Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Well sista.... then you would be wrong!

Posted By: SM on 2009-06-26
In Reply to: In a time of war, we need to get behind our President. - Kathy Pudenda

You obviously don't know a thing about what it means to be an American or you would realize I do not have to be led ignorantly by the nose buy a man who just happened to be 'bought' into the presidency of this country!!

People like you are the problem with this country. They don't even realize we are afforded FREE SPEECH under the constitution and you know why that was put in place? Obviously not!!! So we could SPEAK OUT against ANY government that is controlling the people! The govt is NOT there to run our lives, ONLY to run our military!!

I despise our govt at this moment.... too bad if you don't get that! THAT IS NOT TREASON!!! THAT IS FREE SPEECH!!

If you paid any attention to anything but the color of this man's skin, you would realize OTHER SOCIALIST COUNTRIES are telling our president he needs to STOP what he is doing, that it will take this country down!!! You wonder why he doesn't listen to socialist countries who have already been there, done that? Because he knows it has nothing to do with a free society... he doesn't want a free society! He wants a society that is completley controlled by the government. If you paid any attention to his history and background, you would know that!

You mean you don't like a "free people". You would think you would!! You like to be "OWNED"? Obviously so!!

You don't get what it means to be an American AT ALL!!


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

    The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
    To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


    Other related messages found in our database

    Right on, sista.
    nm
    Right on, sista.
    nm
    Amen Sista!
    Palin is freaky deaky!!!
    Amen sista!!!!!!!!!
    Couldn't have said it any better.
    AMEN SISTA!
    x
    Right on the money Sista!! Thank you!!
    You are so right, and thank you for taking the time to explain that in detail. I've always said he's a smooth operator and I have never trusted him. Now, there it is in black and white.
    Thank you!
    Amen to that, Sista
    and that's exactly what I'm doing.  It is truly our only hope.
    Amen, Sista!!

    amen sista
    x
    all I can say is AMEN, SISTA. n/m
    x
    Amen, Sista! s/m
    Oklahoma cracked down on illegals and what did they do?  They scooted right across the border into Arkansas (6 miles from the Ok. State line here).
    Amen, sista.
    x
    Amen, Sista!
    x
    Amen!!! - you said it sista
    This is scary scary scary times. I don't understand why the people who support him refused to see things as they are. They like to pretend that everything is hunky dory and everyone is just picking on poor Mr. O. I know its not him alone making these decisions. He is just doing what he is told to do by others who are in charge, but since he's the one telling us this he is the one who gets blamed. I do feel bad for the guy sometimes. Other times I am angry and just scream at the TV telling him where to tell "those people" to go. I do always have to remind myself that he is not the one in charge, he is just delivering a message.

    Nevertheless, what can anyone do about it. Waiting until election time again? Do you know how much damage they are doing while they are in there. I'm not for one side or the other, I just want something good to happen for all Americans.

    With unemployment rising it's just very very scary.
    Amen to that, sista! And as far as Bush and

    that's something he's actually GOT experience with.  His war budget includes a FREE comprehensive universal healthcare plan for every IRAQI citizen.


    Maybe someday soon a leader of another country will take a look at how American citizens receive less concern from this president than Iraqi citizens and occupy our country to save us from BUSH.


    yea sista - you tell them - great post
    This is about the most unintilligable thing I have ever heard. They'll rant and rave at someone who says I won't vote for a man because he's not white, but they turn around and spew I won't vote for her because she was in a beauty pagent. Oh please....its so rediculous I have to laugh.

    Truth is...they have not researched anything about her. We have been watching MSNBC for years and really like that station, but yesterday my DH said that without them saying anything about her as governer and what she has done for Alaska or anything they were cutting her down and making fun of her. Really showed me I need to start listening to another station.

    People - if you are going to make such ignoramus remarks like I won't vote for someone cos their black or they are pretty or whatever reason then I don't want the next president to be picked by people of your unknowledgebable base.

