Grammar question
Posted By: Mark on 2009-04-08
In Reply to:
Subject: Grammar question
5 cc of 1% lidocaine was or were injected
Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old. To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
grammar help
Subject: grammar help
Does anyone know the correct way to do "short term?" Should it be short term, shortterm, or short-term?
grammar help
Subject: grammar help
. . . dressing of fluffs were placed . . . . "Dressing" is the subject which requires a singular verb, was. "Of fluffs" is a prepositional phrase which has to be ignored when deciding on the correct verb to use.
Grammar help, please.
Subject: Grammar help, please.
Would you put "dual isotope stress test" or "dual-isotope stress test"? I keep wanting to hyphenate "dual isotope" with the thought that it is acting as an adjective decribing the stress test, but every example I can find leaves it unhyphenated. For whatever reason, my thick head can't come up with the rationale. HELP! I transcribe for a cardiology practice, so it's kind of important, LOL!
Thanks!
Grammar
Subject: Grammar
Hi jc: Don't know the word you are looking for yet, but I believe every placed you have transcribed "impart" should be "in part."
Grammar
Subject: Grammar
An" goes before all words that begin with vowels:
- an apricot
- an egg
- an Indian
- an orbit
- an uprising
with two exceptions: When u makes the same sound as the y in you, or o makes the same sound as w in won, then a is used.
- a union
- a united front
- a unicorn
- a used napkin
- a U.S. ship
- a one-legged man
Grammar help
Subject: Grammar help
Help please.
Is it readmitted or re-admitted?
Is it 24 hour or 24-hour?
Grammar......
Subject: Grammar......
You are right, it should be are, because data is a Latin term, the plural of datum. But it is used as singular. I would also like to use are, instead of is. Type it as dictated. Most people use 'is'.
GRAMMAR help.
Subject: GRAMMAR help.
Head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat exam ___ within normal limits.
Should the blank be 'is' or 'are'?
GRAMMAR
Subject: GRAMMAR
Put "despite her young age" in commas. In grammar this is called in apposition.
Rosie
Grammar help please
Subject: Grammar help please
"Labs are within normal limits except for her cholesterol, which is essentially unchanged with a total of 232, ldl of..."
Am i correct to include the comma after which? is there always a comma after which? do i need another one after unchanged?
TIA
Grammar
Subject: Grammar
You would basically be saying" 5 centimeters was injected." Even 1 cm would be "1 cm was injected." :-)
Some grammar
Subject: Some grammar
rules go against reasoning.
More of a grammar?
Subject: More of a grammar?
The soft tissue and the bowel lumen measures [would you change to measure] 8 cm in length and has [then change to have] a 6 x 3.5 cm margin of the colostomy deep to the subcutaneous tissue.
Or would you just leave this as dictated.......
Regardless, which is proper grammar?
Subject: Regardless, which is proper grammar?
x
grammar thing
Subject: grammar thing
comma before and after symptomatic. otherwise it's a comma splice.
There goes my spelling lol-Grammar
Subject: There goes my spelling lol-Grammar
/
Grammar question
Subject: Grammar question
Does this make sense:
Doctor says, "This will allowist for him to be more aware of whether grogginess is associated..."
ALLOWIST? is the question.
Thanks.
Grammar help! Myself personally
Subject: Grammar help! Myself personally
Dr. states. "I myself personally use drug-X."
or is it myself, personally?
Or leave out one or the other?
This is a verbatim account.
TIA!! ![](http://forum.mtstars.com/smileys/wiggle2.gif)
Grammar question
Subject: Grammar question
I get confused on this one sometimes! Dr. says "she lay herself down on the floor" Is that correct? TIA
Re: Grammar question
Subject: Re: Grammar question
Assuming past tense: 1) She laid herself down on the floor. 2) She lay down on the floor.
Grammar question?
Okay, I have a really "$tupid" question....on this phrase "including but not limited to" how should the formatting be? would there be commas? is it "including, but not limited to," or as typed above?
