Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Not a slam, just a clarification. I post under sm here. sm

Posted By: sm on 2005-09-02
In Reply to: Luckily, your foul tricks won't work this time. Begone, NeoCon. - Zauber

MT is his or her own person.  Final post.  DD.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Bd has 1 post today. Slam has

. .  . oh, who cares enough to count!!


 


Clarification. sm
I love all soldiers - my point was this lady's son was a career military man, I did not mean by my reference to "buck" soldiers that they are of less importance in anyway.  O'Reily kept egging it on and finally asked this grieving mother if she had visited M. Moore's webside, to which she replied "I WILL NOW".  LOL. 
Thanks for the clarification
so a whole bunch of libs got together and google-bombed failure and miserable failure to alter the search engine results, and that's supposed to be impressive? All I can say is people who do this seriously need a life and/or a job.
Clarification.
I meant the part about cutting and running part  when I said from your keyboard to God's ear. You can call it whatever you like as long as it gets US out of there.
Clarification

By you guys I mean you and the other conservative posters who have done the bulk of the posting on the liberal board in the past few days.  I probably should have been clearer on that.


You do have a point about my posts and in some ways I would agree.  However, as stated, it is not worth perseverating over and restating the same points repeatedly, as I have stated. 


In the same league and someone's equal would be very close in meaning the very same thing.  They would pretty much be definitions for each other.  Look it up if you disagree.


Clarification

I am the OP here, and just want to clarify.  I meant no harm posting this and I am sorry if I offended anyone.  I don't like getting bashed for making a statement either.  I didn't make any other comments about the two men.  It's just one of those things, being an MT, I have always noticed the way words or letters go together.  It was something that I saw, and I just thought it was really weird.  I just wondered if anyone else had made that connection, since we are all in this business together. 


Now go on and flame me, I could care less.  You all think I did it to bash Obama.  I didn't.  Take it for what it's worth.  I just thought it was crazy weird.  I NEVER compared him or put him in the same class as OSAMA.  Just made an observation.  Leave it at that. 


Just a little clarification here....
Bush was not against SCHIP. That program is still in effect today. All he opposed was expanding it ever higher up the income ladder.
Clarification....(sm)

What religion does with politics is abuse of rights.  Yes, they should have the right to worship and do whatever within the guidelines of the law, but when it gets to the point it is now where every time you turn around the govt has to worry about how the "religious community" will respond it is obvious that those "rights" have turned into a lobbying force. 


It is illegal for a church or pastor with nonprofit status to endorse any candidate, and yet all through the presidential election the church down the street from me (as did a multitude of other churches) posted signs all over the place about how Obama is the anti-christ, etc, etc.  Exactly where do those rights end? 


Also it was evangelicans who initiated the campaign to pass prop 8 in California and did so with huge donations not only from individuals but from the church as well.  In that case the "church" actually facilitated taking away rights from people.  They didn't think twice about that, and actually rejoiced in their victory, but when it comes to their rights its a different story. 


Thanks much for that clarification!

Would be nice if the government stopped using SS for other things, because per my yearly statement, the percentage that will be left by the time I retire as scheduled keeps going down.


tnx for clarification. I am finding myself
in a confusing new world. All these years I tried to look at others' point of view, but somewhere in there I feel like I have handed out all MY rights and might as well be rodney dangerfield getting no respect!
Clarification...when one perceives attack I should say...
but then she views anything a conservative posts as an attack. Even when I tried to basically get along...and I did try. At least one of you on this board recognized that.

Have a good day, kam. :-)
This is what passes for clarification in W's 22% fan club?
That apples and oranges line of thinking does not compute (life in the US, Russia or Cuba). My brain cells do not connect along those same pathways. Let's try some logic.

Since we don't know what it going to be like (your words, not mine) under O, one can only speculate. Knock yourself out on that one. I'm not into that. Bush, however, has had his debut, 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th acts. The curtain is coming down and we have concrete evidence on which to base our individual takes on his regime. There is reliable data available (approval ratings, whose better off now than in 2000, the state of our economy, our standing in the world, etc) which suggests that for many of us, W has managed to single-handedly turn our country into something we can barely recognize. The hatchet job he and his buddies did early on with the Constitution is all the evidence I need to feel justified in my absolute contempt for the man and his legacy, not to mention the fact that pretty much nothing he has done has even begun to address the problems we face with terrorism on the international front and the economy, health care, the environment, etc on the home front. The decider to some, the destroyer to others.
Clarification...do not allow dissention to their point of view...nm
x
I don't slam Obama....
everything I have posted about Obama is a fact...he has an association with an anarchist. I also said in the same post that until the papers from Oolumbia came out I would reserve judgment. That is in no way a slam. It is a fact. He voted against the Infants Born Alive bill in Illinois. Twice. He is the only senator who got up and actually spoke against it. That is a fact. All you have to do is check the public record of the Illinois state senate. I posted it because it is the truth and that is a concern to me as a voter. That is my right,much as you would like to take it away from me. And you people have the GALL to call me intolerant. Good lord, people.

