Great try at a comeback. You are just as petty as

• More on Sen. John Ensign ....(sm) - Just the big bad
  • How many times was Clinton - Trigger Happy
  • This is old news! WHO CARES? Adultery is on both - sides of the aisle...that all u got? NM
    • So you are okay with paying for his affair?....(sm) - Just the big bad
      • I am not happy about that at all. - Trigger Happy
      • Oh pleeese... if that's all you got to yammer on about... - find something else to do.....NM
      • Perspective. That is nothing compared to what we - will pay with Obama as president! nm
        • Is it better to pay for "why pigs stink? That is - in the stimulus plan. nm
          • What's wrong...don't like this subject? LOL...nm - Just the big bad
    • Exactly!. What about someone like gool ole John - Edwards, the dem? Other pressing things now! nm
      • Yep...he did the same thing....(sm) - Just the big bad
        • If they are running for our president, we SHOULD know this... - I'm independent BTW..... nm
          • I agree especially since Ensign had presidential - hopes, should be impeached like Clinton
        • Who are "you guys">>>>I couldn't care less about Ewards - and his crap.....he's sorry, that's that!! n
        • Great try at a comeback. You are just as petty as - those you accuse of doing same thing.nm

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

//

Obama isn't the one griping about Blair house, I am.  First off, he needed to move early so his kids could go ahead and start school.  He wasn't trying to move into the white house.  He was making a decision based on the needs of his kids.  Yeah, that was just terrible of him.

Secondly, Blair house is what, 70,000 sq feet, comprised of townhouses, with 110 rooms and 35 bathrooms. 

Third, the only guest there is the former prime minister of Australia, John Howard, who incidentally was kicked out of office for aligning with Bush. 

Let me guess, there just wasn't enough room?

This is simply Bush being a butt head.  Very childish, if you ask me, for someone who is supposed to be president.

And continually talking about Sarah Palin's daughter getting pregnant isn't petty?  That has nothing to do with Palin's ability to run her state.  Yet people continually bring that up and consider it a reason for Palin to fail politically. 

The whole point of this is the fact that Obama is spending more money wastefully during this crisis.  I'm sure he didn't foot the bill for that party.  If our country had money, fine.....but everyone has to cut back during this time and that includes politicians.  If they want to spend their own money....more power to them, but a majority of them are using taxpayer money.  Just like Pelosi using military planes.  Everyone is cutting back and they went after bank CEOs and auto CEOs and gave them crap for having private jets and here you have Pelosi using military planes costing taxpayers money.  Another example of do as I say and not as I do, huh?

As much as I do dislike the last admin, this isn't about getting revenge.  It's about standing up for what our nation is supposed to stand for.

If you want to go with just everyone who "knew" about it, then that would definitely wipe out a ton of people in the senate (probably both sides).  However, who gave the orders to carry out torture?  Who tried to rewrite the laws regarding torture?  I would simply go after the directly guilty...and that does not include, btw, military personell who were following orders.

If you want to fry a dem on something, then go for Clinton for rendition, but that guilty by association thing that you guys seem to love to use isn't going to float.

is my . . that's the law of the land, quite your botchin'.  Change it or live with it. Good greasy gravy, grow up.

There are so many of us out here struggling to make ends meet, put food on the table for our families and they are going out on a date at our expense?  I did not vote for O, I am neither a republican or a democrat, but I have encouraged every one I know to support him and give him a chance.  However, it seems that the more that I now try to encourage myself to support him, the more stupid things that he does.  Let's forget about the date and talk about the trip to Los Angeles to raise money for Harry Reid.  He took Air Force One, which by itself costs an unbelievable amount of money to just get ready to fly, hundreds of thousands of dollars, then you add in what it costs to get in the air.  I completely understand that this is something that has been done by both parties in the past but when you stand before the cameras and ask every last person in America to sacrifice and then you go out and do things that are costing these same people even more money, I believe that it is completely appropriate to be angry as heck.  Then I saw on CNN where the question was posed "is the $400,000 salary of the President of the United States adequate, should it be more."  Well let's see, he travels at our expense, he has a roof over his head with no expenses whatsoever, food is on the table at no expense to him, he has a beautiful place to escape to for long weekends, again at no expense to him, so do I think that $400,000 is appropriate?  You are dang right I think that it is appropriate.  

This is an administration who preached about transparency during the election and, in my opinion, so far, they have been far from transparent.  Even though I did not vote for him I truly hoped (and still hope) that he would make things better for all of us and so far I personally do not see that happening. 

xx

I'm sorry if you are offended by my opinion that I don't want to pay more in taxes. You wouldn't either if the tables were turned.

to email this guy and tell him so.

http://www.kabc.com/mcintyre/listingsEntry.asp?ID=432586&PT=McIntyre+in+the+Morning

Formed within three days of the September 11th attacks, and officially founded on September 14, 2001 by Ramsey Clark and members of the International Action Center, ANSWER was one of the first organizations formed to protest the policies of the Bush administration in the wake of the September 11 attacks. Its first major action was a September 29, 2001 Anti-War, Anti-Racist political rally and march in Washington, D.C., primarily in protest of the then-impending U.S. invasion of Afghanistan. Subsequently the organization has organized rallies drawing crowds in the hundreds of thousands, including several with record-setting numbers of people. ANSWER characterizes itself as anti-imperialist, and its steering committee consists of socialists, Marxists, civil rights advocates, and left-wing progressive organizations from the Muslim, Arab, Palestinian, Filipino, Haitian, and Latin American communities. Many of ANSWER's leaders were members of Workers World Party (WWP) at the time of ANSWER's founding, and are current members of the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), a Marxist-Leninist organization that formed in 2004.

in-the-nation's-best-interests job the courts did on the Gore (Nobel prize winner) and Bush (failure in absolutely all business ventures) decision. Clarence still seeking revenge on Anita Hill.  Plus don't forget the Supreme Court justice who just happens to enjoy duck hunting with Cheney.  The guy with a cloud over his head according to Fitzgerald in the Plame case.  Pile in on.

First time in a long time I watched the news and I was pretty amused tonight.  Subject was Barack's trip to Berlin and his speech.  Republican representative said that Obama shouldn't have done it because he's not the president.  They were asked well what about McCain when he went and gave a speech in Canada.  Their response was "Well that was different.  They are Canadians".  He also said it was okay for McCain to give speech to Canadians because Canada is in North America.

When questioned further it actually came out that they (republicans) were upset because the Berlin speech made Obama look good, while McCains biggest highlight of the week was giving in interview in the dairy isle of the grocery store.

They tried to say that Barack was giving a "policy" speech, and when corrected they made up some other lame excuse (that's when it came out that they were upset because having all those people gather for his speech in Berlin made him look good).

Just goes to show you how desperate the republicans are.  They had their chance to pick a better candidate than some old lame, senile guy, but this is who they chose.  Now they are just mad because McCain is looking more feeble, constantly whines, and is constantly mis-speaking and getting the facts wrong (and having to be corrected in public by those closest to him).  Someone said that if he would just stick to issues and not try and attack/belittle Obama every chance he got it might go a little different for him.

I just thought that was quite amusing for a change in the news.

some people can't see beyond their nose and some people don't have the ability to weigh the facts of what is written.

FYI, I have finally made up my mind through reading.