BTDT.

Posted By: sm on 2009-01-07
In Reply to: Yes, but....(sm) - indy

I did comment on it a few minutes ago. I never said I did not believe something was going down. I simply wanted to do my own research, gather the info and draw my own conclusions. I would be interested in any response you may care to make.

To tell you the truth, I don't feel I have enough info just yet to comment on exactly what she may be up to. I'm a dyed-in-wool Kool-Aider, and about as left as they come, but I am not that impressed with Pelosi and think the party could do better....MUCH better. I don't know about her being purposely swarmy or anything like that, but I think she's a divider instead of a uniter and that's the LAST thing we need in the House. It also looks like her power has gone to her head, not a terrible reassuring or attractive quality.

I can be a real hardline agitator when it comes to rhetoric and heated debates on subjects that I hold dear to me, but when it comes to leadership, I look for results, not pomp and circumstance. That's why they are there and I hang out on the forums!

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

Pelosi Erases Gingrich's Long-Standing Fairness Rules....sm - ms
- More smoke and mirrors and much ado about nothing - sm
  - The left media won't report on it. More's the pity. - check back later
    - Again, there is no THERE there. - sm
      - Will you believe Associated Press then? - checking back later
        I appreciate your posting this source, but - sm
        Nah, she probably already made up her mind it's false, even if AP reported it...nm - nm
        My OP would argue otherwise. - sm
    - My husband said the same thing (sm) - indy
- I see the liberal left on this board...save one "sm" could care less for your post....sm - indy
  - They will hardly get that by - sm
    - Yes, but....(sm) - indy
      - BTDT. - sm
- I guess she figured a way around that super majority thing, huh.... - good grief
- Good for her. - sm
  - So the only way, is the democrat (socialist) way from now on? - god help us all

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

BTDT.
x

BTDT. Please address views of the
nm

BTDT. Just thought you might want to share
nm

We've BTDT with this subject.
The "sex education" being discussed relates to the kind where children are empowered to recognize inappropriate touching by adults and encouraged to report such molestation incidents to schoold counselors and parents. By best friend is an adult survivor of molestation that occurred between ages 4 and 7. Her 2 sisters were also molested. She has schizoaffective disorder, had a psychotic break at age 30 (when her first and ONLY relationship with a man ended) of the sort that disabled her from being self-supportive for 2 years.

Since that time, she has been in individual and group counseling twice weekly and has been on heavy medication consisting of anxiolytics x2, antidepressants, antipsychotics and sleep medications ever since. She is 53 years old now and continues to live a tortured existence and is barely able to hold down an hourly MT job...production being out of the question because she can't handle the stress.

I have to wonder how her life and the lives of her 2 sisters (one a life-long alcoholic, the other with manic depression) had someone told her that sitting on grandpa's lap and bounching up and down was not a good game to play with him and that her father was not supposed to touch her "wee-wee" when he puts her to bed at night.

She's not worth a debate IMHO...BTDT..nm

BTDT. This is an equally offensive opportunity.
x

Uhhh. BTDT. What part of burden of proof is on the prosecution
Give it up. Ain't happenin'.