good point.....this one bans if you don't agree with them....or maybe this has stopped since the
Posted By: I HOPE SO on 2005-08-29
In Reply to: Maher - Another Anon
.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
- coulter - gt
- Coulter - Anon
- Maher - Another Anon
- good point.....this one bans if you don't agree with them....or maybe this has stopped since the - I HOPE SO
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Good point, I agree with that...nm
nm
maybe they just stopped writing that calendar at that point
because it seemed like a good place to stop. I mean, they had to stop at some point, right?
ABC Bans Flag Pins
Well isn't that just American... Now do you know why they're called the drive-bys? Think drive-by shooting...
Yesterday, the brass at ABC News issued orders forbidding reporters to wear lapel pin American flags, or other patriotic insignia. Their reasoning was that ABC should remain neutral about "causes". |
Since when is support for preventing our death & destruction some sort of a cause? Since when is Patriotism to be discouraged. I urge you to boycott ABC and its sponsors and affiliates.
|
We are slowly losing everything our country stands for, and everything our men and women fought and died to preserve.
Please forward this to as many as you can. You can verify it by going to:
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/noflags.asp
![](http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=1&attid=0.1.2&disp=emb&view=att&th=11c958db0d2b2836")
Good point, good post. Thanks.
Good point...sm
There is no blaming liberals for Bush's inaction. He hasn't paid us any attention for the past 6 years, so anything that he has done is of his own accord, including the handling of the war in Iraq.
Suzie mentioned not taking out al Sadr above (sound familiar?).
Good point
I remember a disagreement several of us had with our pastor years ago. Several folks were talking about leaving. One of the elders told us, "You don't leave, I don't leave, this is our church, not his. He needs to remember that he works for us, not the other way around." Brought lots of things into perspective for me.
Good point
Yeah, they are both raking in the dough, but why should Hillary or anyone be forced to pay our health care costs? Your right, the post makes no sense.
Good point - :-)
xx
Good point. nm
nm
Good for you! Well-said and to-the-point, too.
x
Good point. nm
nm
Good point! nm
Good point :-) nm
x
Good point - He won by only 4%
They did not get 100% of the vote and he did not win by a landslide. I would say more like "squeaked by".
Good point there
Many of the people that carry on about the sanctity of human life have no problem rushing out during hunting season to bag their quota of wildlife, no problem trashing the environment/planet for profit, etc. Either all life is sacred, or none is, IMHO.
good point s/m
Methodists share that belief as do most protestant churches I believe. I don't believe that politics has any place in the pulpit.
Good point....nm
x
Good point
nm
You have a good point there..........sm
By comparison, what I meant was that if he fails to bring us out of this downward spiral we are in then America would fail. I was looking at it as if Obama was doing what was the best thing for this country, and certainly, none of what he has accomplished thus far has been for the good of the country. I stand corrected!
Good point. (nm)
*
That is a very good point.
All the sex and drugs that goes along with rock n roll. There is always going to be something you don't approve of one way or another whether it be who they sleep with or how much drugs they do. I would not deprive myself of good music just because that particular artist is gay.
That's a good point and it's true. sm
I am sure all of us have things we do in the name of kindness. The rest of us just don't talk about it.
Rush may have a good point here.
From an email I got:
"Love him or loathe him, he nailed this one right on the head..........
By Rush Limbaugh:
I think the vast differences in compensation between victims of the September 11 casualty and those who die serving our country in Uniform are profound. No one is really talking about it either, because you just don't criticize anything having to do with September 11. Well , I can't let the numbers pass by because it says something really disturbing about the entitlement mentality of this country. If you lost a family member in the September 11 attack, you're going to get an average of $1,185,000. The range is a minimum guarantee of $250,000, all the way up to $4.7 million.
If you are a surviving family member of an American soldier kill ed in action, the first check you get is a $6,000 direct death benefit, half of which is taxable.
Next, you get $1,750 for burial costs. If you are the surviving spouse, you get $833 a month until you remarry. And there's a payment of $211 per month for each child under 18. When the child hits 18, those payments come to a screeching halt.
Keep in mind that some of the people who are getting an average of $1.185 million up to $4.7 million are complaining that it's not enough. Their deaths were tragic, but for most, they were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Soldiers put themselves in harms way FOR ALL OF US, and they and their families know the dangers. (Actually, soldiers are put in harms way by politicians and commanding officers.)
We also learned over the weekend that some of the victims from the Oklahoma City bombing have started an organization asking for the same deal that the September 11 families are getting. In addition to that, some of the families of those bombed in the embassies are now asking for compensation as well.
You see where this is going, don't you? Folks, this is part and parcel of over 50 years of entitlement politics in this country. It's just really sad. Every time a pay raise comes up for the military, they usually receive next to nothing of a raise. Now the green machine is in combat in the Middle East while their families have to survive on food stamps and live in low-rent housing. Make sense?
