Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Chomsky - filth?

Posted By: gt on 2005-07-20
In Reply to: We are talking about historically and excuse me...sm - MT

Ranting and raving?  Me?  Im not the one calling Chomsky filth, LOL, you are the one ranting and raving.  I disagree strongly with your belief of why Hitler was destroying the jews, however, I never met the man and I kind of think you didnt either..so neither of us will really truly know what was in the maniacal perons mind..other than analysts surmising Hitlers *master plan*.  I see we will not agree on this debate, but I enjoyed it nevertheless.  That is until your last post when you called Chomsky filth.  The debate was going pretty good, heated but not slinging of derogatory names..I think calling Chomsky filth is off base and in the *not fair zone*. 


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

    The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
    To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


    Other related messages found in our database

    How about despicable filth? sm
    That's what Chomsky is.  Of course I was not there.  But historically, it is well documented. And I posted a wonderful link below about the three pillars on which Hitler based his Reich.  Well documented historically in all history books.  History Channel, too.  All documented. Right there in black and white.  Yep. 
    Chomsky
    Love Chomsky.  Speak on, Chomsky.  America's Constitution gives you freedom of speech.  Speak on.  Dont like it, conservatives?  Dont read his columns, books and dont attend his classes.  Simple as that..Just like I would never read columns or books by Coulter.  IMHO, she has a few screws loose..
    You are not only a low life filthy liar on this board, you spread your filth on the CON

    board, as well.  NOWHERE is it written on this board that ANYONE WISHES that he's drinking again.


    You idiots do this repeatedly.  You take a statement made by someone and totally twist it around to suit your hatred.


    This is what you wrote on the CON board.  I defy you to copy and paste the post you are referring to.  YOU ARE A FILTHY LIAR.


    Another difference between you and me:  I won't post on YOUR board because you don't want people there who don't agree with you.  I am RESPECTING your wishes.  But you can't return the favor because you and those of your ilk have no concept of the existence of the word *respect*.


    I am really frosted about something on that liberal board..





    [Post a Reply] [View Follow Ups]      [Politics] --> [Conservatives]


    Posted By: SM on 2005-09-30,


    I am not going to stoop to their level and say that all liberals are like this, because I know they are not.  But one person in particular over there is so hateful that she actually HOPES that GWB has fallen off the wagon and is drinking again, as claimed by some tabloid article. 



     


    It's really sickening that somebody who claims their party care more about people, so high and mightily more than us horrible selfish conservatives, would say something about ANY other human being, even somebody I guess as despicable as they consider the president to be.  She has really cheapened herself and anything further that she might say. 



     


    That's the hallmark sign that politics has gone too far in your own head, when you actually hope somebody falls off the wagon, gets sick, doesn't get well, or suffers some other form of personal destruction.  I NEVER have those feelings about people of different ideaologies.  We are first and foremost human beings and we should never get so low in our own ideology that we cease to be human. 


    Not at all. I was summing up Chomsky's beliefs. sm
    In direct response to your remark about the quotes I posted. 
    I don't think it is safe to ignore people like Chomsky. sm
    I have never been a head in the sand kind of person.  Especially when Hugo Chavez holds him up (as well as his book) as a shining example when speaking to the UN.
    Noam Chomsky, the supreme anti-American. sm
    If someone told you that they supported Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge, would you think they were a great guy?  He did, you know.  There's quite a dossier on him at www.DiscoverTheNetwork.com.  You might want to check it out.