Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

You are kidding, right? Sheesh. NM

Posted By: MT on 2005-09-20
In Reply to: Whatever. No one hounded them off. sm - Democrat




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Um...well Bi(n La)den..sheesh,
just making an observation as many others will, I am sure.
Sheesh!

I can almost feel palpable hatred that Palin is so fond of inciting at her rallies.


I guess time is getting short, everyone keeps saying Obama will win, they're becoming very angry and the venom is spewing.  Too bad they just can't stick to the issues and must resort to attacking posters instead of issues.  I guess that just shows the extent of their desperation. 


Now, I don't know for sure if Obama will win.  I'm very hesitant about feeling too secure about that.  As long as there are the Karl Roves of the world and Diebold machines, anything can happen.


Sheesh....is there
anyone in D.C who pays taxes? 
Again with the liar. Sheesh is right. NM

Sheesh.....you are delusional.
Pay attention here...Bill Clinton...liberal to the core...regime change in Iraq was hatched during HIS presidency. You can't deny that. Well, you can, but anyone who cares to check will see the truth of it. So...your last paragraph should be aimed at liberals. Apparently, regime change is a LIBERAL idea.

John F. Kennedy...another liberal and incidentally as I have said on many occasions a man I admire...started getting involved in Viet Nam to "stop the spread of communism." FORCING western ideas on those folks. So I guess invading other countries to start democracies must be a LIBERAL idea.

Your rationalizing aka just because they were enacted during a conservative government doesn't mean it was a conservative idea. That is a ridiculous statement. What it DOES mean is that conservatives cared enough about the idea, WHATEVER it was, to actually DO something about it other than TALK about it. Ideas are fine, ACTION is what counts.

Look, for whatever reason and Lord only knows why, I am going to try this one more time. I consider myself an American. Not a conservative, not a liberal, not a libertarian, a Ron Paul supporter, polka-dotted or criss-crossed. I don't have any group, person, club, party who tells me what to believe. You can call me whatever you want to, pigeon hole me however you like, to suit your agenda. It is what you are good at. It makes absolutely no difference to me what you think of me or what group you want to put me in.

As to justifying my beliefs? My dear, you are the one who keeps justifying, and I can show that every major change in this country from the start was enacted under what you call conservative, what I call deeply morally convicted people...and then YOU justify by saying doesn't matter if "conservatives" actually DID it, it was a LIBERAL idea.

Geezzzz....whatever, piglet. If that is the case, thank you for the idea, and YOU'RE WELCOME for ACTUALLY ENACTING THEM.

Sheesh. LOL. THE END.


And you are in theposition to know all before it happens...sheesh...

and the pubs KNEW EVERYTHING for these last eight years and did what was supposedly good for this country?.  One of many horrible things they did was push the average American worker out of the middle class while the fat cats got fatter, all the while thumbing their noses at us, not to mention the 'war' that never should have happened.   


Sheesh - this is what your happy about?
You love to see people in misery? You like to see people unhappy? And why because they are connected to a republican which many hold so much disdain for. You know if John Kerry, AL Gore, Bill Clinton were going through terrible times with their children no matter how much I dislike them I certainly wouldn't be so gleeful that their kids are going through this. And please spare me the "they were pawns or objects" because of so, so was Bidens kids, and you wouldn't be so gleeful about that.

As for this guy going around to the TV shows, who doesn't now adays...especially when your offered a million dollars for your story or to appear on the air.

There are more important things going on now - unemployment, housing crisis, financial crisis, war, and your gleeful that relatives of Sarah Palin are having personal difficulties.

Shameful is what I call it.
sheesh is right, sam, GIVE IT A REST!!!
if we talked about the weather, you would turn it into an abortion topic.  If we talked about fashion, you would turn it into an abortion topic.  If we talked about sports, well, you get it.  And WE GET IT.  Give it a blanking rest.
Sheesh. Well I am so glad you are happy....
come to pick the bones with the rest of the crew? Well, bon appetit. LOL. geez.
Of course you will. It's called spin. lol...sheesh.
nm
Sheesh! You have way too much time on your hands!

Not failures...favors. Sheesh. lol nm
nm
Sheesh louise people.
For the love of pete.....the fact that Obama wants to raise taxes on businesses and the fact that it won't keep jobs in American because it will be cheaper to take their business to other countries.....that isn't fox news tabloid.....that is common sense. 
Whattabuncha nay-sayers. Sheesh.
.
Sheesh. Just asked a question.

