| not overqualifiedPosted By: anon on 2008-01-24In Reply to: same for me - cm
 
 
 It seems to me in the legal sense, you are NOT "overqualified" if you are new to something.  You are new to transcription.  You are probably technically "underqualified" according to the stringent requirements of most companies!!!   
 Personally, I'd leave experience like that off a resume and keep it strictly to the transcription field.  If asked what I did before, I'd say "clerical work" or something ambiguous like that -- enough to let them know you have a brain and are capable of fulfilling their requirements. That's all they need to know I should think.  I leave it off of mine when interviewing and bring it up later if there is an opportunity where it will help my career.  If not, then they don't need to know.  Shocks the pants off some of them when they find out too! and then they ask my why I've "stepped down to this."  LOL 
   
 
 Complete Discussion Below:
  marks the location of current message within thread 
 
 The messages you are viewing 
are archived/old. To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select 
the boards given in left menu
 Other related messages found in our database
 
 overqualified, that is, ...
 ...using the word "afford" loosely.
 
 
 
 |