    Do the research and put your hatred aside until you know everything about a person.
    Amen sista - see message
    I am not a religious person, but....I believe everyone has a right to their opinion/beliefs. If someone in public is speaking religious stuff and I don't want to hear it I walk by, hum to myself or whatever. Within seconds that person is no longer within hearing distance. If I don't want to see the 10 commandment I look the other way. If I don't want to hear some baloney on TV I change the channel. I do believe our constitution guarantees us right as human beings. Nowhere in the constitution does it mention about religion (as far as I know - I could be wrong). As for the posts I always say, you don't like it move on and don't give it a second thought. As long as people don't try to "covert" me I'm fine. But if people have things to say that are half political/have religous I don't care and I'm certainly not going to try to shut them down. I'm a conservative. I believe in free speech.

    On another note my sister told me in the hometown I grew up in (population about 10,000) every year since before I was born the city would put out the decorations, lights, trees, bows, stars and they even starting playing Christmas music on a street. Everyone was always in the Christmas mood and most everyone knew everyone. Last year (or maybe it was the year before) someone who is an Athiest tried to pursue legally to have the decorations removed and the music stopped. Then come to find out he said he only went into town once or twice a week to do something (very small town (1 street with a bank, convenience store, post office, and some mom and pop stores). Now just because I am not religious I know there are other people who are and I have to respect what they would like too. If I didn't like it I would not go into the town. I think that's what the courts told him too. So go ahead and believe what you want, just please don't try to convert me (and I've never heard anyone trying to convert people here on this board).
    wrong, full of wrong statements, see my upper post...nm
    nm
    Wrong Woman - Wrong Message
    http://www.truthout.org/article/palin-wrong-woman-wrong-message
    Wrong, wrong, wrong, clueless Lu.
    Horse hockey
    Sorry about that...wrong board, wrong name
    nm
    You're right. Something is definitely wrong

    Not with the priests who do the molesting.


    Not with the Senator who absolves the priests of blame and instead blames the Liberals.


    No.  Instead something is definitely wrong with ME for my outrage that a Republican Senator can make such an outlandish, IRRESPONSIBLE statement, instead of trying to SAVE these children and condemning what the priests are doing.  Unfortunately, this is typical of the Republican party these days.  Typical of the "We are perfect and make no mistakes" mentality that's prevalent in this country.  They couldn't be honest if their lives depended on it.


     


    Well, tell us what's wo wrong about what he says?
      You can't, because he just pegged the lot of you like he always does which is why he has the top rated radio show in the country 
    You got it wrong....
    Many of us liberals do not have delicate thoughts about terrorists.  But get it through your brain, if you can, that many of us feel that invading Iraq for oil and power WAS NOT THE WAY TO attack or deal with the terrorists.  Apparently they're mostly in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and what are we doing?  Messing around in Iraq.  We are LESS safe and I think time will prove that. 
    WRONG. You know what is

    Not everyone is a liar.  Only the ones who have done it on this board before and don't deserve to be trusted or believed again.


    It's quite simple. If you want to be believed, stop lying.


    Then that was wrong
    absolutely wrong, and the teacher and school administration were clearly in the wrong.   Shouldn't have happened, period.
    Wrong.

    What posts are you talking about?  Either I wasn't here then or you're wrong.  I've read through most of the posts but don't remember seeing that.  Prove it.


    WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU??!

    You called her an elitist pig, claiming to mean it in a good way.


    She replied with Yup, elistist pig here..Yeehhaaww~~


    And now you’re claiming she said she speaks for God.


    WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU??!


    So was I wrong? And if not...
    ...what are you getting so huffy about? Just for the fun of it? There's no arrogance in assuming you aren't one of the 1% of the richest people in the country. It's a natural assumption considering you spend so much time here, and why would you bother if you could be off doing whatever pleased you with money being no object? I'm certainly not one of the 1% and you bet I'd be doing something rather than putting up with your petty indignation if I had a virtually limitless income. So I didn't assume a thing about you that you were not free to assume about me in return. What's the big deal -? Are you ashamed anyone might think you're not in the top 1% of wealthiest Americans? Mighty fragile ego, that. Better face reality and get a grip - that's a pretty exclusive club.
    What is WRONG with you? sm
    Seriously what IS wrong with you?  This has nothing to do with anything in this thread.  Except yet one more occasion to use the word LIAR.
    WRONG!

    I corrected myself.  I admitted to my mistakes.  I always admit to my mistakes, and believe me, I make a lot of them.  I'm even harsher on me than the neocons are.