You said:


"like a very bad itchy rash, or the smell of cow manure, he is EVERYWHERE, even to ignorant dems/independents who (OH MY GOD) get all the nes channels, C-SPAN, that the special Republicans can."


You're all hyped up today. Calm down.  I wasn't sure what you were saying and took it to mean C-Span was a garbage channel..


They are not murdering children - sheesh!!!!
Whether you want to call it murder that is your opinion. Embryos are not children. This is not a living breathing human being that has a mind, nerves, emotions or anything. That's like saying to eat eggs your are murdering baby chickens. When a child is born and is a breathing living fully developed human child and it is born and after it breaths air, and is killed then yes that is murder. Disposing of an egg is not murder, and it is probably the best thing that could happen to someone who is forced into a world of hate, unlove, and unwantedness. I guess it doesn't bother you one bit to see these children suffer because they have been born into a life of despair. Do you get a warm fuzzy feeling to know that a child will be miserable and may even want to commit suicide because they were born into a world where they are unloved and unwanted.

You really need to stop twisting reality into what you want to believe it is. Not every child is born into a loving family and people need to keep their nose out of where it doesn't belong.
Sheesh! I messed up my own joke!

I wrote:  I said, "Well, let's see:  "Algia" means pain.  "Ceph" means pain, so pain in the head -- HEADACHE!"


Obviously, "ceph" means HEAD!


I just got out of the hospital (again for pancreatitis), and I believe MY "ceph" was left behind when I was typing my post.


Good thing I don't own a gun or I'd probably shoot myself in the foot.  LOL.


NOT the same thing - sheesh! - see message
How can you compare the two. I pay taxes as do the companies we work for.

Tupperware reps pay taxes.

Churches do not pay taxes.

Unless churches plan to pay taxes they should not be holding business meetings in their homes.
Sheesh....Clinton didn't go to funerals either....
and yes, soldiers died on his watch too (Somalia, Bosnia,etc). I did not see CNN covering flag-draped coffins then. Yes, more have died in Iraq; however, a soldier killed is a soldier killed. Clinton did not go to the funeral of that US serviceman who was killed and then his body dragged behind a Jeep in Somalia. Was that because Clinton felt guilty? Come on!! It is impossible for a President (ANY President) to show up at a private funeral without causing a media circus, and frankly, I would not want Bush there because along with him would come Cindy Sheehan, the pink ladies, the nutso religious group, the ones who hold up signs saying your son died for nothing, yada yada. Maybe THAT is why Bush does not go to funerals. Ya think???

As to stopping the media...what planet to you live on? As if Bush could stop the liberal media from showing anything they want...ala CNN and their terrorist-made sniper video as the terrorists stalked our soldiers. Good grief, new guy!!! The liberal media doesn't give a rat's patootie about who they hurt as they strive to take Bush down....ya think???

And frankly, new guy, do you think the public need to see a flag-draped coffin to know about the death toll in Iraq? I am surprised CNN has not installed a ticker to count them. Get a grip, get a clue, buy a vowel. You and other Bush haters like you just need to admit it. You hate the man, anything connected with the man, to the point that you criticize him for doing a wonderful thing by showing up at Virginia Tech. I think that shows a remarkable lack of human compassion on your part. Yeah...I THINK.
I stand corrected - sheesh! who can you believe anymore
I'm totally confused with everything going on now adays. I don't know truth from smears. You would think if someone is actually putting their name to something they would be telling the truth due to serious outcomes of false accusations.

So how can we tell if something we hear on TV, radio or internet is true or not?

Makes me just not want to vote anymore and turn off the TV and put my head in the sand and ignore all going on. I just don't know what to believe anymore.
Drink another cup full of Kool-aid...sheesh. nm
.
Clinton...talk about a rewrite on history...sheesh....
He was a waste of a good president. Ergo, he was an embarrassment, in more ways than one.


Where do you want your break, anyway?
Ever hear of TWO WRONGS DON'T MAKE A RIGHT? sheesh you are limited
nm
This is the site you fraudulently tried to pass off as the *truth* about Donahue. Sheesh!










About

All About Philosophy - The Big Questions




















ABOUT US
Our Mission

Our mission is to lead people to Jesus and help them grow in their relationship with Him. We strive to deliver compelling evidence for the Christian faith to seekers, believers, and a skeptical world. We seek to be non-threatening, practical and informative, using the technology of the Internet to answer tough questions about God, Jesus Christ, the Bible and Christianity.

