Not that exactly.

Posted By: clhmt on 2007-08-19
In Reply to: definitely what he is saying. I've never heard it before though, have you??? - gordi

Subject: Not that exactly.

I used to do laboratory work in the silicon chip industry, where we SPC-charted everything. Out of control results were called high-fliers, and so when you said "outlyers", it rung a bell for me. Then, it was just a matter of finding the right spelling. :-)

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

s/l CBC - no outlyers. chemistry - no outlyers. - gordi
- outliers. - clhmt
  - WOW!! You are very sweet! thank you so much. - gordi
    - You're welcome, glad we got it! (nm) - clhmt
  - Technically, I don't think it's correct usage, but might be what he's saying. (nm) - clhmt
    - definitely what he is saying. I've never heard it before though, have you??? - gordi
      - Not that exactly. - clhmt

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database