Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Sorry...not buying it, but it was good for a laugh! (nm)

Posted By: Gobama on 2008-10-21
In Reply to: Obama Facts - Lis

:p


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Anybody up for a good laugh? s/m

That horseface Coultergeist is on Dr. Phil today.  How anyone could take that anything that woman says seriously boggles the mind!!  I think she's hilarious -- what a joke of a human being!!  But like Lamebaugh, their shameless self-promotion and preying on the poor people that actually hang on their every word just makes them richer and richer.


It was definitely good for a laugh! I Obama's got

Saw it. Funny indeed. Need a good laugh right.
Watched the sketch on the debate, not bad but not a home run like this sketch.
HA, that was a good one. thanks for the laugh! I needed it!

I needed a good laugh today.
LOL!!!  This was great.  Thanks for posting it. 
Thanks for that . . . I needed a good laugh today

HAHA


Thank you for that .... I needed a good laugh today.

Duchess, thank you for the good laugh this morning!
I needed that - especially after last week, watching my money market account tank again thanks to Obamanomics.

Yup, Dr. Batra - that's a good one!
I love a good laugh...but this just wasn't funny!
Maybe you better go back to the conservative wacko drawing board!
Michael Moron is always good for a belly-laugh.
x
Sorry, not buying it.....
*I don't like Michael Moore.* Well, I can't imagine why. If you really aren't reading him, then you should be suing him, because your material is the same, right down to the disdainful delivery. Mind cluing me in on the nonpartisan more scholarly research? One or two examples would suffice.
Not buying it. It is about -me me me.
nm
Nice try...not buying it! (nm)
The police are not buying it either. Desperate times call for desperate measures, and the Republicans are beyond desperate at this point!
well, 43% are out buying ammo and
43% are going over their past emails and organization memberships and the other 14% are undecided which way to go and are sitting here handwringing.
Oh pleeeese - I'm not buying it
This is about people obeying the laws...plain and simple. I sick to death of hearing these people talk about how your being "picked on".

Any group/congregation who hold regularly schedule meetings of a large group of people need to get a business license just like anyone else.

What's even more pitiful are the delusional/dysfunctional ones who actually believe they are being picked on simply because they are christians.

Get a grip! Nobody cares what religion you are. If there is a large group of people meeting on a regular basis inconveniencing the neighbors in their own homes, that is called a business. Get a license and the problems will be cleared up.

I live across the street from a guy who turned his home into a car repair shop. Can't tell you how many times our driveway is blocked and no where for our friends to park.

One rule to follow that's very simple. Obey the law. Disobey the law and you should go to jail.
Okay, he is buying them one more year -
Maybe by the end of that year things will be looking better for everybody and they can start to help themselves again.

I compare this to my daughter not having a job and needing my help right now, but hopefully by the end of the year she will be back on her feet and can survive on her own.

At least give people a chance. If he was doing nothing but letting people fend for themselves you would be mad too. Change has got to start somewhere!
I'm not buying his music and never will
and will never listen to it.
Buying of news..by this administration? Really? For sure!
Buying of News by Bush's Aides Is Ruled Illegal



By ROBERT PEAR

Published: October 1, 2005


WASHINGTON, Sept. 30 - Federal auditors said on Friday that the Bush administration violated the law by buying favorable news coverage of President Bush's education policies, by making payments to the conservative commentator Armstrong Williams and by hiring a public relations company to analyze media perceptions of the Republican Party.


In a blistering report, the investigators, from the Government Accountability Office, said the administration had disseminated covert propaganda in the United States, in violation of a statutory ban.


The contract with Mr. Williams and the general contours of the public relations campaign had been known for months. The report Friday provided the first definitive ruling on the legality of the activities.


Lawyers from the accountability office, an independent nonpartisan arm of Congress, found that the administration systematically analyzed news articles to see if they carried the message, The Bush administration/the G.O.P. is committed to education.


