I would not do that either...sm

Posted By: nn on 2006-09-27
In Reply to: In my spellcheck it is written as cardiac wise -- two words; no hypen. - most recent Stedman's downloadable version

Subject: I would not do that either...sm

of course your spellchecker will accept it as *cardiac wise*. It thinks it is two words, meaning wise cardiac, which is totally different from cardiac-wise, hence the hyphen. what happens when you hyphenate it??? I, too, have the most recent downloadable version and update it every year.

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

how do you transcribe this?? - mac
- "wise" is actually a suffix and perfectly...sm - casey
  - In my spellcheck it is written as cardiac wise -- two words; no hypen. - most recent Stedman's downloadable version
    - I would not do that either...sm - nn
    - Wow!! that is different. I would not do that. nm - mac
  - not in MY spellcheck, it isn't, and it is Stedman's. - no name
    - Interesting...it is in mine but mine is older..can't argue with Webster though...nm - casey
      - nope...don't want to either...again, just a matter of preference.nm - NN
- see message - no name
  - "In regards to" is not correct grammar. SM - Nona
    - You forgot to point out "alot" isn't, either, LOL. (nm) - Me
      - and in my reports...I put....sm - no name
  - depends on whether or not it's a verbatim acct - client preference-verbatim account?...nm
    - no,not verbatim. if it were, i would type it verbatim. nm - mac
  - so would you put... - mac
    - see message - no name
      - sounds good....thanks (nm) - mac

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database