Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

preference of most accounts is to

Posted By: sa on 2007-11-16
In Reply to: Need opinions or facts - mandiemt

Subject: preference of most accounts is to

leave off the s, except when it would make an awkward construction, e.g. the patient has Alzheimer's (in that case leave the s). But some accounts still want the s.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

I have two accounts..
Subject: I have two accounts..

One actually wants "same" as the post op dx and one wants the preop dx.
I also have two accounts that want it different.
Subject: I also have two accounts that want it different.

Characters would be less for 1-9 as opposed to one through nine.  It also depends on client preference.  It is hard to train your fingers to do one or the other.  I am old-school and have always done one through nine, 10, 11, 12, and so on.  I have to retrain my fingers.  I also have an account that requires I type the 1st the time the patient came in, and the other requirest the first time the patient came in.
or I should say, some accounts want (sm)
Subject: or I should say, some accounts want (sm)

you to put the s on IF it is dictated. Style preference is now without s.
I have my own accounts and they want the symbol.
Subject: I have my own accounts and they want the symbol.

They could care less what BOS has to say. 
Many accounts want this expanded
Subject: Many accounts want this expanded

now because it's on the dangerous abbrev. list
I have a few former accounts that insist on cc. nm
Subject: I have a few former accounts that insist on cc. nm

b
on my accounts, it's Cerner
Subject: on my accounts, it's Cerner

don't know if it's the same nationwide, though.
Two of my "dozens" accounts (too many!)....sm
Subject: Two of my "dozens" accounts (too many!)....sm

are private surgical hospitals, and even with laparoscopies, cystoscopies, hysteroscopies, etc., there are small 1cm incisions, but you are very correct, with either upper OR lower endoscopies (colon or sigmoid) you would have the scope directly inserted..........does anyone else get hired on for "one or two" accounts and end up with a dozen??? just wondering after all this time....


Might add I didn't do BOS on my accounts. sm
Subject: Might add I didn't do BOS on my accounts. sm

We used that abbrev all the time but I don't know if it is allowerd on BOS.  nm


I use disc myself for all accounts I transcribe for...nm
Subject: I use disc myself for all accounts I transcribe for...nm

.
not all accounts use BOS....mine don't, so don't misinform--nm
Subject: not all accounts use BOS....mine don't, so don't misinform--nm

nm
if all accounts were just that easy LOL. no such luck. xx
Subject: if all accounts were just that easy LOL. no such luck. xx

xx
The accounts that I ASR are verbatim, therefore, I put exactly what they say (within reason) and if
Subject: The accounts that I ASR are verbatim, therefore, I put exactly what they say (within reason) and if a serious question arises I stick in a QA mark with the appropriate question.


I have on my verbatim accounts without being told otherwise.
Subject: I have on my verbatim accounts without being told otherwise.


This can differ by accounts. I have been asked
Subject: This can differ by accounts. I have been asked

to use subcu, subq, and one account sub-Q (which looks really weird to me!).
Calling on anyone doing psych accounts
How can I write PEC able as a word??  PEC-able, PECable, or 2 separate words? I'm about to pull my hair out with this report. ESL whose dialect is unbelievable...on ASR.  Uggg! Any help appreciated.
Some accounts want no personal info
Subject: Some accounts want no personal info

at all in the report, others want pertinent people listed. It depends on the facility/account.
Per client's wishes. I have accounts where
Subject: Per client's wishes. I have accounts where

we spell liters out - 2 liters and one we use the abbreviation 2 L.
we have PACS for radiology on my accounts (nm)
Subject: we have PACS for radiology on my accounts (nm)


my accounts use BOS as a baseline, dictators override it. sm
Subject: my accounts use BOS as a baseline, dictators override it. sm

in retrospect, every account I've ever had has done it that way.
Thanks! Today I'm getting jobs on unfamiliar accounts
Subject: Thanks! Today I'm getting jobs on unfamiliar accounts

and specialties. Appreciate your help.
I think it is the doc's preference (sm)
Subject: I think it is the doc's preference (sm)

I have been asked to spell it discectomy. If you have a sample report that spells it diskectomy, then you probably should spell it that way.
Ask your QA person. Accounts term their labs differently. nm
x
I use tib-fib, but I would say it depends on the account. Some verbatim accounts do not like abbrevi
Subject: I use tib-fib, but I would say it depends on the account. Some verbatim accounts do not like abbreviations, others want it strictly verbatim. The rest seems appropriate to me, but I would say it is dorsiflex the ankle.


it's really client preference.......nm
Subject: it's really client preference.......nm

.
Definitely client preference, if they have one, but -- sm
Subject: Definitely client preference, if they have one, but -- sm

barring that, the AAMT has come out saying that "disk" is preferred over "disc" (for whatever that's worth), though both are still acceptable.