The auditors declared: We see no use for such information except for partisan political purposes. Engaging in a purely political activity such as this is not a proper use of appropriated funds.


The report also sharply criticized the Education Department for telling Ketchum Inc., a public relations company, to pay Mr. Williams for newspaper columns and television appearances praising Mr. Bush's education initiative, the No Child Left Behind Act.


When that arrangement became public, it set off widespread criticism. At a news conference in January, Mr. Bush said: We will not be paying commentators to advance our agenda. Our agenda ought to be able to stand on its own two feet.


But the Education Department has since defended its payments to Mr. Williams, saying his commentaries were no more than the legitimate dissemination of information to the public.


The G.A.O. said the Education Department had no money or authority to procure favorable commentary in violation of the publicity or propaganda prohibition in federal law.


The ruling comes with no penalty, but under federal law the department is supposed to report the violations to the White House and Congress.


In the course of its work, the accountability office discovered a previously undisclosed instance in which the Education Department had commissioned a newspaper article. The article, on the declining science literacy of students, was distributed by the North American Precis Syndicate and appeared in numerous small newspapers around the country. Readers were not informed of the government's role in the writing of the article, which praised the department's role in promoting science education.


The auditors denounced a prepackaged television story disseminated by the Education Department. The segment, a video news release narrated by a woman named Karen Ryan, said that President Bush's program for providing remedial instruction and tutoring to children gets an A-plus.


Ms. Ryan also narrated two videos praising the new Medicare drug benefit last year. In those segments, as in the education video, the narrator ended by saying, In Washington, I'm Karen Ryan reporting.


The television news segments on education and on Medicare did not state that they had been prepared and distributed by the government. The G.A.O. did not say how many stations carried the reports.


The public relations efforts came to light weeks before Margaret Spellings became education secretary in January. Susan Aspey, a spokeswoman for the secretary, said on Friday that Ms. Spellings regarded the efforts as stupid, wrong and ill-advised. She said Ms. Spellings had taken steps to ensure these types of missteps don't happen again.


The investigation by the accountability office was requested by Senators Frank R. Lautenberg of New Jersey and Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, both Democrats. Mr. Lautenberg expressed concern about a section of the report in which investigators said they could not find records to confirm that Mr. Williams had performed all the activities for which he billed the government.


The Education Department said it had paid Ketchum $186,000 for services performed by Mr. Williams's company. But it could not provide transcripts of speeches, articles or records of other services invoiced by Mr. Williams, the report said.



Nice try, but I am not buying, and I doubt others are either.
Your style of posting is obvious and it is not hard to figure it out. You post under different monikers to pile on and support your own points, in the same condescending manner. You just messed up this time and forgot what moniker you were posting under. So now we all know the truth...so let's just let it drop. Put a fork in it...it's done.
Who in their right mind would be buying but the elite?
This is a great site, explains derivatives (hedge funds) which Warren Buffett calls WMD. If I understand it correctly, people bet on funds just like football, at a whopping total of 16 trillion dollar world wide. No one knows who owns them or who sells them. They cannot be traced.

It is very strange. Cramer of Mad Money has even mentioned "financial terrorism."

I bet you 25 cents the market collapses tomorrow. This link is very informative. But in the end, even the politicians do not quite understand how this works as well as the brightest minds in economics.

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/06/derivatives-market-is-unwindin
g.html
I'm thinking of buying a bunch of really mean -
pitbulls, and teaching them to seek and destroy wall street CEO's.
Nice try, not buying that. I have looked at both
nm
Some of this is a rescue caused by those buying
nm
More right-wing propaganda...not buying it! (nm)
:p
Buying her clothes IS from donations.....
!!
Unfortunately, Americans are buying into O's plan
nm
You are buying into her so-called "history"
nm
What they couldn't afford was buying
that had no true value, and when the housing bubble burst, they were left holding worthless paper.
Chinese buying up south CA

They don't want to buy any more of our debt, as our $ is almost worthless.  They've been buying up homes in southern CA big-time.  They already know that this most liberal "plan" will make the US self-destruct.