Thanks so much for your help!!
grammar question
Subject: grammar question
I would type it "including, but not limited to," I used to work for a doctor who had an English minor and this is how he wanted it.
Grammar Question?
Subject: Grammar Question?
I am a 42-year veteran MT, supervisor and QA but also did a stint in an insurance defense law firm for about four years in the 1980s. I reviewed medical records for the firm and boy were my eyes opened then about some very questionable medical transcription! Oh, by the way, no question is ever stupid in my book--just people, in general, who do not ask when necessary!
Your second version is correct, "including, but not l limited, to." If you take the 'commaed' portion out and then read it, you should still have a complete sentence.
Happy Saturday! ![](http://forum.mtstars.com/smileys/bye.gif)
grammar question
Subject: grammar question
Initially, Cytotec insertion in the posterior fornix was done; subsequently, oxytocin stimulation was started. She received 2 doses of Cytotec during the day and, subsequently, variable decelerations were noted. The contraction pattern appeared to be somewhat frequent; therefore, one dose of Brethine was administered and Stadol was given and, subsequently, it subsided.
Am I punctuating right in these instances? I have the hardest time with subsequently and therefore, knowing where to put semicolons and commas.
grammar question SM
Subject: grammar question SM
The dictator has tried to get in touch with the patient and says "I was able to get ahold of the patient's daughter at ....."
I don't think ahold is correct...but I'm not sure how to rephrase this sentence. Any suggestions.
Grammar question sm
Subject: Grammar question sm
Which is proper? Every other doctor dictates it differently.
1200 cc of fluid WERE removed or 1200 cc of fluid WAS removed.
Were makes sense to me because there is more than 1 cc but many, many say WAS. Am I wrong?
Grammar question
Subject: Grammar question
I am terrible with this terminology (affect or effect). He says: I think adjusting her therapy to focus on the myofascial component of her pain is in order. Orders for this (affect or effect) were provided today)
Thanks!
grammar doubt
Subject: grammar doubt
today for routine (follow up or followup) of hypertension.
grammar doubt
Subject: grammar doubt
follow up
It's grammar question
Subject: It's grammar question
Is it "it's location" or "its location"? TIA.
Grammar question re: unfortunately
Subject: Grammar question re: unfortunately
Is this usually set off with commas before and after? or not necessarily
Thank you
grammar question...
Subject: grammar question...
I think you are wrong.
It is:
but the patient, unfortunately, denied treatment.
grammar/punctuation help
"At that juncture she would despite her young age be a candidate for supportive care only."
How should this be punctuated? Help.
grammar/punctuation help
Subject: grammar/punctuation help
Doc dictates- Total time with the patient was 60 minutes and of that, 40 minutes was dedicated to the direct discussion and consultation of the logistics, risks and benefits, and rationale for radiation therapy.
Was or were 40 minutes? Should it be punctuated with a semicolon?
Total time with the patient was 60 minutes; of that, 40 minutes were dedicated.....
thanks
Grammar question
Subject: Grammar question
My mind is "dust" today. Could I get an opinion on the following please:
The patient is a 42-year-old woman (who or whom) I called you about yesterday. I would appreciate your thoughts Thanks.
Grammar question
Subject: Grammar question
My doctor says this ALL the time. I think he is wrong, but every time he says it, I have to question myself.
The right posterosuperior whitish middle ear lesion is unchanged from prior, does not appear to have "enlargened" or changed in any way. (Shouldn't this be "enlarged"?) HELP Any help/thoughts are appreciated. :)
Just a comment - grammar
Subject: Just a comment - grammar
What is up with some of these American doctors and the English language?
"There was no vegetations".
"If there is further problems".
I can see it it were an ESL doc..... They often conjugate their verbs better than their American counterparts. Funny - the ESL docs can learn the grammar but not how to put the proper emPHAsis on the correct syllABLE.
word's spellcheck/grammar is not always right...
