well it's relevant to me

Posted By: sm on 2005-09-13
In Reply to: has anyone ever had a recruiter talk down to them - sm - ??

because i don't want to waste my time in the future applying to them, testing for them, and then being talked to like this.

to answer your question -- i almost forgot, but had a similar experience with OSI, and i have more experience than you...

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

has anyone ever had a recruiter talk down to them - sm - ??
- I talked to a recruiter yesterday that told me she - - sherrie
- I don't know but I try to be fair, but I can tell you - A recruiter's perspective
  - 25 years? - hh
    - The recruiter said it was management, not MT. - uh
  - I can believe it - I've never had a resume in my life, and I'm 59. - txmt
- well it's relevant to me - sm
  - Similar experience - underpaidMT
    - Another similar experience - sm
  - Wow, when did these recruiters become so high and mighty - sm - ??
    - I think most recruiters are NOT MTs. They know very little about MT from what I've found. nm - R
      - The recruiter I spoke with was a transcriptionist - sm - ??
  - 14 years was not enough for her company!!! - MT in Mobile

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

Relevant article
Not trying to start an argument, just another point of view.

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/ts20040601.shtml

If it weren't a psych note I might wonder why it was relevant
but in a psych note I could easily see why mention of sexual orientation might be appropriate. I otherwise might wonder why doc felt need to include it in a regular medical note, where it's not normally mentioned if a person is straight.