Cite resources. Which machines (manufactured by)?
Posted By: Which supporters. Careful. sm on 2008-09-10
In Reply to: you mean the same way Hillary stole the elections in certain states - me
Do you really want to go there?
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Rediculous .....right wing resources
WorldNetDaily is a for-profit website that provides primarily evangelical-conservative-oriented news and editorials, publishes letters to the editor, maintains forums and conducts a daily poll.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldNetDaily
crisis manufactured by Bush
they knew about this for weeks -- trying to railroad dems before election.
Dems have stolen/manufactured votes for Franken in this election...wonderful stuff
We don't have voting machines in my little...sm
state either. It is really funny to me because the first I voted was in 1964 and I lived in New Jersey where they had voting machines even way back then. Sometimes the old ways ARE best. I lived in Hawaii for a few years and they didn't having voting machines either.
bad bad bad voting machines
www.blackboxvoting.org
There are a few documentaries on the problems with the voting machines (laughable physical security, & easily hack-able), especially the ones made by Diebold (a big Republican donator who vowed in a letter that you can see in the documentary to "deliver" the Ohio vote to the Republicans)...
There's a movement to go back to physical ballots or at least take the voting process out of the hands of private industry.
Ohio was mentioned in both the documentaries I saw as having the worst cases of voter suppression, 1 voting machine for an entire precinct, people waiting 10, 12 hours to vote. This tends to happen in largely Democratic precincts...
And the others are propaganda machines for libs...
to each his own, as you say.
Looks more like fact that the machines are flawed than conspiracy..sm
And debating about whether the machines, chads, cards, etc are functioning properly would best be done BEFORE the election than afterwards. Duh!
Those darn dems and their time machines! (nm)
This is exactly how elections are held in Vermont, no voting machines. nm
.
The voting machines is a must to make voters confident their votes are counting...sm
But the Democrat party needs to delineate what separates them from the republican party as terms of what direction they will take the country. That is definitely uncertain. The chances of them getting their voters out to the polls will be better, I think.
Then cite them, don't just sit there. sm
There's an article on the C board.
You cite THIS as factual?
This is a site that judges who is and isn't an athiest/agnostic, etc. based on their PERCEIVED OPINION.
It would be like the people who judged Phil Donahue the other night on O'Reilly as being drunk to then adopt that as the truth and adding his name to a site designed to expose drunks.
This isn't fact. It's trash, as are the other sites that come up when someone googles Donahue/athiest. What authority do you have that Donahue refers to himself as an athiest?
From their own site, this is how people are added to the list.
Who qualifies?
To be a celebrity as it applies to the list, one must have achieved some notoriety, such as appearing often in media with wide distribution. This would include publishing bestselling or critically acclaimed books, appearing in movies, being a leader in one's field, etc.. If a name you submitted does not qualify, it is probably because you did not provide sufficient information. See existing entries for the range of 'celebrity' covered.
Please cite your proof........
x
Please cite source........
x
cite source please...........
Please provide a VALID source. Thank you.
cite source
x
andyou know this how? Please cite sources
nm
Could you please cite your sources? No fear here.
Don't you think you are being just a little presumptuous? There is nothing to fear from Saracuda. O will not be addressing her seriously because he is running against the tin man...you know, the silenced sidekick whose mouth has rusted shut that tags along behind her? How presidential do you think that he is looks when he behaves like that? Dems have BTDT 24 years ago. Geraldine Ferraro surged polls up to the sky for a week or 2, yet ended up being the same kind of sideshow JM has become when it was time to come back to earth and address campaign issues. Hype and hysteria is no substitute for substance.
This is a lie. Cite the rag you call a source.
But if he were, he'd still have my vote because he is the better man in this race.
And you know this how? Cite sources. Give stats.
Status even as old as 10 days ago would not reflect the shift in POTUS since the Palin debaucle. Your Obama bash has nothing to do with POTUS. Supposed you explain what you are talking about now. What do you feel so compelled to blame his for this morning?
Please cite ACLU case that aims to ban
I am not talking about displaying a cross on a wall or behind a podium at an assembly, because that is not what your original post inferred. You said that the ACLU would go to court to prevent a person from WEARING a cross. Last I heard, there is no problem with children wearing crosses to school. Am I missing something here? Please cite the case you were referring to. I am trying to understand what you were talking about. What is your point, exactly?
I'm sure you couldn't even cite the execute orders he has
!!
Put up or shut up. Give examples, cite sources
x
Oh yes andro and ExMQ you are both so knowledgeable - you can cite what the issues are - woohoo nm
x
typo - meant cite things as hoax, not "site" things
Just thought I'd correct that before I get pummeled by the people who want to believe snopes is a truthful organization.
|