Go ye therefore, and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit: teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I commanded you: and lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Matthew 28:19-20 KJV

Our Faith Statement

Although our ministry style often caters to wary skeptics, our group's foundation is based on solid, fundamental Christian doctrine.

Therefore, We Believe


  • The Bible is the only inspired Word of God – a supernaturally integrated set of 66 books, written by 40 authors, over nearly 2,000 years.
  • God created all things – from the massive cosmos to the microscopic cell.
  • We were created in God’s image, yet we were all corrupted and estranged from God after Adam fell into sin. The sin of Adam was the entry point of all sin, as well as physical and spiritual death on Earth.
  • God exists as three distinct personalities, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
  • Jesus Christ is the Son of God who fulfilled over 300 Old Testament prophecies when he took on human flesh, through the miracle of the virgin birth, and came to Earth as the promised Messiah.
  • Jesus died a physical death on the cross as the ultimate love sacrifice and act of grace, which allows all who believe in Him to be cleansed of sin by His blood and have a renewed, eternal relationship with God.
  • Jesus rose from the dead as the ultimate sign of his deity. He ascended to heaven, with the ultimate promise of his return to Earth as our just and mighty Lord. We constantly strive to be a Spirit-filled ministry, regularly praying and seeking God's guidance for our activities. We remind each other daily that this is God's work, not ours.

    But without faith it is impossible to please Him: for He that cometh to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him. Hebrews 11:6 KJV

    Contact Information:
    All About GOD Ministries, Inc.
    7150 Campus Drive, Suite 320
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80920
    719-884-2246
    719-884-2247 fax
    Email: Questions1.1@AllAboutGOD.com
    Website: AllAboutGOD.com












  • Philosophy Home | About Us | Support Us | FAQ | Sitemap
    Copyright © 2002 - 2005 AllAboutPhilosophy.org, All Rights Reserved.


    Now that makes all kinds of sense. Sheesh. I am sure murders occur...
    where you live too. Are you a murderer? What a goofy post. I just happen to be one of those people who knew of Bill before he came to national fame. And I did not say he murdered anyone. All I said is that there are unexplained deaths. All you have to do is google. People should not post rumor and innuendo if they do not want it turned around and applied to their side.
    MSNBC doesn't encourage these witch hunts at all. Sheesh
    Convention III of the Geneva Convention has to do with treatment of Prisoners of War.

    Identifying who is to be classified as a POW is specifically called out in detail in Art 4 of Convention III.

    The AL Queda and Taliban rogues, and other ''terrorists'' DO NOT fall under the protections of Convention III, commonly referred to as Common Article III.
    Sheesh, you not only hate Bush, you hate PEOPLE!
    x
    not avoid their rehab, afford their rehab....sheesh lol
    I will correct myself before someone else does...lol
    Are you kidding? (sm)
    He never had any cheese on his cracker! All that clown needs is a room with mirrored walls and he'd be happy!
    Who are YOU kidding?

    You don't want to interrupt our so-called "Bush hate-fest with facts"????


    Number one, you THRIVE on this.  You thrive on spouting your drivel, fighting and spreading your venom.  You need it like a fish needs water.  You can't survive unless you spread your evil hatefulnes all over this board.  You're not satisfied with a respectful, reasonable debate.  You're not happy unless you're personally stomping someone who disagrees with you into the ground.


    Number two, the entire issue involved with this thread IS "FACTS."  An increasing number of Americans want to know what the truth is, and they're bright enough to realize they've been fed a bunch of lies by the idiot in the White House.  You people are so adverse to the truth, you wouldn't be able to identify a fact if it hit you between the eyes. 


    I realize that you're energized and over the fact that you've got a fight going here.


    You have no compelling point of view.  All you know how to do is insult and call people names.  You don't have the ability to intelligently debate any issue.  You're nothing more than message board thugs.  I personally am very uncomfortable stooping that low, and from now on, I refuse to read and/or respond to any of your posts, and I would urge the thoughtful, respectful, intelligent people who frequent this board to do the same and NOT give you the conflict that you thrive on. 


    Take it back to the cesspool you call home:  The Conservative Board.  Isn't that what you've repeatedly promised to do, anyway, LEAVE??  Once again, your word has just as much value and credibility as Bush's.  It's easy to see why you worship him.  You share the same "values."


