That is probably what it was - sm

Posted By: MT+10 on 2006-01-04
In Reply to: It was the mttest. - Jodi

I wouldn't worry to much about it. I failed one company's test and did great on every other that I have taken. If I remember correctly, the mttest is very long and tedious with a lot of the new stuff on it.

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

I'm a failure!!! - Jodi
- Failiure? - sme
- Did you learn - Dee
- I have 20 years' experience. I once took a test for - me
- You're not a failure! Those tests are brutal! - omt
  - I recently tested for Mxsecure - rough dictations.
  - that is so funny because - sm - me too
    - Sort of like passing your driving test and knowing. . . - omt
- test - J.R.
- I just went through a similar experience. - anon
  - I thought spelling out 1-9 has always sm - long time MQr
    - Number 1 through 9 - anon
      - It's the AAMT new BOS rule on numbers. - keeping us on our toes.
        Good grief, back to the future. nm - Becky
- If you didn't follow the current BOS style "rules" etc. that's where you might have fail - let 'em get you down! nm
- What company test did you fail? - sm - MT+10
  - It was the mttest. - Jodi
    - I think it's a good, thorough test, myself. - sm
      - That mttest website is terrible. Companies that use that test in my opinion - Experienced MT
    - The mttest - Dee
    - That is probably what it was - sm - MT+10
      - Thanks Everybody! - Jodi

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database