Some of us are literally catching their sm

• Webmedx - Benefits and Full-Time Status - Current Webmedx Employee
  • 40 hours at Webmedx, et al - Web MT
  • I feel you pain - starla
  • Nobody is saying anything because sm - not a web fan anymore
    • Not making $$ but still buying companies? - MTPockets
      • LOL Remarkable is right. I was just telling my hubby s/m - Dear Abby
  • Some of us are literally catching their sm - oldtimer
    • Good grief its just 1 hour more a day - yearling
      • I agree - I came from MQ and WMX is like a breath of fresh air. (sm) - SM
        • You'll get over the good feelings. I've been here over a year now. (sm) - Ex-Q
      • One hour more is a lot to some of us. I, for one, have a s/m - Webalicious
        • I feel your pain - I'm in the same shoes
          • Thank you, I appreciate that. I could have written your post as well s/m - Webalicious
    • Then retire. - nm
      • BAH HUMBUG - MTPockets
      • My, aren't you the kind soul? What that necessary? nm - Cali Bound
        • That should be Was that necessary. nm - Cali Bound
    • Don't you think this is a little too dramatic?? sm - China Beach
      • OMG. That made me laugh, and I was so tensed up - with the other posts. LOL.
  • SNA ticket - Judy
    • Comm Pg; request Help; use the drop-down box. nm - Web-Head
      • THANKS! - Judy
  • To me 40=FT at every job I've had - initially thought it was the same here
  • Do we need to schedule those hours through STM or just let her know we are increasing or (sm) - Asking
    • I think a quick email to your STM would be it. sm - Web-Head
  • Not thrilled about the new 40-hour week but SM - MissIndigo
  • I haven't sat in on benefits conf call yet, but I think (sm) - sm
  • Not enough work for that... (sm) - scared
    • Why don't you ask your manager to train you - sm - Web-Head
    • sm - WMX'er
      • None of that is in writing, though. There is SM - not necessarily
        • Read today's letter by **** - it specifically DOES SAY in writing sm - Web-Head
          • The letter said that the STM has the discretion to not let your benes be s/m - webalicious
          • No letter here! nm - not necessarily
  • I used to sing the highest praises of this company, but they are s/m - Nurse Diesel
    • That is true. If the hospital has inhouse - sm
    • You might ask your STM to clarify the point sm - Web-Head
  • I'm on 40+ hrs, but 15-20 waiting for some work. nm - the truth
  • I wish I had enough work to work ...sm - blondie_1147
    • There isn't enough work for 35 hours. nm - The thing is
      • Short on hours - screwed on holiday pay. My fault (sm) - nn

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

This story may sound unbelievable, but I was just IMing my friend and told her I was going to let everyone in on what is happening at this company.  About a month ago, I was hired in at a company doing soap notes.  The accounts are so basic and easy, you can practically do them in your sleep.  Of course being a new hire, I was put on 100% QA, but then the first week went by, then the second week,and I was still on 100% QA without any errors whatsoever.  I inquired about this and was told I was still going to be on 100% QA until they deem it necessary for me to come off.  I started IMing my girlfriend who has been at this particular company for 15 months.  I complained about the QA status, and she said she has been on 100% QA for 15 months.   I told her this was ridiculous and I stopped doing work for them immediately. If her work was that bad, why keep her on to work for them for 15 months?  If my work was bad why not let me go?  I had absolutely no errors, but put on QA hold until the QA person deemed you worthy because of the way she felt about you.  Also, when training on Gotomeeting.com and she shared her computer, she showed us that she had over 1000 jobs to QA.  The reason being she keeps people on QA for her own pleasure and this purposely holds people back.  I am hesitant to mention this company's name, but if you email me, I will gladly share.  I will say that it is located in Michigan.  Is this not an abuse of authority?  Is there any reason to have someone on QA for 15 months.  If an MT need QA 100% for 15 months, would you not let that MT go?  The more QA work she gets, the fatter her paycheck is,right?  Have any QA person every held an MT on QA without any errors and if so why?

Thanks