However, our own US Congress voted themselves a raise. Many of you don't know that they only have to be in Congress one time to receive a pension that is more than $15,000 per month. And most are now equal to being millionaires plus. They do not receive Social Security on retirement beca use they didn't have to pay into the system. If some of the military people stay in for 20 years and get out as an E-7, they may receive a pension of $1,000 per month, and the very people who placed them in harm's way receives a pension of $15,000 per month.
I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our sons and daughters who are now fighting.
Good point - forgot about that
x
oh, good comeback. What is the point
nm
You bring up such a good point...
my partner drives a school bus in 2 areas, a very impoverished area, and then in the 'upper class' area, and he never gets over all the kindness and gifts he gets from the poorest of people during holidays, while the more affluent areas not even give nothing, they do not even treat him as a person.
I have noticed that during post office drives, you always see the most donated goods hanging on the mailboxes in poor neighborhoods, and very rarely anything from the huge gigantic housing developments. not to say they do not give but it really says SO MUCH.
we are musicians here where I live also and even the money-making machine bars and restaurants, they want to get everything free, they are making musicians around here go broke and do not care at all. they hold open mics and get everyone to play for free, while over-charging for every other little service, and give the musicians nothing, not even a free pop or coffee (or drink if you drink).
by the way, these establishments all boast they are christians/family establishments.
I think wick has a good point here..
That's a good point. I'm like you in the middle -nm
.....
Good point - what about HC's suits.
How come nobody commented on Hillary Clintons outfits. She doesn't shop at Penny/Sears or any of the other stores I do. Her clothes are very expensive but nobody made any comments about her spending money on clothes.
Good point. Actually, I think he wants to be Denzel
nm
Good point, Amanda. sm
If you had really listened closely to Prez Obama's speech earlier, he clearly stated the government is willing to give them a boost up in order to stabilize them and give them a chance to revamp their manufacturing in order to be competative with the global car manufacturers. I am so glad to hear that one of the plants that will be shut down is Hummer. We don't need gas guzzlers like that on the road. They serve no purpose other than to satisfy the egomaniacs who need a huge obnoxious vehicle in order for them to feel superior. We are not all going to be driving Smart cars. For pete's sake, be realistic. There is a solid purpose to keep manufacturing trucks and SUVs, and they can be made more energy efficient. We desperately need a new mindset in this country, one that insists on less consumption, more cost effectiveness with an eye to achieving freedom from foreign oil. In other words, we need to adapt a new attitude of learning to live without all the disgusting excess that goes on in this country. People need to wake up and reprioritize what is really important, which is not more, more, more. We can be the leaders in the world and set an example to everyone else that our values are more important than the trappings that we have prostituted ourselves for decades. This is not a bad thing!
"'The truth is that the president is just doing with GM what we, the people elected him to do: manage America’s decline and do it gently, painlessly, without seeming to abandon the old tropes of American Greatness."
A good uplifting point of view from God.....
http://www.sjchurchofchrist.org/freeboot.shtml
That Bill WAS our president at one point and a good one at that....sm
DUH!
lol
Good point. Yeah, maybe that is the norm there.
nm
Good post. I think you made your point!
Go McCain/Palin 2008
Good point, if you're going to support something, you should be able to look at it (sm)
and still think you're right, right?
"poo" litical, good point.
LOL sorry.
I think FOX is very balanced. We have every right to use words like FEAR and SCARED.
If Mccain had won and didn't seem like he was going to take into account anything from the left, you would be scared too.
Good point. We give money because we want to.
nm
Good, I made my point, but I won't move on.
 Too bad for you.
They bring out a good point about the strategy being used in Iraq. sm
The more I think about it, I think Bush is trying to keep it cool (keep casualties down) until he gets closer to his last days, then maybe he plans to let them have it. All of this tip toeing around the terrorist is not going to work. They are not going to fight fair. They are taking classes on how to make more powerful bombs without being detected - like the one that killed the 14 US troops this week.
They're stepping up their game and we have to step ours up. I think the drawback from doing this is that it will mean more US troop casualties and more Iraqi civilian deaths, and this administration knows that will cause them a backlash they don't have the balls to sustain.
Good dodge, but it doesn't let you off the hook with regards to the point
x
I thought Brunson made a good point down below.
One of the reasons the antiwar protesters have not been taken more seriously is that they have personalized this against Bush and not against war. I do think it is possible to separate the two. But I also think that protesting in the streets puts our military at risk, in fact I know that it does. The pen is a mighty weapon. Senators and congressmen and women want to be reelected. Sitting in front of the WH with a bullhorn and shouting obscenities and name calling to the President of the United States is not going to ever work. And it shows a distinct lack of respect, if not for the man, then for the office and the White House itself.
Oh, hahaha. Good point, Rush. He is smarter than
nm
I agree to a certain point.....
I found it loathsome that he abandoned his wife and children. I have also seen tears in his eyes when he recounts this and admits he abandoned the entire situation.
