5 fingerbreadths although there was no nodularity?
Posted By: MT50 on 2007-11-09
In Reply to: Renal - typo
Subject: 5 fingerbreadths although there was no nodularity?
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
- Renal - typo
- 5 fingerbreadths although there was no nodularity? - MT50
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
fingerbreadths
Subject: fingerbreadths
Standard means of measuring this
I think 8 fingerbreadths
Subject: I think 8 fingerbreadths
finger's breadth is two words and it's hyphenated near as I can tell.
Pam's right - BOS has fingerbreadths. nm
Subject: Pam's right - BOS has fingerbreadths. nm
nm
yes fingerbreadths
Subject: yes fingerbreadths
nm
nodularity
Subject: nodularity
I suggest nodularity.
Hope that helps.
nodularity?
Subject: nodularity?
Areolae were free of nodularity?
Subject: Areolae were free of nodularity?
flat without firm nodularity ??? (nm)
Subject: flat without firm nodularity ??? (nm)
That's it - The areola were free of any nodularity. Thks
Subject: That's it - The areola were free of any nodularity. Thks
nonchalarity is actually nodularity, the freezing part is actually funny, but I am not sure what it
Subject: nonchalarity is actually nodularity, the freezing part is actually funny, but I am not sure what it is yet
|