I've had some clients with a preference for "disc" with respect to the eyes, and "disk" when referring to the spine, but the vast majority (in my recent experience) have shown a preference for disk in all cases.
Client preference here. nm :)
Subject: Client preference here. nm :)

nm
it's really client preference.........
Subject: it's really client preference.........


Client preference
Subject: Client preference

Amen to that, don't ever worry about learning things the right way, just learn the client way and you can't go wrong.
Either/or, matter of preference
Subject: Either/or, matter of preference


probably regional or preference, but
Subject: probably regional or preference, but

I would probably only use burnt if a. I could hear it that clearly and b. if he were saying the toast was burnt. I just think burned looks and sounds better.
Preference now is without apostrophe.
Subject: Preference now is without apostrophe.

x
Doctor's preference
Subject: Doctor's preference

For the accounts that I work on, the doctors prefer it all written out.  I don't know what the BOS3 has to say about this, but it's probably one of those things that goes by what the doctor, or QA, prefers.


That is probably a facility preference. The
Subject: That is probably a facility preference. The

abbreviations you gave examples of are standard abbreviations still in use.
That is probably a facility preference. The
Subject: That is probably a facility preference. The

abbreviations you gave examples of are standard abbreviations still in use.
If you are allowed to type superscripts (I cannot use that kind of symbols on my accounts) then you
Subject: If you are allowed to type superscripts (I cannot use that kind of symbols on my accounts) then you can put it also as 10 (superscript 5)


Personally, I would put incised and drained (unless one of those really strict verbatim accounts)
Subject: Personally, I would put incised and drained (unless one of those really strict verbatim accounts)


most accounts don't care (not as fussy as BOS authors). I have a shortcut that expands out. NM
Subject: most accounts don't care (not as fussy as BOS authors). I have a shortcut that expands out. NM

.
nope...don't want to either...again, just a matter of preference.nm
Subject: nope...don't want to either...again, just a matter of preference.nm

nm
and I agree - client preference and most a/c's are
Subject: and I agree - client preference and most a/c's are

@@


Well, CLIENT PREFERENCE rules.....sm
Subject: Well, CLIENT PREFERENCE rules.....sm

Always, always it's client preference.  I was just speaking in a BOS/AAMT ruling about numbers.  Client preference most definitely IS the bottom line. 
Client preference but usually KCl vs Kay Ciel...nm
Subject: Client preference but usually KCl vs Kay Ciel...nm


Client preference, I suppose, but I do --sm
Subject: Client preference, I suppose, but I do --sm

L5 compression fracture; C5-6 herniated nucleus puposus. I have never used fifth lumbar or lumbar five. Most docs I have had always dictate as L5 or C5-6 and also some do C-spine or L-spine. easier for them, I guess, as well as whoever reads the report.
client preference re- expanding.....
Subject: client preference re- expanding.....

.
I think it depends on your client preference
Subject: I think it depends on your client preference

I usually would type 2-5, but my client doesn't want numbers 1-10 to be spelled out.
It's client preference and if it's verbatim or not.....
Subject: It's client preference and if it's verbatim or not.....

Many MDs want verbatim - despite BOS...so it's really client preference........
usually not capitalized, but might be a "client preference." Ask why /nm
Subject: usually not capitalized, but might be a "client preference." Ask why /nm


Client or personal preference
Subject: Client or personal preference

You have several choices here that are correct. You can put E:A reversal, E/A reversal, or E to A reversal. If no client preference, your pick - all are correct.
yes, me too - also it may depend on client preference NM
Subject: yes, me too - also it may depend on client preference NM


Okay, now I guess it is a matter of preference.
Subject: Okay, now I guess it is a matter of preference.


I believe that current preference these days is
Subject: I believe that current preference these days is

followup, without the dash. Back in the old days it was follow-up or follow up. I would go with whatever the client wants, I have one that wants the dash, one that does not.