Very misleading....in actuality....sm
Posted By: sm on 2008-10-27
In Reply to: Obama Tax Plan - Marmann
people under a certain range will receive a one-time check rebate....all other taxes on all other items will go up....far more than what this little oneside slide show makes it seem like you will get under Obama's so called "tax cut"
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
In actuality...
There is some speculation that Savage was put on the list because they didn't want to have the Muslim community crying out that the UK was singling them out and discriminating against them, so they had to find some repellant people who were non-Muslim and Savage got swept in it... he has made a few calls to violence, specifically against gays. Most of the names on the list were Muslims, there were a couple of 'bad characters' that were Russian, and I think the US was also represented on the list with that lunatic Rev. Phelps.
Also, I don't think there is anybody here, especially those who lean even a little left (although I guess I shouldn't speak for all them) that really thinks that we here should boot Rush, Hannity, et AL out of the country (plus, we really couldn't do that..I don't think you can lose your citizenship even if you wanted to). I think it's just like when you think about what you'd do if you hit the lottery...it's a fun little exercise in one's head but has no root in reality.
There's more (and misleading ads)
Check out this station. I think they have been truthful in checking out the ads and stating the facts. Each week they have done this for the past month or so. I watch this station so I feel they are truthful, but all of you can make your own decision. At first, they only did it every Thursday, but I think this link includes everything.
http://www.wgal.com/politics/17597035/detail.html
Misleading and incorrect....this is not a tax cut....sm
It is a one-time payout to poor people. Everything else under the sun that you buy in the future will be taxed higher.
People are so gullible.
Good grief....talk about misleading....
economic ruin? Look again at the first 4 years after we were attacked. The economy COULD have crashed, but it did not. We had record low unemployment and the economy GREW during those 4 years. What is happening now has nothing to do with 9-11. It has to do with relaxing borrowing standards on housing so that "everyone" could realize the "American dream" and whether or not they had a good credit history or could afford what they were signing on did not matter. Well come to find out, it did matter, when the floating interest rate kicked in and there were mass foreclosures, and rolling on from that the mortgage companies failing. That is what happens when you try to artificially encourage people to engage in things they cannot afford. Government should NOT do that, and that is what Obama wants more of...socialization. Here, let the government get you in over your head and keep you in that lower income bracket so you will keep voting for us because we promise we will get you out of the bracketbut somehow never do. Instead we shower you with gimmes to keep you there, instead of trying to help you OUT of there. sigh.
Obama campaign cracks down on misleading TV ads...sm
I can find no liberal comments on this, either blogs or liberal media. So my guess is that liberals think this is okay to do and enforce.
The first link below is the local Missouri spot on their website
Obama campaign cracks down on misleading TV ads
http://www.kmov.com/video/?z=y&nvid=285793&shu=1
http://www.webcommentary.com/asp/ShowArticle.asp?id=zieves&date=080927
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZmZmZDg3NjkzMTk3OGZiMjc0YjVhOWUyY2I5YjY1ZTE=
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=76308
As we can see, there is no reliable source. Twisted, misleading passages out of context
rasberries
this message is misleading - she is not for killing innocent soldiers and civilians in Iraq
You lumped killing innocent wildlife and killing soldiers and civilians in Iraq into the same line. She is not for killing innocent solderies and civilians in Iraq.
As distasteful as it is killing wildlife she is definitely not for the other. That is totally absurb.
Show me the proof where she said she is for killing innocent soldiers and civilians in Iraq.
You may hate her but making up totally false statement is outrageous and why once again I see the "political rape" of Sarah Palin. If you can show me proof I take back this last paragraph and eat my words, but I need proof. Saying something like that is like saying because Obama is a Muslim he is for killing all american if they don't convert to the muslim faith. Plain idiocracy.
|
