Yeah, okay, Sybil. Whatever you say. (yawn)

Maybe some people buy your crap, but I just find it impossible to believe that two distinct different people (inhabiting two distinct different BODIES) would coincidentally choose to use the EXACT SAME WORDS, EXACT SAME PUNCTUATION, ETC. in a post concerning their abusive behavior on this board, both claiming they are somehow held here against their will because GT wants them to stay.

I can't speak for GT, but I feel confident she would release you/sm/mt/sybil/whoeverelseyouare from such an apparently unpleasant commitment.  Please.  PLEASE.  FEEL FREE TO LEAVE, and take all the voices in your head with you.

• Can something be done to keep one person from slamming the board - Help admin!
  • Look I offered to leave and gt asked me to stay. Make up your minds. nm - sm
    • Unreal, totally unreal - gt
    • When did she do that, sm/MT/etc/E-I-E-I-O? - American Woman
      • Haha! American Woman rocks. - Zauber
        • LOL! - American Woman
        • American Woman is most likely gt and Observor. - /
          • Luckily, your foul tricks won't work this time. Begone, NeoCon. - Zauber
            • You bet they're busted. - American Woman
            • Not a slam, just a clarification. I post under sm here. sm - sm
      • sm is not me. And I offered to leave too. It's on the board. SM - MT
        • No way to know now, is there? - Zauber
        • Yeah, okay, Sybil. Whatever you say. (yawn) - American Woman
          • I won't be nasty. sm - sm
            • Strange coincidence. - Zauber
            • Give it up, sm, I did. Come on over to the C board. :) NM - MT
              • Heard that before. - Zauber
                • Yeah, whatever Dixie Dew. nm - sm
  • reported it - a poster
    • Thanks. Was going to mention there's a special "monitor" board for reports. - Gadfly

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

She reminds me of a homely stick-thin 5-year-old girl with stringy blonde hair trying to get anyone's attention by showing her panties, singing off key, etc. She just says outrageous things for media attention.  She has a small group of fans, but then so does charlie manson.

Or are you like the rest of your lowly cowardly bunch who just don't have the guts?

That's a rhetorical question, davie.  It's obvious that Rush speaks for you, so I already know the cowardly answer.

By the way, don't you think it's rather childish to post something about one of your heroes on the liberal board and then to run back to the conservative board, bragging about it, like you did something special?  If anything, I'm guessing you're in the elephant dog house now, daviebuoy, because it didn't incite the anger and hatefulness that you were so obviously trying to achieve.  I realize things have been slow for all you hate addicts lately, but don't despair.  One of your beloved "ushes" (be it "B" or "R") is bound to do something else controversial, unethical or illegal before long, so things will heat up again soon enough, and all you hate addicts will get your "fix."  Must be very painful for you, though, with all that hatred and intolerance just busting at the seams! 

That's exactly what I said.  Scarborough has always supported Bush.  There is a difference between supporting and blindly following.  For example, you see nothing wrong with how this case was handled.  You see nothing wrong with Bush lying every time he opens his mouth.  That's blind faith.

Scarborough is an objective Republican who believes in honesty.  I realize this is a difficult concept for some CONS to understand.  Once upon a time, honesty was considered a good thing in the United States.  People who were honest were considered to have moral character and integrity.  Scarborough is one of those rare of Republicans, totally foreign to you, I'm sure.

To blindly follow (which I'm sure you're quite familiar with) means worshiping a man as if he's some kind of god, believing every single word he says, even when you see evidence to the contrary right before your eyes.   He lies every day; those who follow blindly believe him every day.  And when it becomes common knowledge that he's lied and when they can't twist and manipulate the lie out of recognition any more, then his blind followers make excuses for him, usually blaming democrats or anyone else who is handy but never blaming the liar himself.  And they justify all the lying because they have that special *connection* with God.  They can lie all they want and God just winks at them and says it's okay because their place in heaven has already been guaranteed, unlike the rest of us poor slobs out there without that special connection.

The only thing that scares me more than Bush having the same credibility as Al Qaeda is the fact that there are so many morons who blindly follow him, who just aren't smart enough to figure out that Bush was never on their side - he's only on the side of big money.  He even joked about his *base* - the *haves* and the *have nots.*

By the way, you are on the liberal board.  If you don't care for the liberal point of view, the CON board is ---->

I was responding to this:  *And know a lot PK. I know A LOT about your posting habits more than you could ever imagine.*  I was accused of doing something I simply didn't do, so that just shows me how much you people really DO know, and, yes, I can *imagine* a LOT when faced with this kind of ominous post. 

Those of your ilk have dark histories of murdering people of different beliefs (for example, personnel at abortion clinics), and the latest tactic of the Neocons is intimidation and retribution.  Just ask Valerie Plame, who used to have a career before her husband spoke the truth.

If someone said that to you on your board, you'd be accusing them of threatening to assassinate you and contacting the FBI.  Who are you KIDDING?  Typical neocon double standard and hypocrisy at work again. 

but the point is, the far left hates Cheney as much or more than Bush, so impeach Bush, get Cheney, then what?  Impeach Cheney?  Then you get Hastert. I know the far left doesn't like him. Impeach him and get Ted Stevens.  He's a Republican, too.  (President pro tempore of the Senate).  Impeach him and get...Condi Rice...if she isn't buying shoes.  What have you gained. Absolutely nothing. Well...maybe some payback for Clinton, which is what this is all about anyway.  Why not just wait until 2008 and vote the bums out.