me an optimist.  I cannot condemn a whole generation based on my version of what is moral and what isn't.  I would say sending soldiers to die in an unnecessary war is immoral.  Lack of care for our country's poor and sick is immoral.  Little kids starving in our country is immoral.  Our treatment of minorities and your condemntation of all liberals is immoral.  I believe that not only is abortion immoral, but many other things, too.  You may also blindly support our military, no matter what it is sent to do.  I don't.  I'm not a fool.  I would not have supported our military slaughtering hundreds of thousands of Native Americans in the 1800s, or supporting the slavery trade indirectly.  I would have applauded and supported any soldier who went AWOL, any demonstration against this military action.  Unlike you.


    But you see, I have common sense.  I cannot argue or debate with  someone who doesn't have it.  You have a blinding anger toward Democrats and liberals.  You have no use for the truth.   I am sure this is not the first time you have been told this.


    The rest of your post is so twisted and lacking common sense, even to insulting a person for reading books (heavens, we wouldn't want to educate ourselves -- another fear of the conservative posters) that it isn't worth my time to answer.


    Please read Lurker's post.  You will deny it's accuracy, I'm sure.


    As far as Ann Coulter, someone posted that the liberals had written and said terrible things also.  Indeed they have.  But Ann's article was posted on the conservative board as a fine and shining example of conservative wit and intelligence.  In reality, it was one of the smuttiest and sickening things I have read in a long time.  I don't recall any liberal posters crowing over such liberal trash on this board.  They seem to be a pretty moral group over all, and a group that's got a lot of common sense, most of all.


    Talk about twisting....

    You said:


    There are things that the poster felt needed to be said, and you see, this is a liberal board. 


    As it has been said ad nauseam, anyone can post on this board.  Liberals post on the conservative board as well.  I must have been absent the day you were named moderator.


    You said: 


    You have a habit of mis-representing the facts, of twisting them to fit your agenda and your conscience. 


     On the basis of what, three posts, you say I have a habit of misrepresenting the facts and twisting them to fit my agenda and m conscience.  Pot calling the kettle black, I would say.  You posted erroneous information, represented it as fact, and I called you on it.  If anyone's conscience should be bothering them, that would be you.


    You say most of the people of the U.S. were against slavery.  At different points in history that may or may not have been true, there weren't a lot of nationwide polls back then.  Could you share your facts?  Just the facts, ma'am. 


    I again refer you to history.  History is full of the people who opposed slavery.  We are at war right now as a country but as it is perfectly clear, is it not, that the whole country is not behind the war. 


    The fact is though that slavery was perfectly legal for 100 years in this country.  Try twisting that one.  That's what I mean when I say this country condoned slavery.  But I think that was obvious to most folks.


    Because it is legal does not mean all the people in the country condone it.  Abortion is legal in this country but I sure as heck do not condone it.  That doesn't mean I bomb abortion clinics or stand outside them and ridicule the people using them.  But I do not condone it, nor do many others.  I follow the laws of the land but I do make sure with my vote and in other ways to work to see that law gone.  And I think that is obvious to most folks as well. 



    Secondly, you say this was Congress's war just as much as Bush's.  Well, we know that is not true either.  It was Bush and his cronies that planned this war, probably even before 9/11.  There was erroneous evidence presented to Congress that led them to okay military action.


    I really am incredulous that there are still people who buy that nonsense.  Erroneous evidence presented to Congress?  The Senate Intelligence Committee had the very same information the Bush administration had.  And if all those congresspeople are so ignorant they could be *fooled* into buying into lies (if there were any, which there is no proof there were) that led the country into war, then I would think, for the love of pete, that you would be equally as incensed at them.   What proof do you have that Bush and his cronies planned anything?  None, because there is none.  As you said, just the FACTS, ma'am.  


      If your daughter came home from school and stated that the neighbor girl beat her up you would might believe the evidence.  However, do you not change your course of action if it turns out the neighbor girl didn't do the actual damage? 

    I am sorry, I do not grasp your analogy.  If you are saying now that maybe Congress screwed up, and now they realized they screwed up, how many years into it, so now the thing to do is, after we committed ourselves to the Iraqis to just up and go, leave them dangling, just like we did in Viet Nam?  Nothing noble about that.  And make no mistake...if the war suddenly became popular they would fall all over themselves backpedaling again ahd saying *I did vote for it and I voted against it but now I am for it again...* yada yada.  They are politicians. 

