Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

I just wasn't sure if there was a "right" way..

Posted By: Thanks for helping :) nm on 2008-01-09
In Reply to: I'd leave them just how you have them. - It seems clear enough to me. JMO. NM

Subject: I just wasn't sure if there was a "right" way..

nm


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

I appreciate your help. It wasn't in my drug book and wasn't sure if I was even hearing it ri
Subject: I appreciate your help. It wasn't in my drug book and wasn't sure if I was even hearing it right.


No, it wasn't, but I wasn't responding to "the OP"
Subject: No, it wasn't, but I wasn't responding to "the OP"

get a hobby
Does this sound "right" sm
Subject: Does this sound "right" sm

Will check BMP to recheck sodium. I think this was s/l falsely (or could be possibly) low due to her glucose of 280.

Is anyone familiar with this? Is it possible for sodium to be falsely low in the context of high glucose?

Thanks..
Hi, Carol; I am glad you got the "right" help....sm
Subject: Hi, Carol; I am glad you got the "right" help....sm

You know, I have been doing this since 1983, hospital, clinic, in-house, nationals,etc., and I was not trying to say that it was impossible, only that I had not personally heard it, I just thought if you could double-listen, because being an Operative MT especially these last few years, I had PERSONALLY never come across that, even in lower extremity surgery with elderly patients, but I was not saying you were wrong. I am really disappointed, because it seems like some MTs here are treating this board as a personal challenge or contest, who can get the best answer first, and I am the first to know my own limitations, I just share what I PERSONBALLY know. Some (minority) like to criticize other people's answers. If you know better, that is great because you can really help the questioning MT. Why be rude when someone posts and states that they are trying to be helpful? Wow, talk about egos.
maybe "right more than left" edema??
Subject: maybe "right more than left" edema??


could it be "right minor fissure"?
Subject: could it be "right minor fissure"?


s/l "right narrow fissure" on chest x-ray?
Subject: s/l "right narrow fissure" on chest x-ray?

Chest x-ray showed a small amount of fluid in the right s/l "narrow fissure"???


Anyone know of this??


Thanks,


 


Abby


QA ended up changing it to "right" in chief complaint
Subject: QA ended up changing it to "right" in chief complaint


posted wrong. I mean "right side" isn't close.
Subject: posted wrong. I mean "right side" isn't close.

again, could this be "isolated"???
hm...sorry i wasn't able to help! nm
Subject: hm...sorry i wasn't able to help! nm


wasn't the cap - was the E in......nm
Subject: wasn't the cap - was the E in......nm


thanks wasn't quite sure :)
Subject: thanks wasn't quite sure :)


Thank you-wasn't sure
Subject: Thank you-wasn't sure

nm
Oh well, I wasn't much help....sorry - nm
Subject: Oh well, I wasn't much help....sorry - nm

XXX
no that wasn't it.
Subject: no that wasn't it.


Sorry I wasn't more help...
Subject: Sorry I wasn't more help...


Thanks! I wasn't sure about the
Subject: Thanks! I wasn't sure about the


I did see your *lol* and I wasn't angry *LOL*...sm
Subject: I did see your *lol* and I wasn't angry *LOL*...sm

Really, I'm in a good mood!  *lol*  Have a GREAT day!!!
No, it wasn't positive (sm)
Subject: No, it wasn't positive (sm)

And I just meant I hadn't ever heard "plus" in front of S1, S2 before.  That was what I was questioning.  Thanks for taking the time to reply!


 


It's labral; doc probably wasn't sure which one to use. nm
Subject: It's labral; doc probably wasn't sure which one to use. nm

nm
That wasn't the OPs question, now, was it? nm
Subject: That wasn't the OPs question, now, was it? nm

zzz
Thanks! It wasn't an op note...
Subject: Thanks! It wasn't an op note...

Just someone reviewing the history and there was no elaboration other than that.  This particular dictator is killing me tonight...they sound like they are recanting a dream while still out of it themselves...words are trickling out their mouth oh every 15-30 seconds or so and sentences are all malformed, they are yawning, so a 10 minute report is only yielding like 30 lines and I'm falling asleep myself...very frustrating! 
If it wasn't a typo:
Subject: If it wasn't a typo:

"bronchial dialator or inhalation therapy"

dilator, not dialator.
nice to see I wasn't the only one who...sm
Subject: nice to see I wasn't the only one who...sm

who misunderstood OP's query...*LOL* - WELCOME TO THE CLUB!!! 
Nope, it sure wasn't and...
Subject: Nope, it sure wasn't and...

we actually had to work with some live stuff in training, was always thinking I had the symptoms of everthing we worked with!
Great help, wasn't it!
Subject: Great help, wasn't it!