Those who voted for this man and refused to listen to many of us who said h'ed do this, don't cry to me.  This is merely the beginning.


Sorry, but that article is loaded with opinion. I'm not buying the
x
Rupert Murdoch, GW, & Co. are buying up all her books LOL, sm
like they say the Scientologists buy Cruise's movie tickets. She is a good servant for those in the shadows, so I am sure she is highly paid, just like those gas bags Hannity, Limbaugh and O'Reilly. No one with a conscience would do what they do unless it involved a lot of money.
I heard this morning russia is buying up
iceland's debts, guess they are in real trouble. supposedly could be a change in the balance of power (not a good one if you know what I mean)...?
valid points and YES, people are buying
concerning, huh?
Or we'd be BROKE buying his carbon credits
while he's rolling in the dough.
How about Bush's plan of buying banks?
What's that called?
People have been buying foreign cars
for years.  What does that have to do with losing our jobs due to fewer patient visits to doctors or hospitals?  Actually, a lot of so-called American-made cars are made in Mexico, like the PT Cruiser.  In fact, a lot of cars are made in Mexico because of cheap labor, including VW.
I could laugh at that...
...if it wasn't so scary. Unfortunately though I think you are right.
That you can laugh at that

LOL! Thanks for the laugh. (nm)


Thanks so much for the laugh.
You dare to use the word truth in the context of the most untruthful president in American history.  He lied about why we went to war with Iraq.  Plain and simple.  He lied.  You are defending an unethical dishonest liar. 
Thanks for the laugh...
//
Thank you for the laugh. LOL
xx
LOL thanks for the laugh

Any idea how I got in the kitchen to paint vegetables in my old age?  No?  I didn't think so.  LOL


Thanks for the laugh! nm
x
HA HA HA - I have to laugh at
the ignor@ance of some people. I think I would have been standing with my mouth open and said "do you hear yourselves".

Here's something amusing. This was said by low and behold....Joe Biden. When talking about Obama he described him "clean and good looking". All I could think of was "you ignor@ant fool, we take showers too".

P.S. - I think people watch too much TV and get their ideas from there.

Thanks for the laugh though.
Don't know whether to laugh or cry
If people will believe "blogcaca," they will believe anything.

I'm still in shock.

Thank you for the laugh!
I wish Saturday Night Live would have been able to do this one!!!
I can laugh because.....(sm)

I think it is absolutely ridiculous to try and paint Fox News as a *middle of the road* news organization.  They are about as far right as you can get, just like MSNBC is about as far left as you can get. 


 


LOL is right on this one. A laugh is all
know who is more ignorantly childish Maddow or Olberman. However, Olberman is so big, he just looks like a big oaf. Besides, he is so consumed with jealousy of O'Reilly, he devotes most of his time to trying to poke fun at the man he despises the most because he can't get the ratings Bill does. The whole MSNBC crew can only see to the left, would get scared to death if they ever looked to the center, let alone to the right.
LOL is right on this one. A laugh is all
know who is more ignorantly childish Maddow or Olberman. However, Olberman is so big, he just looks like a big oaf. Besides, he is so consumed with jealousy of O'Reilly, he devotes most of his time trying to poke fun at the man he despises the most because he can't get the ratings Bill does. The whole MSNBC crew can only see to the left, would get scared to death if they ever looked to the center, let alone to the right.
LOL is right for this one. A laugh is all
know who is the most ignorantly childish Maddow or Olberman. She tries so hard to be witty and cute with her hate-filled opinions. Olberman just makes himself look like a big oaf. Besides, he is so eaten up with jealousy of O'Reilly that he devotes most of his time trying to make Bill look bad just because he hates him and can't get his ratings anywhere near Bill's ratings. The whole crew at MSNBC can only see to the left, so bad that if they even looked to the center a little it would scare them to death, let alone if they ever peeped to the right and saw a little real joy and happiness.