Yeah, Nixon is gone but, (sm)

I found a lot of the tapes rather interesting.  He used extremely foul language consistently, was paranoid as I don't know what all (in particular with the press), and actually notes at one point that pushing republicans father to the right and dividing the country would benefit the republican party for elections.  I think you can learn a lot by going back and reviewing this stuff.

As far as Bush goes, he's still up for a good bashing every now and then.  He may be a lame duck, but he's still passing legislation, which can hopefully be reversed.  He has also put together a team (including Rove) to come up with a strategy for how he will be *presented* as a past president.  These are government employees on this committee, so guess who's paying for Bush's new reputation? 

• How about those Nixon tapes...LOL - Just the big bad
  • He's about what one would expect - gourdpainter
  • I've not been following that story........ sm - m
    • Yeah, Nixon is gone but, (sm) - Just the big bad
      • Right, dont every forget to bash Bush. - Get a life and look in your own mirror.nm
        • I know, lets just talk about....(sm) - Just the big bad
        • But Bush is soooo bashable and he has earned - every single bash he gets.
          • I think that history will be far kinder to Bush than - Kendra
      • You may not be old enough to remember......... sm - m
        • I was 11 when he resigned. (sm) - Just the big bad
          • Oh my! I remember him well. I remember we used to call him...sm - oldtimer
            • As a matter of fact my youngest son was born...sm - oldtimer
        • Oh, I remember the Nixon administration - gourdpainter
          • yeah, does get worse with each administration. - Will be the same with Obama, unfortunately.nm

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Let's see your statistics.  I'm assuming you've done a lot of research to support these claims.

As stated below, my guess is the wrong-doers are about 50 percent Republican and 50 percent Democrat.  The only thing I can see that is particularly ironic or shameful is that the Republican party generallly portrays itself as the superiorly moral, family-oriented party. 

That's exactly what I said.  Scarborough has always supported Bush.  There is a difference between supporting and blindly following.  For example, you see nothing wrong with how this case was handled.  You see nothing wrong with Bush lying every time he opens his mouth.  That's blind faith.

Scarborough is an objective Republican who believes in honesty.  I realize this is a difficult concept for some CONS to understand.  Once upon a time, honesty was considered a good thing in the United States.  People who were honest were considered to have moral character and integrity.  Scarborough is one of those rare of Republicans, totally foreign to you, I'm sure.

To blindly follow (which I'm sure you're quite familiar with) means worshiping a man as if he's some kind of god, believing every single word he says, even when you see evidence to the contrary right before your eyes.   He lies every day; those who follow blindly believe him every day.  And when it becomes common knowledge that he's lied and when they can't twist and manipulate the lie out of recognition any more, then his blind followers make excuses for him, usually blaming democrats or anyone else who is handy but never blaming the liar himself.  And they justify all the lying because they have that special *connection* with God.  They can lie all they want and God just winks at them and says it's okay because their place in heaven has already been guaranteed, unlike the rest of us poor slobs out there without that special connection.

The only thing that scares me more than Bush having the same credibility as Al Qaeda is the fact that there are so many morons who blindly follow him, who just aren't smart enough to figure out that Bush was never on their side - he's only on the side of big money.  He even joked about his *base* - the *haves* and the *have nots.*

By the way, you are on the liberal board.  If you don't care for the liberal point of view, the CON board is ---->

I was responding to this:  *And know a lot PK. I know A LOT about your posting habits more than you could ever imagine.*  I was accused of doing something I simply didn't do, so that just shows me how much you people really DO know, and, yes, I can *imagine* a LOT when faced with this kind of ominous post. 

Those of your ilk have dark histories of murdering people of different beliefs (for example, personnel at abortion clinics), and the latest tactic of the Neocons is intimidation and retribution.  Just ask Valerie Plame, who used to have a career before her husband spoke the truth.

If someone said that to you on your board, you'd be accusing them of threatening to assassinate you and contacting the FBI.  Who are you KIDDING?  Typical neocon double standard and hypocrisy at work again. 

but the point is, the far left hates Cheney as much or more than Bush, so impeach Bush, get Cheney, then what?  Impeach Cheney?  Then you get Hastert. I know the far left doesn't like him. Impeach him and get Ted Stevens.  He's a Republican, too.  (President pro tempore of the Senate).  Impeach him and get...Condi Rice...if she isn't buying shoes.  What have you gained. Absolutely nothing. Well...maybe some payback for Clinton, which is what this is all about anyway.  Why not just wait until 2008 and vote the bums out.