Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

not overqualified

Posted By: anon on 2008-01-24
In Reply to: same for me - cm

It seems to me in the legal sense, you are NOT "overqualified" if you are new to something.  You are new to transcription.  You are probably technically "underqualified" according to the stringent requirements of most companies!!! 


Personally, I'd leave experience like that off a resume and keep it strictly to the transcription field.  If asked what I did before, I'd say "clerical work" or something ambiguous like that -- enough to let them know you have a brain and are capable of fulfilling their requirements. That's all they need to know I should think.  I leave it off of mine when interviewing and bring it up later if there is an opportunity where it will help my career.  If not, then they don't need to know.  Shocks the pants off some of them when they find out too! and then they ask my why I've "stepped down to this."  LOL


 




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

overqualified, that is, ...
...using the word "afford" loosely.