Tried searching every which way on that one!  Have to say I hang out here a lot, usually not of much help to anyone myself, but sure a lot of useful info and links from others!  Thanks to everyone who helps here, including you, Hayseed.  You rock and really enjoy your posts! 
I came across that term thanks wasn't quite sure :)
Subject: I came across that term thanks wasn't quite sure :)


You're welcome, wish I wasn't! :-(
Subject: You're welcome, wish I wasn't! :-(


That's how I looked at it, too, but just wasn't sure. nm
Subject: That's how I looked at it, too, but just wasn't sure. nm

nm
Oops, I'm sorry, you said it definitely wasn't that!!!!
Subject: Oops, I'm sorry, you said it definitely wasn't that!!!!

:o)
wasn't trying to just guess sm
Subject: wasn't trying to just guess sm

I wasn't sure if it was something more popular I should know but didn't
I'm sorry I wasn't more clear on that.
Subject: I'm sorry I wasn't more clear on that.


thanks, but that wasn't the question?!
Subject: thanks, but that wasn't the question?!

xx
it helped to know I wasn't crazy!
Subject: it helped to know I wasn't crazy!


That's what I thought, but QA said it wasn't correct.
Subject: That's what I thought, but QA said it wasn't correct.

That's what I thought, but QA said it wasn't correct. But I can't find any documentation either way.
wasn't trying to be rude, just the suggestions--sm
Subject: wasn't trying to be rude, just the suggestions--sm

given had absolutely nothing to do with the low back, which she specifically mentioned in her post. Not all MTs are way off in what they are asking about or looking for and some of these suggestions that have nothing to do with their requests can be very misleading, as well. JMO and again, not meant to be rude.
No wasn't Lamisil. I flagged it. Thanks though. nm
Subject: No wasn't Lamisil. I flagged it. Thanks though. nm

nm
wasn't being nasty as you put it - I merely asked
Subject: wasn't being nasty as you put it - I merely asked

how you can interpret a simple question being *nasty* is beyond belief....I asked because she never posted before 3/1 and there are a slew of questions - and is the ONLY reason I asked if she was testing.  I showed and had no attitude in my question BUT YOU SURE DID !!!


around these here parts, I guess one is dam*ed if you do and  dam*ed if you don't. 


Thanks, I sent for QA. Wasn't Charcot, maybe Kidner.
Subject: Thanks, I sent for QA. Wasn't Charcot, maybe Kidner.


You are so right! She is the second twin. I just wasn't thinking that way. THX!
Subject: You are so right! She is the second twin. I just wasn't thinking that way. THX!


Nah, sorry I wasn't clear. Just trying to point it out so
Subject: Nah, sorry I wasn't clear. Just trying to point it out so

s
Thanks. That's what I thought but wasn't positive
Subject: Thanks. That's what I thought but wasn't positive


I knew that wasn't right, just having a bad morning!
Subject: I knew that wasn't right, just having a bad morning!


thanks! I should have looked it up but I was so sure it wasn't really a word...LOL nm
Subject: thanks! I should have looked it up but I was so sure it wasn't really a word...LOL nm


Thanks. Was trying to hear glossitis, but the s wasn't there.
Subject: Thanks. Was trying to hear glossitis, but the s wasn't there.

x
And he wasn't meaning "propensity"? -nm
Subject: And he wasn't meaning "propensity"? -nm


Thank you- the "EMIA' part was what I wasn't sure of.
Subject: Thank you- the "EMIA' part was what I wasn't sure of.


That's what I thought it was, but it wasn't in my ref book, thanks.
Subject: That's what I thought it was, but it wasn't in my ref book, thanks.

xx
oops, sorry I wasn't clear, sm
Subject: oops, sorry I wasn't clear, sm

I meant to suggest that "with a lauer" might not be "with a lauer" but rather may be something ***areolar, like subareolar, but could be way off here.
oops, sorry I wasn't clear, sm
Subject: oops, sorry I wasn't clear, sm

I meant to suggest that "with a lauer" might not be "with a lauer" but rather may be something ***areolar, like subareolar, but could be way off here.
possibly. it's what i was thinking but wasn't sure. thanx!
Subject: possibly. it's what i was thinking but wasn't sure. thanx!