    I believe you twist and arrange the evidence so you don't feel guilty about this utter madness and endless slaughter we know as Iraq as you similarly defend the US government role in the slaughter of indigenous peoples.


    There you go again.  First, my friend, I do not feel guilty.  I have nothing to feel guilty about.  I support the American military and I certainly support the war on terrorism.  I do not readily forget 3000 people dying.  I will never forget watching those people jump out of that building to avoid being incinerated and for what?  Simply because they were Americans.  How easily you seem to blow that off.


    And I did not defend the US government role in the slaughter of indigenous peoples.  I did not defend slavery.  Both were wrong.  Abortion is wrong, but they happen every day, and they happen NOW.  There is no longer slavery and there is no longer the slaugher of indigenous peoples.   Why does it not bother you that it is legal to slaughter upwards or over a million babies unborn babies every year?  Why don't you get involved to stop that?


    My whole point is that the US is indeed a great and often noble and generous country.  I really want it to stay that way though and powerful people have a way of corrupting the moral values that have sustained this country for so long. 


    Excuse me yet again...but that is exactly what I said.  The moral values that the country was founded upon and have sustained and how far we have gotten from that.  But I guess we are talking about two different sets of moral values.  What set are you talking about?


     The US has taken some pretty bad detours along the way but fortunately common sense and good character have generally won out in the long run.  Complacency and acceptance of corrupt power is always a threat though and that's why we need to QUESTION always those that are in near-absolute power.  I firmly believe that those who question are the MOST patriotic.


    I never said questioning was unpatriotic.  What is unpatriotic in my view and always will be is suggesting that any American soldier died in vain.  What I think is unpatriotic is while we have men and women dying in combat, no matter who sent them there or for what reason, we owe them the respect to, if we cannot support their mission, to not go public with rampant criticism and for the love of everything Holy not to suggest publically that they are fighting and dying for nothing.  Not only do I think that is unpatriotic, I think it is selfish and mean.  Doesn't mean you or anyone else can't grouse about it friends in the privacy of a home, but to go public with it where friends, family and loved ones of soldiers who have died there, were injured there and continue to fight there can read it.  I don't know why some people (not naming anyone in particular) cannot just hold all that in until the troops come home.  Then if they want to dissect it, take it apart, malign it or whatever, our troops are home and no longer in harm's way.


    It is rhetoric like you are repeating that Al Qaeda loves to hear, and their greatest propaganda tool.  Playing right into their hands.  And yes, giving that upper hand to the enemy is to me, yes, unpatriotic.


     


    Twisting and turning

    You have a need to twist and turn the truth and you appear to have little common sense or ability to see the big picture as far as humanity is concerned.  This may explain why you appear to have little to do with your time other than post incessantly and lengthily on a board where you are only interested in passive-aggressive attacks under the pretense of "trying to understand." 


    As far as your post where you perseverate to almost a frightening degree regarding my comment on your "rightwing rags" -- you know exactly what I'm referring to.  Just your comment alone about all the soldiers supporting the war and your questioning the poster about where they heard that some soldiers do not support this war --- that's a prime example.  A year or two ago when you'd post you'd simply cut and paste lengthy quotes from those right-wing publications I refer to. 


    Don't know why I'm having to tell you this.  I'm having to play your game and that's not a good idea as your rules aren't fair, or truthful some of the time.


    Unbelievable is all I can say, keep twisting
    .
    Fact-twisting: It's key.

    Twisting words
    Obama says "...he believes the US can win over moderate Muslims..."

    You say "...make friends with people who have taken the lives of so many Americans without conscience?"

    You say "...trying to 'win over' terrorists."

    Obama says moderate Muslims, you call moderate Muslims terrorists. Do you know ANY Muslims, MT? Well I do. Moderate Muslims. And you know what? They're far more moderate in their thinking and beliefs than most of the Christians who post on this very forum. So don't go spouting about moderate Muslims being terrorists and don't twist what Obama actually said because you clearly don't know what you're talking about.
    Always twisting and spinning

    things for your own advantage.  I'm just tired of the same ole BS spewed by you.  Obama is the best thing and Bush is the root of all evil...blah blah blah.


    All politicians are evil.  That is why we have switched control from pubs to dems and our country is still going down the crapper.  That isn't change.  Seems to me like pubs and dems alike want to spend.  They only complain when the other side spends and screws the American people but it is fair play when it is their political party doing all the spending. 


