By being on 100% QA, do you mean

Posted By: Ronni on 2008-09-04
In Reply to: QA gone mad, literally!!! - MickeyButton

that the person goes over the whole report (each report)?

You would think the company would be on the QA persons back if all that work was so behind.

Something doesn't sound right.

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

QA gone mad, literally!!! - MickeyButton
- I'm pretty sure we work for the same company - XanaX
  - Xanax - I was told even if I forget to put QA - MickeyButton
- Could be any number of factors - Have you thought to ask?
- If it does not affect your paycheck, who cares.....sm - LongTimeMT
- REMEMBER-QA IS PAID TO FIND FAULT...SM - SC MT
  - So true--Big waste of time. - Villi
  - QAs are paid the same whether your report is - QA sm
  - I have to say I disagree. QA is not paid to find faults with your report. sm - SMC
- with you/your friend's situation, personally, I think... - aa
- By being on 100% QA, do you mean - Ronni
  - It is a family owned company and - MickeyButton
    - Is this company in clinton township? - I'm wondering
    - I agree...something is wrong. Does the QA - ndmt68
      - Everyone is on 100% QA. - MickeyButton
- Not only is it crazy, also, what does - see message
  - Or what does it do to the MT's paycheck?..SM - SC MT
    - Amen! - Lilli

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database