I don't hate the Clintons. I don't hate Obama. I don't even hate you poor people. I don't hate anyone. Hate is a useless, wasted emotion. Maybe one of these days you people will realize that.

I have said this over and over, and perhaps you people can make me understand this question. Democrats are supposed to be all about individual freedom, including freedom of speech. Yet you do not practice it. What is that about? Don't you need to just come clean and say yes we believe in that for us, but not for you?
Clarification...the investigator is personal friend of the man who was fired. nm
nm
oh, it's ok for you to slam the conservative board
but it's not ok for me to say you're a whiner? Why don't you just live with it? The conservative board is, you know, for conservatives. Let it be, let it be.
What an unfair slam against this woman.
nm
Oh, snap! Slam dunk on that one!

The slam dunk was by "Watcher"
nm
Maybe gourdpainter did not, but you and JTBB slam
nm
Slam dunk nothing. What did she say that was so sensational? More of her opinion
x
The rule is that you are requested not to slam on other boards. sm
Conservatives and liberals are welcome to post on each other boards if it is done with respect.
Never miss a chance to slam the Dems, do you?
nm
Then we'd have to endure that "dignity of the office" slam
An outdoor shindig in the dead middle of winter after dark? Average mean temperature in DC for January 20 is 34 degrees, average low of 27 and record low of -2F.

Hello. Many donors and attendees are fairly evolved folks who actually ENJOY puttin' on the Ritz. For the last time, it's not tax payer money. Once again, this is not about Obama. It's about all the Americans who will be celebrating his inauguration.


Oh slam Obama all day, but don't bring up BUSH
He's the one that put us in the mess. Get it?
I woulld call that one a slam dunk!

 


That would explain why you slam Obama, hate Clinton
nm
Obama slam dunks socialist slur at
in news conference Q&A after the event.  Turns lemons into lemonade on Joe the Plumber and Biden's alleged gaffes.  Looking more and more presidential with each passing moment.  Wait.  What's that I hear?  Must be the sound of the helium leak seeping out of McCain's deflating hot air balloon.   
Wrong! You guys love to blow things up just to slam
nm
Wow, you have just proven my point with such a nasty slam, you knew exactly that I was referring to
thankfully has been translated into the King's English, as I, too, never found the time to learn the old languages, but if you look into any bookstore, you can pick up a copy, best seller, very easy to read and follow with an open heart. Why the nasty slams, do they stem from some very frayed, exposed nerves that come from trying to defend the indefensible? Mr. Bush is a very nice, Christian man in my point of view, I would probably love to meet him, but he made an abdomination out of the office of the presidency, and I am just hoping and praying for a return to respect, decency, hope, altruism, etc for this country. But if the haters have their way, it will never happen, a house divided against itself really will fall, and we can all continue to argue and ridicule. Really sad.
P.S. Please scroll down after reading above post. Washington Post article included.

Reprinted in Boston Globe.  Sorry!


I wrote: I second JTBB's post, 'watcher's post is misinformed crap...sm
pYou have also to read what's posted 'inside' the message.
Oops, meant to post this under the loose trolls post...
I'm going to keep ignoring these troll posts.  It's kind of fun, actually, just pretend you don't see them.
Post the direct link. I don't see the post you're referring to.
t
The post I quoted was the entire post. It was not taken out of context. sm
I imagine there are as many emotions and thoughts going on with our troops as possible and each does not feel the same as the other, which is obvious by the posts here. 
Sorry gourdpainter, my other post should have been under the wacky Pakistan post (nm)
xx
Why did you post this? Republicans have been asked NOT to post here..Bye Bye.
Why did you post this?  Happy Thanksgiving is enough but to be so happy we have a republican president?  Why did you post that?  I would like to remind you, you are on the liberal board.  Are you trying to start trouble?  If so, let me know and I will report you immediately.  No, Im not happy we have a republican president, a warmonger chickenhawk president.  Does that answer your question?  Now, go back to the republican board.  We dont want you here and actually the moderator and administrator have asked republicans not to post here..Bye..bye..
Forgot to post a link in 1st post. Sorry.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/money/tax/article1996735.ece
Please refer me to any post where I referred to either the post...
or the poster as ignorant. And I certainly never sunk to the levels you did at the top of the post, against a man who is ill in a wheelchair. Pot calling the kettle black...?
I re-read your post, and I stand by my post.
You are twisting his words by saying that he wants to make friends with terrorists. That is not what he said.
Ya gotta understand the rules. We have to post on this board only. They can post on any board they