    Obama is not doing a good job.  If we was, there wouldn't be so many tea parties, etc.  Moderate democrats aren't even on board with what he is doing either.  Our country is quickly changing for the worse and yes...Bush started it....but Obama is going to finish it and he is pushing it as quickly as he can.  He has blatantly lied and the media has given him a pass.  The man has broken so many promises and is spending so much money that we don't have.  He is ruining us and all people like you do is refuse to see what he is actually doing.  You just listen to his smooth teleprompter speeches and watch with gaga gaga eyes and drool while you believe every lie that comes out of his mouth. 


    You are just as bad as the Bush lovers who refuse to believe he did anything wrong either.  I think the extreme left and extreme right both need to get a clue!


    That's not twisting and spinning...(sm)
    That was a direct quote...hence the marks that look like this:  "  ".  Maybe my posts just make you dizzy because they are outside of the (watch out...here come some more of those marks).."no spin zone."  
    Twisting and Squirming..I love it!!









    All disquiet on West Wing front

    Aides: W must right ship




    WASHINGTON - Embattled White House aides have begun to believe President Bush must take the reins personally if his evaporating agenda and credibility are to be salvaged.

    We're just plodding along, admitted a senior Bush aide from deep within the West Wing bunker. It's up to the President to turn things around now.

    Even as his poll numbers tank, however, Bush is described by aides as still determined to stay the course. He resists advice from Republicans who fear disaster in next year's congressional elections, and rejects criticism from a media establishment he disdains.

    The President has always been willing to make changes, the senior aide said, but not because someone in this town tells him to - NEVER!

    For the moment, Bush has dismissed discreetly offered advice from friends and loyalists to fire Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and bring back longtime confidant Karen Hughes from the State Department to shore up his personal White House staff.

    He thinks that would be an admission he's screwed up, and he can't bring himself to do that, a former senior staffer lamented.

    So aides have circled the wagons as Bush's woes mount, partly hoping they can sell the President on a December blitz of media interviews to help turn the tide.

    The staff basically still has an unyielding belief in the wisdom of what they're doing, a close Bush confidant said. They're talking to people who could help them, but they're not listening.

    Two sources said Bush has not only lost some confidence in his top aides, as the Daily News has previously reported, but is furious with a stream of leaks about the mood within the West Wing.

    He's asking [friends] for opinions on who he can trust and who he can't, one knowledgeable source said.

    Much to Bush's relief, political mastermind Karl Rove is said to be engaged in day-to-day strategy, even though he still could be indicted in the CIA leak case. Some in the White House think Rove is a continuing drain and has also hurt Bush's recovery by not clearing the reputation of spokesman Scott McClellan, who repeatedly told reporters Rove assured him he had nothing to do with leaking covert agent Valerie Plame's name, even though it's now clear he did.

    The problem for Bush, advisers admit, is that the ongoing leak probe reinforces allegations that the White House allegedly hyped prewar intelligence to justify a war most Americans no longer support.

    So far Team Bush doesn't know how to separate the two issues, and compounding its woes is the fact that aides aren't talking to each other as much as they once did.

    Gone from the schedule are weekly cholesterol-laden breakfasts at Rove's home where top Bush hands discussed strategy. Also missing are Sunday message meetings with outside thinkers like GOP Chairman Ken Mehlman, campaign pollster Matthew Dowd and superlobbyist Ed Gillespie.

    A card-carrying member of the Washington GOP establishment with close ties to the White House recently encountered several senior presidential aides at a dinner and came away shaking his head at their no problems here mentality.

    There is just no introspection there at all, he said in exasperation. It is everybody else's fault - the press, gutless Republicans on the Hill. They're still in denial.

    Not ready to throw in the towel and declare the boss a lame duck, the Bushies are hoping two issues can help firm up their base and perhaps make inroads with centrists who voted for Bush: the anticipated confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito, and a plan to reinforce the border with Mexico to help stop illegal immigration.

    This week Bush will begin to press the border security issue, while Alito's Senate confirmation hearings start early next year. Aides hope those issues will draw attention away from the war and leak probe.


    What you call twisting words is

    what some may call interpretation.  I didn't twist any words.  Let me say this again,


    WHEN OBAMA WAS ASKED ABOUT THE PHRASE "WAR ON TERROR", HE REPLIED HE WOULD LIKE TO "WIN OVER MODERATE MUSLIMS".


