Thanks, Brunson. sm
Posted By: Suzie on 2005-08-07
In Reply to: Suzie. sm - Brunson
I also enjoy your posts, and I find your tone to be generally reasonable and logical. Like you, I cannot understand the reason for the big fracas when the obvious solution to the problem would seem to be to retire to one's own board if the debate becomes too heated, and I think it is a shame that anyone has had to feel driven away. I had hoped that dividing the boards would provide for calmer and more rationale debate, but that certainly hasn't happened.
Whoever chooses to leave or to stay, I hope we can at some point reach a reasonable level of discourse on these boards so that we can all feel free to voice our opinions respectfully.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Brunson, I think you missed
the point. Democrat was being I believe satirical and quite humorous at that. No notorized documents or right-wing-approved web sites or links are needed here...and she is right, if Hillary or any other Democrat jaywalks we will hear endless monologue on the moral decay of the left. Chill.
you mean Brunson/American
you might get challenged to a duel.
Brunson was a moderator??
Well, that sure explains a lot, doesn't it...
Your flame went out, Brunson burner.
You apparently think I'm gt, but I'm not.
But keep defending the behavior of your cohorts.
You know nothing about me or my mindset, Brunson Burnout.
You're looking and acting like an idiot. Go back home to the conservative board where idiots rule. 
Yet another conservative LIE Brunson Burnout.
Sincere apologies, wrong board. NM
[Post a Reply] [View Follow Ups] [Politics] --> [Conservatives]
Posted By: Libby on 2005-09-03,
In Reply to: They will never stop. Look at the post below where Brunson hopes that somebody is *hounded* off - Libby
NM
Brunson didn't post that. someone else did.
.
You're so predictable, Nan or should I say *Brunson*
On June 15th, you accused me of being *Teddy* (which I wasn't), just like I'm not Stephen Crockett. In fact, before reading your post on the Conservative Board, I never knew he existed, and I even told him that when I emailed him regarding your misleading use of his post on another topic because I felt he had a right to defend himself, as it's cruel and unusual punishment for anyone to be compared to Ann Coulter.
It seems he feels that manipulating people's votes to favor one party or another should be a very serious crime, punishable with the death penalty. (I thought you guys were all about the death penalty; I'm shocked.) I can't say I disagree with him. In other words, there was a context to his quotes; he had a reason for saying what he said, as opposed to Coulter who wants to have Supreme Justices killed, John Murtha killed and thinks the Oklahoma City bombing should have occurred in the New York Times Building -- all to assassinate people who merely dared to DISAGREE the almighty Coultergeist -- not because they had committed a crime that stripped Americans of their rights.
As far as accusing me of impersonating him or *Teddy,* I'm sure the administrator can verify that I wasn't posting as either poster, if the administrator chooses to do so. Also, you probably should realize that when you make whacko accusations like this, it diminishes the credibility you have when you post other things.
In any event, I'd like to personally thank you for posting his post. He now has a new fan, thanks to you.
Have a nice day. 
Thanks for taking up for me Brunson, the problem is SM
I didn't post any of these posts. Someone is playing a stupid joke and not a very funny one. However, since Lurker seems content to know me so well, I am not sure who got the real butt of the joke ;)
Brunson...remember Teddy?
Teddy and Taiga are one in the same, though she adamantly denied it until she tripped herself up and finally had to admit it. However, the truth eventually catches up and she just had to be her...if you know what I mean. Would not surprise me if she was the one hounding you. The Teddy side of the personality definitely has/had a mean streak.
I read Brunson's post. You are being disingenuous. SM
and I am pretty sure you know it.
You're full of S**T, Brunson Burner
How's it feel? This is what you posted a little over a week ago to a person who mistakenly posted on your board and apologized for it. You tell them to leave, yet you won't leave the liberal board.
It would be so nice if you weren't here. SM
[ Post a Reply] [View Follow Ups] [Politics] --> [Conservatives]
Posted By: Brunson on 2005-09-03,
In Reply to: They will never stop. Look at the post below where Brunson hopes that somebody is *hounded* off - Libby
Perhaps you enjoy stories with no kind of facts to them. I am sure you probably do. The fact remains, nanananana comes on here and tells us to stay off YOUR board which we have already done and here you are. Tell me again, WHO is it who will NEVER stop? You are looking like a fool. Since the high road seems to have disappeared for you, try the low road. Any road. Just go.
Well Brunson, I've been posting on the politics board on mtstars sm
for a few years, since it was created. It has took some tough skin - really tough to debate Nan and AG and the others of their ilk. Though I must say their unwaivering love and confidence in President Bush is almost admirable and I can't help but respect a person who knows what they believe in and stand strong for it; at the very same time, not being open to other's view points is close minded.
I have seen in my day AG (AKA Bush Supporter), Nan, and more of their coherts run quite a few liberal minded, even meek speaking posters and they did it with no regard to their feelings. They like to make the debate a personal one, so I would say by looking at what the trolls did to them was a healthy dose of their own medicine, and by the way from what I've read I didn't see death wished on anyone. That's yet another trick of theirs, again you would have to know them, to demonize everything the democrats/liberals say.
I thought Brunson's reponse was succint and summed...
it all up. And for you to assume on the basis of one post the quality of a person certainly goes a long way to defining the quality of yourself. I do not think Brunson cares to debate the issue...opinion was stated, succint and summed it up.
You have a good day now.
I thought Brunson made a good point down below.
One of the reasons the antiwar protesters have not been taken more seriously is that they have personalized this against Bush and not against war. I do think it is possible to separate the two. But I also think that protesting in the streets puts our military at risk, in fact I know that it does. The pen is a mighty weapon. Senators and congressmen and women want to be reelected. Sitting in front of the WH with a bullhorn and shouting obscenities and name calling to the President of the United States is not going to ever work. And it shows a distinct lack of respect, if not for the man, then for the office and the White House itself.
|