    I don't know that it was kidding, but it's quite different.
    But I'm sure you knew that.  I could take the time to explain how these are two very different threats/comments from a legal as well as common sense standpoint but it it would fall on deaf ears.  Not playing this game with you anymore.  If you want to pretend to be ignorant, go ahead.  Just not sure why you'd want to do it in public.
    You ARE kidding, right?
    You never heard of TRAVELGATE?!!!!!?   Oh, well, people's lives were only ruined.  People who had worked in the travel office under many different administrations.   You know, people like you and me, just average Joes.  Until Clinton cronyism ruined their lives.  Gosh, how come you people don't know this stuff?  That's really amazing.  And disturbing.
    You have got to be kidding, right?

    Those comments the other night weren't particularly disturbing.  They were a bit crass at times, and the John Willkes Booth comment was a bit coarse and probably a bit over the top.....but overall they were quite amusing.  I even saved one posting because it was HILARIOUS.  Okay, probably not hilarious to the conservative board, I do realize that.  But after watching these dreadful playground bullies beat up on everyone on that board that didn't spew their propaganda there was some sort of justice in those posts that appeared.  Sort of a karmic get-even thing.  I am so glad that I got to read all of them that particular evening.


    Reading the other board is kind of like passing a gruesome car accident.  You don't want to look, but yet you can't resist.....and you never know how awful it's going to be.  Human nature, I guess.


    Your kidding right...??...sm
    While this is not at the top of my list, a sitting president who was not elected by the people is nothing to say 'oh well' about.

    I have always favored the popular vote over electorial votes. All electronic so swinging chads are not an issue.
    You got to be kidding.
    All day and night long, Bush used it as a political statement, beginning with Cheney and Rice on the Sunday talk show circuit and ending with a neocon made for TV movie that tried to pin the blame for 9/11 on Clinton.
    Are you kidding?
    213,000 refugees in 2004 and 801,000 in 2005 - I guess all this liberty/democracy/newfound security is just too much for some Iraqis, so they have to leave their country. ???????????????


    Baghdad Empties as Residents Flee to Safety
    Major Exodus Sends Hundreds of Thousands of Iraqis to Jordan, Syria
    By JIM SCIUTTO

    BAGHDAD, Iraq, Sept. 18, 2006 — - Iraqi officials insist that the government's security plan shows signs of success, but hundreds of thousands of Iraqis express a different view -- by leaving the region in hordes.

    Baghdad's passport office is overrun with people trying to leave the country. On a recent afternoon, a car bomb went off just outside the gates, killing nine people.

    Inside an official tried to calm the crowd, saying this happens all the time. The attack was one more reason for resident Kaiss Warash to want to leave Iraq.

    I'm tired of life here, he said.

    Visit bus stations in Iraq's capital and it's clear many feel the same as Warash. By some estimates, this is now the largest movement of refugees in the world today, with most of the fleeing people going to neighboring Syria and Jordan. And the pace of the movement has accelerated. In 2004, 213,000 Iraqis fled the country. Last year that number rose to 801,000.

    There is persecution going on of religious minorities, of professionals … and of course Shia or Sunni, said Lavinia Limón of the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants. People are actually told if you don't leave we're going to kill you.

    The drain is worst among professionals. An estimated 40 percent of the country's professionals have left, and Baghdad's main hospital is now experiencing a dangerous shortage of trauma surgeons.

    Unemployed but Safe

    Across Baghdad, in some areas quiet streets and vacant homes are an eerie testament to the exodus.

    In Jordan entire neighborhoods of Iraqi refugees have sprung up. In Jordan they can walk the streets safely again, but many can't work legally.

    One refugee told us, I don't have a job here … but there's nothing better than security.

    And so many keep leaving, hoping some day it will be safe to come home.

    Copyright © 2006 ABC News Internet Ventures

    No kidding!
    I belive the vet stated that someone spat on the ground near him.  This same vet has also had other incidents happen to him.  Kind of strange.  I guess accusations of spitting have been what is called an urban legend and been around since VIet Nam.
    no kidding, you are right about that
    My son heard some negative ads on the radio the other day and was telling me Obama did this or McCain is going to do that, and we had to have a talk about taking all of this with a grain of salt and about twisted half-truths. It's hard to get to the bottom of a lot of it. I really commend you for "I stand corrected." Not many people are willing to do that on either side.
    You have got to be kidding!

    Spreading false rumors - I thought junior high was over with!

    Besides, it's far more probable that the Palin had the baby due to her age, rather than her young daughter.

    Grow up, would ya?