    I didn't twist his words.  He's the one who referenced moderate muslims with terrorists.  If you prefer I rephrase it using his words, fine "I prefer not to win over moderate Muslims."  Does that make what I said previously any different?  Not likely. 


    You're entitled to your opinion as I am entitled to mine.  Trying to convince me otherwise will not work.  That wasn't the intent of my post.  My post was to see if anyone else felt the same way as me, not try to change someone else's feelings. 


    This politics board cracks me up.  No one is supposed to have an opinion that differs from the "big posters".  Well, guess what?  I do have a different opinion.  If pi$$ed you off, too bad. 


    Talk about twisting things around!!!

    She didn't say anything remotely close to what you're accusing her of saying!


    Facts are facts - sorry you don't like it cos it doesn't support your candidate
    You can't change facts. That's what makes them facts. You may not like it but that's the way it is.


    Conservative vs true conservative
    The Conservative:
    I'm a conservative. I believe in individual liberty, free markets,
    private
    property, and limited government, except for:
    1. Social Security;
    2. Medicare;
    3. Medicaid;
    4. Welfare;
    5. Drug laws;
    6. Public schooling;
    7. Federal grants;
    8. Economic regulations;
    9. Minimum-wage laws and price controls;
    10. Federal Reserve System;
    11. Paper money;
    12. Income taxation and the IRS;
    13. Trade restrictions;
    14. Immigration controls;
    15. Foreign aid;
    16. Foreign wars of aggression;
    17. Foreign occupations;
    18. An overseas military empire;
    19. A standing army and a military industrial complex;
    20. Infringements on civil liberties;
    21. Military detentions and denial of due process and jury trials for
    citizens
    and non-citizens accused of crimes;
    22. Torture and sex abuse of prisoners;
    23. Secret kidnappings and renditions to brutal foreign regimes for
    purposes of torture;
    24. Secret torture centers around the world;
    25. Secret courts and secret judicial proceedings;
    26. Warrantless wiretapping of citizens and non-citizens;
    27. Violations of the Constitution and Bill of Rights for purposes of
    national security;
    28. Out-of-control federal spending to pay for all this.

    The Libertarian (true conservative):
    I'm a libertarian. I believe in individual liberty, free markets,
    private
    property, and limited government. Period. No exceptions.

    Facts are facts. No bash intended.
    It will be this stellar record from which voters will be assessing her and her running mate.
    If you're offended, too bad. Facts are facts...
    I know Muslims in this country who have turned from the hateful evil beliefs that were forced down their throats. They did not have the freedom to learn anything else growing up. But after they gained their freedom and came here, they were able to receive the Word of God and they have told me that NEVER were they taught anything about loving others, just other Muslims, and that the God they learned about spoke of nothing but killing and hate... so if Obama is receiving large donations from those middle eastern countries, as you say, and he is grounded in Muslim culture, being taught this in school for years as a child, do you honestly think he doesn't carry some of those beliefs with him? He's never denounced it.

    Here ya go.........

    http://bibleprobe.com/muhammad.htm
    stating facts folks, just the facts....if it's getting
    xx
    Folks want facts, you give'm facts and still
    xx
    This poster wants facts, facts, facts...
    xx
    Poster wants facts, facts, facts.....
    xx
    What's even more typical

    ....is when somebody posts the hypocrisy in your posts you accuse them of something in an effort to change the subject.


    Go ahead and have the administrator track my IP address.  I don't have anything to hide.


    Typical

    They're desperate.  The fact that she had the decency to even think of something is refreshing.  Truthfully, both parties need to try it more often.


    If they want to continue this, fine.  We can just keep reminding them how nobody on their side does anything to return $ to the taxpayers.  All the libs want is to redistribute wealth and take more $ from you to give to someone else while further bloating the gov't.  This is why the Republicans were punished by America and also their own party.  They deserved it.  Now we're reclaiming our party.


    Ask your accountants how it'll affect you.  I suppose some people will get lucky due to random numbers, but not the bulk of Americans.


    typical
    dumb dem drama queen
    Typical ploy
    Ask me a question and then answer it for me.

    Where did I say *any*one wasn't entitled to spew as much filth as they want?

    WHERE?

    Typical apologist for the hate-mongerers out there: Don't address the real issue(s) just change the subject or wave a red herring.
    This is so typical of you lefties. sm

    Cut and run. It's your mantra.  For all your crying about the innocent civilians killed in Iraq, that is NOTHING compared to what will happen when we leave.  But you never mention that.  Just like Vietnam.  Well, at least your are consistent.


