| ChapPosted By: blondie on 2007-12-16In Reply to: Doesn't this just chap?  A new MT grad is better than 15 yrs exp? - ARGGHHH!!!
 
 Well that does sound a little far fetched.  I did not read the whole thing of course to see how he came to this conclusion.  I think maybe he is just trying to make the school sound good.  Not that some new grad MTs aren't good, but I don't think a company would actually choose a new grad over 15 years exp unless they wanted to pay cheap wages. Actually I only have about 11 months exp. so I am not far from being a new grad myself, but I know they didn't want me over someone with alot of exp.  The lady that hired me I guess just wanted to give me a chance and she had some really easy dictation too.  I am grateful because now I have moved on to acute care.
 
 
 Complete Discussion Below:
  marks the location of current message within thread 
 
 The messages you are viewing 
are archived/old. To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select 
the boards given in left menu
 Other related messages found in our database
 
 Doesn't this just chap?  A new MT grad is better than 15 yrs exp?
 
 In the September 2006 Plexus Magazine for AAMT members and Student members, Dee Thomas of Thomas Transcription wrote a letter to the editor. Below is what particularly caught my eye.   
 "Last week, I ased my staff a question: "Does anyone care about quality anymore?" You know how strong I am on doing it right the first time and proofing the line above. These days, I'd rather hire an M-Tec student with tech savvy than to hire an MT with 15 years' experience in a hospital environment because that's all she has -- a hospital environment that gave her absolutely no feedback or tech savvy for the future, which is now inevitably upon us. It's sad but true."  
 |