    If the neocons could just admit to theirs, the dialogue might be more productive.


    and *what if* you are wrong?

    We both could be wrong.  I find debating what if's a waste of time. 


    The simple answer to any what if question is:


    If you're right then I'm wrong.  However, I find dealing in knowns a better way to logistically deal with any scenario.  You can what if yourself all day long and never get anywhere.


     


    Wrong. nm
      Richard Cohen was right.  Sad.
    You are all three wrong. TI

    Despite the UN ruling that Israel completed its withdrawal from southern Lebanon (UN, June 18, 2000), Hizballah and the Lebanese government insist that Israel still holds Lebanese territory in eastern Mount Dov, a 100-square-mile, largely uninhabited patch called Shebaa Farms. This claim provides Hizballah with a pretext to continue its activities against Israel. Thus, after kidnapping three Israeli soldiers in that area, it announced that they were captured on Lebanese soil.  Israel, which has built a series of observation posts on strategic hilltops in the area, maintains that the land was captured from Syria; nevertheless, the Syrians have supported Hizballah's claim. According to the Washington Post, the controversy benefits each of the Arab parties. For Syria, it means Hizballah can still be used to keep the Israelis off balance; for Lebanon, it provides a way to apply pressure over issues, like the return of Lebanese prisoners still held in Israeli jails. For Hezbollah, it is a reason to keep its militia armed and active, providing a ready new goal for a resistance movement that otherwise had nothing left to resist. In January 2005, the UN Security Council adopted a resolution condemning violence along the Israel-Lebanon border and reasserted that the Lebanese claim to the Shebaa farms area is not compatible with Security Council resolutions.



    Wrong. I did not.

    I never said this person was sent to SHUT DOWN down the board, as I was accused of saying by the rude, rabid person you're defending.


    I said this person was sent to crash the board (as in INVADE the board, as in someone who would CRASH A PARTY). 


    Yes, I made the mistake of posting on the other board twice before I read further and realized the nature of these boards.  I haven't repeated that mistake since.


    I suppose I can expect 3,869 more posts from you to make us even for my two posts.


    After reading some posts by you on your board (such as Prophecy certainly is being fulfilled.  So much of the world has turned their back on Israel.), I can totally understand your blind, unquestioning loyalty to Israel.  You obviously believe the end times are near, and if you don't support Israel, you won't get to spend eternity with people like Ann Coulter.  People like you scare me because I believe you will do anything it takes to self-fulfill that prophecy.  That is yet another reason why religion and politics don't mix; I can't help but wonder if God told Bush to bring the end times about, which he seems to be intent on doing with his bomb first, ask questions later tactics.  After all, God told Bush to go to war with Iraq, and Bush obeyed that order.


    I was wrong....sm
    He said Fox was off his meds or *acting.* {{same thing}}

    Enjoy your show! (and all its *cough* facts).
    You are wrong. sm
    Noam Chomsky and Ward Chamberlain both made comments that we got what we deserved on 9/11. 
    you got this one wrong.
    I have been to the boards in the last 2 or 3 weeks once. I did not post whatever you are referring to and when I do post I always use my name. I have yet to come up with a reason to hide behind another. It was not me.
    Wrong again...
    I don't know what other liberals are doing or if they are mad about TV coverage. Secondly, I am reacting to a 1-hour broadcast, nothing more, nothing less. Maybe the new War Czar will see the necessity of administration presence at soldier's funerals. I agree with Democrat that this convocation was quite a bit more pomp and circumstance than Katrina where he showed up in shirtsleeves, made promises and left. I am not mad because liberal causes are not on TV...this has not a thing to do with liberal causes or TV coverage. It was my response to an event.
    Wrong AGAIN....
    President Bush declared a national day of remembrance for the Katrina victims and there was a great bit of pomp and circumstance as I remember it. I have never seen any administration order half-staff for a natural disaster, no matter who was in power.
    you are just wrong
    your facts and thoughts are so twisted and convoluted that further discussion with you is futile.  Step aside.  Next.
    Okay, that's just wrong, wrong, wrong!
    I'd say that is right up there with Hillary attacking Obama's kindergarten essay. What's wrong with these people and their campaign? Isn't anyone telling them when they have stepped off the deep end into the abyss of bull....
    when I'm wrong I'm wrong
    Everyone is wrong at one time or another...gotta suck it up and admit it. That's what makes us human. My MIL...she will never admit that she's wrong - infurates DH. When he tries to tell her the truth about certain things if she doesn't want to hear it, mysteriously something will be on the stove burning and she'll have to hang up immediately. Then she doesh't have the decency to call back. LOL
    I'm sorry....but you are wrong.

