Not multiparous

Posted By: nyt on 2006-03-10
In Reply to: multiparous - medic muze

Subject: Not multiparous

I am sure it is not multiparous. (s/l muliparous or perhaps nuliparous) but not multiparous.

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

Muliparous? - nyt
- nulliparas - Del
- multiparous - medic muze
  - Not multiparous - nyt
    - How about nulliparous? - never having borne children?? - lucyo
      - Maybe that is it. - nyt
        glad to be able to help for a change - I've often found answers here..... - lucyo

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

multiparous
Subject: multiparous