    What is typical of the left?
    It kind of got lost in the point you were trying to make, something about Lurker not answering your question the way you wanted her to...or somethin' like that.
    Typical lib reply
    The name-calling.  You wear it so well.... Classy, honey.
    This is your typical response from the
    Obama Kool-Aid drinkers. They cannot and will not face the truth, they only want to argue. So what if this is just an example. So is Joe the Plumber. He is just a man who asked a simple question. He never said he was a licensed master plumber making 250,000 a year. He did not go to Obama to ask the question, just happened to be there. Oh, sorry, wrong subject. Anyway, stereotypical response.
    You have the typical dem attitude of it's everyone
    nm
    Typical Democrat
    always wanting to take from what others have created.  HA!  Sorry, you're wrong.
    Dramatic and typical........
    I agree with you 100%. I want the best for my country and I am willing to sacrifice whatever I have to in order to achieve that end.
    Typical liberal
    When you can't debate a point adequately or someone dares speak out about your party or candidate, you turn to personal insults. Sad.
    Typical NeoCon spincrud
    NOBODY KNOWS for a FACT what is causing climate change on earth. It's just as much propaganda to hear one side as the other on the matter. Not surprising however that NeoCons would find outrageous the fact that anyone might want to take some action to lessen the human impact on the planet in hopes of preserving some part of it for future generations. Oh, how EVIL! Oh, the dark awful motivations of people who want to CLEAN THE AIR and restore some balance to our atmosphere.

    Besides that the article is ridiculously stupid. It harps on KILLER hurricanes. Oooh killer hurricanes are DECREASING DECREASING.

    Interesting fact ANYONE can figure out for themselves: Hurricane ANDREW (note the first letter) struck on an August 29. First hurricane of the season that year. On August 29.

    Note Katrina's first letter: K. That makes her the 11TH hurricane of this year. On August 29.

    While the category 4's and 5's are rare, the instance for having them at all is VASTLY INCREASED WHEN THE NUMBER OF HURRICANES THAT COULD BECOME ONE ARE VASTLY INCREASED. Last year and this year both have shown an astonishing upsurge in the NUMBER of hurricanes were are experiencing per season. Since hurricanes are born in the hot air over the African desert, the fact that the desert is expanding by leaps and bounds due to an upward trend in temperatures in that region virtually guarantees we will be having more and more hurricanes that have a chance to develop into killers under just the right conditions.

    Nobody knows if global warming is responsible for the expansion of the Sahara or the melting of the polar glaciers, or if the worldwide phenomenon is due to mankind's effects or is just a natural cycle we can't avert. WHO CARES. If some educated people believe they know a way we can HELP the situation why do NeoCons want to thwart them? Oh, right, because corporations might lose money. Our oil economy might burp. So, let's just pooh the world away why don't we. Let's make it a political game and let our arrogant pride hold out for the sake of nothing but holding out. That's the NeoCon game!
    Typical when somebody tries to engage you in debate
    you show them the door like you are the princess of this palace or something.
    You post an article. How typical.
    I DON'T CARE about your articles.  This isn't ABOUT articles.  Many of us have someone there.  By all means, don't step outside that box.  Don't make a life better.  And by all means NEVER EVER THINK OF ANYONE BUT YOURSELF.   I don't want to hear your personal stories.  As far as I am concerned, those soldiers over there are everyone's son, everyone's daughter. 
    Typical....when a liberal does not like history...
    they ignore it or attempt to re-write it.
    Typical Republican POMPOSITY.
    !
    Typical response from someone who refuses to
    xx
    Your typical ignorant, have no answers
    xx
    Aah, typical response from an O lover....
    !!
    There is the old typical refrain, play it
    Bush, baby. Thank God, the pubs in the house wised up, along with 11 of the dems! Prayerfully, so will the Senators!
    Typical of the honeymoon phase. nm
    x
    Typical right-wing intelligence.
    .
    So true; really just typical of that mindsdet. s/m

    There's an addendum that is also 2 hours, done last year, all about the Federal Reserve and exactly what it is and its function.  V-e-r--r-y interesting . . . and scary.  I haven't seen the whole thing yet, but I will definitely sit and watch the whole thing later.


    Maybe we can pick this thread up again after you've watched!