    Are you kidding me?
    In my family....if there is a baby in the house....it is passed around like a game of pass the parcel.  We love babies and quite frankly they get heavy sometimes....and so you pass them to someone else to TAKE A BREAK FROM THE DEAD WEIGHT OF A SLEEPING BABY. SHEESH.  This isn't child abuse.  This is called sharing the love!
    are you kidding me?????
    Glenn Beck last night!
    ARE YOU KIDDING ME??
    x
    Are you kidding me?
    The poor people of this country get all the benefits.  I go to my local Wallyworld on the first weekend of every month and see those "poor" people wheeling 2 baskets of groceries, with crab legs and cases of beer and steaks, wearing gold jewelry, hair and nails done and better clothes than I wear and they pull out their benefits card to pay.  And then when I get out to the parking lot I see them loading their groceries into the brand new car while I work for 3 services, dh works a full time job and a part time job and I got into my 10 year old SUV.  and this happens every month, not a once or 2 thing.  These people know how to work the system to get benefits and live the good life all the while.  Give me a freaking break...you believe in charity...you give your paycheck away and leave mine alone.  I have kids to take care of and I'd like to retire someday.
    Are you kidding me??????
    Believe me, if you were making 250K a year, you would definitely be paying more than 25%. I do have family members who work their BUTTS OFF to make that and I can guarantee you they pay FAR MORE than 25% in taxes, not to mention all the other garbage they get hit with, just for making an honest living and employing others.

    So what now, we're supposed to despise those that succeed in life? Isn't that what we're supposed to strive to do?

    Where do you think all the jobs come from in this country, besides our out of control government jobs? Jobs usually do come from those that financially may be better off. What's wrong with that? If they didn't own more and have more, so they could have businesses that employ the rest of us, where do you think you would be?

    My husband is a CPA and does taxes as well and I can tell you you don't have a clue what you are talking about. Those making 250K don't make it by sitting on their duffs. They usually live at their businesses and if you think you have little time, they have even less for enjoyment, etc. And they pay through the nose to the tune of 50% plus on their taxes.

    A flat tax would be the only fair way to be taxed at all, even though individuals paying income tax in this country is illegal anyway. There are no laws governing such thing. Only for corporate taxes. Instead of taxes, we should only have consumer taxing...we pay taxes on what we buy, not what we make.

    Government has no right to our money, never has. Supreme Court shot down individuals paying income taxes back in the early 1900's, called it unconstitutional, but look how it managed to creep its ugly self back into our lives.

    You have got to be kidding!!!!

    From BF's own mouth when Greenspan and the republicans were trying to regulate FMFM, he said there was no problem. Know why? They would find out he and a bunch of others were skimming the profits.


    This started before Bush. There were warnings but the dems did not heed them. Why? Because the republicans wanted this regulation and we all know NOW that the dems won't do anything for the better of the people if it means voting for something the repubs try to put in place, no matter how good the legislation is.


    I think you better do some homework.


    Are you kidding?
    I know if your a democrat you staunchly believe it wasn't the democrats fault and it was all the republicans fault and vice versa. I'm sure you could even find articles written by democrats or republicans who will write article proving why its not the democrats or republicans fault. But facts are facts and they cannot be hidden.

    My take is it is both sides fault. They all let it happen. They knew what was going on and they continued to line their pockets (both democrats and republicans?)

    I am sick to death of one side blaming the other side and then sit there and say , oh no, it wasn't the side I support, it was everyone else.

    Have you seen a list of the people who had a hand in this. BOTH SIDES!!!!!

    Then of course when you point it out they say "oh, well lets not do the blame game". They won't take responsibility for a situation they created.

    And now they have the nerve to let the same people who got us into this mess figure out a solution to get us out? Are they for real?????? That's like letting criminals once found guilty decide what punishment they should receive.

    Oh and the top 1% of republicans that is getting rich under a republican president is the same 1% that were getting rich under a democrat president. It may take awhile but I could find the names of the 1% wealthy that got even more wealthy when Clinton was in. Both sides! Face the facts.

    I am so disgusted with the whole thing. They are all crooks and I don't trust not one of them! They should all be fired! Crooked to the bone, liars to the core!!!!!!
    No, I'm not kidding

    It would be nice to write off the current crisis on Wall Street and global financial markets as something that only matters to the investor class.


    Unfortunately, the effects are already being felt in lower-income communities around the United States. Worst-case scenarios for what spins out from the U.S. mortgage meltdown are truly frightening -- a severe world recession is a distinct possibility.