The problem is, when I watch Obama, he is never apologetic for his associations and NEVER fesses up to them. He just denies them as if they don't exist, when everyone knows they do. And even scarier to me, who will fill ALL THOSE thousand of positions he will appoint if he gets in the white house. I'll betcha 100 to 1 it will be Muslims, people you've never heard of before, questionable associations, questionable how they can even be in the white house cabinet because there will be BIG questions if they are even a real US citizen. You just hide and watch. It won't be pretty. That man feels no guilt for anything; why do you think he hung out with Ayers, Dohrn, Rezko, uses Pakistani roommates from college to do his fundraising from unknown sources overseas, came up with so much money to spend so much time in Muslim countries during his college years when he proclaims to have been broke. Too many questions that everyone refuses to demand an answer to.
At least McCain owns up to his past, unlike Obama. To hear him tell it, he's perfect in every way.
I agree with you to a point
however, there are laws against murder and to me...abortion is murder. I cannot stand by someone who would allow something like that to be considered okay by society. Yes, people have free will and they will have to live with that decision. However, if society is more willing to accept things like that it just seems like morals drop in society. What was once considered bad is no big deal. I feel that is the path that are country has started in and I don't like it.
I still don't understand why abortion isn't murder but a person who does something to a pregnant mother that causes her unborn child to die is considered murder and is punishable. A pregnant mother is killed and so is her unborn child and that is double homocide. The only difference is one fetus wasn't wanted by its parents and the other was. Other than that.....it is still murder in my eyes.
Here is my standing on this. I do not have a problem with the morning after pill. I think that is a great emergency contraceptive if a condom should fail or a rape should happen and no protection was used, etc. Do I want abortion to be totally illegal.....yes but the problem with that is you will still have illegal ones going on ending up in seriously hurt people because they may not be done properly, etc. If abortion is going to lbe egal, I think there should be guidelines. You only have such and such time to abort before it is considered murder. If you abort after that time frame, you can face charges of murder as well as any doctor who willingly performs the abortion knowing it is too late time frame wise.
I have no problem if the mother's life is in danger. That is it....in danger. I think that if an abortion fails, that infant has a right to live and should be protected. No late term abortions because that is murder. To have Obama want to legalize abortion with no guidelines....just go and abort because no one wants a baby as a punishment.....that is SO wrong and to allow that in our society is ridiculous.
In my opinion it will just cause more people to be even less cautious about their sexual practices and use abortion more as birth control and that isn't right. If more people are less worried about having a baby because abortions are so easy to get, etc.....I think it will cause a rise in STDs as well. JMO.
I agree with you to a point but
why did it have to come to a vote to begin with? Who decided it would come up for a vote? If it was the gay community to begin with, then they should honor the outcome, don't you think?
I saw Frasier's (can't think of his name right now) "brother" on The View yesterday and he's happy that his marriage will stay intact. I'm sure many others are also happy about it, too.
As for those that didn't jump on the bandwagon right away, well, what can I say? They missed the boat.
Good point. I see no problem with both points of view being taught...
and letting indivdiuals decide. Isn't that what America is about?
Very good point!!! The world doesn't see any of that on the news! Thanks for posting that! nm
x
Then I agree wholeheartedly with your point...
I would like to see it also. I would like to see the declassified document from the CIA where Joe Wilson (Valerie Plame's husband) supposedly corroborates Bush's speech about Saddam trying to buy yellowcake from Niger. I am sure that is something the Democrats would rather not make public knowledge. I would also like to know what they think they have as proof on Bush. Not guess, not innuendo, but hard proof that he lied. And I think if they had that, they would go forward. There are just too many questions that would be raised that Congress themselves would have a hard time answering...and I don't think they want to open Pandora's box. That is why I think it is political posturing because they viscerally hate the man (the Dems). And I have NEVER understood the degree that goes to. All that being said...I agree. They should make it all public, every last bit. I just wouldn't hold my breath waiting for it.
I agree with the point that the children's
private lives should be left out of it, but as to being on stage, that is just showing family support for their parents. Two entirely different things.
I agree, gourdpainter, to a point....
but one thing I DO know...Obama and a majority democrat congress mean socialism. There are no two ways about it. And I DON'T want socialism for America. So I would not vote for Obama, and if I vote for a third party and NOT McCain, that is a vote for Obama. I will NOT be a party to putting that man in the White House. No way, no how.
I am a registered Independent. I have not been a party faithful for several years. But I am concerned enough about Obama and his agenda that I am voting a straight Republican ticket for the FIRST time in my life. THAT is how much I DO NOT want him and his agenda for this country.
I agree with McCain on some things "he says." If he does them, fine. If he doesn't, we still don't get socialism. If McCain just gets elected and the status quo remains, we don't get socialism.
I don't want socialism. I don't know how much more clear I need to be about it.
|