The above post explains a lot about everything else you post!
Your revelation about being married to a career Army guy explains why your views are skewed so drastically to the far right! I thought it had to do with small-town Pennsylvania, but now I truly understand where you are coming from. Thank you for explaining that us. We will read your posts in a completely different light now that we know the truth.
If you want to post something on the subject, post

objective views. This is a one-sided publication that asks for donations to keep it going. Nothing I read in there posts anything against any democrats, just republicans. It is not a fair-minded reporting.


I like to read both sides of the aisle but this publication spews hatred for anything not democratic in order to sell books.  To those who can't see both sides, this blog, or publication as they like to state, is just up their aisle. I shake my head at one-sided news. Taken from their web site:


"Indeed, a founding idea of the Consortium for Independent Journalism was that a major investment was needed in journalistic endeavors committed to honestly informing the American people about important events, no matter what the political and economic pressures.


While we are proud of the journalistic contribution that this Web site has made over the past decade – and while we are deeply grateful to our readers whose contributions have kept us afloat – we also must admit that we have not made the case well enough that this mission is a vital one.


Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His new book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at secrecyandprivilege.com. It's also available at Amazon.com, as is his 1999 book, Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth.' "


I second your post and 'watcher's post
is misinformed crap.
My post was a direct answer to the direct post...
of Democrat. It was not a blank open-ended statement. And dial it back a notch...it is certainly your right to protest anything any time you want to. Just like it is my right to protest you protesting while men and women are still in harm's way, because you are in effect aiding the enemy. Apparently the Viet Nam experience taught you nothing. Americans protesting in the streets heartened the enemy and when they were about to surrender decided not to, based a lot upon what was happening in the American streets. I believe that the protesting in that war prolonged the war and cost more American lives. Hanoi Jane should have been tried for treason. That being said...lessons were not learned and the protestors are doing the exact same thing now. Exercising the very right bought for them by shedding of American military blood. And I still say common courtesy should keep people out of the streets and off the TV until the military are home safe. But it just proves the same thing to me over and over...the selfISHhness of the protestors vs. the selfLESSness of the military. They continue to put it all on the line for your right to protest anything you want to protest...it is up to YOU to decide where and when that is appropriate, and it is up to you to take the heat for same. It is up to me and others like me (in my opinion) to apply that heat. Go ahead and do whatever your conscience or lack thereof moves you to do. But do not expect those of a different mind not to protest the protest.
Thanks for the post. I think I will look up that

article.


And thanks for pointing out all the other "results" of his administration that, as you say, benefit nobody but the rich and/or the corporations or, as he himself once publicly bragged, "his base."


I know for a fact that when he ran for President in 2000, I told every single person I knew that if he becomes President, we're going to go to war with Iraq.  (Nobody's gonna treat his daddy like Saddam did and get away with it.)


I didn't have a crystal ball.  I had common sense and a good memory from the Gulf War when his father was President and how he didn't "finish the job." Seems a lot of other Americans forgot about that.


I really enjoyed reading your post and all the facts you raised that I failed to raise in mine.  Thanks for the mention of the LA Times article.  I'm going to try to look that up on the web.


I know they don't. I said that in my post. NM
//
Actually, that post is right on. sm
You sound like a total lunatic, out of control and full of hatred.  You sound like someone who could do just what "vs" says.  You had best take a look at your behavior.  YOUR posts are the ones who should be reported.  You are one frightening person. 
Re your post

From your post:


"Did you read Mein Kampf?  Would that be good enough evidence for you, because he wrote about it in there."


Wrote about what?  That the Jews were socialists?


This is an entirely different post.
Really wasn't directed to you anyhow.
your post is just sad

I'm actually feeling sad for you right now gt.  You obviously don't know what Christianity is about.  Pat Robertson does not speak for me, and I don't endorse what he said.  I'm sorry you are so bitter and hate filled that you would wish anyone to burn in hell.  There are some evil people in this world but my first wish for them is that they find Christ and turn from their evil ways with His help.  I too hope one day you find Christ, gt, and quit letting misguided Christians and Christian leaders keep you from HIM.  Their blunders are not worth your eternal soul.