    Clinton was impeached on two counts, grand jury perjury and obstruction of justice, with the votes split along party lines. The Senate Republicans, however, were unable to gather enough support to achieve the two-thirds majority required for his conviction. On Feb. 12, 1999, the Senate acquitted President Clinton on both counts. The perjury charge failed by a vote of 55–45, with 10 Republicans voting against impeachment along with all 45 Democrats. The obstruction of justice vote was 50–50, with 5 Republicans breaking ranks to vote against impeachment. 


     


    So....even though he was not convicted and not told to step down from office....he was still impeached.  Only one president has been impeached and told to step down and that was President Andrew Johnson...I do believe.  President Nixon chose to resign rather than be impeached.


    wrong, wrong
    True "feminists" are going to vote for Obama, issues over politician. Any true Hillary followers who followed her for issues will follow her to Obama instead of McCain. Only those few who followed her solely because she was a woman and no other reason will vote for McCain now. Fortunately they will be cancelled out by what one journalist called the "caveman" vote, in this case voting against McCain or just not voting at all because he has a woman on the ticket and no other reason. Oh yeah, they're still out there.
    Wrong again, Sam.

    It is not that the Soup Nazi didn't have any soup, it is just that he was free to deny soup to anyone he felt was not deserving of it.  The same goes for us.  We are not obligated to respond to your demands for documentation if we feel you are not deserving of it.  Therefore, no soup for you!



     


     


    You are so wrong!
    They're trying to do it in Alaska!!!
    Don't get me wrong here
    I guess I am always thinking of the future, and about the choices we make today and how it could affect our future.  As I said, I have two wonderful lesbian friends (partners) who I love dearly.  They are the sweetest women on earth.  They mean to harm no one.  They have 5 children (3 offsprings of one of the women and 2 they are foster parents to - children of one of the women's sisters, who is a crack addict, and cannot take care of them).  These women are wonderful "parents" to these children.  It is not that I am against it.  I just don't understand it, I guess.  I too have nothing against gays or lesbians, as long as they do not try to push their lifestyle off on me.  I am just thinking how it just does not seem to be right in the sense of the future, or past for that matter.  If same-gender marriage was to be then where would there be offspring?  Are you getting where I am coming from here. 
    Once again you are wrong
    You really need to do some research. What does Iran and the 911 attack have to do with the federal research and bailouts. OP posted a good well researched post. You are just throwing out more rhetoric for the hatred you have toward Sarah Palin. And for what? OP was correct. Stop blaming each side. This started a long time ago and both parties have been in power since it began. For me the question is who has been profiting from it. I'm not blaming either side, but it just goes to show me how corrupt Washington is when people on both sides are making money off of it, then will tax the american people more and tell us we should feel patriotic about it.

    As for the 911 attack... there's a lot more involved that one day we will know the whole story (not what is being hand fed to us). SP has been correct in what she has said. We have to stop the fundamentalist no matter what country they are in.
    I believe you are wrong, Sam!
    The first post regarding Alinsky was posted by someone named Jules regarding a link to the Boston Globe entitled "Son of Communist organizer Saul Alinksy praises Democratic convention and Obama campaign for using his father's methods." You're response to that post was, "holey moley...gonna have to put research into overdrive. Thanks for posting." This can all be found on page 16 of the political forum archives dated 09/02/2008. Since that post on 09/02/2008, you have been dropping Saul Alinksy's name as often as possible.

    If you can prove that you were posting messages about Saul Alinsky with regards to the election prior to the above post on 09/02/2008, please provide the archive page number and date for verification.

    We look forward to your response.
    I said "I believe.." and I did believe, and I was wrong....
    I do admit when wrong. However, everything I have posted about Alinsky and Obama regarding Alinsky is true. It can be confirmed.