SE's vs IC's?

Posted By: MQr on 2005-09-08
In Reply to: It is not the SE's, but rather the IC's - MQ'ers that HOG up the work

Are one of the same under MQ's terms, so not sure who your trying to blame here?

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

Does MQ have STATUTORY EMPLOYEEs anymore under new plan???? - ??????????????????
- They better have SE because no way is my insurance riding on the BS they pull with no work all the - MQMT
  - Boy! you got that right. - too much BS to get 12,000
- they will be offering some pto time for se - yes
  - That is incorrect... no PTO for SE - no name
  - It does not mention statutory anything in my letter dated 9/2/05. - where are you seeing that?
    - ditto, no SE mentioned in 9/2 letter - nana23
    - full time, part time, statutory - no name
      - Letter - MQSE
    - super told me to meet lines of 12000 or be dropped to SE - i was told all employees who do not meet 12000 min
      - 12,000 AND 40 hours - no name
      - MQ-letter and 12000 lines - Tiki
        from amherst - tonya wimberly-huger
      - If you don't mind could you clarify with her what she means? - I'd appreciate it so much
        coming from corporate - from amherst ofc
        Interesting - what is date on that? and does this newest memo from - Barbato override it
        i do believe the barbato memo is the newest - same date - sept 2
        Huh? you mean your letter and my memo from Barbato - are both Sept 2?
        i do believe that is correct, same memo - yes
        oops sorry - thought you had a - separate memo dated 9/2
    - my CSC person told me there is FT and SE - my misunderstanding then
- no letter or memo to me yet - abc
  - Good point re: insurance, but also...sm - HomeMT
    - Not every SE is a "hog" - MT should have flexibility too
      - It is not the SE's, but rather the IC's - MQ'ers that HOG up the work
        SE's vs IC's? - MQr
        Not the SE's, but the IC's hogging the work. - Confused
        MTs choose to be ICs for a reason... - wondering
        Please, stop the Blame Game - MT naively hoping for solidarity?
    - Isn't MQ saving a kazillion$$$ by not - using 1-800 numbers
      - Don't you just love it when MQ expects the MT's to return - MQ Supes want you to call them back --
        The supes just love it, because - MQ supes can "charge off" their long distanc
  - "Thinking" and "knowing" are 2 entirely different things. Actually I could see them doi - SE to get more control of

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database