Subject: word's spellcheck/grammar is not always right...
i have come across that many, many times even with stedmans.
when all else fails with stedmans/word, grab webster.
"In regards to" is not correct grammar. SM
Subject: "In regards to" is not correct grammar. SM
If we are going to be grammar experts, we must know that it should be in regard or as regards.
calling all grammar police.. Is it
Subject: calling all grammar police.. Is it
I will see him in follow up, or, I will see him in followup. I think it is followup, followup being a noun and follow up being a verb. What do you think? I'm editing and want to make sure I'm right.
grammar help when using versus in a series
Subject: grammar help when using versus in a series
Can someone answer if you use a comma if a dictator is dictating versus so and so, versus so and so, versus so and so, etc? i.e. the mole is blue versus black versus brown versus green and so on. Thank you.
Personally, I am a grammar freak--sm
Subject: Personally, I am a grammar freak--sm
AND I was taught through my medical transcription school, to change things like this to make a readable, correct sentence. Verbatim was not acknowledged, as we all know that some docs cannot put a sentence together verbally in the English structural rules. I was taught that a good transcriptionist always changes incorrect things to become correct things...not just *this is what he says, so this is what I give 'em.* attitude. Personally, I would change the sentence to read * A __ cm hardware was tried.* It does not change the meaning of the sentence one iota and sounds much better, at least to me. But that is me and my opinion. My many years of proper English schooling just will not let that sentence pass as is. The hair on the back of my neck stands up when I know it is incorrect. This is just my opinion, and I don't need to be slammed for it. I would really like to know what your employer has to say about it Hayseed, if you ever get a response.
Verbatim vs correct grammar
Subject: Verbatim vs correct grammar
Do you folks type your dictators verbatim including any grammar infractions or do you correct the grammatical errors? I'm talking about verb tense, run-on sentences, ending a sentence with a preposition, etc. It seems to me that corrections are interpreted by the transcription companies as errors, but all of the docs I have ever worked for have requested that I correct their grammar. How does everybody else do it?
"has got" is not correct grammar, but nothing
Subject: "has got" is not correct grammar, but nothing
wrong with "is getting worse."
grammar ? bilateral versus both
Hello! I am trying to clarify this grammar question for my doc: Why would be correct to say 'both maxillary sinuses' or 'maxillary sinuses bilaterally,' but incorrect to say 'bilateral maxillary sinuses?' I appreciate your input! Thanks!
Easy Grammar Question
Subject: Easy Grammar Question
TIA
someone was breaking in to his house.
someone was breaking into his house.
which one?
Format/Grammar/Punctuation Help (psychiatric)
Subject: Format/Grammar/Punctuation Help (psychiatric)
DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT: AXIS I: Psychosis NOS, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type versus bipolar I disorder versus a drug induced psychosis, also polysubstance abuse. Should the word versus be transcribed as a slash or another format in this example? Thanks!
http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000123.htm (nm)
Subject: http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000123.htm (nm)
http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000123.htm
A couple of grammar rules are at play here
Subject: A couple of grammar rules are at play here
First of all, both got and gotten are correct forms of the verb get. However, got is a past tense or past participle depending on whether or not the word "has" or "have" is used in front of it. Gotten, however, is past participle and should be used with the word "has" or "have" in front of it.
It has gotten increasingly larger - okay. It gotten increasingly larger - not okay. It got increasingly larger - okay. It has got increasingly larger - okay.
So if your doc says it anyway but "It gotten increasingly larger", he is correct. It's simply a matter of preference. Brits don't generally use the word "gotten", and therefore, a lot of people think it is not a legitimate word, but it is.
I was thinking maybe things had changed since I was taught grammar. nm
Subject: I was thinking maybe things had changed since I was taught grammar. nm
nm
even with verbatim, we can change wording if incorrect grammar...YW:)..nm
Subject: even with verbatim, we can change wording if incorrect grammar...YW:)..nm
x
|