they both have five syllables, so

Posted By: lol on 2006-07-02
In Reply to: It is just the way the word is structured--sm - noyb

Subject: they both have five syllables, so

what is the difference?

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

Dictator kept saying polynephritis ... sm - gmg
- has to be pyelonephritis - no such thing as polynephritis
- Check this out---sm - noyb
  - This is a PERFECT example about how sm - ARRRRGH!
    - dont believe everything you read, or - doubting thomas
    - I agree, but do you think docs are gonna--sm - noyb
      - only fast food I know is from McDonald's - I don't know the physicians you transcribe for,
      - That doesn't make it correct, though. I had sm - nm
      - WHY do you think it is, as you say, easier for a physician to say - dont believe everything you hear
        It is just the way the word is structured--sm - noyb
        they both have five syllables, so - lol
        Or the way some of us use prolly for probably. Shorthand speech is used in all fields now. nm - It's our "fast food" way of life
      - True, but we as MTs are suppose to know - the correct terms to use.nm

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

No, definitely two syllables because (sm)
Subject: No, definitely two syllables because (sm)

the doc uses the word 3 times in the report "...a small ______lacunar infarct." Then, "At times with a _____ lacune,..." And "...facial droop suggestive of a _____ infarct."

It is three syllables.
Subject: It is three syllables.

Yes, that is what he is saying, minus a few syllables. Thanks.
.

It sounds like it has more syllables than that. nm
Subject: It sounds like it has more syllables than that. nm

Enough syllables for spondylolisthesis? nm
Subject: Enough syllables for spondylolisthesis? nm

s

No, two syllables. ends in "y"
Subject: No, two syllables. ends in "y"

Perhaps he was slurring through it, but it was sure two syllables. Thank you!
Subject: Perhaps he was slurring through it, but it was sure two syllables. Thank you!

x

Ugh..can you separate your s/l into syllables for us, please? Thx. nm
Subject: Ugh..can you separate your s/l into syllables for us, please? Thx. nm

s

Can you break up the syllables for us? Thx. nm
Subject: Can you break up the syllables for us? Thx. nm

s

Can you accent the syllables for us? nm
Subject: Can you accent the syllables for us? nm

s

seeing as you have 3 syllables, urethral
Subject: seeing as you have 3 syllables, urethral

nm

Can you separate your s/l into syllables for us? nm
Subject: Can you separate your s/l into syllables for us? nm

s

It was a thought I had, but there seems to be a few more syllables. Thx!!
Subject: It was a thought I had, but there seems to be a few more syllables. Thx!!

Nope...there are only 2 syllables.
Subject: Nope...there are only 2 syllables.

I thought of htat too but not enough syllables. Thanks though.
Subject: I thought of htat too but not enough syllables. Thanks though.

no it does not... it's really muffled but i can hear 2 syllables. NM
Subject: no it does not... it's really muffled but i can hear 2 syllables. NM

x

the syllables are backwards - it's Relistor
Subject: the syllables are backwards - it's Relistor

Spiratin doesn't have enough syllables for what he is saying, but the active ingredient is spiron
Subject: Spiratin doesn't have enough syllables for what he is saying, but the active ingredient is spironolactone which is the closest thing I found

Listen closely to syllables, there is also desquamating (interstitial) pneumonia, which fits??? nm
Subject: Listen closely to syllables, there is also desquamating (interstitial) pneumonia, which fits??? nm

nm

If you're hearing a lot of syllables, it might be uric acid stone nephrolithiasis. Do a Google
Subject: If you're hearing a lot of syllables, it might be uric acid stone nephrolithiasis. Do a Google

s