    Whether such worst-case scenarios can be averted, or softened -- and preventing the recurrence of similar crises in the future -- depends on abandoning the laissez-faire financial regulatory regime entrenched over the last decade.


    The current crisis is the predictable (and predicted) result of a massive U.S. housing bubble, which itself can be traced in part to global economic imbalances that could have been prevented.


    At least five distinct regulatory failures led to the current crisis.


    Regulatory Failure Number One: Failure to Manage the U.S. Trade Deficit. The housing bubble (as well as the surge in leveraged buyouts of publicly traded companies ("private equity")) was fueled by cheap credit -- low interest rates. One reason for the cheap credit was an influx of capital into the United States from China. China's capital surplus was the mirror image of the U.S. trade deficit -- U.S. corporations were sending lots of dollars to China in exchange for the cheap stuff sold to U.S. consumers.


    Regulatory Failure Number Two: Failure to Intervene to Pop the Housing Bubble. Along with an influx of capital, Federal Reserve policy kept interest rates very low. There were good reasons for the Fed Policy, but that did not mean the Fed was helpless to prevent the housing bubble. As economists Dean Baker and Mark Weisbrot of the Center for Economic and Policy Research insisted at the time, Federal Reserve Chair Alan Greenspan simply by identifying the bubble -- and adjusting public perception of the future of the housing market -- could have prevented or at least contained the bubble. He declined, and even denied the existence of a bubble.


    Regulatory Failure Number Three: Financial Deregulation and Unchecked Financial "Innovation." A key reason that mortgages were made available so widely and with such little review of recipients' qualifications was a shift in which institutions hold the mortgages. Traditionally, banks made mortgages and held them. In the new era, banks and non-bank mortgage lenders made loans, but then sold the loans to others. Investment banks packaged lots of mortgage loans into "Collateralized Debt Obligations" (CDOs) and then sold them on Wall Street, with a promise of a steady stream of revenue from interest payments. These operations were pretty much unregulated. Despite the supposed sophistication of the investors involved, no one took account of how shoddy the loans were or -- more fundamentally -- the certainty that huge numbers would go bad if and when the housing bubble popped.


    Regulatory Failure Number Four: Private Regulatory Failure. It was the job of ratings agencies (like Standard and Poor's, and Moody's) to assess the CDOs and give investors guidance on how risky they were. They failed totally, likely in part because they wanted to maintain good relations with the investment banks issuing the CDOs.


    Regulatory Failure Number Five: No Controls Over Predatory Lenders. The toxic stew of financial deregulation and the housing bubble created the circumstances in which aggressive lenders were nearly certain to abuse vulnerable borrowers. The terms of your loan don't matter, they effectively purred to borrowers, so long as the value of your house is going up. Lenders duped borrowers into conditions they could not possibly satisfy, making the current rash of foreclosures on subprime loans inevitable. Effective regulation of lending practices could have prevented the abusive loans, but none was to be found.


    Unfortunately, the consequences of the mortgage meltdown go far beyond the foreclosure epidemic, as horrible a toll as that is taking. The entanglement of the financial sector with mortgage instruments, and the ripple effects of the housing bubble, has made lenders uncertain of who even among large corporations and financial institutions is credit worthy. The resulting credit crunch endangers the functioning of the global economy. Financial markets are guessing wildly about the prospects of banks, insurers and other financial corporations, and the plunging value of stocks poses immediate dangers to the real global economy.


    Less acute, but probably more profoundly, the popping of the housing bubble is driving down home prices. U.S. consumer demand over the last five years has been driven by consumers borrowing against the increased value of their homes; with housing values falling, that process is working in reverse. The depressed housing market is also ravaging the construction sector, a nontrivial portion of the U.S. economy. A serious recession looms as a real possibility.


    Mitigating these harms and preventing the worst now depends on active and interventionist government -- a government stimulus plan, and aggressive efforts to force lenders to adjust mortgage terms and let people stay in their homes. Preventing financial panics of the kind now underway require new standards of transparency and regulation for high finance. The coming days and months will tell whether any lessons have been learned.


    R U Kidding?
    Suggest you study up on national health care in other countries. It is NOT good.
    no kidding!
    x
    You are kidding, right?
    Surely you have more to do with your time than this rubbish. Get over it!!
    no, I'm not kidding
    and the part that matters is that the tax tables do not lie. did you read that part or just jump to a conclusion. Do what it says. Look at the tax tables from those years and see for yourself. The IRS publications and tables are all available to you.